- Lead
- 466
- Total
- 20,944
- vs nation
- D+3.7
- Turnout
- 83.4%
Door County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 83.4% of 25,224 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 292
- Total
- 20,117
- vs nation
- R+3.0
- Turnout
- 88.7%
- Lead
- 566
- Total
- 17,592
- vs nation
- R+5.3
- Turnout
- 77.4%
- Lead
- 1,236
- Total
- 17,671
- vs nation
- D+3.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,030
- Total
- 17,481
- vs nation
- D+10.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 543
- Total
- 17,491
- vs nation
- R+0.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,250
- Total
- 15,220
- vs nation
- R+8.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 642
- Total
- 12,251
- vs nation
- R+3.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+2.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 30,4452024 5-year
- Population density
- 63 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 482 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $74,7952024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 91.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+24.7 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+79.4 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Oneida County, WI · twin score 89.6
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 83.4%21,049 participants ÷ 25,224 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- +2.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 64.9%–73.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21,049 | 25,224 ± 182 | 83.4% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2022Mid | 17,443 | 24,839 ± 199 | 70.2% | Audited | B/A |
| 20,206 | 22,774 ± 199 | 88.7% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 17,128 | 22,586 ± 210 | 75.8% | Audited | B/A |
| 17,592 | 22,741 ± 152 | 77.4% | Audited | C/A | |
| 17,671 | 22,559 | 78.3% | Derived | — | |
| 17,481 | 22,454 | 77.9% | Derived | — | |
| 17,491 | 22,349 extrapolated | 78.3% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 148/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 21 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
21 precincts · 20,944 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 1-9CITY OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 1-9 | 1,411 | 999 | 32 | 2,442 | 57.8% | 40.9% | D+16.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWN OF SEVASTOPOL WARDS 1-5TOWN OF SEVASTOPOL WARDS 1-5 | 1,068 | 1,072 | 30 | 2,170 | 49.2% | 49.4% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 10-15,22CITY OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 10-15,22 | 932 | 815 | 22 | 1,769 | 52.7% | 46.1% | D+6.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LIBERTY GROVE WARDS 1-3TOWN OF LIBERTY GROVE WARDS 1-3 | 982 | 648 | 30 | 1,660 | 59.2% | 39.0% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 16-21CITY OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 16-21 | 838 | 655 | 18 | 1,511 | 55.5% | 43.3% | D+12.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NASEWAUPEE WARDS 1-4TOWN OF NASEWAUPEE WARDS 1-4 | 598 | 803 | 20 | 1,421 | 42.1% | 56.5% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EGG HARBOR WARDS 1-3TOWN OF EGG HARBOR WARDS 1-3 | 570 | 556 | 16 | 1,142 | 49.9% | 48.7% | D+1.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GIBRALTAR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF GIBRALTAR WARDS 1-2 | 581 | 400 | 18 | 999 | 58.2% | 40.0% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BAILEYS HARBOR WARDS 1-3TOWN OF BAILEYS HARBOR WARDS 1-3 | 610 | 373 | 14 | 997 | 61.2% | 37.4% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GARDNER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF GARDNER WARDS 1-2 | 309 | 560 | 12 | 881 | 35.1% | 63.6% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF SISTER BAY WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF SISTER BAY WARDS 1-2 | 530 | 285 | 11 | 826 | 64.2% | 34.5% | D+29.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF UNION WARDS 1-2TOWN OF UNION WARDS 1-2 | 228 | 494 | 7 | 729 | 31.3% | 67.8% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BRUSSELS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BRUSSELS WARDS 1-2 | 211 | 507 | 9 | 727 | 29.0% | 69.7% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FORESTVILLE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF FORESTVILLE WARDS 1-2 | 225 | 442 | 13 | 680 | 33.1% | 65.0% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WASHINGTON WARD 1TOWN OF WASHINGTON WARD 1 | 340 | 295 | 10 | 645 | 52.7% | 45.7% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF JACKSONPORT WARDS 1-2TOWN OF JACKSONPORT WARDS 1-2 | 310 | 323 | 5 | 638 | 48.6% | 50.6% | R+2.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 1-2TOWN OF STURGEON BAY WARDS 1-2 | 257 | 337 | 3 | 597 | 43.0% | 56.4% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF EGG HARBOR WARD 1VILLAGE OF EGG HARBOR WARD 1 | 179 | 114 | 0 | 293 | 61.1% | 38.9% | D+22.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF FORESTVILLE WARD 1VILLAGE OF FORESTVILLE WARD 1 | 101 | 173 | 0 | 274 | 36.9% | 63.1% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM WARDS 1-2 | 158 | 108 | 7 | 273 | 57.9% | 39.6% | D+18.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLAY BANKS WARD 1TOWN OF CLAY BANKS WARD 1 | 127 | 140 | 3 | 270 | 47.0% | 51.9% | R+4.8 |
presidential history
Party record book
Door County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
61.6%
4,149 votes · D+24.7
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 58.0%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
88.3%
3,817 votes · R+79.4
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 80.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
10,565votes
50.4% of the vote · D+2.2
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 10,142 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
10,099votes
48.2% of the vote · D+2.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 9,752 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
+10.1pts D vs U.S.
Place D+17.3 · U.S. D+7.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · +6.9 pts
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
+53.2pts R vs U.S.
Place R+79.4 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · +51.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Door County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+215 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,350 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $115,815 in average income, against $93,584 for residents who stayed — 24% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+4.8 on average — 2.6 points more Democratic-leaning than Door County, WI itself (D+2.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Brown County, WI104R+7.5
- Kewaunee County, WI51R+33.7
- Cook County, IL45D+41.6
- Outagamie County, WI43R+10.2
- Dane County, WI31D+51.5
- Milwaukee County, WI29D+38.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Brown County, WI162
- Kewaunee County, WI51
- Dane County, WI46
- Milwaukee County, WI45
- Cook County, IL31
- Outagamie County, WI23
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +121 |
| 2012 | −124 |
| 2013 | +225 |
| 2014 | −26 |
| 2015 | −12 |
| 2016 | +137 |
| 2017 | +264 |
| 2018 | +262 |
| 2019 | +231 |
| 2021 | +496 |
| 2022 | +293 |
| 2023 | +133 |
| 2024 | +135 |
| 2025 | +215 |
Door County's tourist-driven economy and mix of retirees and longtime fishing families produces some of Wisconsin's most competitive county-level results, with the 2024 margin landing within 2.2 points of even.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 24.7 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 79.4 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.8 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 2.2 points.
A population of 30,445, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,795 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Oneida County and Sawyer County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Door County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55029/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.