Shawano County, Wisconsin
Precinct data
Results by precinct
43 precincts · 23,500 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TOWN OF WESCOTT WARDS 1-5TOWN OF WESCOTT WARDS 1-5 | 669 | 1,366 | 25 | 2,060 | 32.5% | 66.3% | R+33.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWN OF RICHMOND WARDS 1-3TOWN OF RICHMOND WARDS 1-3 | 311 | 871 | 17 | 1,199 | 25.9% | 72.6% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WASHINGTON WARDS 1-4TOWN OF WASHINGTON WARDS 1-4 | 348 | 837 | 14 | 1,199 | 29.0% | 69.8% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANGELICA WARDS 1-3TOWN OF ANGELICA WARDS 1-3 | 271 | 906 | 15 | 1,192 | 22.7% | 76.0% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BELLE PLAINE WARDS 1-4TOWN OF BELLE PLAINE WARDS 1-4 | 340 | 797 | 11 | 1,148 | 29.6% | 69.4% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 9-10CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 9-10 | 451 | 501 | 15 | 967 | 46.6% | 51.8% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LESSOR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LESSOR WARDS 1-2 | 172 | 649 | 6 | 827 | 20.8% | 78.5% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BONDUEL WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF BONDUEL WARDS 1-2 | 213 | 572 | 12 | 797 | 26.7% | 71.8% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 11-12CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 11-12 | 345 | 430 | 12 | 787 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 3-4CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 3-4 | 293 | 432 | 22 | 747 | 39.2% | 57.8% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 1-2CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 1-2 | 268 | 464 | 14 | 746 | 35.9% | 62.2% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 5-6CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 5-6 | 267 | 381 | 14 | 662 | 40.3% | 57.6% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GREEN VALLEY WARDS 1-2TOWN OF GREEN VALLEY WARDS 1-2 | 128 | 489 | 11 | 628 | 20.4% | 77.9% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WAUKECHON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF WAUKECHON WARDS 1-2 | 158 | 459 | 9 | 626 | 25.2% | 73.3% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 7-8CITY OF SHAWANO WARDS 7-8 | 273 | 342 | 8 | 623 | 43.8% | 54.9% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MAPLE GROVE WARD 1TOWN OF MAPLE GROVE WARD 1 | 153 | 431 | 3 | 587 | 26.1% | 73.4% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PELLA WARD 1TOWN OF PELLA WARD 1 | 128 | 440 | 7 | 575 | 22.3% | 76.5% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GRANT WARD 1TOWN OF GRANT WARD 1 | 104 | 446 | 10 | 560 | 18.6% | 79.6% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WITTENBERG WARDS 1-2TOWN OF WITTENBERG WARDS 1-2 | 156 | 374 | 4 | 534 | 29.2% | 70.0% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF RED SPRINGS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF RED SPRINGS WARDS 1-2 | 308 | 217 | 6 | 531 | 58.0% | 40.9% | D+17.1 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WITTENBERG WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF WITTENBERG WARDS 1-2 | 165 | 286 | 8 | 459 | 35.9% | 62.3% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HARTLAND WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HARTLAND WARDS 1-2 | 88 | 353 | 2 | 443 | 19.9% | 79.7% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HERMAN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF HERMAN WARDS 1-2 | 114 | 319 | 5 | 438 | 26.0% | 72.8% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BIRNAMWOOD WARD 1TOWN OF BIRNAMWOOD WARD 1 | 133 | 288 | 5 | 426 | 31.2% | 67.6% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF TIGERTON WARD 1VILLAGE OF TIGERTON WARD 1 | 124 | 254 | 2 | 380 | 32.6% | 66.8% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BARTELME WARD 1TOWN OF BARTELME WARD 1 | 271 | 98 | 5 | 374 | 72.5% | 26.2% | D+46.