- Lead
- 16,549
- Total
- 50,300
- vs nation
- R+31.4
- Turnout
- 72.3%
Dodge County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 72.3% of 70,530 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 14,999
- Total
- 48,436
- vs nation
- R+35.4
- Turnout
- 70.8%
- Lead
- 12,667
- Total
- 43,078
- vs nation
- R+31.5
- Turnout
- 64.1%
- Lead
- 6,449
- Total
- 44,488
- vs nation
- R+18.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,832
- Total
- 42,823
- vs nation
- R+16.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 10,511
- Total
- 44,336
- vs nation
- R+21.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,104
- Total
- 37,701
- vs nation
- R+19.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 265
- Total
- 29,422
- vs nation
- R+9.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+32.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 88,7422024 5-year
- Population density
- 101 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 876 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $75,9292024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 87.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 2.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 6.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+51.7 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+61.8 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Waupaca County, WI · twin score 85.7
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 72.3%51,015 participants ÷ 70,530 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.6 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.0 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 57.8%–60.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51,015 | 70,530 ± 337 | 72.3% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2022Mid | 39,591 | 70,359 ± 344 | 56.3% | Audited | C/A |
| 49,036 | 69,226 ± 361 | 70.8% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2018Mid | 38,173 | 68,412 ± 358 | 55.8% | Audited | C/A |
| 44,075 | 68,801 ± 345 | 64.1% | Audited | C/A | |
| 44,488 | 68,218 | 65.2% | Derived | — | |
| 42,823 | 67,297 | 63.6% | Derived | — | |
| 44,336 | 66,376 extrapolated | 66.8% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 17.2%; series 312/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 16.4%; series 307/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 17.1%; series 302/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 16.9%; series 298/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 17.4%; series 294/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 54 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
54 precincts · 50,300 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF MAYVILLE WARDS 1-6CITY OF MAYVILLE WARDS 1-6 | 964 | 2,013 | 40 | 3,017 | 32.0% | 66.7% | R+34.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CITY OF WAUPUN WARDS 1-8,13-15CITY OF WAUPUN WARDS 1-8,13-15 | 911 | 1,750 | 27 | 2,688 | 33.9% | 65.1% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF HORICON WARDS 1-6CITY OF HORICON WARDS 1-6 | 753 | 1,391 | 30 | 2,174 | 34.6% | 64.0% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 8,11,19-20,23,27CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 8,11,19-20,23,27 | 1,068 | 1,062 | 28 | 2,158 | 49.5% | 49.2% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 9-10,12-15CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 9-10,12-15 | 906 | 952 | 26 | 1,884 | 48.1% | 50.5% | R+2.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ASHIPPUN WARDS 1-4TOWN OF ASHIPPUN WARDS 1-4 | 441 | 1,389 | 31 | 1,861 | 23.7% | 74.6% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 3-6TOWN OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 3-6 | 717 | 981 | 25 | 1,723 | 41.6% | 56.9% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF WATERTOWN WARDS 1-2CITY OF WATERTOWN WARDS 1-2 | 669 | 999 | 22 | 1,690 | 39.6% | 59.1% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 17-18,21-22,24,28CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 17-18,21-22,24,28 | 778 | 850 | 34 | 1,662 | 46.8% | 51.1% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF RUBICON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF RUBICON WARDS 1-3 | 304 | 1,284 | 15 | 1,603 | 19.0% | 80.1% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 1-2,4,16CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 1-2,4,16 | 757 | 712 | 20 | 1,489 | 50.8% | 47.8% | D+3.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF LOMIRA WARDS 1-3VILLAGE OF LOMIRA WARDS 1-3 | 416 | 1,019 | 38 | 1,473 | 28.2% | 69.2% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF WATERTOWN WARDS 5-7CITY OF WATERTOWN WARDS 5-7 | 490 | 886 | 19 | 1,395 | 35.1% | 63.5% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF WATERTOWN WARDS 3-4,23CITY OF WATERTOWN WARDS 3-4,23 | 444 | 893 | 29 | 1,366 | 32.5% | 65.4% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HUBBARD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HUBBARD WARDS 1-2 | 363 | 845 | 9 | 1,217 | 29.8% | 69.4% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 3,5-7CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 3,5-7 | 526 | 619 | 24 | 1,169 | 45.0% | 53.0% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF JUNEAU WARDS 1-3CITY OF JUNEAU WARDS 1-3 | 384 | 738 | 14 | 1,136 | 33.8% | 65.0% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LEBANON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF LEBANON WARDS 1-3 | 228 | 753 | 19 | 1,000 | 22.8% | 75.3% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HUSTISFORD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HUSTISFORD WARDS 1-2 | 187 | 762 | 10 | 959 | 19.5% | 79.5% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF FOX LAKE WARDS 1-3CITY OF FOX LAKE WARDS 1-3 | 315 | 594 | 12 | 921 | 34.2% | 64.5% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EMMET WARDS 1-2TOWN OF EMMET WARDS 1-2 | 201 | 664 | 15 | 880 | 22.8% | 75.5% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WESTFORD WARDS 1-3TOWN OF WESTFORD WARDS 1-3 | 325 | 516 | 9 | 850 | 38.2% | 60.7% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF THERESA WARDS 1-3VILLAGE OF THERESA WARDS 1-3 | 231 | 585 | 24 | 840 | 27.5% | 69.6% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FOX LAKE WARDS 1-4TOWN OF FOX LAKE WARDS 1-4 | 233 | 573 | 7 | 813 | 28.7% | 70.5% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HERMAN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HERMAN WARDS 1-2 | 123 | 676 | 9 | 808 | 15.2% | 83.7% | R+68.