Johnson County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
44 precincts · 80,930 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 43Precinct 43 | 2,567 | 1,711 | 78 | 4,356 | 58.9% | 39.3% | D+19.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 30Precinct 30 | 586 | 3,088 | 26 | 3,700 | 15.8% | 83.5% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 41Precinct 41 | 857 | 2,418 | 42 | 3,317 | 25.8% | 72.9% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 35Precinct 35 | 723 | 2,531 | 23 | 3,277 | 22.1% | 77.2% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 629 | 2,436 | 28 | 3,093 | 20.3% | 78.8% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 11Precinct 11 | 543 | 2,335 | 33 | 2,911 | 18.7% | 80.2% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 19Precinct 19 | 641 | 2,095 | 36 | 2,772 | 23.1% | 75.6% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 18Precinct 18 | 639 | 1,967 | 43 | 2,649 | 24.1% | 74.3% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 22Precinct 22 | 735 | 1,830 | 44 | 2,609 | 28.2% | 70.1% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12APrecinct 12A | 511 | 1,947 | 24 | 2,482 | 20.6% | 78.4% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 32Precinct 32 | 511 | 1,924 | 20 | 2,455 | 20.8% | 78.4% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 599 | 1,617 | 29 | 2,245 | 26.7% | 72.0% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 42Precinct 42 | 739 | 1,448 | 32 | 2,219 | 33.3% | 65.3% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 39Precinct 39 | 593 | 1,592 | 22 | 2,207 | 26.9% | 72.1% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 7Precinct 7 | 503 | 1,666 | 31 | 2,200 | 22.9% | 75.7% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 24Precinct 24 | 423 | 1,752 | 23 | 2,198 | 19.2% | 79.7% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 40Precinct 40 | 658 | 1,476 | 36 | 2,170 | 30.3% | 68.0% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10Precinct 10 | 505 | 1,501 | 23 | 2,029 | 24.9% | 74.0% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 23Precinct 23 | 210 | 1,802 | 14 | 2,026 | 10.4% | 88.9% | R+78.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 27Precinct 27 | 268 | 1,740 | 16 | 2,024 | 13.2% | 86.0% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 33Precinct 33 | 359 | 1,623 | 36 | 2,018 | 17.8% | 80.4% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 5Precinct 5 | 483 | 1,498 | 24 | 2,005 | 24.1% | 74.7% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 37Precinct 37 | 443 | 1,432 | 25 | 1,900 | 23.3% | 75.4% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17Precinct 17 | 492 | 1,386 | 13 | 1,891 | 26.0% | 73.3% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 13Precinct 13 | 332 | 1,461 | 13 | 1,806 | 18.4% | 80.9% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 8Precinct 8 | 405 | 1,239 | 24 | 1,668 | 24.3% | 74.3% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 405 | 1,184 | 16 | 1,605 | 25.2% | 73.8% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 34Precinct 34 | 389 | 1,170 | 14 | 1,573 | 24.7% | 74.4% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 28Precinct 28 | 263 | 1,207 | 21 | 1,491 | 17.6% | 81.0% | R+63.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 26Precinct 26 | 167 | 1,183 | 6 | 1,356 | 12.3% | 87.2% | R+74.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 15Precinct 15 | 205 | 1,040 | 15 | 1,260 | 16.3% | 82.5% | R+66.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 21Precinct 21 | 164 | 995 | 11 | 1,170 | 14.0% | 85.0% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 31Precinct 31 | 180 | 866 | 13 | 1,059 | 17.0% | 81.8% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 29Precinct 29 | 169 | 784 | 11 | 964 | 17.5% | 81.3% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 25Precinct 25 | 206 | 654 | 8 | 868 | 23.7% | 75.3% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 9Precinct 9 | 111 | 734 | 9 | 854 | 13.0% | 85.9% | R+73.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 20Precinct 20 | 286 | 548 | 4 | 838 | 34.1% | 65.4% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12BPrecinct 12B | 173 | 654 | 9 | 836 | 20.7% | 78.2% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 36Precinct 36 | 196 | 426 | 10 | 632 | 31.0% | 67.4% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 6Precinct 6 | 82 | 454 | 13 | 549 | 14.9% | 82.7% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 38Precinct 38 | 111 | 398 | 6 | 515 | 21.6% | 77.3% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 14Precinct 14 | 45 | 371 | 3 | 419 | 10.7% | 88.5% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 16Precinct 16 | 85 | 319 | 3 | 407 | 20.9% | 78.4% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 56 | 250 | 1 | 307 | 18.2% | 81.4% | R+63.2 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +64.4% |
| 1908 | +73.8% |
| 1912 | +77.2% |
| 1916 | +79.1% |
| 1920 | +56.3% |
| 1924 | +65.1% |
| 1928 | −23.2% |
| 1932 | +80.1% |
| 1936 | +84.9% |
| 1940 | +79.0% |
| 1944 | +71.4% |
| 1948 | +64.1% |
| 1952 | +6.0% |
| 1956 | −2.6% |
| 1960 | −7.9% |
| 1964 | +32.5% |
| 1968 | +7.7% |
| 1972 | −43.0% |
| 1976 | +20.2% |
| 1980 | −3.9% |
| 1984 | −33.1% |
| 1988 | −16.6% |
| 1992 | −3.9% |
| 1996 | −10.6% |
| 2000 | −37.2% |
| 2004 | −47.4% |
| 2008 | −47.5% |
| 2012 | −55.6% |
| 2016 | −58.0% |
| 2020 | −53.0% |
| 2024 | −51.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 91,821 |
| 2018 | 97,281 |
| 2020 | 105,574 |
| 2022 | 116,736 |
| 2024 | 129,287 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+5,585 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +50,283 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $71,271 in average income, against $83,087 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+10.1 on average — 41 points more Democratic-leaning than Johnson County, TX itself (R+51.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tarrant County, TX3,712R+5.1
- Dallas County, TX594D+22.2
- Ellis County, TX333R+31.1
- Hood County, TX169R+65.9
- Denton County, TX159R+13.1
- Parker County, TX146R+66.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tarrant County, TX2,237
- Dallas County, TX293
- Ellis County, TX249
- Hill County, TX192
- Hood County, TX175
- Parker County, TX151
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +140 |
| 2012 | +542 |
| 2013 | +474 |
| 2014 | +1,569 |
| 2015 | +1,804 |
| 2016 | +2,664 |
| 2017 | +3,536 |
| 2018 | +3,429 |
| 2019 | +4,018 |
| 2021 | +6,661 |
| 2022 | +7,269 |
| 2023 | +6,387 |
| 2024 | +6,205 |
| 2025 | +5,585 |
Anchoring the southwestern corner of the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex, Johnson County has grown steadily as suburban sprawl pushes outward, yet its presidential margins have remained among the widest in the region.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 84.9 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 58.0 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 51.4 points.
A population of 195,597, a 65% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $84,859 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hunt County and Randall County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Johnson County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48251/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.