Washington County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
131 precincts · 97,248 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WAS16WAS16 | 158 | 1,023 | 25 | 1,206 | 13.1% | 84.8% | R+71.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -STG45STG45 | 257 | 901 | 15 | 1,173 | 21.9% | 76.8% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -HUR12HUR12 | 213 | 905 | 20 | 1,138 | 18.7% | 79.5% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -WAS07WAS07 | 325 | 781 | 18 | 1,124 | 28.9% | 69.5% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -STG28STG28 | 320 | 780 | 12 | 1,112 | 28.8% | 70.1% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -WAS06WAS06 | 225 | 844 | 20 | 1,089 | 20.7% | 77.5% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -STG25STG25 | 185 | 882 | 18 | 1,085 | 17.1% | 81.3% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -ENT01ENT01 | 48 | 994 | 17 | 1,059 | 4.5% | 93.9% | R+89.3 |
| Precinct -HUR03HUR03 | 241 | 776 | 20 | 1,037 | 23.2% | 74.8% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -IVN04IVN04 | 320 | 688 | 15 | 1,023 | 31.3% | 67.3% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -WAS13WAS13 | 162 | 840 | 19 | 1,021 | 15.9% | 82.3% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -WAS12WAS12 | 163 | 835 | 21 | 1,019 | 16.0% | 81.9% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -STG15STG15 | 201 | 794 | 14 | 1,009 | 19.9% | 78.7% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -WAS10WAS10 | 234 | 762 | 12 | 1,008 | 23.2% | 75.6% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -STG16STG16 | 243 | 721 | 28 | 992 | 24.5% | 72.7% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct -WAS14WAS14 | 165 | 799 | 22 | 986 | 16.7% | 81.0% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -STG07STG07 | 179 | 782 | 18 | 979 | 18.3% | 79.9% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct -WAS18WAS18 | 181 | 776 | 16 | 973 | 18.6% | 79.8% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -WAS17WAS17 | 137 | 801 | 18 | 956 | 14.3% | 83.8% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -HUR04HUR04 | 221 | 721 | 13 | 955 | 23.1% | 75.5% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -STG19STG19 | 168 | 762 | 25 | 955 | 17.6% | 79.8% | R+62.2 |
| Precinct -HUR11HUR11 | 124 | 822 | 7 | 953 | 13.0% | 86.3% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -STG21STG21 | 146 | 782 | 20 | 948 | 15.4% | 82.5% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -IVN06IVN06 | 285 | 638 | 20 | 943 | 30.2% | 67.7% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -STG47STG47 | 234 | 692 | 16 | 942 | 24.8% | 73.5% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -HUR07HUR07 | 173 | 738 | 29 | 940 | 18.4% | 78.5% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -STG13STG13 | 185 | 735 | 20 | 940 | 19.7% | 78.2% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -STG14STG14 | 139 | 782 | 15 | 936 | 14.9% | 83.5% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -WAS02WAS02 | 236 | 676 | 20 | 932 | 25.3% | 72.5% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -IVN02IVN02 | 306 | 609 | 15 | 930 | 32.9% | 65.5% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -STG34STG34 | 258 | 653 | 19 | 930 | 27.7% | 70.2% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -STG49STG49 | 288 | 615 | 18 | 921 | 31.3% | 66.8% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -STG57STG57 | 291 | 609 | 13 | 913 | 31.9% | 66.7% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -HUR08HUR08 | 107 | 780 | 22 | 909 | 11.8% | 85.8% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -HUR01HUR01 | 254 | 638 | 16 | 908 | 28.0% | 70.3% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -HUR09HUR09 | 180 | 716 | 10 | 906 | 19.9% | 79.0% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -STG09STG09 | 150 | 731 | 14 | 895 | 16.8% | 81.7% | R+64.9 |
