Shasta County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 88,894 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -04209120420912 | 763 | 1,915 | 50 | 2,728 | 28.0% | 70.2% | R+42.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -03905600390560 | 568 | 1,839 | 52 | 2,459 | 23.1% | 74.8% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -03204200320420 | 752 | 1,521 | 60 | 2,333 | 32.2% | 65.2% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -03200680320068 | 693 | 1,531 | 63 | 2,287 | 30.3% | 66.9% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -02204600220460 | 791 | 1,364 | 52 | 2,207 | 35.8% | 61.8% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -03912100391210 | 562 | 1,523 | 43 | 2,128 | 26.4% | 71.6% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -04310050431005 | 647 | 1,385 | 54 | 2,086 | 31.0% | 66.4% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -05903300590330 | 435 | 1,589 | 45 | 2,069 | 21.0% | 76.8% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -04208610420861 | 653 | 1,346 | 50 | 2,049 | 31.9% | 65.7% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -01208940120894 | 669 | 1,307 | 72 | 2,048 | 32.7% | 63.8% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -02207600220760 | 786 | 1,161 | 72 | 2,019 | 38.9% | 57.5% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -05909400590940 | 613 | 1,319 | 45 | 1,977 | 31.0% | 66.7% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -05913100591310 | 499 | 1,412 | 46 | 1,957 | 25.5% | 72.2% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -01208970120897 | 691 | 1,200 | 41 | 1,932 | 35.8% | 62.1% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -02205750220575 | 768 | 1,107 | 55 | 1,930 | 39.8% | 57.4% | R+17.6 |
| Precinct -02201700220170 | 594 | 1,282 | 40 | 1,916 | 31.0% | 66.9% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -05100150510015 | 504 | 1,300 | 61 | 1,865 | 27.0% | 69.7% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -02207700220770 | 642 | 1,132 | 52 | 1,826 | 35.2% | 62.0% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -04203750420375 | 591 | 1,147 | 52 | 1,790 | 33.0% | 64.1% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -03209780320978 | 537 | 1,199 | 35 | 1,771 | 30.3% | 67.7% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -01217500121750 | 774 | 897 | 72 | 1,743 | 44.4% | 51.5% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -02916400291640 | 401 | 1,305 | 32 | 1,738 | 23.1% | 75.1% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -02902600290260 | 583 | 1,103 | 43 | 1,729 | 33.7% | 63.8% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -01206600120660 | 721 | 945 | 62 | 1,728 | 41.7% | 54.7% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -04203700420370 | 571 | 1,121 | 34 | 1,726 | 33.1% | 64.9% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -01203900120390 | 545 | 1,015 | 51 | 1,611 | 33.8% | 63.0% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -01204000120400 | 526 | 1,025 | 60 | 1,611 | 32.7% | 63.6% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -01205230120523 | 597 | 933 | 39 | 1,569 | 38.0% | 59.5% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -03203760320376 | 429 | 1,076 | 41 | 1,546 | 27.7% | 69.6% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -04310030431003 | 492 | 954 | 37 | 1,483 | 33.2% | 64.3% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -05900800590080 | 325 | 1,081 | 27 | 1,433 | 22.7% | 75.4% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -02219820221982 | 454 | 913 | 41 | 1,408 | 32.2% | 64.8% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -01205700120570 | 532 | 812 | 44 | 1,388 | 38.3% | 58.5% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -04906500490650 | 322 | 1,023 | 25 | 1,370 | 23.5% | 74.7% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -04901010490101 | 323 | 996 | 21 | 1,340 | 24.1% | 74.3% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -05916200591620 | 268 | 1,036 | 30 | 1,334 | 20.1% | 77.7% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -05100300510030 | 372 | 927 | 21 | 1,320 | 28.2% | 70.2% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -01902010190201 | 318 | 931 | 25 | 1,274 | 25.0% | 73.1% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -04310040431004 | 373 | 819 | 23 | 1,215 | 30.7% | 67.4% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -05110550511055 | 374 | 791 | 37 | 1,202 | 31.1% | 65.8% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -05903310590331 | 210 | 951 | 11 | 1,172 | 17.9% | 81.1% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -02919300291930 | 409 | 701 | 29 | 1,139 | 35.9% | 61.5% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -01211200121120 | 455 | 631 | 40 | 1,126 | 40.4% | 56.0% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -02201600220160 | 391 | 696 | 34 | 1,121 | 34.9% | 62.1% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -05929700592970 | 348 | 740 | 20 | 1,108 | 31.4% | 66.8% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -03904700390470 | 282 | 764 | 25 | 1,071 | 26.3% | 71.3% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -03906110390611 | 278 | 769 | 12 | 1,059 | 26.3% | 72.6% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -03905900390590 | 209 | 798 | 26 | 1,033 | 20.2% | 77.3% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -02219790221979 | 315 | 683 | 21 | 1,019 | 30.9% | 67.0% | R+36.1 |