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF TRENTON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF TRENTON WARDS 1-3 | 211 | 554 | 11 | 776 | 27.2% | 71.4% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 1-2,7-12TOWN OF BEAVER DAM WARDS 1-2,7-12 | 331 | 421 | 9 | 761 | 43.5% | 55.3% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LOMIRA WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LOMIRA WARDS 1-2 | 131 | 576 | 12 | 719 | 18.2% | 80.1% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF RANDOLPH WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF RANDOLPH WARDS 1-2 | 232 | 474 | 11 | 717 | 32.4% | 66.1% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LOWELL WARDS 1-4TOWN OF LOWELL WARDS 1-4 | 185 | 510 | 16 | 711 | 26.0% | 71.7% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PORTLAND WARDS 1-2TOWN OF PORTLAND WARDS 1-2 | 240 | 465 | 6 | 711 | 33.8% | 65.4% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF OAK GROVE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF OAK GROVE WARDS 1-2 | 185 | 508 | 7 | 700 | 26.4% | 72.6% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF HUSTISFORD WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF HUSTISFORD WARDS 1-2 | 168 | 498 | 9 | 675 | 24.9% | 73.8% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ELBA WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ELBA WARDS 1-2 | 244 | 402 | 7 | 653 | 37.4% | 61.6% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CALAMUS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF CALAMUS WARDS 1-2 | 236 | 393 | 6 | 635 | 37.2% | 61.9% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LEROY WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LEROY WARDS 1-2 | 123 | 483 | 3 | 609 | 20.2% | 79.3% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF KEKOSKEE WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF KEKOSKEE WARDS 1-2 | 138 | 455 | 4 | 597 | 23.1% | 76.2% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF IRON RIDGE WARD 1VILLAGE OF IRON RIDGE WARD 1 | 141 | 408 | 16 | 565 | 25.0% | 72.2% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BURNETT WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BURNETT WARDS 1-2 | 154 | 407 | 1 | 562 | 27.4% | 72.4% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF WATERTOWN WARD 8CITY OF WATERTOWN WARD 8 | 175 | 327 | 6 | 508 | 34.4% | 64.4% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLYMAN WARD 1TOWN OF CLYMAN WARD 1 | 107 | 373 | 5 | 485 | 22.1% | 76.9% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF THERESA WARDS 2-3TOWN OF THERESA WARDS 2-3 | 89 | 350 | 7 | 446 | 20.0% | 78.5% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BROWNSVILLE WARD 1VILLAGE OF BROWNSVILLE WARD 1 | 102 | 331 | 9 | 442 | 23.1% | 74.9% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF REESEVILLE WARD 1VILLAGE OF REESEVILLE WARD 1 | 138 | 261 | 7 | 406 | 34.0% | 64.3% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CHESTER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF CHESTER WARDS 1-2 | 103 | 285 | 8 | 396 | 26.0% | 72.0% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SHIELDS WARD 1TOWN OF SHIELDS WARD 1 | 99 | 271 | 5 | 375 | 26.4% | 72.3% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NEOSHO WARD 1VILLAGE OF NEOSHO WARD 1 | 79 | 293 | 2 | 374 | 21.1% | 78.3% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF THERESA WARDS 1,4TOWN OF THERESA WARDS 1,4 | 49 | 212 | 4 | 265 | 18.5% | 80.0% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CLYMAN WARD 1VILLAGE OF CLYMAN WARD 1 | 48 | 142 | 6 | 196 | 24.5% | 72.4% | R+48.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF LOWELL WARD 1VILLAGE OF LOWELL WARD 1 | 52 | 115 | 2 | 169 | 30.8% | 68.0% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARD 25CITY OF BEAVER DAM WARD 25 | 23 | 32 | 0 | 55 | 41.8% | 58.2% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WESTFORD WARD 4TOWN OF WESTFORD WARD 4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF HARTFORD WARD 11CITY OF HARTFORD WARD 11 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LOMIRA WARD 3TOWN OF LOMIRA WARD 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Dodge County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
75.1%
15,874 votes · D+51.7
Runner-up · Grover Cleveland, 1892 · 70.1%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
77.5%
11,354 votes · R+61.8
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 73.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
19,183votes
44.8% of the vote · R+8.9
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 18,762 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
33,067votes
65.7% of the vote · R+32.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 31,355 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Grover Cleveland1892
+41.2pts D vs U.S.
Place D+42.8 · U.S. D+1.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · +33.9 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
+36.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+29.4 · U.S. D+7.5
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · +35.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Dodge County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 3 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+367 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +128 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $64,338 in average income, against $76,279 for residents who stayed — 16% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+6.5 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than Dodge County, WI itself (R+32.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Jefferson County, WI268R+16.3
- Fond du Lac County, WI239R+28.7
- Washington County, WI229R+36.2
- Waukesha County, WI224R+19.7
- Dane County, WI217D+51.5
- Columbia County, WI144R+4.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Fond du Lac County, WI292
- Jefferson County, WI268
- Dane County, WI249
- Washington County, WI183
- Waukesha County, WI180
- Milwaukee County, WI144
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −324 |
| 2012 | −264 |
| 2013 | −175 |
| 2014 | +113 |
| 2015 | −114 |
| 2016 | −357 |
| 2017 | +477 |
| 2018 | +187 |
| 2019 | +90 |
| 2021 | −274 |
| 2022 | +91 |
| 2023 | +90 |
| 2024 | +221 |
| 2025 | +367 |
Dodge County's economy is anchored in agriculture and small manufacturing, and its largely rural, white, non-college electorate has delivered Republican presidential margins above 30 points in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 51.7 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 61.8 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 32.9 points.
A population of 88,742, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $75,929 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Waupaca County and Shawano County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Dodge County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55027/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.