| Precinct -STG26STG26 | 139 | 735 | 18 | 892 | 15.6% | 82.4% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct -STG22STG22 | 147 | 725 | 12 | 884 | 16.6% | 82.0% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -IVN03IVN03 | 273 | 600 | 8 | 881 | 31.0% | 68.1% | R+37.1 |
| Precinct -WAS01WAS01 | 173 | 697 | 11 | 881 | 19.6% | 79.1% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -IVN01IVN01 | 486 | 373 | 11 | 870 | 55.9% | 42.9% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -STG30STG30 | 305 | 550 | 10 | 865 | 35.3% | 63.6% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -SC01SC01 | 136 | 711 | 17 | 864 | 15.7% | 82.3% | R+66.6 |
| Precinct -WAS19WAS19 | 153 | 684 | 22 | 859 | 17.8% | 79.6% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -STG44STG44 | 252 | 589 | 15 | 856 | 29.4% | 68.8% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -STG46STG46 | 241 | 600 | 14 | 855 | 28.2% | 70.2% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -STG01STG01 | 266 | 562 | 25 | 853 | 31.2% | 65.9% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -HUR06HUR06 | 187 | 640 | 19 | 846 | 22.1% | 75.7% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -STG48STG48 | 224 | 602 | 18 | 844 | 26.5% | 71.3% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -STG11STG11 | 215 | 618 | 9 | 842 | 25.5% | 73.4% | R+47.9 |
| Precinct -STG10STG10 | 161 | 666 | 10 | 837 | 19.2% | 79.6% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -STG12STG12 | 165 | 655 | 16 | 836 | 19.7% | 78.3% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -STG50STG50 | 192 | 623 | 17 | 832 | 23.1% | 74.9% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -STG27STG27 | 280 | 540 | 11 | 831 | 33.7% | 65.0% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -HUR10HUR10 | 116 | 702 | 8 | 826 | 14.0% | 85.0% | R+70.9 |
| Precinct -STG08STG08 | 189 | 617 | 17 | 823 | 23.0% | 75.0% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -SC03SC03 | 181 | 620 | 17 | 818 | 22.1% | 75.8% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -SC05SC05 | 210 | 589 | 15 | 814 | 25.8% | 72.4% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -WAS05WAS05 | 166 | 629 | 19 | 814 | 20.4% | 77.3% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -STG56STG56 | 247 | 550 | 13 | 810 | 30.5% | 67.9% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -WAS04WAS04 | 212 | 579 | 13 | 804 | 26.4% | 72.0% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct -STG05STG05 | 232 | 554 | 15 | 801 | 29.0% | 69.2% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -CONH28CONH28 | 115 | 672 | 10 | 797 | 14.4% | 84.3% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct -STG24STG24 | 137 | 649 | 10 | 796 | 17.2% | 81.5% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -SC02SC02 | 139 | 634 | 17 | 790 | 17.6% | 80.3% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -STG23STG23 | 137 | 633 | 15 | 785 | 17.5% | 80.6% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -STG35STG35 | 168 | 606 | 8 | 782 | 21.5% | 77.5% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -STG43STG43 | 179 | 580 | 21 | 780 | 22.9% | 74.4% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -LAV03LAV03 | 152 | 595 | 27 | 774 | 19.6% | 76.9% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -STG20STG20 | 79 | 683 | 12 | 774 | 10.2% | 88.2% | R+78.0 |
| Precinct -STG04STG04 | 223 | 526 | 16 | 765 | 29.2% | 68.8% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -SC04SC04 | 180 | 559 | 22 | 761 | 23.7% | 73.5% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -STG03STG03 | 199 | 547 | 15 | 761 | 26.1% | 71.9% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -STG33STG33 | 130 | 606 | 15 | 751 | 17.3% | 80.7% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -STG18STG18 | 167 | 569 | 12 | 748 | 22.3% | 76.1% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -STG54STG54 | 238 | 496 | 14 | 748 | 31.8% | 