Box Elder County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
51 precincts · 29,332 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TRE4TRE4 | 195 | 856 | 33 | 1,084 | 18.0% | 79.0% | R+61.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -BC06BC06 | 204 | 687 | 50 | 941 | 21.7% | 73.0% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -PER1PER1 | 166 | 711 | 35 | 912 | 18.2% | 78.0% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -PER4PER4 | 153 | 682 | 37 | 872 | 17.5% | 78.2% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -TRE1TRE1 | 128 | 703 | 27 | 858 | 14.9% | 81.9% | R+67.0 |
| Precinct -ELWDELWD | 88 | 727 | 40 | 855 | 10.3% | 85.0% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -TRE5TRE5 | 138 | 675 | 27 | 840 | 16.4% | 80.4% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -TREWTREW | 106 | 668 | 40 | 814 | 13.0% | 82.1% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -TRE3TRE3 | 139 | 643 | 28 | 810 | 17.2% | 79.4% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -MANTMANT | 105 | 652 | 37 | 794 | 13.2% | 82.1% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -GAR1GAR1 | 97 | 663 | 24 | 784 | 12.4% | 84.6% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -BC10BC10 | 183 | 538 | 45 | 766 | 23.9% | 70.2% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -COR1COR1 | 113 | 626 | 27 | 766 | 14.8% | 81.7% | R+67.0 |
| Precinct -PER3PER3 | 160 | 563 | 41 | 764 | 20.9% | 73.7% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -BC07BC07 | 195 | 484 | 37 | 716 | 27.2% | 67.6% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -BC15BC15 | 176 | 495 | 38 | 709 | 24.8% | 69.8% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -BC14BC14 | 209 | 453 | 41 | 703 | 29.7% | 64.4% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -WLD1WLD1 | 132 | 532 | 31 | 695 | 19.0% | 76.5% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -BC02BC02 | 180 | 461 | 33 | 674 | 26.7% | 68.4% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -BC12BC12 | 208 | 430 | 33 | 671 | 31.0% | 64.1% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -TRE2TRE2 | 102 | 527 | 18 | 647 | 15.8% | 81.5% | R+65.7 |
| Precinct -BEARBEAR | 70 | 521 | 21 | 612 | 11.4% | 85.1% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -TRESTRES | 55 | 523 | 26 | 604 | 9.1% | 86.6% | R+77.5 |
| Precinct -GAR2GAR2 | 96 | 481 | 22 | 599 | 16.0% | 80.3% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -BC03BC03 | 168 | 397 | 30 | 595 | 28.2% | 66.7% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -WLD2WLD2 | 102 | 447 | 34 | 583 | 17.5% | 76.7% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -BCNWBCNW | 82 | 470 | 19 | 571 | 14.4% | 82.3% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -BC08BC08 | 152 | 390 | 26 | 568 | 26.8% | 68.7% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -SW01SW01 | 78 | 434 | 17 | 529 | 14.7% | 82.0% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -BC04BC04 | 126 | 377 | 22 | 525 | 24.0% | 71.8% | R+47.8 |
| Precinct -BC13BC13 | 122 | 352 | 18 | 492 | 24.8% | 71.5% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -PER2PER2 | 91 | 366 | 21 | 478 | 19.0% | 76.6% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -HNY1HNY1 | 60 | 390 | 23 | 473 | 12.7% | 82.5% | R+69.8 |
| Precinct -BC05BC05 | 126 | 328 | 10 | 464 | 27.2% | 70.7% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -HNY2HNY2 | 61 | 356 | 25 | 442 | 13.8% | 80.5% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -TRE6TRE6 | 78 | 340 | 12 | 430 | 18.1% | 79.1% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -BC01BC01 | 116 | 290 | 17 | 423 | 27.4% | 68.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -GAREGARE | 23 | 366 | 26 | 415 | 5.5% | 88.2% | R+82.7 |
