Uintah County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
29 precincts · 15,823 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -ME06ME06 | 86 | 674 | 16 | 776 | 11.1% | 86.9% | R+75.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -BL19BL19 | 107 | 649 | 13 | 769 | 13.9% | 84.4% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -AE15AE15 | 69 | 670 | 10 | 749 | 9.2% | 89.5% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct -MN27MN27 | 59 | 670 | 10 | 739 | 8.0% | 90.7% | R+82.7 |
| Precinct -VC09VC09 | 93 | 594 | 19 | 706 | 13.2% | 84.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -LT21LT21 | 46 | 633 | 19 | 698 | 6.6% | 90.7% | R+84.1 |
| Precinct -SO05SO05 | 56 | 624 | 9 | 689 | 8.1% | 90.6% | R+82.4 |
| Precinct -SW26SW26 | 60 | 592 | 11 | 663 | 9.0% | 89.3% | R+80.2 |
| Precinct -VC10VC10 | 94 | 541 | 28 | 663 | 14.2% | 81.6% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -NE04NE04 | 65 | 568 | 9 | 642 | 10.1% | 88.5% | R+78.3 |
| Precinct -GN23GN23 | 84 | 547 | 7 | 638 | 13.2% | 85.7% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -GS17GS17 | 79 | 538 | 3 | 620 | 12.7% | 86.8% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -DE02DE02 | 43 | 555 | 3 | 601 | 7.2% | 92.3% | R+85.2 |
| Precinct -MW25MW25 | 62 | 522 | 8 | 592 | 10.5% | 88.2% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -AW22AW22 | 63 | 519 | 9 | 591 | 10.7% | 87.8% | R+77.2 |
| Precinct -DW03DW03 | 38 | 514 | 10 | 562 | 6.8% | 91.5% | R+84.7 |
| Precinct -VC13VC13 | 105 | 442 | 11 | 558 | 18.8% | 79.2% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct -VC08VC08 | 64 | 471 | 5 | 540 | 11.9% | 87.2% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -JN01JN01 | 45 | 471 | 5 | 521 | 8.6% | 90.4% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -VC12VC12 | 74 | 418 | 20 | 512 | 14.5% | 81.6% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -NW28NW28 | 55 | 425 | 6 | 486 | 11.3% | 87.4% | R+76.1 |
| Precinct -VC11VC11 | 85 | 383 | 14 | 482 | 17.6% | 79.5% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -FD18FD18 | 140 | 240 | 10 | 390 | 35.9% | 61.5% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -SE29SE29 | 55 | 332 | 3 | 390 | 14.1% | 85.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -DN24DN24 | 29 | 344 | 6 | 379 | 7.7% | 90.8% | R+83.1 |
| Precinct -VC14VC14 | 76 | 250 | 8 | 334 | 22.8% | 74.9% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -DF07DF07 | 33 | 200 | 4 | 237 | 13.9% | 84.4% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -AW16AW16 | 32 | 141 | 4 | 177 | 18.1% | 79.7% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -WR20WR20 | 50 | 68 | 1 | 119 | 42.0% | 57.1% | R+15.1 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +77.6% |
| 1900 | +9.5% |
| 1904 | −8.2% |
| 1908 | −5.9% |
| 1912 | +1.1% |
| 1916 | +32.8% |
| 1920 | −24.0% |
| 1924 | −27.3% |
| 1928 | −28.6% |
| 1932 | +13.3% |
| 1936 | +24.3% |
| 1940 | +4.4% |
| 1944 | +1.3% |
| 1948 | +3.5% |
| 1952 | −42.4% |
| 1956 | −55.2% |
| 1960 | −35.2% |
| 1964 | −6.4% |
| 1968 | −40.9% |
| 1972 | −68.1% |
| 1976 | −46.1% |
| 1980 | −68.1% |
| 1984 | −71.7% |
| 1988 | −49.1% |
| 1992 | −27.4% |
| 1996 | −40.6% |
| 2000 | −63.7% |
| 2004 | −72.8% |
| 2008 | −68.8% |
| 2012 | −81.2% |
| 2016 | −68.5% |
| 2020 | −75.5% |
| 2024 | −73.6% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.5 points more Democratic.
18,131 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−126 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +602 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,158 in average income, against $73,881 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+37.4 on average — 36 points more Democratic-leaning than Uintah County, UT itself (R+73.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Duchesne County, UT124R+75.9
- Salt Lake County, UT95D+10.2
- Utah County, UT57R+39.8
- Davis County, UT28R+24.9
- Weber County, UT25R+23.5
- Washington County, UT21R+52.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Duchesne County, UT100
- Utah County, UT73
- Salt Lake County, UT70
- Washington County, UT29
- Weber County, UT23
- Davis County, UT22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +376 |
| 2012 | +899 |
| 2013 | +513 |
| 2014 | +638 |
| 2015 | +372 |
| 2016 | −1,973 |
| 2017 | −1,408 |
| 2018 | −129 |
| 2019 | +10 |
| 2021 | +350 |
| 2022 | +657 |
| 2023 | +403 |
| 2024 | +20 |
| 2025 | −126 |
Uintah County sits atop the Uinta Basin's energy reserves, and its economy of extraction workers and ranchers has produced presidential margins exceeding 70 points Republican in recent cycles — among the widest in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 77.6 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 81.2 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 73.6 points.
A population of 37,056, a 80% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,746 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Duchesne County and Sanpete County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Uintah County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49047/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.