66.3% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -HUR05HUR05 | 137 | 599 | 8 | 744 | 18.4% | 80.5% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -STG29STG29 | 274 | 463 | 7 | 744 | 36.8% | 62.2% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -STG51STG51 | 188 | 536 | 8 | 732 | 25.7% | 73.2% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -STG37STG37 | 166 | 547 | 18 | 731 | 22.7% | 74.8% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -TOQ01TOQ01 | 152 | 555 | 19 | 726 | 20.9% | 76.4% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -HUR13HUR13 | 159 | 551 | 11 | 721 | 22.1% | 76.4% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -STG40STG40 | 175 | 525 | 15 | 715 | 24.5% | 73.4% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -STG02STG02 | 170 | 519 | 9 | 698 | 24.4% | 74.4% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -WAS08WAS08 | 198 | 479 | 7 | 684 | 28.9% | 70.0% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -STG06STG06 | 198 | 473 | 12 | 683 | 29.0% | 69.3% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -STG52STG52 | 239 | 421 | 17 | 677 | 35.3% | 62.2% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -WAS09WAS09 | 206 | 457 | 10 | 673 | 30.6% | 67.9% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -STG42STG42 | 198 | 454 | 16 | 668 | 29.6% | 68.0% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -STG53STG53 | 186 | 464 | 8 | 658 | 28.3% | 70.5% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -STG55STG55 | 176 | 467 | 13 | 656 | 26.8% | 71.2% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -STG32STG32 | 155 | 475 | 14 | 644 | 24.1% | 73.8% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -STG36STG36 | 149 | 483 | 9 | 641 | 23.2% | 75.4% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -CODAVCODAV | 157 | 470 | 13 | 640 | 24.5% | 73.4% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -CODIVCODIV | 64 | 554 | 19 | 637 | 10.0% | 87.0% | R+76.9 |
| Precinct -STG17STG17 | 171 | 457 | 9 | 637 | 26.8% | 71.7% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -WAS11WAS11 | 111 | 512 | 9 | 632 | 17.6% | 81.0% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -STG38STG38 | 178 | 432 | 20 | 630 | 28.3% | 68.6% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -STG58STG58 | 174 | 439 | 11 | 624 | 27.9% | 70.4% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -COWHCOWH | 98 | 518 | 6 | 622 | 15.8% | 83.3% | R+67.5 |
| Precinct -IVN07IVN07 | 212 | 395 | 14 | 621 | 34.1% | 63.6% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -STG41STG41 | 209 | 387 | 16 | 612 | 34.2% | 63.2% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -STG59STG59 | 136 | 467 | 4 | 607 | 22.4% | 76.9% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -LAV02LAV02 | 117 | 468 | 18 | 603 | 19.4% | 77.6% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -STG39STG39 | 195 | 367 | 24 | 586 | 33.3% | 62.6% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct -STG31STG31 | 124 | 442 | 14 | 580 | 21.4% | 76.2% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -WAS03WAS03 | 124 | 443 | 7 | 574 | 21.6% | 77.2% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -WAS20WAS20 | 173 | 393 | 8 | 574 | 30.1% | 68.5% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -LEED01LEED01 | 88 | 464 | 7 | 559 | 15.7% | 83.0% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -APV01APV01 | 102 | 440 | 6 | 548 | 18.6% | 80.3% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -LAV01LAV01 | 104 | 416 | 18 | 538 | 19.3% | 77.3% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -IVN05IVN05 | 131 | 384 | 6 | 521 | 25.1% | 73.7% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -HUR02HUR02 | 107 | 362 | 3 | 472 | 22.7% | 76.7% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -WAS15WAS15 | 66 | 378 | 4 | 448 | 14.7% | 84.4% | R+69.6 |
| Precinct -VIR01VIR01 | 166 | 272 | 7 | 445 | 37.3% | 61.1% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -HIL01HIL01 | 43 | 356 | 8 | 407 | 10.6% | 87.5% | R+76.9 |
