Tooele County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
70 precincts · 33,985 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GV04:11 | 194 | 843 | 36 | 1,073 | 18.1% | 78.6% | R+60.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TC15TC15 | 282 | 656 | 27 | 965 | 29.2% | 68.0% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -SP04:11 | 273 | 568 | 21 | 862 | 31.7% | 65.9% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -GV07GV07 | 168 | 656 | 22 | 846 | 19.9% | 77.5% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -TC03:11 | 271 | 553 | 18 | 842 | 32.2% | 65.7% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -GV03GV03 | 171 | 612 | 29 | 812 | 21.1% | 75.4% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -TC21TC21 | 225 | 544 | 30 | 799 | 28.2% | 68.1% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -TC20TC20 | 225 | 512 | 29 | 766 | 29.4% | 66.8% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -LP02LP02 | 154 | 568 | 27 | 749 | 20.6% | 75.8% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -GV05GV05 | 160 | 553 | 16 | 729 | 21.9% | 75.9% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -SP08SP08 | 246 | 469 | 10 | 725 | 33.9% | 64.7% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -TC17TC17 | 227 | 470 | 26 | 723 | 31.4% | 65.0% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -TC14TC14 | 260 | 421 | 34 | 715 | 36.4% | 58.9% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -TC13TC13 | 225 | 472 | 13 | 710 | 31.7% | 66.5% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -TC16TC16 | 193 | 488 | 29 | 710 | 27.2% | 68.7% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -TC11TC11 | 203 | 475 | 27 | 705 | 28.8% | 67.4% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -GV01:11 | 113 | 569 | 16 | 698 | 16.2% | 81.5% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -TC10TC10 | 247 | 436 | 13 | 696 | 35.5% | 62.6% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -LP01:22 | 183 | 486 | 18 | 687 | 26.6% | 70.7% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -SP05SP05 | 230 | 434 | 16 | 680 | 33.8% | 63.8% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -SP01SP01 | 216 | 440 | 23 | 679 | 31.8% | 64.8% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -TC18TC18 | 241 | 411 | 25 | 677 | 35.6% | 60.7% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -TC06TC06 | 209 | 435 | 20 | 664 | 31.5% | 65.5% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -TC22TC22 | 221 | 420 | 22 | 663 | 33.3% | 63.3% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -SP02SP02 | 255 | 379 | 22 | 656 | 38.9% | 57.8% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -TC09TC09 | 211 | 425 | 20 | 656 | 32.2% | 64.8% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -GV02:11 | 133 | 503 | 19 | 655 | 20.3% | 76.8% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -TC04TC04 | 255 | 375 | 16 | 646 | 39.5% | 58.0% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -TC05TC05 | 225 | 403 | 15 | 643 | 35.0% | 62.7% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -TC01TC01 | 205 | 412 | 22 | 639 | 32.1% | 64.5% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -TC19TC19 | 152 | 453 | 11 | 616 | 24.7% | 73.5% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -TC12TC12 | 197 | 389 | 16 | 602 | 32.7% | 64.6% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -SP07SP07 | 186 | 392 | 16 | 594 | 31.3% | 66.0% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -SP06SP06 | 264 | 307 | 15 | 586 | 45.1% | 52.4% | R+7.3 |
| Precinct -SP03:11 | 197 | 361 | 19 | 577 | 34.1% | 62.6% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -ST02:2U2U | 73 | 495 | 8 | 576 | 12.7% | 85.9% | R+73.3 |
| Precinct -TC08TC08 | 193 | 334 | 9 | 536 | 36.0% | 62.3% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -GV09GV09 | 121 | 397 | 12 | 530 | 22.8% | 74.9% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -EC05EC05 | 121 | 368 | 22 | 511 | 23.7% | 72.0% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -TC07TC07 | 150 | 342 | 12 | 504 | 29.8% | 67.9% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -GV10GV10 | 73 | 410 | 19 | 502 | 14.5% | 81.7% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -TC02TC02 | 200 | 275 | 16 | 491 | 40.7% | 56.0% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -GV06GV06 | 79 | 384 | 13 | 476 | 16.6% | 80.7% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -GV08GV08 | 81 | 382 | 13 | 476 | 17.0% | 80.3% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -SP10SP10 | 160 | 277 | 7 | 444 | 36.0% | 62.4% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -SP09:11 | 135 | 279 | 18 | 432 | 31.3% | 64.6% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -LC01LC01 | 111 | 269 | 4 | 384 | 