| Precinct -RIVRIV | 31 | 341 | 21 | 393 | 7.9% | 86.8% | R+78.9 |
| Precinct -SW02SW02 | 68 | 309 | 14 | 391 | 17.4% | 79.0% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -DEWYDEWY | 64 | 313 | 12 | 389 | 16.5% | 80.5% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -FLDG2FLDG2 | 37 | 346 | 4 | 387 | 9.6% | 89.4% | R+79.8 |
| Precinct -BD/CBD/C | 36 | 338 | 7 | 381 | 9.4% | 88.7% | R+79.3 |
| Precinct -PLYMPLYM | 26 | 311 | 9 | 346 | 7.5% | 89.9% | R+82.4 |
| Precinct -BC11BC11 | 100 | 228 | 6 | 334 | 29.9% | 68.3% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -BC09BC09 | 65 | 233 | 18 | 316 | 20.6% | 73.7% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -FLDG1FLDG1 | 23 | 272 | 6 | 301 | 7.6% | 90.4% | R+82.7 |
| Precinct -BOXWBOXW | 4 | 182 | 6 | 192 | 2.1% | 94.8% | R+92.7 |
| Precinct -PORTPORT | 16 | 157 | 7 | 180 | 8.9% | 87.2% | R+78.3 |
| Precinct -HOWLHOWL | 17 | 129 | 2 | 148 | 11.5% | 87.2% | R+75.7 |
| Precinct -SNOWSNOW | 4 | 90 | 2 | 96 | 4.2% | 93.8% | R+89.6 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +43.8% |
| 1900 | −5.6% |
| 1904 | −34.7% |
| 1908 | −25.4% |
| 1912 | −6.1% |
| 1916 | +10.0% |
| 1920 | −18.8% |
| 1924 | −22.7% |
| 1928 | −14.2% |
| 1932 | +9.5% |
| 1936 | +39.0% |
| 1940 | +18.6% |
| 1944 | +15.0% |
| 1948 | −1.6% |
| 1952 | −32.4% |
| 1956 | −36.7% |
| 1960 | −26.5% |
| 1964 | −14.5% |
| 1968 | −39.2% |
| 1972 | −60.5% |
| 1976 | −44.2% |
| 1980 | −68.5% |
| 1984 | −73.7% |
| 1988 | −63.7% |
| 1992 | −35.5% |
| 1996 | −38.9% |
| 2000 | −62.9% |
| 2004 | −73.5% |
| 2008 | −62.5% |
| 2012 | −77.9% |
| 2016 | −50.0% |
| 2020 | −62.5% |
| 2024 | −60.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 0.7 points.
33,775 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+893 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,535 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,799 in average income, against $80,607 for residents who stayed — 21% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+23.7 on average — 37 points more Democratic-leaning than Box Elder County, UT itself (R+60.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Weber County, UT499R+23.5
- Davis County, UT222R+24.9
- Cache County, UT203R+34.4
- Salt Lake County, UT126D+10.2
- Utah County, UT82R+39.8
- Washington County, UT23R+52.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Weber County, UT376
- Cache County, UT202
- Davis County, UT145
- Salt Lake County, UT111
- Utah County, UT66
- Washington County, UT38
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −524 |
| 2012 | −602 |
| 2013 | +57 |
| 2014 | +70 |
| 2015 | +31 |
| 2016 | +597 |
| 2017 | +542 |
| 2018 | +500 |
| 2019 | +680 |
| 2021 | +1,489 |
| 2022 | +1,422 |
| 2023 | +748 |
| 2024 | +632 |
| 2025 | +893 |
Box Elder stretches from the Great Salt Lake to the Idaho border, combining ranching communities and small agricultural towns that have delivered Republican presidential margins above 55 points in each of the last three cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 43.8 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 77.9 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.7 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 60.8 points.
A population of 61,246, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $84,550 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sanpete County and Franklin County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Box Elder County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.