Sanpete County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
28 precincts · 12,944 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -MTP:1M1M | 204 | 783 | 23 | 1,010 | 20.2% | 77.5% | R+57.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -EPH:1M1M | 187 | 731 | 29 | 947 | 19.7% | 77.2% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -GUN:MM | 102 | 751 | 14 | 867 | 11.8% | 86.6% | R+74.9 |
| Precinct -MAN:1M1M | 116 | 699 | 31 | 846 | 13.7% | 82.6% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -FRV:UU | 126 | 693 | 23 | 842 | 15.0% | 82.3% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -FRV:MM | 83 | 541 | 23 | 647 | 12.8% | 83.6% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -CEN:MM | 56 | 565 | 9 | 630 | 8.9% | 89.7% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -MOR:MM | 87 | 522 | 17 | 626 | 13.9% | 83.4% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -EPH:2M2M | 121 | 453 | 23 | 597 | 20.3% | 75.9% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -FTG:MM | 80 | 493 | 15 | 588 | 13.6% | 83.8% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -MAN:2M2M | 71 | 467 | 27 | 565 | 12.6% | 82.7% | R+70.1 |
| Precinct -SPR:MM | 128 | 402 | 32 | 562 | 22.8% | 71.5% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -SPR:UU | 73 | 449 | 24 | 546 | 13.4% | 82.2% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -MTP:2M2M | 92 | 390 | 9 | 491 | 18.7% | 79.4% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -EPH:3M3M | 84 | 384 | 10 | 478 | 17.6% | 80.3% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -EPH:UU | 28 | 314 | 7 | 349 | 8.0% | 90.0% | R+81.9 |
| Precinct -MAY:MM | 57 | 257 | 8 | 322 | 17.7% | 79.8% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -MAN:3M3M | 25 | 286 | 8 | 319 | 7.8% | 89.7% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -MTP:2U2U | 27 | 257 | 12 | 296 | 9.1% | 86.8% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -MTP:1U1U | 28 | 224 | 7 | 259 | 10.8% | 86.5% | R+75.7 |
| Precinct -MOR:UU | 24 | 186 | 9 | 219 | 11.0% | 84.9% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -SS:UU | 23 | 149 | 5 | 177 | 13.0% | 84.2% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -WAL:MM | 28 | 130 | 10 | 168 | 16.7% | 77.4% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -AXT:SSDSSD | 14 | 136 | 3 | 153 | 9.2% | 88.9% | R+79.7 |
| Precinct -STR:MM | 12 | 131 | 0 | 143 | 8.4% | 91.6% | R+83.2 |
| Precinct -STR:UU | 19 | 105 | 1 | 125 | 15.2% | 84.0% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -FAY:MM | 7 | 114 | 3 | 124 | 5.6% | 91.9% | R+86.3 |
| Precinct -NS:UU | 4 | 41 | 3 | 48 | 8.3% | 85.4% | R+77.1 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +30.3% |
| 1900 | −18.8% |
| 1904 | −36.3% |
| 1908 | −17.8% |
| 1912 | −8.5% |
| 1916 | +7.2% |
| 1920 | −21.5% |
| 1924 | −19.2% |
| 1928 | −19.6% |
| 1932 | +6.6% |
| 1936 | +18.1% |
| 1940 | −2.7% |
| 1944 | −2.0% |
| 1948 | −4.6% |
| 1952 | −30.2% |
| 1956 | −37.2% |
| 1960 | −20.7% |
| 1964 | −1.4% |
| 1968 | −30.3% |
| 1972 | −49.1% |
| 1976 | −29.6% |
| 1980 | −58.7% |
| 1984 | −63.2% |
| 1988 | −42.3% |
| 1992 | −25.3% |
| 1996 | −33.4% |
| 2000 | −61.5% |
| 2004 | −68.4% |
| 2008 | −57.4% |
| 2012 | −77.8% |
| 2016 | −54.8% |
| 2020 | −68.1% |
| 2024 | −67.6% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 2.8 points.
15,597 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+313 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,705 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,010 in average income, against $70,098 for residents who stayed — 10% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.4 on average — 40 points more Democratic-leaning than Sanpete County, UT itself (R+67.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Utah County, UT210R+39.8
- Salt Lake County, UT112D+10.2
- Sevier County, UT35R+75.9
- Davis County, UT32R+24.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Utah County, UT198
- Salt Lake County, UT79
- Sevier County, UT47
- Washington County, UT29
- Cache County, UT28
- Davis County, UT25
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −184 |
| 2012 | −285 |
| 2013 | −16 |
| 2014 | −64 |
| 2015 | +164 |
| 2016 | +372 |
| 2017 | +472 |
| 2018 | +387 |
| 2019 | +241 |
| 2021 | +473 |
| 2022 | +458 |
| 2023 | +441 |
| 2024 | −67 |
| 2025 | +313 |
Sanpete County, a rural stretch of central Utah anchored by small LDS-majority towns, recorded an R+66.7 margin in 2024 — placing it among the state's most one-sided jurisdictions and reflecting the deep Republican lean of agrarian Intermountain West communities.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 30.3 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 77.8 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.5 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 67.6 points.
A population of 29,719, a 84% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,083 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sevier County and Millard County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Sanpete County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49039/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.