- Lead
- 516
- Total
- 43,258
- vs nation
- D+2.7
- Turnout
- 76.5%
Portage County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 76.5% of 56,724 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 1,129
- Total
- 40,603
- vs nation
- R+1.7
- Turnout
- 73.0%
- Lead
- 1,224
- Total
- 38,589
- vs nation
- D+1.1
- Turnout
- 69.7%
- Lead
- 5,460
- Total
- 39,337
- vs nation
- D+10.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 11,007
- Total
- 39,422
- vs nation
- D+20.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,315
- Total
- 38,961
- vs nation
- D+16.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,728
- Total
- 33,760
- vs nation
- D+13.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,270
- Total
- 29,928
- vs nation
- D+12.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+1.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 70,8322024 5-year
- Population density
- 88 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 801 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $76,0702024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 89.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+44.9 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+34.0 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Winona County, MN · twin score 93.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 76.5%43,415 participants ÷ 56,724 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +12.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -3.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 64.2%–67.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43,415 | 56,724 ± 295 | 76.5% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2022Mid | 33,887 | 55,921 ± 323 | 60.6% | Audited | B/A |
| 40,789 | 55,897 ± 317 | 73.0% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 35,161 | 55,280 ± 395 | 63.6% | Audited | B/A |
| 38,768 | 55,610 ± 294 | 69.7% | Audited | B/A | |
| 39,337 | 54,497 | 72.2% | Derived | — | |
| 39,422 | 53,192 | 74.1% | Derived | — | |
| 38,961 | 51,887 extrapolated | 75.1% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 38 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
38 precincts · 43,258 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF PLOVER WARDS 1-10VILLAGE OF PLOVER WARDS 1-10 | 4,111 | 3,868 | 120 | 8,099 | 50.8% | 47.8% | D+3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWN OF HULL WARDS 1-8TOWN OF HULL WARDS 1-8 | 1,760 | 1,768 | 47 | 3,575 | 49.2% | 49.5% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF STOCKTON WARDS 1-5TOWN OF STOCKTON WARDS 1-5 | 766 | 1,195 | 30 | 1,991 | 38.5% | 60.0% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 16-18CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 16-18 | 918 | 608 | 27 | 1,553 | 59.1% | 39.2% | D+20.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 22-24CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 22-24 | 958 | 552 | 20 | 1,530 | 62.6% | 36.1% | D+26.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SHARON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF SHARON WARDS 1-3 | 499 | 948 | 19 | 1,466 | 34.0% | 64.7% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 4-6CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 4-6 | 845 | 525 | 22 | 1,392 | 60.7% | 37.7% | D+23.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 1-3CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 1-3 | 902 | 406 | 41 | 1,349 | 66.9% | 30.1% | D+36.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 25-27CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 25-27 | 813 | 492 | 29 | 1,334 | 60.9% | 36.9% | D+24.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 28-30CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 28-30 | 776 | 480 | 27 | 1,283 | 60.5% | 37.4% | D+23.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 7-9CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 7-9 | 800 | 404 | 33 | 1,237 | 64.7% | 32.7% | D+32.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 13-15CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 13-15 | 798 | 399 | 34 | 1,231 | 64.8% | 32.4% | D+32.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GRANT WARDS 1-3TOWN OF GRANT WARDS 1-3 | 424 | 792 | 15 | 1,231 | 34.4% | 64.3% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 10-12CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 10-12 | 762 | 424 | 34 | 1,220 | 62.5% | 34.8% | D+27.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 19-21,34CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 19-21,34 | 734 | 452 | 21 | 1,207 | 60.8% | 37.4% | D+23.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WHITING WARDS 1-4VILLAGE OF WHITING WARDS 1-4 | 610 | 470 | 29 | 1,109 | 55.0% | 42.4% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 31-33,35CITY OF STEVENS POINT WARDS 31-33,35 | 620 | 451 | 16 | 1,087 | 57.0% | 41.5% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LANARK WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LANARK WARDS 1-2 | 382 | 637 | 25 | 1,044 | 36.6% | 61.0% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF AMHERST WARDS 1-2TOWN OF AMHERST WARDS 1-2 | 432 | 541 | 19 | 992 | 43.5% | 54.5% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PLOVER WARDS 1-3TOWN OF PLOVER WARDS 1-3 | 360 | 583 | 22 | 965 | 37.3% | 60.4% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CARSON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF CARSON WARDS 1-2 | 319 | 573 | 16 | 908 | 35.1% | 