- Lead
- 11,647
- Total
- 15,832
- vs nation
- R+72.1
- Turnout
- 64.5%
Uintah County, UT
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.5% of 24,850 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 11,598
- Total
- 15,370
- vs nation
- R+79.9
- Turnout
- 67.2%
- Lead
- 7,751
- Total
- 12,864
- vs nation
- R+70.6
- Turnout
- 55.1%
- Lead
- 9,424
- Total
- 11,611
- vs nation
- R+85.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,979
- Total
- 10,151
- vs nation
- R+76.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,252
- Total
- 9,957
- vs nation
- R+70.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,346
- Total
- 8,397
- vs nation
- R+64.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,029
- Total
- 7,464
- vs nation
- R+49.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+73.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 37,0562024 5-year
- Population density
- 8.3 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 4,483 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $73,7462024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 80.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 8.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+77.6 in 1896MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+81.2 in 2012MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Duchesne County, UT · twin score 98.6
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 64.5%16,035 participants ÷ 24,850 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +21.6 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -3.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 42.9%–48.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16,035 | 24,850 ± 286 | 64.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 10,914 | 23,942 ± 258 | 45.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 15,840 | 23,570 ± 328 | 67.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 10,519 | 23,631 ± 291 | 44.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 12,953 | 23,523 ± 326 | 55.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 11,611 | 21,201 | 54.8% | Derived | — | |
| 10,151 | 19,150 | 53.0% | Derived | — | |
| 9,957 | 17,099 extrapolated | 58.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Uintah County only. The complete district District 3 result is shown below for comparison.
Uintah County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
District District 3 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 29 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
29 precincts · 15,823 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -ME06ME06 | 86 | 674 | 16 | 776 | 11.1% | 86.9% | R+75.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -BL19BL19 | 107 | 649 | 13 | 769 | 13.9% | 84.4% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -AE15AE15 | 69 | 670 | 10 | 749 | 9.2% | 89.5% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct -MN27MN27 | 59 | 670 | 10 | 739 | 8.0% | 90.7% | R+82.7 |
| Precinct -VC09VC09 | 93 | 594 | 19 | 706 | 13.2% | 84.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -LT21LT21 | 46 | 633 | 19 | 698 | 6.6% | 90.7% | R+84.1 |
| Precinct -SO05SO05 | 56 | 624 | 9 | 689 | 8.1% | 90.6% | R+82.4 |
| Precinct -SW26SW26 | 60 | 592 | 11 | 663 | 9.0% | 89.3% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct -VC10VC10 | 94 | 541 | 28 | 663 | 14.2% | 81.6% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -NE04NE04 | 65 | 568 | 9 | 642 | 10.1% | 88.5% | R+78.3 |
| Precinct -GN23GN23 | 84 | 547 | 7 | 638 | 13.2% | 85.7% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -GS17GS17 | 79 | 538 | 3 | 620 | 12.7% | 86.8% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -DE02DE02 | 43 | 555 | 3 | 601 | 7.2% | 92.3% | R+85.2 |
| Precinct -MW25MW25 | 62 | 522 | 8 | 592 | 10.5% | 88.2% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -AW22AW22 | 63 | 519 | 9 | 591 | 10.7% | 87.8% | R+77.2 |
| Precinct -DW03DW03 | 38 | 514 | 10 | 562 | 6.8% | 91.5% | R+84.7 |
| Precinct -VC13VC13 | 105 | 442 | 11 | 558 | 18.8% | 79.2% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -VC08VC08 | 64 | 471 | 5 | 540 | 11.9% | 87.2% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -JN01JN01 | 45 | 471 | 5 | 521 | 8.6% | 90.4% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -VC12VC12 | 74 | 418 | 20 | 512 | 14.5% | 81.6% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -NW28NW28 | 55 | 425 | 6 | 486 | 11.3% | 87.4% | R+76.1 |
| Precinct -VC11VC11 | 85 | 383 | 14 | 482 | 17.6% | 79.5% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -FD18FD18 | 140 | 240 | 10 | 390 | 35.9% | 61.5% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -SE29SE29 | 55 | 332 | 3 | 390 | 14.1% | 85.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -DN24DN24 | 29 | 344 | 6 | 379 | 7.7% | 90.8% | R+83.1 |
| Precinct -VC14VC14 | 76 | 250 | 8 | 334 | 22.8% | 74.9% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -DF07DF07 | 33 | 200 | 4 | 237 | 13.9% | 84.4% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -AW16AW16 | 32 | 141 | 4 | 177 | 18.1% | 79.7% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -WR20WR20 | 50 | 68 | 1 | 119 | 42.0% | 57.1% | R+15.1 |
presidential history
Party record book
Uintah County, UT · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1896–2024 · 33 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
88.8%
890 votes · D+77.6
Runner-up · Woodrow Wilson, 1916 · 64.1%
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
89.8%
10,421 votes · R+81.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 86.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
2,142votes
46.8% of the vote · R+6.4
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 1,986 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
13,599votes
85.9% of the vote · R+73.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 13,261 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+83.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+77.6 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · Woodrow Wilson, 1916 · +29.7 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+85.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+81.2 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +79.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Uintah County, UT. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 11.1%1,717 | 88.9%13,714 | 15,431 |
| 2020 | R | 11.2%1,604 | 88.8%12,666 | 14,270 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.5 points more Republican than the rolls.
18,131 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−126 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +602 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,158 in average income, against $73,881 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+37.4 on average — 36 points more Democratic-leaning than Uintah County, UT itself (R+73.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Duchesne County, UT124R+75.9
- Salt Lake County, UT95D+10.2
- Utah County, UT57R+39.8
- Davis County, UT28R+24.9
- Weber County, UT25R+23.5
- Washington County, UT21R+52.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Duchesne County, UT100
- Utah County, UT73
- Salt Lake County, UT70
- Washington County, UT29
- Weber County, UT23
- Davis County, UT22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +376 |
| 2012 | +899 |
| 2013 | +513 |
| 2014 | +638 |
| 2015 | +372 |
| 2016 | −1,973 |
| 2017 | −1,408 |
| 2018 | −129 |
| 2019 | +10 |
| 2021 | +350 |
| 2022 | +657 |
| 2023 | +403 |
| 2024 | +20 |
| 2025 | −126 |
Uintah County sits atop the Uinta Basin's energy reserves, and its economy of extraction workers and ranchers has produced presidential margins exceeding 70 points Republican in recent cycles — among the widest in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 77.6 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 81.2 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 73.6 points.
A population of 37,056, a 80% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,746 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Duchesne County and Sanpete County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Uintah County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49047/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.