Mendocino County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
165 precincts · 39,057 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -100003100003 | 369 | 479 | 53 | 901 | 41.0% | 53.2% | R+12.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -400005400005 | 586 | 211 | 25 | 822 | 71.3% | 25.7% | D+45.6 |
| Precinct -300006300006 | 476 | 287 | 38 | 801 | 59.4% | 35.8% | D+23.6 |
| Precinct -200002200002 | 528 | 221 | 28 | 777 | 68.0% | 28.4% | D+39.5 |
| Precinct -500005500005 | 544 | 186 | 39 | 769 | 70.7% | 24.2% | D+46.6 |
| Precinct -400002400002 | 478 | 242 | 45 | 765 | 62.5% | 31.6% | D+30.8 |
| Precinct -999405999405 | 467 | 261 | 26 | 754 | 61.9% | 34.6% | D+27.3 |
| Precinct -400004400004 | 488 | 219 | 23 | 730 | 66.8% | 30.0% | D+36.8 |
| Precinct -300002300002 | 391 | 295 | 32 | 718 | 54.5% | 41.1% | D+13.4 |
| Precinct -999423999423 | 515 | 151 | 28 | 694 | 74.2% | 21.8% | D+52.4 |
| Precinct -500004500004 | 549 | 109 | 28 | 686 | 80.0% | 15.9% | D+64.1 |
| Precinct -300001300001 | 357 | 292 | 24 | 673 | 53.0% | 43.4% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -999507999507 | 528 | 118 | 27 | 673 | 78.5% | 17.5% | D+60.9 |
| Precinct -400001400001 | 434 | 198 | 23 | 655 | 66.3% | 30.2% | D+36.0 |
| Precinct -500007500007 | 512 | 116 | 24 | 652 | 78.5% | 17.8% | D+60.7 |
| Precinct -300008300008 | 383 | 207 | 29 | 619 | 61.9% | 33.4% | D+28.4 |
| Precinct -100004100004 | 269 | 327 | 18 | 614 | 43.8% | 53.3% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -999318999318 | 343 | 216 | 33 | 592 | 57.9% | 36.5% | D+21.5 |
| Precinct -999415999415 | 391 | 178 | 22 | 591 | 66.2% | 30.1% | D+36.0 |
| Precinct -999424999424 | 421 | 143 | 24 | 588 | 71.6% | 24.3% | D+47.3 |
| Precinct -300007300007 | 324 | 233 | 26 | 583 | 55.6% | 40.0% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -999204999204 | 356 | 162 | 32 | 550 | 64.7% | 29.5% | D+35.3 |
| Precinct -100006100006 | 322 | 202 | 21 | 545 | 59.1% | 37.1% | D+22.0 |
| Precinct -300003300003 | 321 | 206 | 18 | 545 | 58.9% | 37.8% | D+21.1 |
| Precinct -300004300004 | 250 | 258 | 16 | 524 | 47.7% | 49.2% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -999212999212 | 301 | 188 | 27 | 516 | 58.3% | 36.4% | D+21.9 |
| Precinct -100001100001 | 254 | 248 | 12 | 514 | 49.4% | 48.2% | D+1.2 |
| Precinct -100009100009 | 178 | 301 | 22 | 501 | 35.5% | 60.1% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct -300005300005 | 262 | 196 | 23 | 481 | 54.5% | 40.7% | D+13.7 |
| Precinct -999108999108 | 239 | 224 | 16 | 479 | 49.9% | 46.8% | D+3.1 |
| Precinct -200001200001 | 242 | 208 | 14 | 464 | 52.2% | 44.8% | D+7.3 |
| Precinct -999516999516 | 238 | 201 | 25 | 464 | 51.3% | 43.3% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -200004200004 | 281 | 148 | 15 | 444 | 63.3% | 33.3% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -999501999501 | 365 | 50 | 25 | 440 | 83.0% | 11.4% | D+71.6 |
| Precinct -500002500002 | 364 | 53 | 17 | 434 | 83.9% | 12.2% | D+71.7 |
| Precinct -999409999409 | 297 | 121 | 10 | 428 | 69.4% | 28.3% | D+41.1 |
| Precinct -999304999304 | 217 | 186 | 24 | 427 | 50.8% | 43.6% | D+7.3 |
| Precinct -999208999208 | 246 | 156 | 19 | 421 | 58.4% | 37.1% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -999214999214 | 283 | 117 | 16 | 416 | 68.0% | 28.1% | D+39.9 |
| Precinct -200003200003 | 238 | 137 | 22 | 397 | 59.9% | 34.5% | D+25.4 |
| Precinct -999201999201 | 213 | 163 | 13 | 389 | 54.8% | 41.9% | D+12.9 |
| Precinct -999513999513 | 295 | 82 | 12 | 389 | 75.8% | 21.1% | D+54.8 |
| Precinct -500008500008 | 285 | 80 | 9 | 374 | 76.2% | 21.4% | D+54.8 |
| Precinct -999102999102 | 196 | 164 | 12 | 372 | 52.7% | 44.1% | D+8.6 |