| Precinct -CODXDRCODXDR | 74 | 315 | 9 | 398 | 18.6% | 79.1% | R+60.6 |
| Precinct -TOQ02TOQ02 | 68 | 290 | 9 | 367 | 18.5% | 79.0% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -SPR01SPR01 | 195 | 137 | 4 | 336 | 58.0% | 40.8% | D+17.3 |
| Precinct -COVECOVE | 38 | 237 | 13 | 288 | 13.2% | 82.3% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -COCNBRCOCNBR | 33 | 205 | 10 | 248 | 13.3% | 82.7% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -COPINECOPINE | 40 | 160 | 1 | 201 | 19.9% | 79.6% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -COCDSRCOCDSR | 32 | 150 | 0 | 182 | 17.6% | 82.4% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -COLEEDCOLEED | 17 | 151 | 2 | 170 | 10.0% | 88.8% | R+78.8 |
| Precinct -RCK01RCK01 | 90 | 63 | 4 | 157 | 57.3% | 40.1% | D+17.2 |
| Precinct -NHT01NHT01 | 23 | 131 | 0 | 154 | 14.9% | 85.1% | R+70.1 |
| Precinct -CONCFCONCF | 6 | 141 | 2 | 149 | 4.0% | 94.6% | R+90.6 |
| Precinct -COHS72COHS72 | 21 | 64 | 4 | 89 | 23.6% | 71.9% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -COGLCOGL | 14 | 61 | 0 | 75 | 18.7% | 81.3% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -CONH27CONH27 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 27 | 14.8% | 85.2% | R+70.4 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +75.4% |
| 1900 | +42.0% |
| 1904 | +2.9% |
| 1908 | +4.5% |
| 1912 | +8.0% |
| 1916 | +33.0% |
| 1920 | −6.0% |
| 1924 | −14.6% |
| 1928 | −32.5% |
| 1932 | +8.9% |
| 1936 | +27.2% |
| 1940 | +10.2% |
| 1944 | +3.6% |
| 1948 | −12.4% |
| 1952 | −46.4% |
| 1956 | −56.7% |
| 1960 | −37.8% |
| 1964 | −17.2% |
| 1968 | −45.0% |
| 1972 | −63.3% |
| 1976 | −48.1% |
| 1980 | −69.7% |
| 1984 | −73.0% |
| 1988 | −61.9% |
| 1992 | −37.0% |
| 1996 | −51.2% |
| 2000 | −61.7% |
| 2004 | −63.9% |
| 2008 | −53.5% |
| 2012 | −67.1% |
| 2016 | −51.9% |
| 2020 | −51.3% |
| 2024 | −52.3% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 2.7 points.
112,855 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+4,714 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +57,741 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $82,785 in average income, against $95,915 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.4 on average — 38 points more Democratic-leaning than Washington County, UT itself (R+52.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Salt Lake County, UT814D+10.2
- Utah County, UT593R+39.8
- Clark County, NV408D+2.6
- Iron County, UT350R+57.0
- Davis County, UT244R+24.9
- Los Angeles County, CA179D+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Utah County, UT566
- Salt Lake County, UT549
- Iron County, UT363
- Clark County, NV362
- Davis County, UT159
- Maricopa County, AZ117
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +1,572 |
| 2012 | +1,803 |
| 2013 | +1,942 |
| 2014 | +3,003 |
| 2015 | +2,530 |
| 2016 | +3,698 |
| 2017 | +5,533 |
| 2018 | +4,814 |
| 2019 | +5,028 |
| 2021 | +9,671 |
| 2022 | +5,468 |
| 2023 | +3,845 |
| 2024 | +4,120 |
| 2025 | +4,714 |
Washington County's population has more than doubled since 2000, driven by retirees and families relocating from California and the Mountain West. That growth has done little to shift its heavily Republican presidential margins, which have held above R+50 for over a decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 75.4 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 73.0 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 52.3 points.
A population of 196,431, a 81% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $80,632 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Box Elder County and Bonneville County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Washington County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49053/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.