Grant County, Wisconsin
Precinct data
Results by precinct
56 precincts · 27,306 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF LANCASTER WARDS 1-6CITY OF LANCASTER WARDS 1-6 | 873 | 1,269 | 23 | 2,165 | 40.3% | 58.6% | R+18.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 3-4CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 3-4 | 866 | 731 | 26 | 1,623 | 53.4% | 45.0% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BOSCOBEL WARDS 1-8CITY OF BOSCOBEL WARDS 1-8 | 578 | 860 | 19 | 1,457 | 39.7% | 59.0% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF JAMESTOWN WARDS 1-3TOWN OF JAMESTOWN WARDS 1-3 | 491 | 936 | 18 | 1,445 | 34.0% | 64.8% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 1-2CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 1-2 | 822 | 577 | 22 | 1,421 | 57.8% | 40.6% | D+17.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 7-9CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 7-9 | 676 | 686 | 31 | 1,393 | 48.5% | 49.2% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF FENNIMORE WARDS 1-4CITY OF FENNIMORE WARDS 1-4 | 529 | 764 | 15 | 1,308 | 40.4% | 58.4% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 5-6CITY OF PLATTEVILLE WARDS 5-6 | 612 | 577 | 33 | 1,222 | 50.1% | 47.2% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CUBA CITY WARDS 1-4CITY OF CUBA CITY WARDS 1-4 | 486 | 516 | 16 | 1,018 | 47.7% | 50.7% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MUSCODA WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF MUSCODA WARDS 1-2 | 269 | 358 | 9 | 636 | 42.3% | 56.3% | R+14.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF HAZEL GREEN WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF HAZEL GREEN WARDS 1-2 | 257 | 370 | 8 | 635 | 40.5% | 58.3% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF DICKEYVILLE WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF DICKEYVILLE WARDS 1-2 | 234 | 375 | 11 | 620 | 37.7% | 60.5% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HAZEL GREEN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HAZEL GREEN WARDS 1-2 | 173 | 363 | 9 | 545 | 31.7% | 66.6% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PLATTEVILLE WARD 2TOWN OF PLATTEVILLE WARD 2 | 224 | 309 | 11 | 544 | 41.2% | 56.8% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SMELSER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SMELSER WARDS 1-2 | 182 | 301 | 5 | 488 | 37.3% | 61.7% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF POTOSI WARDS 1-2TOWN OF POTOSI WARDS 1-2 | 164 | 310 | 9 | 483 | 34.0% | 64.2% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CASSVILLE WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF CASSVILLE WARDS 1-2 | 200 | 263 | 10 | 473 | 42.3% | 55.6% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PARIS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF PARIS WARDS 1-2 | 156 | 296 | 3 | 455 | 34.3% | 65.1% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF POTOSI WARD 1VILLAGE OF POTOSI WARD 1 | 135 | 282 | 9 | 426 | 31.7% | 66.2% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SOUTH LANCASTER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SOUTH LANCASTER WARDS 1-2 | 132 | 280 | 4 | 416 | 31.7% | 67.3% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LIMA WARD 1TOWN OF LIMA WARD 1 | 156 | 245 | 3 | 404 | 38.6% | 60.6% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BLOOMINGTON WARD 1VILLAGE OF BLOOMINGTON WARD 1 | 142 | 235 | 8 | 385 | 36.9% | 61.0% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PLATTEVILLE WARD 1TOWN OF PLATTEVILLE WARD 1 | 215 | 160 | 2 | 377 | 57.0% | 42.4% | D+14.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MUSCODA WARD 1TOWN OF MUSCODA WARD 1 | 113 | 253 | 7 | 373 | 30.3% | 67.8% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BEETOWN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BEETOWN WARDS 1-2 | 85 | 275 | 8 | 368 | 23.1% | 74.7% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WATERLOO WARD 1TOWN OF WATERLOO WARD 1 | 97 | 260 | 7 | 364 | 26.6% | 71.4% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF LIVINGSTON WARD 1VILLAGE OF LIVINGSTON WARD 1 | 154 | 186 | 7 | 347 | 44.4% | 53.6% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ELLENBORO WARD 1TOWN OF ELLENBORO WARD 1 | 91 | 253 | 1 | 345 | 26.4% | 73.3% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HARRISON WARD 1TOWN OF HARRISON WARD 1 | 96 | 226 | 4 | 326 | 29.4% | 69.3% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NORTH LANCASTER WARD 1TOWN OF NORTH LANCASTER WARD 1 | 109 | 205 | 4 | 318 | 34.3% | 64.5% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MONTFORT WARD 1VILLAGE OF MONTFORT WARD 1 | 148 | 155 | 4 | 307 | 48.2% | 50.5% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MOUNT IDA WARD 1TOWN OF MOUNT IDA WARD 1 | 77 | 213 | 3 | 293 | 26.3% | 72.7% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LIBERTY WARD 1TOWN OF LIBERTY WARD 1 | 68 | 203 | 5 | 276 | 24.6% | 73.6% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MARION WARD 1TOWN OF MARION WARD 1 | 86 | 172 | 6 | 264 | 32.6% | 65.2% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FENNIMORE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF FENNIMORE WARDS 1-2 | 87 | 173 | 2 | 262 | 33.2% | 66.0% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GLEN HAVEN WARD 1TOWN OF GLEN HAVEN WARD 1 | 61 | 169 | 2 | 232 | 26.3% | 72.8% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BLOOMINGTON WARD 1TOWN OF BLOOMINGTON WARD 1 | 70 | 155 | 3 | 228 | 30.7% | 68.0% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BLUE RIVER WARD 1VILLAGE OF BLUE RIVER WARD 1 | 91 | 132 | 2 | 225 | 40.4% | 58.7% | R+18.