28.9% | 70.1% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -EC01EC01 | 85 | 242 | 3 | 330 | 25.8% | 73.3% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -EC03:22 | 64 | 243 | 7 | 314 | 20.4% | 77.4% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -EC02:22 | 41 | 251 | 7 | 299 | 13.7% | 83.9% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -RV01:11 | 44 | 219 | 5 | 268 | 16.4% | 81.7% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -EC04:11 | 43 | 194 | 7 | 244 | 17.6% | 79.5% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -SP03:22 | 62 | 147 | 2 | 211 | 29.4% | 69.7% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -ST01:11 | 47 | 140 | 7 | 194 | 24.2% | 72.2% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -WE01:11 | 67 | 102 | 3 | 172 | 39.0% | 59.3% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -VR01:11 | 16 | 117 | 3 | 136 | 11.8% | 86.0% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -ST02:11 | 21 | 98 | 7 | 126 | 16.7% | 77.8% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -GV01:2U2U | 17 | 101 | 4 | 122 | 13.9% | 82.8% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -EC03:11 | 25 | 93 | 1 | 119 | 21.0% | 78.2% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -DG01DG01 | 30 | 74 | 2 | 106 | 28.3% | 69.8% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -RV01:2U2U | 9 | 64 | 1 | 74 | 12.2% | 86.5% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -SP04:22 | 6 | 62 | 2 | 70 | 8.6% | 88.6% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -EC04:22 | 17 | 49 | 0 | 66 | 25.8% | 74.2% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -TE01TE01 | 12 | 36 | 1 | 49 | 24.5% | 73.5% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -ST01:3U3U | 4 | 32 | 1 | 37 | 10.8% | 86.5% | R+75.7 |
| Precinct -VR01:2U2U | 5 | 31 | 0 | 36 | 13.9% | 86.1% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -IB01IB01 | 4 | 28 | 3 | 35 | 11.4% | 80.0% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -DG02DG02 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 26 | 23.1% | 73.1% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -ST01:2U2U | 13 | 9 | 2 | 24 | 54.2% | 37.5% | D+16.7 |
| Precinct -GV01:3U3U | 5 | 14 | 1 | 20 | 25.0% | 70.0% | R+45.0 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +72.0% |
| 1900 | −6.1% |
| 1904 | −32.0% |
| 1908 | −15.1% |
| 1912 | −14.1% |
| 1916 | +14.6% |
| 1920 | −19.1% |
| 1924 | −25.2% |
| 1928 | −9.1% |
| 1932 | +13.8% |
| 1936 | +39.2% |
| 1940 | +28.0% |
| 1944 | +23.0% |
| 1948 | +15.6% |
| 1952 | +4.6% |
| 1956 | −11.6% |
| 1960 | +9.7% |
| 1964 | +35.2% |
| 1968 | +10.0% |
| 1972 | −35.3% |
| 1976 | −3.1% |
| 1980 | −29.8% |
| 1984 | −28.6% |
| 1988 | −14.0% |
| 1992 | −4.0% |
| 1996 | +1.2% |
| 2000 | −30.5% |
| 2004 | −48.3% |
| 2008 | −29.8% |
| 2012 | −50.4% |
| 2016 | −30.0% |
| 2020 | −38.3% |
| 2024 | −40.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 0.1 points.
42,037 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,925 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +17,885 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $65,859 in average income, against $82,295 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+1.3 on average — 40 points more Democratic-leaning than Tooele County, UT itself (R+40.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Salt Lake County, UT1,396D+10.2
- Davis County, UT168R+24.9
- Utah County, UT163R+39.8
- Weber County, UT47R+23.5
- Elko County, NV41R+56.6
- Washington County, UT34R+52.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Salt Lake County, UT755
- Utah County, UT181
- Davis County, UT111
- Weber County, UT71
- Washington County, UT51
- Elko County, NV48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +7 |
| 2012 | −101 |
| 2013 | +185 |
| 2014 | +110 |
| 2015 | +558 |
| 2016 | +1,288 |
| 2017 | +2,158 |
| 2018 | +1,770 |
| 2019 | +1,523 |
| 2021 | +2,950 |
| 2022 | +2,483 |
| 2023 | +1,428 |
| 2024 | +1,601 |
| 2025 | +1,925 |
Tooele County hosts the U.S. Army's Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility and major defense logistics operations, anchoring a workforce that has voted Republican by roughly 40-point margins in recent presidential cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 72.0 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 50.4 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 40.9 points.
A population of 79,347, a 78% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $106,587 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Weber County and Davis County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Tooele County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49045/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.