| Precinct -100008100008 | 200 | 151 | 17 | 368 | 54.3% | 41.0% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct -400006400006 | 284 | 56 | 15 | 355 | 80.0% | 15.8% | D+64.2 |
| Precinct -100500100500 | 183 | 149 | 6 | 338 | 54.1% | 44.1% | D+10.1 |
| Precinct -999213999213 | 211 | 95 | 26 | 332 | 63.6% | 28.6% | D+34.9 |
| Precinct -999205999205 | 163 | 145 | 6 | 314 | 51.9% | 46.2% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -999313999313 | 160 | 123 | 26 | 309 | 51.8% | 39.8% | D+12.0 |
| Precinct -999150999150 | 150 | 152 | 5 | 307 | 48.9% | 49.5% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -999124999124 | 165 | 133 | 4 | 302 | 54.6% | 44.0% | D+10.6 |
| Precinct -500006500006 | 207 | 78 | 14 | 299 | 69.2% | 26.1% | D+43.1 |
| Precinct -100005100005 | 154 | 122 | 6 | 282 | 54.6% | 43.3% | D+11.3 |
| Precinct -999510999510 | 192 | 73 | 9 | 274 | 70.1% | 26.6% | D+43.4 |
| Precinct -999427999427 | 188 | 74 | 10 | 272 | 69.1% | 27.2% | D+41.9 |
| Precinct -500003500003 | 170 | 69 | 26 | 265 | 64.2% | 26.0% | D+38.1 |
| Precinct -100007100007 | 153 | 97 | 13 | 263 | 58.2% | 36.9% | D+21.3 |
| Precinct -500009500009 | 160 | 88 | 10 | 258 | 62.0% | 34.1% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct -400007400007 | 190 | 50 | 7 | 247 | 76.9% | 20.2% | D+56.7 |
| Precinct -400003400003 | 163 | 74 | 8 | 245 | 66.5% | 30.2% | D+36.3 |
| Precinct -999307999307 | 120 | 113 | 11 | 244 | 49.2% | 46.3% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct -500001500001 | 173 | 52 | 8 | 233 | 74.2% | 22.3% | D+51.9 |
| Precinct -999211999211 | 145 | 78 | 8 | 231 | 62.8% | 33.8% | D+29.0 |
| Precinct -100002100002 | 116 | 110 | 4 | 230 | 50.4% | 47.8% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct -999115999115 | 103 | 100 | 6 | 209 | 49.3% | 47.8% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -999207999207 | 107 | 88 | 9 | 204 | 52.5% | 43.1% | D+9.3 |
| Precinct -999505999505 | 152 | 40 | 12 | 204 | 74.5% | 19.6% | D+54.9 |
| Precinct -999514999514 | 153 | 33 | 16 | 202 | 75.7% | 16.3% | D+59.4 |
| Precinct -999216999216 | 120 | 70 | 9 | 199 | 60.3% | 35.2% | D+25.1 |
| Precinct -999109999109 | 108 | 79 | 10 | 197 | 54.8% | 40.1% | D+14.7 |
| Precinct -999526999526 | 131 | 54 | 8 | 193 | 67.9% | 28.0% | D+39.9 |
| Precinct -999314999314 | 140 | 40 | 8 | 188 | 74.5% | 21.3% | D+53.2 |
| Precinct -999428999428 | 120 | 55 | 8 | 183 | 65.6% | 30.1% | D+35.5 |
| Precinct -999519999519 | 137 | 35 | 10 | 182 | 75.3% | 19.2% | D+56.0 |
| Precinct -999544999544 | 83 | 83 | 9 | 175 | 47.4% | 47.4% | Even |
| Precinct -999221999221 | 91 | 78 | 5 | 174 | 52.3% | 44.8% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -999116999116 | 88 | 70 | 9 | 167 | 52.7% | 41.9% | D+10.8 |
| Precinct -999404999404 | 94 | 60 | 13 | 167 | 56.3% | 35.9% | D+20.4 |
| Precinct -999225999225 | 91 | 62 | 9 | 162 | 56.2% | 38.3% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -999215999215 | 92 | 62 | 3 | 157 | 58.6% | 39.5% | D+19.1 |
| Precinct -999224999224 | 85 | 65 | 2 | 152 | 55.9% | 42.8% | D+13.2 |
| Precinct -999110999110 | 78 | 64 | 3 | 145 | 53.8% | 44.1% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -999121999121 | 91 | 41 | 4 | 136 | 66.9% | 30.1% | D+36.8 |
| Precinct -999563999563 | 108 | 23 | 5 | 136 | 79.4% | 16.9% | D+62.5 |
| Precinct -999562999562 | 63 | 57 | 9 | 129 | 48.8% | 44.2% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -999142999142 | 52 | 70 | 6 | 128 | 40.6% | 54.7% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -999522999522 | 92 | 25 | 11 | 128 | 71.9% | 19.5% | D+52.3 |
| Precinct -999111999111 | 73 | 50 | 1 | 124 | 58.9% | 40.3% | D+18.5 |
| Precinct -999425999425 | 77 | 40 | 6 | 123 | 62.6% | 32.5% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -999436999436 | 94 | 20 | 4 | 118 | 79.7% | 16.9% | D+62.7 |
