Knox County, Tennessee
Precinct data
Results by precinct
101 precincts · 221,864 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -66NW66NW | 1,983 | 3,678 | 88 | 5,749 | 34.5% | 64.0% | R+29.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -8181 | 1,046 | 4,630 | 62 | 5,738 | 18.2% | 80.7% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -70E70E | 1,883 | 3,292 | 65 | 5,240 | 35.9% | 62.8% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -63N63N | 1,480 | 3,648 | 64 | 5,192 | 28.5% | 70.3% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -6464 | 1,790 | 3,246 | 91 | 5,127 | 34.9% | 63.3% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -70W70W | 2,004 | 2,965 | 84 | 5,053 | 39.7% | 58.7% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -7171 | 2,097 | 2,829 | 83 | 5,009 | 41.9% | 56.5% | R+14.6 |
| Precinct -5959 | 1,297 | 3,549 | 44 | 4,890 | 26.5% | 72.6% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -66SE66SE | 1,710 | 3,109 | 60 | 4,879 | 35.0% | 63.7% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct -6767 | 2,000 | 2,397 | 72 | 4,469 | 44.8% | 53.6% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -4545 | 2,041 | 2,299 | 66 | 4,406 | 46.3% | 52.2% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -6262 | 1,246 | 2,844 | 62 | 4,152 | 30.0% | 68.5% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -61W61W | 970 | 3,126 | 43 | 4,139 | 23.4% | 75.5% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -65SW65SW | 1,487 | 2,513 | 60 | 4,060 | 36.6% | 61.9% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -69E69E | 1,551 | 2,249 | 74 | 3,874 | 40.0% | 58.1% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -8484 | 1,109 | 2,642 | 54 | 3,805 | 29.1% | 69.4% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -69S69S | 1,448 | 2,268 | 55 | 3,771 | 38.4% | 60.1% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -69W69W | 1,629 | 1,924 | 61 | 3,614 | 45.1% | 53.2% | R+8.2 |
| Precinct -69N69N | 1,498 | 2,015 | 82 | 3,595 | 41.7% | 56.1% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -9090 | 1,001 | 2,512 | 48 | 3,561 | 28.1% | 70.5% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -61E61E | 879 | 2,585 | 34 | 3,498 | 25.1% | 73.9% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -6868 | 1,460 | 1,773 | 71 | 3,304 | 44.2% | 53.7% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -65W65W | 1,066 | 2,161 | 35 | 3,262 | 32.7% | 66.2% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -73E73E | 861 | 2,300 | 48 | 3,209 | 26.8% | 71.7% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -5858 | 635 | 2,513 | 40 | 3,188 | 19.9% | 78.8% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -4646 | 1,532 | 1,507 | 59 | 3,098 | 49.5% | 48.6% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -3636 | 1,461 | 1,556 | 75 | 3,092 | 47.3% | 50.3% | R+3.1 |
| Precinct -3737 | 1,491 | 1,533 | 63 | 3,087 | 48.3% | 49.7% | R+1.4 |
| Precinct -8989 | 1,268 | 1,745 | 44 | 3,057 | 41.5% | 57.1% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -2626 | 1,769 | 1,043 | 70 | 2,882 | 61.4% | 36.2% | D+25.2 |
| Precinct -6363 | 736 | 2,094 | 38 | 2,868 | 25.7% | 73.0% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -7474 | 999 | 1,771 | 38 | 2,808 | 35.6% | 63.1% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -5555 | 1,184 | 1,493 | 51 | 2,728 | 43.4% | 54.7% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -65S65S | 1,013 | 1,644 | 37 | 2,694 | 37.6% | 61.0% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -65N65N | 776 | 1,853 | 30 | 2,659 | 29.2% | 69.7% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -47N47N | 1,407 | 1,105 | 50 | 2,562 | 54.9% | 43.1% | D+11.8 |
| Precinct -5151 | 1,061 | 1,455 | 34 | 2,550 | 41.6% | 57.1% | R+15.5 |
| Precinct -4444 | 1,182 | 1,312 | 54 | 2,548 | 46.4% | 51.5% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -2525 | 1,371 | 1,101 | 62 | 2,534 | 54.1% | 43.4% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -24Q24Q | 1,434 | 952 | 55 | 2,441 | 58.7% | 39.0% | D+19.7 |
