Pend Oreille County, Washington
Precinct data
Results by precinct
54 precincts · 8,545 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -NOBLENOBLE | 195 | 396 | 17 | 608 | 32.1% | 65.1% | R+33.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -DALKENADALKENA | 162 | 387 | 16 | 565 | 28.7% | 68.5% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -DIAMOND LKDIAMOND LK | 215 | 285 | 17 | 517 | 41.6% | 55.1% | R+13.5 |
| Precinct -DEER VALLEY NORTHDEER VALLEY NORTH | 137 | 345 | 14 | 496 | 27.6% | 69.6% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -TIGER DRY CANYONTIGER DRY CANYON | 103 | 341 | 14 | 458 | 22.5% | 74.5% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -NEWPORT NENEWPORT NE | 119 | 275 | 20 | 414 | 28.7% | 66.4% | R+37.7 |
| Precinct -FURPORTFURPORT | 112 | 283 | 14 | 409 | 27.4% | 69.2% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -SACHEENSACHEEN | 157 | 209 | 12 | 378 | 41.5% | 55.3% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -NEWPORT SWNEWPORT SW | 109 | 244 | 15 | 368 | 29.6% | 66.3% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -NEWPORT NWNEWPORT NW | 124 | 219 | 17 | 360 | 34.4% | 60.8% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -DIAMOND LK WESTDIAMOND LK WEST | 96 | 242 | 6 | 344 | 27.9% | 70.3% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -USKUSK | 84 | 248 | 11 | 343 | 24.5% | 72.3% | R+47.8 |
| Precinct -CAMDENCAMDEN | 79 | 246 | 5 | 330 | 23.9% | 74.5% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -FERTILE VALLEY NORTHFERTILE VALLEY NORTH | 73 | 241 | 4 | 318 | 23.0% | 75.8% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -FERTILE VALLEY SOUTHFERTILE VALLEY SOUTH | 70 | 236 | 8 | 314 | 22.3% | 75.2% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -IONE WESTIONE WEST | 63 | 211 | 8 | 282 | 22.3% | 74.8% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -METALINE FALLSMETALINE FALLS | 88 | 176 | 9 | 273 | 32.2% | 64.5% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -DIAMOND LK EASTDIAMOND LK EAST | 56 | 192 | 8 | 256 | 21.9% | 75.0% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -NEWPORT SENEWPORT SE | 62 | 160 | 12 | 234 | 26.5% | 68.4% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -IONE EASTIONE EAST | 52 | 169 | 7 | 228 | 22.8% | 74.1% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -DEER VALLEY SOUTHDEER VALLEY SOUTH | 61 | 158 | 5 | 224 | 27.2% | 70.5% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -KALISPEL LECLERCKALISPEL LECLERC | 79 | 110 | 6 | 195 | 40.5% | 56.4% | R+15.9 |
| Precinct -CUSICKCUSICK | 53 | 133 | 3 | 189 | 28.0% | 70.4% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -METALINEMETALINE | 47 | 105 | 7 | 159 | 29.6% | 66.0% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -SKOOKUMSKOOKUM | 36 | 80 | 1 | 117 | 30.8% | 68.4% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -LOCKELOCKE | 19 | 90 | 1 | 110 | 17.3% | 81.8% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -RUBYRUBY | 10 | 45 | 1 | 56 | 17.9% | 80.4% | R+62.5 |
| Camden Voting District53_530515101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Cusick Voting District53_530515102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dalkena Voting District53_530515103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Deer Valley North Voting District53_530515121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Deer Valley South Voting District53_530515125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Diamond Lake East Voting District53_530515104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Diamond Lake Voting District53_530515127 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Diamond Lake West Voting District53_530515120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fertile Valley North Voting District53_530515105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fertile Valley South Voting District53_530515126 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Furport Voting District53_530515106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ione East Voting District53_530515107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ione West Voting District53_530515108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kalispel - LeClerc Voting District53_530515123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Locke Voting District53_530515122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Metaline Falls Voting District53_530515110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Metaline Voting District53_530515109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Newport Northeast Voting District53_530515112 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Newport Northwest Voting District53_530515114 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Newport Southeast Voting District53_530515113 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Newport Southwest Voting District53_530515115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Noble Voting District53_530515116 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ruby Voting District53_530515117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sacheen Voting District53_530515118 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Skookum Voting District53_530515124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Tiger - Dry Canyon Voting District53_530515111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Usk Voting District53_530515119 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1912–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1912 | +21.1% |
| 1916 | +7.7% |
| 1920 | −21.5% |
| 1924 | −39.5% |
| 1928 | −20.4% |
| 1932 | +33.2% |
| 1936 | +37.9% |
| 1940 | +17.6% |
| 1944 | +13.6% |
| 1948 | +17.8% |
| 1952 | −6.3% |
| 1956 | +1.7% |
| 1960 | +11.4% |
| 1964 | +33.5% |
| 1968 | +8.6% |
| 1972 | −23.0% |
| 1976 | +0.5% |
| 1980 | −19.2% |
| 1984 | −17.6% |
| 1988 | +3.2% |
| 1992 | +5.7% |
| 1996 | +2.3% |
| 2000 | −20.3% |
| 2004 | −22.3% |
| 2008 | −17.6% |
| 2012 | −21.4% |
| 2016 | −34.8% |
| 2020 | −36.7% |
| 2024 | −39.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 10,196 |
| 2018 | 10,885 |
| 2020 | 12,083 |
| 2022 | 11,437 |
| 2024 | 11,927 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+183 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,505 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $67,632 in average income, against $74,437 for residents who stayed — 9% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+13.4 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than Pend Oreille County, WA itself (R+39.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Spokane County, WA183R+4.9
- Bonner County, ID41R+46.1
- Kootenai County, ID24R+51.8
- Snohomish County, WA22D+18.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Spokane County, WA166
- Bonner County, ID43
- Stevens County, WA24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +38 |
| 2012 | +80 |
| 2013 | −79 |
| 2014 | +61 |
| 2015 | +180 |
| 2016 | +83 |
| 2017 | +245 |
| 2018 | +273 |
| 2019 | +175 |
| 2021 | +506 |
| 2022 | +343 |
| 2023 | +324 |
| 2024 | +93 |
| 2025 | +183 |
Tucked against the Idaho panhandle, Pend Oreille is one of Washington's least populous counties, with a rural, resource-economy identity that has produced Republican presidential margins exceeding 35 points in each of the last several cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 37.9 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 39.5 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 39.4 points.
A population of 14,050, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,436 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Burnett County and Cass County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Pend Oreille County, Washington. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/53051/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.