Iron County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
49 precincts · 27,878 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CC 25CC 25 | 176 | 941 | 29 | 1,146 | 15.4% | 82.1% | R+66.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CC 27CC 27 | 266 | 793 | 34 | 1,093 | 24.3% | 72.6% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct -CC 24CC 24 | 197 | 748 | 21 | 966 | 20.4% | 77.4% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -CC 18CC 18 | 175 | 724 | 23 | 922 | 19.0% | 78.5% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -3PK3PK | 135 | 766 | 11 | 912 | 14.8% | 84.0% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -WSTVWSTV | 104 | 725 | 14 | 843 | 12.3% | 86.0% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -ENO 3ENO 3 | 120 | 625 | 15 | 760 | 15.8% | 82.2% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -CC 16CC 16 | 186 | 537 | 23 | 746 | 24.9% | 72.0% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -ENO 6ENO 6 | 73 | 640 | 9 | 722 | 10.1% | 88.6% | R+78.5 |
| Precinct -PAREPARE | 141 | 572 | 8 | 721 | 19.6% | 79.3% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -CC 29CC 29 | 160 | 529 | 12 | 701 | 22.8% | 75.5% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -ENO 1ENO 1 | 121 | 566 | 12 | 699 | 17.3% | 81.0% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -MIDVMIDV | 100 | 586 | 13 | 699 | 14.3% | 83.8% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -BRYLBRYL | 76 | 589 | 11 | 676 | 11.2% | 87.1% | R+75.9 |
| Precinct -CVCV | 84 | 574 | 14 | 672 | 12.5% | 85.4% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -ENO 5ENO 5 | 109 | 532 | 22 | 663 | 16.4% | 80.2% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -CC 20CC 20 | 82 | 563 | 10 | 655 | 12.5% | 86.0% | R+73.4 |
| Precinct -CC 3CC 3 | 197 | 424 | 15 | 636 | 31.0% | 66.7% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -ENO 2ENO 2 | 100 | 510 | 20 | 630 | 15.9% | 81.0% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -ENO 4ENO 4 | 77 | 523 | 12 | 612 | 12.6% | 85.5% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -CC 10CC 10 | 197 | 391 | 19 | 607 | 32.5% | 64.4% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -PARNPARN | 83 | 513 | 10 | 606 | 13.7% | 84.7% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -CC 8CC 8 | 168 | 390 | 16 | 574 | 29.3% | 67.9% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -PARSPARS | 94 | 441 | 10 | 545 | 17.2% | 80.9% | R+63.7 |
| Precinct -CC 5CC 5 | 124 | 407 | 13 | 544 | 22.8% | 74.8% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -CC 19CC 19 | 126 | 388 | 19 | 533 | 23.6% | 72.8% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -CC 12CC 12 | 151 | 350 | 18 | 519 | 29.1% | 67.4% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -CC 28CC 28 | 130 | 365 | 22 | 517 | 25.1% | 70.6% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -CC 9CC 9 | 126 | 381 | 6 | 513 | 24.6% | 74.3% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -CC 22CC 22 | 107 | 380 | 13 | 500 | 21.4% | 76.0% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -KANKAN | 76 | 406 | 6 | 488 | 15.6% | 83.2% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -CC 2CC 2 | 106 | 369 | 6 | 481 | 22.0% | 76.7% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -CC 6CC 6 | 140 | 324 | 9 | 473 | 29.6% | 68.5% | R+38.9 |
| Precinct -CC 4CC 4 | 126 | 317 | 4 | 447 | 28.2% | 70.9% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -CC 15CC 15 | 136 | 287 | 11 | 434 | 31.3% | 66.1% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -CC 7CC 7 | 153 | 248 | 14 | 415 | 36.9% | 59.8% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -CC 17CC 17 | 129 | 271 | 7 | 407 | 31.7% | 66.6% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -CC 1CC 1 | 106 | 286 | 6 | 398 | 26.6% | 71.9% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -CC 26CC 26 | 102 | 279 | 12 | 393 | 26.0% | 71.0% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -CC 13CC 13 | 104 | 269 | 14 | 387 | 26.9% | 69.5% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -PARGPARG | 43 | 324 | 11 | 378 | 11.4% | 85.7% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -CC 11CC 11 | 82 | 283 | 6 | 371 | 22.1% | 76.3% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -CC 14CC 14 | 78 | 275 | 14 | 367 | 21.3% | 74.9% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -CC 21CC 21 | 94 | 254 | 9 | 357 | 26.3% | 71.1% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -CHCH | 75 | 269 | 5 | 349 | 21.5% | 77.1% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -CC 23CC 23 | 84 | 209 | 5 | 298 | 28.2% | 70.1% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -SUMSUM | 26 | 180 | 5 | 211 | 12.3% | 85.3% | R+73.0 |
| Precinct -PARVPARV | 9 | 184 | 3 | 196 | 4.6% | 93.9% | R+89.3 |
| Precinct -BHBH | 29 | 64 | 3 | 96 | 30.2% | 66.7% | R+36.5 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +59.4% |
| 1900 | +6.0% |
| 1904 | −23.7% |
| 1908 | −17.6% |
| 1912 | −10.8% |
| 1916 | +16.1% |
| 1920 | −41.7% |
| 1924 | −43.9% |
| 1928 | −45.1% |
| 1932 | −7.6% |
| 1936 | +13.6% |
| 1940 | −3.6% |
| 1944 | −7.0% |
| 1948 | −17.7% |
| 1952 | −33.1% |
| 1956 | −43.4% |
| 1960 | −27.8% |
| 1964 | −10.3% |
| 1968 | −43.5% |
| 1972 | −60.0% |
| 1976 | −44.7% |
| 1980 | −63.6% |
| 1984 | −66.8% |
| 1988 | −54.7% |
| 1992 | −43.5% |
| 1996 | −49.7% |
| 2000 | −66.0% |
| 2004 | −68.3% |
| 2008 | −56.3% |
| 2012 | −71.7% |
| 2016 | −51.1% |
| 2020 | −56.2% |
| 2024 | −57.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.3 points.
32,836 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,066 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +10,663 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,714 in average income, against $71,832 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+22.0 on average — 35 points more Democratic-leaning than Iron County, UT itself (R+57.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Washington County, UT363R+52.3
- Clark County, NV229D+2.6
- Utah County, UT165R+39.8
- Salt Lake County, UT163D+10.2
- San Bernardino County, CA55R+2.1
- Los Angeles County, CA53D+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Washington County, UT350
- Utah County, UT172
- Salt Lake County, UT164
- Clark County, NV136
- Davis County, UT51
- Maricopa County, AZ41
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −270 |
| 2012 | −535 |
| 2013 | −666 |
| 2014 | +23 |
| 2015 | +531 |
| 2016 | +1,070 |
| 2017 | +589 |
| 2018 | +1,450 |
| 2019 | +1,675 |
| 2021 | +2,585 |
| 2022 | +1,459 |
| 2023 | +1,088 |
| 2024 | +598 |
| 2025 | +1,066 |
Iron County, anchored by Cedar City and Southern Utah University, posts presidential margins above 55 points Republican — an outlier even within a state that already leans heavily red in rural areas.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 59.4 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 71.7 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 57.0 points.
A population of 62,252, a 83% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,247 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Madison County and Sanpete County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Iron County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49021/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.