| Precinct -05909420590942 | 284 | 704 | 22 | 1,010 | 28.1% | 69.7% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -04900910490091 | 270 | 647 | 34 | 951 | 28.4% | 68.0% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -04903200490320 | 183 | 672 | 15 | 870 | 21.0% | 77.2% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -04903600490360 | 251 | 480 | 26 | 757 | 33.2% | 63.4% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -03921130392113 | 142 | 502 | 11 | 655 | 21.7% | 76.6% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -03906000390600 | 252 | 374 | 24 | 650 | 38.8% | 57.5% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -03903210390321 | 119 | 392 | 19 | 530 | 22.5% | 74.0% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -03900700390070 | 120 | 328 | 14 | 462 | 26.0% | 71.0% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -04905570490557 | 128 | 313 | 8 | 449 | 28.5% | 69.7% | R+41.2 |
| Precinct -02905300290530 | 115 | 255 | 9 | 379 | 30.3% | 67.3% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -05905310590531 | 96 | 260 | 7 | 363 | 26.4% | 71.6% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -03901020390102 | 67 | 270 | 8 | 345 | 19.4% | 78.3% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct -03906100390610 | 111 | 179 | 7 | 297 | 37.4% | 60.3% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -02904620290462 | 11 | 53 | 2 | 66 | 16.7% | 80.3% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -02911300291130 | 5 | 54 | 0 | 59 | 8.5% | 91.5% | R+83.1 |
| Precinct -01204630120463 | 18 | 17 | 2 | 37 | 48.6% | 45.9% | D+2.7 |
| Precinct -03200100320010 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 21 | 14.3% | 85.7% | R+71.4 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +1.3% |
| 1880 | +0.5% |
| 1884 | −5.8% |
| 1888 | −3.3% |
| 1892 | −3.4% |
| 1896 | +22.5% |
| 1900 | +7.1% |
| 1904 | −27.9% |
| 1908 | −12.6% |
| 1912 | +43.6% |
| 1916 | +15.2% |
| 1920 | −31.8% |
| 1924 | −29.1% |
| 1928 | −6.3% |
| 1932 | +48.2% |
| 1936 | +41.0% |
| 1940 | +37.3% |
| 1944 | +18.0% |
| 1948 | +17.2% |
| 1952 | −12.5% |
| 1956 | +11.9% |
| 1960 | +21.5% |
| 1964 | +35.1% |
| 1968 | +9.2% |
| 1972 | +1.7% |
| 1976 | +5.1% |
| 1980 | −25.7% |
| 1984 | −25.9% |
| 1988 | −20.6% |
| 1992 | −9.6% |
| 1996 | −22.1% |
| 2000 | −34.8% |
| 2004 | −35.9% |
| 2008 | −25.8% |
| 2012 | −29.1% |
| 2016 | −36.4% |
| 2020 | −33.1% |
| 2024 | −36.5% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 7.2 points more Democratic.
113,931 registered voters · 2024 · up from 111,526 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+544 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,982 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $66,269 in average income, against $75,957 for residents who stayed — 13% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+6.0 on average — 42 points more Democratic-leaning than Shasta County, CA itself (R+36.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tehama County, CA355R+41.8
- Sacramento County, CA206D+19.7
- Butte County, CA159R+3.1
- Humboldt County, CA123D+28.4
- Los Angeles County, CA114D+32.9
- Contra Costa County, CA101D+37.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tehama County, CA340
- Butte County, CA172
- Sacramento County, CA156
- San Diego County, CA96
- Humboldt County, CA88
- Los Angeles County, CA78
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +129 |
| 2012 | +152 |
| 2013 | +308 |
| 2014 | +300 |
| 2015 | −650 |
| 2016 | +132 |
| 2017 | +986 |
| 2018 | +483 |
| 2019 | +514 |
| 2021 | +725 |
| 2022 | −562 |
| 2023 | +96 |
| 2024 | +825 |
| 2025 | +544 |
Shasta County, anchored by Redding in the northern Sacramento Valley, has delivered Republican presidential margins exceeding 30 points in each of the last three cycles, making it a consistent outlier within a heavily Democratic state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 48.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 36.5 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 36.5 points.
A population of 181,436, a 75% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,636 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Clay County and Klamath County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Shasta County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06089/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.