| Precinct -66SW66SW | 746 | 1,631 | 25 | 2,402 | 31.1% | 67.9% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -9393 | 629 | 1,697 | 22 | 2,348 | 26.8% | 72.3% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -73W73W | 613 | 1,702 | 31 | 2,346 | 26.1% | 72.5% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -16E16E | 1,332 | 856 | 39 | 2,227 | 59.8% | 38.4% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -6060 | 395 | 1,730 | 25 | 2,150 | 18.4% | 80.5% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -72W72W | 637 | 1,350 | 20 | 2,007 | 31.7% | 67.3% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -8686 | 387 | 1,536 | 15 | 1,938 | 20.0% | 79.3% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -8282 | 660 | 1,241 | 24 | 1,925 | 34.3% | 64.5% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -72E72E | 587 | 1,310 | 27 | 1,924 | 30.5% | 68.1% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -8585 | 395 | 1,494 | 18 | 1,907 | 20.7% | 78.3% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -3535 | 912 | 936 | 36 | 1,884 | 48.4% | 49.7% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -4040 | 827 | 985 | 30 | 1,842 | 44.9% | 53.5% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -7676 | 484 | 1,249 | 24 | 1,757 | 27.5% | 71.1% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -47S47S | 972 | 730 | 30 | 1,732 | 56.1% | 42.1% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -2929 | 787 | 780 | 39 | 1,606 | 49.0% | 48.6% | D+0.4 |
| Precinct -66NE66NE | 628 | 945 | 25 | 1,598 | 39.3% | 59.1% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -4343 | 757 | 780 | 24 | 1,561 | 48.5% | 50.0% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -68E68E | 817 | 693 | 36 | 1,546 | 52.8% | 44.8% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -65E65E | 573 | 934 | 31 | 1,538 | 37.3% | 60.7% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -0606 | 997 | 483 | 42 | 1,522 | 65.5% | 31.7% | D+33.8 |
| Precinct -4242 | 681 | 788 | 35 | 1,504 | 45.3% | 52.4% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -8080 | 244 | 1,202 | 21 | 1,467 | 16.6% | 81.9% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -5656 | 266 | 1,182 | 15 | 1,463 | 18.2% | 80.8% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -8787 | 266 | 1,158 | 14 | 1,438 | 18.5% | 80.5% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -1111 | 1,125 | 266 | 43 | 1,434 | 78.5% | 18.5% | D+59.9 |
| Precinct -1313 | 1,119 | 282 | 29 | 1,430 | 78.3% | 19.7% | D+58.5 |
| Precinct -3232 | 714 | 655 | 31 | 1,400 | 51.0% | 46.8% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -2727 | 659 | 675 | 35 | 1,369 | 48.1% | 49.3% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -16W16W | 816 | 442 | 26 | 1,284 | 63.6% | 34.4% | D+29.1 |
| Precinct -3131 | 769 | 453 | 26 | 1,248 | 61.6% | 36.3% | D+25.3 |
| Precinct -4848 | 736 | 484 | 18 | 1,238 | 59.5% | 39.1% | D+20.4 |
| Precinct -1717 | 762 | 395 | 38 | 1,195 | 63.8% | 33.1% | D+30.7 |
| Precinct -39E39E | 468 | 683 | 22 | 1,173 | 39.9% | 58.2% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -7979 | 259 | 889 | 8 | 1,156 | 22.4% | 76.9% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -33S33S | 533 | 537 | 17 | 1,087 | 49.0% | 49.4% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -1818 | 665 | 357 | 32 | 1,054 | 63.1% | 33.9% | D+29.2 |
| Precinct -1212 | 900 | 131 | 20 | 1,051 | 85.6% | 12.5% | D+73.2 |
| Precinct -49N49N | 700 | 269 | 23 | 992 | 70.6% | 27.1% | D+43.4 |
| Precinct -1919 | 653 | 322 | 12 | 987 | 66.2% | 32.6% | D+33.5 |
| Precinct -3030 | 724 | 232 | 22 | 978 | 74.0% | 23.7% | D+50.3 |
| Precinct -3434 | 518 | 406 | 22 | 946 | 54.8% | 42.9% | D+11.8 |
