Mariposa County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
26 precincts · 9,509 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -40014001 | 305 | 348 | 25 | 678 | 45.0% | 51.3% | R+6.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -40024002 | 285 | 327 | 20 | 632 | 45.1% | 51.7% | R+6.6 |
| Precinct -50015001 | 186 | 378 | 22 | 586 | 31.7% | 64.5% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -40034003 | 187 | 348 | 15 | 550 | 34.0% | 63.3% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -30043004 | 200 | 314 | 12 | 526 | 38.0% | 59.7% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -20052005 | 165 | 337 | 22 | 524 | 31.5% | 64.3% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -50045004 | 195 | 312 | 13 | 520 | 37.5% | 60.0% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -10081008 | 163 | 345 | 9 | 517 | 31.5% | 66.7% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -50025002 | 167 | 323 | 18 | 508 | 32.9% | 63.6% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -30013001 | 143 | 329 | 7 | 479 | 29.9% | 68.7% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -50055005 | 154 | 236 | 11 | 401 | 38.4% | 58.9% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -20032003 | 111 | 273 | 4 | 388 | 28.6% | 70.4% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -20022002 | 89 | 288 | 6 | 383 | 23.2% | 75.2% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -10031003 | 190 | 171 | 18 | 379 | 50.1% | 45.1% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -10061006 | 128 | 185 | 5 | 318 | 40.3% | 58.2% | R+17.9 |
| Precinct -30033003 | 97 | 153 | 9 | 259 | 37.5% | 59.1% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -20062006 | 74 | 180 | 4 | 258 | 28.7% | 69.8% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -30023002 | 59 | 178 | 4 | 241 | 24.5% | 73.9% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -10051005 | 174 | 48 | 7 | 229 | 76.0% | 21.0% | D+55.0 |
| Precinct -10011001 | 190 | 19 | 13 | 222 | 85.6% | 8.6% | D+77.0 |
| Precinct -20042004 | 94 | 123 | 5 | 222 | 42.3% | 55.4% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -30053005 | 62 | 156 | 4 | 222 | 27.9% | 70.3% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -10021002 | 81 | 83 | 4 | 168 | 48.2% | 49.4% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -30063006 | 32 | 109 | 4 | 145 | 22.1% | 75.2% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -10091009 | 64 | 43 | 0 | 107 | 59.8% | 40.2% | D+19.6 |
| Precinct -10041004 | 27 | 19 | 1 | 47 | 57.4% | 40.4% | D+17.0 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +20.7% |
| 1880 | +16.1% |
| 1884 | +13.0% |
| 1888 | +11.4% |
| 1892 | +12.1% |
| 1896 | +18.7% |
| 1900 | +17.1% |
| 1904 | +2.3% |
| 1908 | +13.4% |
| 1912 | +58.9% |
| 1916 | +25.5% |
| 1920 | −18.8% |
| 1924 | −20.6% |
| 1928 | −11.7% |
| 1932 | +40.5% |
| 1936 | +50.2% |
| 1940 | +30.0% |
| 1944 | +10.9% |
| 1948 | −16.0% |
| 1952 | −33.0% |
| 1956 | −20.9% |
| 1960 | −8.8% |
| 1964 | +14.8% |
| 1968 | −10.3% |
| 1972 | −16.8% |
| 1976 | +1.9% |
| 1980 | −21.3% |
| 1984 | −24.4% |
| 1988 | −11.1% |
| 1992 | +0.5% |
| 1996 | −13.3% |
| 2000 | −23.7% |
| 2004 | −22.7% |
| 2008 | −12.4% |
| 2012 | −18.2% |
| 2016 | −23.2% |
| 2020 | −18.1% |
| 2024 | −21.1% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.6 points.
11,641 registered voters · 2024 · up from 11,557 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+7 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −851 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $81,346 in average income, against $70,388 for residents who stayed — 16% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+10.5 on average — 11 points more Democratic-leaning than Mariposa County, CA itself (R+21.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Merced County, CA64R+4.4
- Stanislaus County, CA41R+11.0
- Madera County, CA36R+20.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Merced County, CA44
- Stanislaus County, CA35
- Madera County, CA33
- Fresno County, CA23
- Tuolumne County, CA22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −100 |
| 2012 | −291 |
| 2013 | −19 |
| 2014 | −78 |
| 2015 | −63 |
| 2016 | −143 |
| 2017 | +17 |
| 2018 | +32 |
| 2019 | −179 |
| 2021 | +87 |
| 2022 | −21 |
| 2023 | −112 |
| 2024 | +12 |
| 2025 | +7 |
Mariposa's small, rural population—anchored by tourism and resource industries near Yosemite National Park—has backed Republican presidential candidates by double digits in each of the last four cycles, with the 2024 margin reaching R+21.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 58.9 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 33.0 points in 1952. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 21.1 points.
A population of 17,082, a 74% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $68,412 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Amador County and Calaveras County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Mariposa County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06043/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.