| Precinct -999533999533 | 54 | 58 | 2 | 114 | 47.4% | 50.9% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -999320999320 | 52 | 52 | 5 | 109 | 47.7% | 47.7% | Even |
| Precinct -999112999112 | 41 | 64 | 3 | 108 | 38.0% | 59.3% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -999227999227 | 73 | 33 | 0 | 106 | 68.9% | 31.1% | D+37.7 |
| Precinct -999220999220 | 64 | 38 | 2 | 104 | 61.5% | 36.5% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -999407999407 | 78 | 20 | 6 | 104 | 75.0% | 19.2% | D+55.8 |
| Precinct -999203999203 | 49 | 48 | 6 | 103 | 47.6% | 46.6% | D+1.0 |
| Precinct -999309999309 | 57 | 38 | 7 | 102 | 55.9% | 37.3% | D+18.6 |
| Precinct -999542999542 | 36 | 60 | 3 | 99 | 36.4% | 60.6% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -999429999429 | 69 | 23 | 5 | 97 | 71.1% | 23.7% | D+47.4 |
| Precinct -999439999439 | 56 | 35 | 6 | 97 | 57.7% | 36.1% | D+21.6 |
| Precinct -999151999151 | 25 | 57 | 5 | 87 | 28.7% | 65.5% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -999315999315 | 58 | 20 | 8 | 86 | 67.4% | 23.3% | D+44.2 |
| Precinct -999206999206 | 55 | 26 | 4 | 85 | 64.7% | 30.6% | D+34.1 |
| Precinct -999321999321 | 45 | 33 | 7 | 85 | 52.9% | 38.8% | D+14.1 |
| Precinct -999303999303 | 58 | 20 | 6 | 84 | 69.0% | 23.8% | D+45.2 |
| Precinct -999539999539 | 43 | 35 | 5 | 83 | 51.8% | 42.2% | D+9.6 |
| Precinct -999555999555 | 47 | 34 | 2 | 83 | 56.6% | 41.0% | D+15.7 |
| Precinct -999103999103 | 38 | 43 | 1 | 82 | 46.3% | 52.4% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -999426999426 | 53 | 28 | 1 | 82 | 64.6% | 34.1% | D+30.5 |
| Precinct -999105999105 | 36 | 40 | 2 | 78 | 46.2% | 51.3% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -999306999306 | 52 | 20 | 6 | 78 | 66.7% | 25.6% | D+41.0 |
| Precinct -999132999132 | 40 | 32 | 3 | 75 | 53.3% | 42.7% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -999520999520 | 51 | 14 | 4 | 69 | 73.9% | 20.3% | D+53.6 |
| Precinct -999312999312 | 39 | 24 | 4 | 67 | 58.2% | 35.8% | D+22.4 |
| Precinct -999508999508 | 59 | 7 | 0 | 66 | 89.4% | 10.6% | D+78.8 |
| Precinct -999538999538 | 34 | 28 | 1 | 63 | 54.0% | 44.4% | D+9.5 |
| Precinct -999152999152 | 25 | 33 | 2 | 60 | 41.7% | 55.0% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -999218999218 | 28 | 31 | 0 | 59 | 47.5% | 52.5% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -999140999140 | 20 | 32 | 3 | 55 | 36.4% | 58.2% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -999401999401 | 29 | 24 | 2 | 55 | 52.7% | 43.6% | D+9.1 |
| Precinct -999438999438 | 28 | 20 | 4 | 52 | 53.8% | 38.5% | D+15.4 |
| Precinct -999506999506 | 40 | 5 | 3 | 48 | 83.3% | 10.4% | D+72.9 |
| Precinct -999532999532 | 29 | 10 | 7 | 46 | 63.0% | 21.7% | D+41.3 |
| Precinct -999543999543 | 25 | 20 | 1 | 46 | 54.3% | 43.5% | D+10.9 |
| Precinct -999557999557 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 45 | 66.7% | 31.1% | D+35.6 |
| Precinct -999551999551 | 32 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 86.5% | 8.1% | D+78.4 |
| Precinct -999305999305 | 25 | 7 | 3 | 35 | 71.4% | 20.0% | D+51.4 |
| Precinct -999406999406 | 23 | 10 | 0 | 33 | 69.7% | 30.3% | D+39.4 |
| Precinct -999518999518 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 84.8% | 9.1% | D+75.8 |
| Precinct -999411999411 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 32 | 68.8% | 28.1% | D+40.6 |
| Precinct -999421999421 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 31 | 77.4% | 12.9% | D+64.5 |
| Precinct -999432999432 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 31 | 61.3% | 38.7% | D+22.6 |