| Precinct -7777 | 313 | 597 | 10 | 920 | 34.0% | 64.9% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -9292 | 200 | 704 | 7 | 911 | 22.0% | 77.3% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -39W39W | 316 | 398 | 11 | 725 | 43.6% | 54.9% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -7878 | 146 | 559 | 8 | 713 | 20.5% | 78.4% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -2323 | 335 | 339 | 6 | 680 | 49.3% | 49.9% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -10W10W | 380 | 222 | 16 | 618 | 61.5% | 35.9% | D+25.6 |
| Precinct -15W15W | 490 | 106 | 17 | 613 | 79.9% | 17.3% | D+62.6 |
| Precinct -2020 | 406 | 182 | 10 | 598 | 67.9% | 30.4% | D+37.5 |
| Precinct -15E15E | 476 | 90 | 10 | 576 | 82.6% | 15.6% | D+67.0 |
| Precinct -50S50S | 332 | 187 | 9 | 528 | 62.9% | 35.4% | D+27.5 |
| Precinct -5757 | 77 | 441 | 5 | 523 | 14.7% | 84.3% | R+69.6 |
| Precinct -1414 | 451 | 43 | 6 | 500 | 90.2% | 8.6% | D+81.6 |
| Precinct -4141 | 209 | 273 | 9 | 491 | 42.6% | 55.6% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -50N50N | 184 | 148 | 11 | 343 | 53.6% | 43.1% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -49S49S | 160 | 135 | 8 | 303 | 52.8% | 44.6% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -10N10N | 174 | 114 | 5 | 293 | 59.4% | 38.9% | D+20.5 |
| Precinct -33N33N | 137 | 138 | 3 | 278 | 49.3% | 49.6% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -0909 | 159 | 35 | 4 | 198 | 80.3% | 17.7% | D+62.6 |
| Precinct -10A10A | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -33X33X | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −2.3% |
| 1896 | −21.3% |
| 1900 | +4.7% |
| 1904 | −14.4% |
| 1908 | −16.8% |
| 1912 | +20.9% |
| 1916 | −15.6% |
| 1920 | −27.5% |
| 1924 | −19.9% |
| 1928 | −43.3% |
| 1932 | +4.7% |
| 1936 | +23.8% |
| 1940 | +18.5% |
| 1944 | −5.7% |
| 1948 | −13.1% |
| 1952 | −24.8% |
| 1956 | −21.3% |
| 1960 | −22.6% |
| 1964 | −0.4% |
| 1968 | −25.2% |
| 1972 | −44.9% |
| 1976 | −2.7% |
| 1980 | −17.5% |
| 1984 | −27.7% |
| 1988 | −27.1% |
| 1992 | −4.8% |
| 1996 | −6.9% |
| 2000 | −17.2% |
| 2004 | −25.1% |
| 2008 | −23.0% |
| 2012 | −29.2% |
| 2016 | −23.7% |
| 2020 | −15.0% |
| 2024 | −19.5% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 305,106 |
| 2018 | 318,167 |
| 2020 | 306,107 |
| 2022 | 313,630 |
| 2024 | 335,872 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+2,376 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +47,264 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $72,182 in average income, against $108,525 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.0 on average — 5.5 points more Republican-leaning than Knox County, TN itself (R+19.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Blount County, TN1,076R+47.7
- Anderson County, TN772R+35.7
- Sevier County, TN556R+61.1
- Loudon County, TN420R+53.0
- Jefferson County, TN275R+64.2
- Davidson County, TN267D+27.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Blount County, TN1,105
- Anderson County, TN1,038
- Loudon County, TN646
- Sevier County, TN494
- Davidson County, TN361
- Roane County, TN359
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +2,092 |
| 2012 | +2,319 |
| 2013 | +1,902 |
| 2014 | +2,189 |
| 2015 | +1,824 |
| 2016 | +3,163 |
| 2017 | +4,077 |
| 2018 | +3,228 |
| 2019 | +2,627 |
| 2021 | +5,843 |
| 2022 | +8,875 |
| 2023 | +3,996 |
| 2024 | +2,753 |
| 2025 | +2,376 |
Knox County anchors East Tennessee's urban core around Knoxville, but its Republican lean has deepened over successive cycles, with the 2024 presidential margin reaching nearly 20 points despite a large public-university population.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 23.8 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 44.9 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 19.5 points.
A population of 494,148, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,222 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Cleveland County and Greenville County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Knox County, Tennessee. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/47093/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.