Orange County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
34 precincts · 36,377 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 28Precinct 28 | 242 | 2,168 | 10 | 2,420 | 10.0% | 89.6% | R+79.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 23Precinct 23 | 203 | 2,019 | 6 | 2,228 | 9.1% | 90.6% | R+81.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 16Precinct 16 | 139 | 1,697 | 15 | 1,851 | 7.5% | 91.7% | R+84.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 8Precinct 8 | 259 | 1,539 | 11 | 1,809 | 14.3% | 85.1% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 9Precinct 9 | 213 | 1,345 | 4 | 1,562 | 13.6% | 86.1% | R+72.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 26Precinct 26 | 186 | 1,290 | 10 | 1,486 | 12.5% | 86.8% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 32Precinct 32 | 110 | 1,362 | 5 | 1,477 | 7.4% | 92.2% | R+84.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 27Precinct 27 | 151 | 1,267 | 10 | 1,428 | 10.6% | 88.7% | R+78.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 18Precinct 18 | 170 | 1,175 | 9 | 1,354 | 12.6% | 86.8% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17Precinct 17 | 116 | 1,198 | 8 | 1,322 | 8.8% | 90.6% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 31Precinct 31 | 120 | 1,162 | 13 | 1,295 | 9.3% | 89.7% | R+80.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 15Precinct 15 | 245 | 956 | 7 | 1,208 | 20.3% | 79.1% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 6Precinct 6 | 201 | 985 | 8 | 1,194 | 16.8% | 82.5% | R+65.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 25Precinct 25 | 137 | 1,043 | 7 | 1,187 | 11.5% | 87.9% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 7Precinct 7 | 282 | 872 | 11 | 1,165 | 24.2% | 74.8% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 33Precinct 33 | 130 | 973 | 12 | 1,115 | 11.7% | 87.3% | R+75.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 34Precinct 34 | 121 | 969 | 9 | 1,099 | 11.0% | 88.2% | R+77.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 24Precinct 24 | 103 | 967 | 7 | 1,077 | 9.6% | 89.8% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 14Precinct 14 | 323 | 721 | 5 | 1,049 | 30.8% | 68.7% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 19Precinct 19 | 128 | 906 | 9 | 1,043 | 12.3% | 86.9% | R+74.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 20Precinct 20 | 120 | 816 | 10 | 946 | 12.7% | 86.3% | R+73.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 5Precinct 5 | 429 | 438 | 7 | 874 | 49.1% | 50.1% | R+1.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 30Precinct 30 | 82 | 663 | 8 | 753 | 10.9% | 88.0% | R+77.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 13Precinct 13 | 262 | 466 | 2 | 730 | 35.9% | 63.8% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 29Precinct 29 | 65 | 644 | 6 | 715 | 9.1% | 90.1% | R+81.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12Precinct 12 | 150 | 548 | 6 | 704 | 21.3% | 77.8% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 22Precinct 22 | 86 | 614 | 4 | 704 | 12.2% | 87.2% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 477 | 118 | 3 | 598 | 79.8% | 19.7% | D+60.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10Precinct 10 | 107 | 475 | 5 | 587 | 18.2% | 80.9% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 338 | 237 | 4 | 579 | 58.4% | 40.9% | D+17.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 11Precinct 11 | 70 | 243 | 5 | 318 | 22.0% | 76.4% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 26 | 169 | 1 | 196 | 13.3% | 86.2% | R+73.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 21Precinct 21 | 23 | 131 | 2 | 156 | 14.7% | 84.0% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 131 | 15 | 2 | 148 | 88.5% | 10.1% | D+78.4 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +48.2% |
| 1908 | +62.0% |
| 1912 | +79.5% |
| 1916 | +75.4% |
| 1920 | +72.1% |
| 1924 | +45.3% |
| 1928 | +15.1% |
| 1932 | +84.0% |
| 1936 | +84.3% |
| 1940 | +78.6% |
| 1944 | +61.5% |
| 1948 | +58.3% |
| 1952 | +17.5% |
| 1956 | +3.6% |
| 1960 | +24.6% |
| 1964 | +20.3% |
| 1968 | +2.8% |
| 1972 | −29.6% |
| 1976 | +24.6% |
| 1980 | +9.1% |
| 1984 | +4.4% |
| 1988 | +19.6% |
| 1992 | +17.0% |
| 1996 | +4.0% |
| 2000 | −18.3% |
| 2004 | −27.6% |
| 2008 | −47.1% |
| 2012 | −54.0% |
| 2016 | −61.8% |
| 2020 | −63.4% |
| 2024 | −66.7% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 53,064 |
| 2018 | 53,278 |
| 2020 | 54,442 |
| 2022 | 55,008 |
| 2024 | 56,232 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+220 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,451 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,373 in average income, against $78,169 for residents who stayed — 32% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.9 on average — 41 points more Democratic-leaning than Orange County, TX itself (R+66.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Jefferson County, TX557R+8.9
- Harris County, TX175D+5.5
- Hardin County, TX133R+75.8
- Calcasieu Parish, LA113R+39.6
- Jasper County, TX87R+66.6
- Newton County, TX48R+66.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Jefferson County, TX463
- Harris County, TX151
- Hardin County, TX135
- Calcasieu Parish, LA118
- Jasper County, TX97
- Newton County, TX56
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +230 |
| 2012 | +360 |
| 2013 | −233 |
| 2014 | +290 |
| 2015 | +442 |
| 2016 | +356 |
| 2017 | +325 |
| 2018 | −1,513 |
| 2019 | −147 |
| 2021 | +17 |
| 2022 | +457 |
| 2023 | +559 |
| 2024 | +88 |
| 2025 | +220 |
Anchored by the Sabine River petrochemical corridor, Orange County has delivered Republican presidential margins above 60 points in consecutive cycles, reflecting a heavily white, blue-collar electorate shaped by refinery and industrial employment.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 84.3 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 66.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 66.7 points.
A population of 85,307, a 77% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,104 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hardin County and Livingston Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Orange County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48361/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.