| Precinct -999523999523 | 17 | 12 | 2 | 31 | 54.8% | 38.7% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -999528999528 | 10 | 18 | 2 | 30 | 33.3% | 60.0% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -999126999126 | 19 | 8 | 0 | 27 | 70.4% | 29.6% | D+40.7 |
| Precinct -999541999541 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 27 | 44.4% | 48.1% | R+3.7 |
| Precinct -999125999125 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 26 | 38.5% | 61.5% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -999540999540 | 19 | 7 | 0 | 26 | 73.1% | 26.9% | D+46.2 |
| Precinct -999437999437 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 22 | 50.0% | 36.4% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -999311999311 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 21 | 61.9% | 38.1% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -999301999301 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 75.0% | 25.0% | D+50.0 |
| Precinct -999530999530 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 20 | 70.0% | 25.0% | D+45.0 |
| Precinct -999559999559 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 20 | 35.0% | 65.0% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -999129999129 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 19 | 42.1% | 57.9% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -999525999525 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 73.7% | 21.1% | D+52.6 |
| Precinct -999316999316 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 82.4% | 11.8% | D+70.6 |
| Precinct -999403999403 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 81.3% | 18.8% | D+62.5 |
| Precinct -999123999123 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 15 | 13.3% | 80.0% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -999512999512 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 66.7% | 26.7% | D+40.0 |
| Precinct -999117999117 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 78.6% | 21.4% | D+57.1 |
| Precinct -999131999131 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -999138999138 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 14 | 21.4% | 78.6% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -999148999148 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 57.1% | 42.9% | D+14.3 |
| Precinct -999535999535 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 14 | 50.0% | 42.9% | D+7.1 |
| Precinct -999416999416 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 76.9% | 15.4% | D+61.5 |
| Precinct -999527999527 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 61.5% | 38.5% | D+23.1 |
| Precinct -999118999118 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -999130999130 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 33.3% | 33.3% | Even |
| Precinct -999146999146 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 72.7% | 18.2% | D+54.5 |
| Precinct -999413999413 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 10.0% | 90.0% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -999515999515 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -999531999531 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -999558999558 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 80.0% | 10.0% | D+70.0 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +16.0% |
| 1880 | +15.0% |
| 1884 | +9.0% |
| 1888 | +7.7% |
| 1892 | +7.7% |
| 1896 | +0.6% |
| 1900 | −8.0% |
| 1904 | −30.0% |
| 1908 | −20.1% |
| 1912 | +44.4% |
| 1916 | −1.6% |
| 1920 | −39.3% |
| 1924 | −44.4% |
| 1928 | −28.8% |
| 1932 | +26.2% |
| 1936 | +26.9% |
| 1940 | +13.6% |
| 1944 | +7.9% |
| 1948 | −6.5% |
| 1952 | −22.2% |
| 1956 | −14.1% |
| 1960 | +0.9% |
| 1964 | +30.4% |
| 1968 | −2.1% |
| 1972 | −7.8% |
| 1976 | +4.0% |
| 1980 | −5.8% |