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CASSVILLE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF CASSVILLE WARDS 1-2 | 58 | 162 | 3 | 223 | 26.0% | 72.6% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BAGLEY WARD 1VILLAGE OF BAGLEY WARD 1 | 99 | 117 | 5 | 221 | 44.8% | 52.9% | R+8.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WATTERSTOWN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF WATTERSTOWN WARDS 1-2 | 61 | 157 | 1 | 219 | 27.9% | 71.7% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF TENNYSON WARD 1VILLAGE OF TENNYSON WARD 1 | 66 | 146 | 2 | 214 | 30.8% | 68.2% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WYALUSING WARD 1TOWN OF WYALUSING WARD 1 | 72 | 133 | 3 | 208 | 34.6% | 63.9% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BOSCOBEL WARDS 1-3TOWN OF BOSCOBEL WARDS 1-3 | 84 | 119 | 2 | 205 | 41.0% | 58.0% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WINGVILLE WARD 1TOWN OF WINGVILLE WARD 1 | 75 | 114 | 2 | 191 | 39.3% | 59.7% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HICKORY GROVE WARD 1TOWN OF HICKORY GROVE WARD 1 | 63 | 121 | 3 | 187 | 33.7% | 64.7% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PATCH GROVE WARD 1TOWN OF PATCH GROVE WARD 1 | 61 | 110 | 5 | 176 | 34.7% | 62.5% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LITTLE GRANT WARD 1TOWN OF LITTLE GRANT WARD 1 | 49 | 120 | 0 | 169 | 29.0% | 71.0% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK WARD 1TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK WARD 1 | 51 | 86 | 5 | 142 | 35.9% | 60.6% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLIFTON WARD 1TOWN OF CLIFTON WARD 1 | 62 | 80 | 0 | 142 | 43.7% | 56.3% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MOUNT HOPE WARD 1TOWN OF MOUNT HOPE WARD 1 | 22 | 80 | 6 | 108 | 20.4% | 74.1% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WOODMAN WARD 1TOWN OF WOODMAN WARD 1 | 20 | 79 | 2 | 101 | 19.8% | 78.2% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MOUNT HOPE WARD 1VILLAGE OF MOUNT HOPE WARD 1 | 36 | 60 | 4 | 100 | 36.0% | 60.0% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MILLVILLE WARD 1TOWN OF MILLVILLE WARD 1 | 34 | 63 | 2 | 99 | 34.3% | 63.6% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF PATCH GROVE WARD 1VILLAGE OF PATCH GROVE WARD 1 | 33 | 48 | 2 | 83 | 39.8% | 57.8% | R+18.1 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WOODMAN WARD 1VILLAGE OF WOODMAN WARD 1 | 15 | 34 | 2 | 51 | 29.4% | 66.7% | R+37.3 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −6.3% |
| 1896 | −17.6% |
| 1900 | −25.7% |
| 1904 | −32.4% |
| 1908 | −14.3% |
| 1912 | +4.2% |
| 1916 | −15.0% |
| 1920 | −64.4% |
| 1924 | −29.6% |
| 1928 | −20.4% |
| 1932 | +23.3% |
| 1936 | +11.3% |
| 1940 | −19.6% |
| 1944 | −25.3% |
| 1948 | −11.4% |
| 1952 | −54.6% |
| 1956 | −38.0% |
| 1960 | −20.2% |
| 1964 | +8.3% |
| 1968 | −31.1% |
| 1972 | −26.0% |
| 1976 | −10.7% |
| 1980 | −20.5% |
| 1984 | −25.8% |
| 1988 | −3.2% |
| 1992 | +5.3% |
| 1996 | +11.4% |
| 2000 | +2.1% |
| 2004 | +2.6% |
| 2008 | +23.9% |
| 2012 | +13.8% |
| 2016 | −9.4% |
| 2020 | −12.3% |
| 2024 | −18.1% |
U.S. Senate
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−78 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −494 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $50,716 in average income, against $70,095 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+1.8 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Grant County, WI itself (R+18.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Dane County, WI97D+51.5
- Lafayette County, WI88R+20.2
- Iowa County, WI85D+7.6
- Dubuque County, IA78R+8.6
- Crawford County, WI60R+13.8
- Richland County, WI56R+13.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Dane County, WI141
- Dubuque County, IA108
- Lafayette County, WI108
- Iowa County, WI86
- Richland County, WI51
- Crawford County, WI50
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −96 |
| 2012 | −407 |
| 2013 | +36 |
| 2014 | +591 |
| 2015 | +327 |
| 2016 | −204 |
| 2017 | −346 |
| 2018 | −394 |
| 2019 | −103 |
| 2021 | −647 |
| 2022 | +41 |
| 2023 | +455 |
| 2024 | +331 |
| 2025 | −78 |
Grant County sits along the Mississippi River bluffs and has shifted from a competitive battleground to a reliably Republican-leaning county over the past decade, moving roughly 20 points toward the GOP since Barack Obama carried it twice.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 23.9 points in 2008 and a Republican high of 64.4 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 18.1 points.
A population of 51,770, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,858 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lafayette County and Crawford County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Grant County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55043/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.