Wasatch County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
51 precincts · 18,348 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -106106 | 351 | 598 | 26 | 975 | 36.0% | 61.3% | R+25.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -105105 | 269 | 458 | 24 | 751 | 35.8% | 61.0% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -305305 | 256 | 397 | 11 | 664 | 38.6% | 59.8% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -504504 | 183 | 398 | 5 | 586 | 31.2% | 67.9% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -410410 | 152 | 374 | 13 | 539 | 28.2% | 69.4% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -415415 | 204 | 318 | 7 | 529 | 38.6% | 60.1% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -300300 | 169 | 343 | 12 | 524 | 32.3% | 65.5% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -417417 | 300 | 212 | 11 | 523 | 57.4% | 40.5% | D+16.8 |
| Precinct -414414 | 198 | 307 | 11 | 516 | 38.4% | 59.5% | R+21.1 |
| Precinct -302302 | 202 | 303 | 4 | 509 | 39.7% | 59.5% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -520520 | 112 | 386 | 9 | 507 | 22.1% | 76.1% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -412412 | 124 | 369 | 10 | 503 | 24.7% | 73.4% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -304304 | 170 | 286 | 13 | 469 | 36.2% | 61.0% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -400400 | 296 | 160 | 7 | 463 | 63.9% | 34.6% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -416416 | 260 | 186 | 10 | 456 | 57.0% | 40.8% | D+16.2 |
| Precinct -306306 | 209 | 236 | 4 | 449 | 46.5% | 52.6% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -301301 | 171 | 243 | 8 | 422 | 40.5% | 57.6% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -104104 | 101 | 294 | 12 | 407 | 24.8% | 72.2% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -208208 | 115 | 277 | 12 | 404 | 28.5% | 68.6% | R+40.1 |
| Precinct -206206 | 123 | 257 | 14 | 394 | 31.2% | 65.2% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -411411 | 69 | 303 | 15 | 387 | 17.8% | 78.3% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -100100 | 161 | 206 | 8 | 375 | 42.9% | 54.9% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -102102 | 127 | 241 | 6 | 374 | 34.0% | 64.4% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -562562 | 44 | 315 | 10 | 369 | 11.9% | 85.4% | R+73.4 |
| Precinct -307307 | 136 | 223 | 7 | 366 | 37.2% | 60.9% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -207207 | 83 | 260 | 8 | 351 | 23.6% | 74.1% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -103103 | 112 | 220 | 7 | 339 | 33.0% | 64.9% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -303303 | 108 | 220 | 9 | 337 | 32.0% | 65.3% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -205205 | 94 | 207 | 7 | 308 | 30.5% | 67.2% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -560560 | 53 | 241 | 5 | 299 | 17.7% | 80.6% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct -413413 | 76 | 212 | 9 | 297 | 25.6% | 71.4% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -203203 | 118 | 170 | 6 | 294 | 40.1% | 57.8% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -502502 | 91 | 198 | 4 | 293 | 31.1% | 67.6% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -350350 | 144 | 135 | 7 | 286 | 50.3% | 47.2% | D+3.1 |
| Precinct -200200 | 70 | 204 | 8 | 282 | 24.8% | 72.3% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -201201 | 110 | 156 | 5 | 271 | 40.6% | 57.6% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -530530 | 82 | 185 | 2 | 269 | 30.5% | 68.8% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -340340 | 74 | 167 | 5 | 246 | 30.1% | 67.9% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -204204 | 67 | 154 | 5 | 226 | 29.6% | 68.1% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -503503 | 84 | 137 | 5 | 226 | 37.2% | 60.6% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -202202 | 73 | 146 | 6 | 225 | 32.4% | 64.9% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -500500 | 102 | 112 | 3 | 217 | 47.0% | 51.6% | R+4.6 |
| Precinct -561561 | 28 | 166 | 1 | 195 | 14.4% | 85.1% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -101101 | 105 | 76 | 10 | 191 | 55.0% | 39.8% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -550550 | 33 | 135 | 4 | 172 | 19.2% | 78.5% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -501501 | 70 | 84 | 2 | 156 | 44.9% | 53.8% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -320320 | 83 | 48 | 5 | 136 | 61.0% | 35.3% | D+25.7 |
| Precinct -120120 | 41 | 68 | 2 | 111 | 36.9% | 61.3% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -121121 | 40 | 35 | 2 | 77 | 51.9% | 45.5% | D+6.5 |
| Precinct -540540 | 6 | 56 | 2 | 64 | 9.4% | 87.5% | R+78.1 |
| Precinct -563563 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 19 | 36.8% | 57.9% | R+21.1 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +92.6% |
| 1900 | +3.8% |
| 1904 | −22.5% |
| 1908 | −11.9% |
| 1912 | −8.7% |
| 1916 | +4.0% |
| 1920 | −22.8% |
| 1924 | −17.9% |
| 1928 | −15.8% |
| 1932 | +2.8% |
| 1936 | +11.6% |
| 1940 | +11.2% |
| 1944 | +8.3% |
| 1948 | +2.3% |
| 1952 | −26.8% |
| 1956 | −33.6% |
| 1960 | −16.3% |
| 1964 | +10.2% |
| 1968 | −25.3% |
| 1972 | −46.4% |
| 1976 | −26.9% |
| 1980 | −45.7% |
| 1984 | −46.4% |
| 1988 | −25.9% |
| 1992 | −18.0% |
| 1996 | −20.0% |
| 2000 | −41.3% |
| 2004 | −48.6% |
| 2008 | −29.8% |
| 2012 | −52.2% |
| 2016 | −24.9% |
| 2020 | −25.9% |
| 2024 | −27.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 13 points more Republican.
22,054 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+382 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +9,149 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $188,848 in average income, against $159,083 for residents who stayed — 19% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+1.8 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than Wasatch County, UT itself (R+27.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Summit County, UT258D+14.8
- Salt Lake County, UT227D+10.2
- Utah County, UT175R+39.8
- Los Angeles County, CA34D+32.9
- Maricopa County, AZ26R+3.5
- Orange County, CA26D+2.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Salt Lake County, UT234
- Utah County, UT211
- Summit County, UT174
- Washington County, UT57
- Davis County, UT29
- Clark County, NV28
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +482 |
| 2012 | +614 |
| 2013 | +831 |
| 2014 | +849 |
| 2015 | +934 |
| 2016 | +921 |
| 2017 | +1,142 |
| 2018 | +850 |
| 2019 | +689 |
| 2021 | +1,010 |
| 2022 | +130 |
| 2023 | +214 |
| 2024 | +101 |
| 2025 | +382 |
Wasatch County's population has climbed steadily as Heber Valley attracts second-home buyers and commuters from the Salt Lake metro, yet its presidential margins have held firmly Republican, landing at R+26.9 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 92.6 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 52.2 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 27.4 points.
A population of 36,642, a 81% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $117,608 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Davis County and Weber County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Wasatch County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49051/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.