63.1% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LINWOOD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LINWOOD WARDS 1-2 | 322 | 464 | 17 | 803 | 40.1% | 57.8% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BUENA VISTA WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BUENA VISTA WARDS 1-2 | 256 | 510 | 12 | 778 | 32.9% | 65.6% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF DEWEY WARD 1TOWN OF DEWEY WARD 1 | 273 | 408 | 10 | 691 | 39.5% | 59.0% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EAU PLEINE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF EAU PLEINE WARDS 1-2 | 231 | 448 | 7 | 686 | 33.7% | 65.3% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF AMHERST WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF AMHERST WARDS 1-2 | 325 | 338 | 15 | 678 | 47.9% | 49.9% | R+1.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ALBAN WARD 1TOWN OF ALBAN WARD 1 | 191 | 382 | 11 | 584 | 32.7% | 65.4% | R+32.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NEW HOPE WARD 1TOWN OF NEW HOPE WARD 1 | 278 | 217 | 7 | 502 | 55.4% | 43.2% | D+12.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ALMOND WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ALMOND WARDS 1-2 | 119 | 303 | 10 | 432 | 27.5% | 70.1% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF PARK RIDGE WARD 1VILLAGE OF PARK RIDGE WARD 1 | 279 | 148 | 5 | 432 | 64.6% | 34.3% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BELMONT WARD 1TOWN OF BELMONT WARD 1 | 139 | 272 | 5 | 416 | 33.4% | 65.4% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PINE GROVE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF PINE GROVE WARDS 1-2 | 127 | 260 | 7 | 394 | 32.2% | 66.0% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF ROSHOLT WARD 1VILLAGE OF ROSHOLT WARD 1 | 89 | 169 | 4 | 262 | 34.0% | 64.5% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF AMHERST JUNCTION WARD 1VILLAGE OF AMHERST JUNCTION WARD 1 | 89 | 148 | 4 | 241 | 36.9% | 61.4% | R+24.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF ALMOND WARD 1VILLAGE OF ALMOND WARD 1 | 56 | 174 | 2 | 232 | 24.1% | 75.0% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF JUNCTION CITY WARD 1VILLAGE OF JUNCTION CITY WARD 1 | 75 | 136 | 5 | 216 | 34.7% | 63.0% | R+28.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NELSONVILLE WARD 1VILLAGE OF NELSONVILLE WARD 1 | 62 | 41 | 1 | 104 | 59.6% | 39.4% | D+20.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MILLADORE WARD 2VILLAGE OF MILLADORE WARD 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 75.0% | 25.0% | D+50.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Portage County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
72.1%
11,887 votes · D+44.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 71.7%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
65.4%
5,527 votes · R+34.0
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 61.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
24,817votes
63.0% of the vote · D+27.9
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 22,075 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
20,987votes
48.5% of the vote · D+1.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 19,299 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
George McGovern1972
+41.2pts D vs U.S.
Place D+18.1 · U.S. R+23.2
Runner-up · Al Smith, 1928 · +30.8 pts
Republican
William H. Taft1912
+12.6pts R vs U.S.
Place D+6.9 · U.S. D+19.5
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · +7.8 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Portage County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 3 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+244 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −112 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $58,296 in average income, against $82,400 for residents who stayed — 29% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+10.4 on average — 12 points more Republican-leaning than Portage County, WI itself (D+1.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Wood County, WI269R+19.9
- Marathon County, WI194R+18.6
- Waupaca County, WI103R+33.4
- Dane County, WI85D+51.5
- Waushara County, WI62R+35.2
- Outagamie County, WI48R+10.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Wood County, WI271
- Marathon County, WI166
- Dane County, WI105
- Waupaca County, WI85
- Milwaukee County, WI59
- Outagamie County, WI57
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −176 |
| 2012 | +49 |
| 2013 | −96 |
| 2014 | −299 |
| 2015 | −314 |
| 2016 | −350 |
| 2017 | −97 |
| 2018 | +43 |
| 2019 | −283 |
| 2021 | −898 |
| 2022 | +1,142 |
| 2023 | +523 |
| 2024 | +400 |
| 2025 | +244 |
Home to the University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point, Portage County sits at a demographic crossroads where a college-town core moderates the surrounding rural conservative lean, producing margins that have flipped repeatedly over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 44.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 34.0 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 1.2 points.
A population of 70,832, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,070 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Winona County and Winnebago County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Portage County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55097/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.