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FAIRBANKS WARD 1TOWN OF FAIRBANKS WARD 1 | 66 | 294 | 3 | 363 | 18.2% | 81.0% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CECIL WARD 1VILLAGE OF CECIL WARD 1 | 89 | 254 | 3 | 346 | 25.7% | 73.4% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HUTCHINS WARD 1TOWN OF HUTCHINS WARD 1 | 75 | 258 | 7 | 340 | 22.1% | 75.9% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ALMON WARD 1TOWN OF ALMON WARD 1 | 77 | 258 | 3 | 338 | 22.8% | 76.3% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANIWA WARD 1TOWN OF ANIWA WARD 1 | 78 | 249 | 4 | 331 | 23.6% | 75.2% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SENECA WARD 1TOWN OF SENECA WARD 1 | 88 | 209 | 3 | 300 | 29.3% | 69.7% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BIRNAMWOOD WARD 1VILLAGE OF BIRNAMWOOD WARD 1 | 93 | 192 | 4 | 289 | 32.2% | 66.4% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NAVARINO WARDS 1-2TOWN OF NAVARINO WARDS 1-2 | 64 | 215 | 5 | 284 | 22.5% | 75.7% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRESHAM WARD 1VILLAGE OF GRESHAM WARD 1 | 111 | 153 | 3 | 267 | 41.6% | 57.3% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MORRIS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF MORRIS WARDS 1-2 | 67 | 185 | 6 | 258 | 26.0% | 71.7% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GERMANIA WARD 1TOWN OF GERMANIA WARD 1 | 56 | 143 | 4 | 203 | 27.6% | 70.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MATTOON WARD 1VILLAGE OF MATTOON WARD 1 | 48 | 132 | 2 | 182 | 26.4% | 72.5% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BOWLER WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF BOWLER WARDS 1-2 | 55 | 76 | 0 | 131 | 42.0% | 58.0% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF ANIWA WARD 1VILLAGE OF ANIWA WARD 1 | 35 | 86 | 2 | 123 | 28.5% | 69.9% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF ELAND WARD 1VILLAGE OF ELAND WARD 1 | 48 | 65 | 2 | 115 | 41.7% | 56.5% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF PULASKI WARDS 4,7VILLAGE OF PULASKI WARDS 4,7 | 32 | 68 | 1 | 101 | 31.7% | 67.3% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MARION WARD 4CITY OF MARION WARD 4 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 14 | 21.4% | 78.6% | R+57.1 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +19.5% |
| 1896 | −30.5% |
| 1900 | −36.1% |
| 1904 | −48.2% |
| 1908 | −30.5% |
| 1912 | +2.8% |
| 1916 | −41.2% |
| 1920 | −67.0% |
| 1924 | −17.8% |
| 1928 | −15.7% |
| 1932 | +49.6% |
| 1936 | +40.1% |
| 1940 | −9.6% |
| 1944 | −36.8% |
| 1948 | −19.6% |
| 1952 | −53.8% |
| 1956 | −43.5% |
| 1960 | −34.5% |
| 1964 | +0.3% |
| 1968 | −36.6% |
| 1972 | −37.0% |
| 1976 | −11.3% |
| 1980 | −27.7% |
| 1984 | −31.8% |
| 1988 | −11.8% |
| 1992 | −6.6% |
| 1996 | +2.9% |
| 2000 | −12.6% |
| 2004 | −16.6% |
| 2008 | +3.6% |
| 2012 | −10.0% |
| 2016 | −33.8% |
| 2020 | −35.6% |
| 2024 | −36.2% |
U.S. Senate
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+162 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −155 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,522 in average income, against $70,275 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+11.0 on average — 25 points more Democratic-leaning than Shawano County, WI itself (R+36.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Brown County, WI173R+7.5
- Outagamie County, WI100R+10.2
- Waupaca County, WI96R+33.4
- Marathon County, WI84R+18.6
- Oconto County, WI72R+43.0
- Menominee County, WI50D+61.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Brown County, WI157
- Outagamie County, WI92
- Marathon County, WI87
- Waupaca County, WI82
- Oconto County, WI59
- Menominee County, WI52
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −255 |
| 2012 | −194 |
| 2013 | −36 |
| 2014 | −58 |
| 2015 | −285 |
| 2016 | −65 |
| 2017 | −51 |
| 2018 | −120 |
| 2019 | +49 |
| 2021 | +54 |
| 2022 | +224 |
| 2023 | +215 |
| 2024 | +205 |
| 2025 | +162 |
Shawano's economy blends dairy farming, timber, and the Menominee Nation's reservation lands, producing an electorate that has shifted steadily rightward over the past decade and delivered a 36-point Republican margin in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 49.6 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 67.0 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 36.2 points.
A population of 41,039, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,479 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Oconto County and Waupaca County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Shawano County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55115/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.