| 1984 | −6.2% |
| 1988 | +13.5% |
| 1992 | +28.4% |
| 1996 | +15.9% |
| 2000 | +12.7% |
| 2004 | +29.7% |
| 2008 | +42.6% |
| 2012 | +38.5% |
| 2016 | +29.5% |
| 2020 | +35.8% |
| 2024 | +26.8% |
DemocraticRepublican
Congressional elections · 2 Senate races
U.S. Senate
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2024D+25.0
Presidential vote · 2024D+26.8
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 1.8 points.
53,748 registered voters · 2024 · up from 53,009 in 2022
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−741 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −5,726 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $68,212 in average income, against $71,843 for residents who stayed — 5% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+34.0 on average — 7.1 points more Democratic-leaning than Mendocino County, CA itself (D+26.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sonoma County, CA231D+46.2
- Lake County, CA122R+1.4
- Alameda County, CA59D+53.6
- Sacramento County, CA57D+19.7
- Los Angeles County, CA55D+32.9
- Humboldt County, CA48D+28.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sonoma County, CA259
- Lake County, CA141
- Sacramento County, CA68
- Los Angeles County, CA50
- San Francisco County, CA43
- Alameda County, CA41
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −652 |
| 2012 | −309 |
| 2013 | −443 |
| 2014 | −19 |
| 2015 | −272 |
| 2016 | +39 |
| 2017 | +157 |
| 2018 | −213 |
| 2019 | −660 |
| 2021 | +6 |
| 2022 | −1,225 |
| 2023 | −867 |
| 2024 | −527 |
| 2025 | −741 |
Mendocino's sparse population, rugged Pacific coastline, and long-established counterculture communities have anchored its Democratic lean for decades, with 2024's D+26.8 margin consistent with its recent presidential-cycle pattern.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 44.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 44.4 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 9.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.8 points.
A population of 90,244, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $68,092 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Sonoma County and Santa Cruz County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Sonoma County
California
93.7twin score
2004–2020 trajectory≠ median income
Santa Cruz County
California
92.9twin score
2004–2020 trajectory≠ median income
Lake County
California
92.3twin score
2000–2012 trajectory≠ Irish ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Mendocino County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06045/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Mendocino County
California at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Mendocino County, California vote in 2024?
In 2024, Mendocino County, California voted Democratic by 26.8 points (D+26.8), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 39,216 votes cast, 24,049 went Democratic and 13,528 went Republican.
When did Mendocino County, California last vote Republican?
The most recent presidential election in which Mendocino County, California voted Republican was 1984.
How many people live in Mendocino County, California?
Mendocino County, California has a population of 90,244 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Mendocino County, California?
Median household income in Mendocino County, California is $68,092 — below the national median of $80,734. The California state median is $99,122.
What is the political history of Mendocino County, California?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Mendocino County, California from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 23 went Democratic and 14 went Republican.