Yolo County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
51 precincts · 92,589 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -1202512025 | 5,286 | 770 | 209 | 6,265 | 84.4% | 12.3% | D+72.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -1203712037 | 2,927 | 2,172 | 188 | 5,287 | 55.4% | 41.1% | D+14.3 |
| Precinct -1202312023 | 4,200 | 790 | 166 | 5,156 | 81.5% | 15.3% | D+66.1 |
| Precinct -1204212042 | 2,569 | 1,612 | 201 | 4,382 | 58.6% | 36.8% | D+21.8 |
| Precinct -1205412054 | 3,672 | 507 | 158 | 4,337 | 84.7% | 11.7% | D+73.0 |
| Precinct -1201312013 | 2,519 | 1,638 | 165 | 4,322 | 58.3% | 37.9% | D+20.4 |
| Precinct -1203912039 | 2,787 | 1,359 | 168 | 4,314 | 64.6% | 31.5% | D+33.1 |
| Precinct -1203812038 | 2,173 | 1,994 | 131 | 4,298 | 50.6% | 46.4% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -1205712057 | 2,382 | 1,692 | 169 | 4,243 | 56.1% | 39.9% | D+16.3 |
| Precinct -1202612026 | 2,853 | 597 | 136 | 3,586 | 79.6% | 16.6% | D+62.9 |
| Precinct -1202712027 | 1,951 | 1,505 | 117 | 3,573 | 54.6% | 42.1% | D+12.5 |
| Precinct -1201012010 | 1,872 | 1,349 | 119 | 3,340 | 56.0% | 40.4% | D+15.7 |
| Precinct -1205312053 | 2,726 | 425 | 138 | 3,289 | 82.9% | 12.9% | D+70.0 |
| Precinct -1200312003 | 1,888 | 1,043 | 109 | 3,040 | 62.1% | 34.3% | D+27.8 |
| Precinct -1203212032 | 2,407 | 394 | 98 | 2,899 | 83.0% | 13.6% | D+69.4 |
| Precinct -1204812048 | 1,129 | 1,477 | 63 | 2,669 | 42.3% | 55.3% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -1200212002 | 1,696 | 846 | 77 | 2,619 | 64.8% | 32.3% | D+32.5 |
| Precinct -1202112021 | 2,206 | 256 | 114 | 2,576 | 85.6% | 9.9% | D+75.7 |
| Precinct -1202412024 | 2,113 | 252 | 75 | 2,440 | 86.6% | 10.3% | D+76.3 |
| Precinct -1202012020 | 2,074 | 198 | 123 | 2,395 | 86.6% | 8.3% | D+78.3 |
| Precinct -1200712007 | 1,475 | 821 | 94 | 2,390 | 61.7% | 34.4% | D+27.4 |
| Precinct -1200912009 | 1,286 | 766 | 75 | 2,127 | 60.5% | 36.0% | D+24.4 |
| Precinct -1200612006 | 1,043 | 729 | 66 | 1,838 | 56.7% | 39.7% | D+17.1 |
| Precinct -1204012040 | 864 | 635 | 52 | 1,551 | 55.7% | 40.9% | D+14.8 |
| Precinct -1203512035 | 667 | 330 | 30 | 1,027 | 64.9% | 32.1% | D+32.8 |
| Precinct -1204512045 | 380 | 605 | 27 | 1,012 | 37.5% | 59.8% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -1205212052 | 674 | 114 | 27 | 815 | 82.7% | 14.0% | D+68.7 |
| Precinct -1204312043 | 308 | 457 | 36 | 801 | 38.5% | 57.1% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -1200812008 | 430 | 328 | 28 | 786 | 54.7% | 41.7% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -1205612056 | 426 | 329 | 22 | 777 | 54.8% | 42.3% | D+12.5 |
| Precinct -1200412004 | 371 | 241 | 16 | 628 | 59.1% | 38.4% | D+20.7 |
| Precinct -1200112001 | 291 | 216 | 23 | 530 | 54.9% | 40.8% | D+14.2 |
| Precinct -1204712047 | 238 | 240 | 20 | 498 | 47.8% | 48.2% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -1201412014 | 216 | 260 | 17 | 493 | 43.8% | 52.7% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -1203012030 | 231 | 189 | 11 | 431 | 53.6% | 43.9% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -1204912049 | 166 | 255 | 6 | 427 | 38.9% | 59.7% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -1202212022 | 311 | 51 | 26 | 388 | 80.2% | 13.1% | D+67.0 |
| Precinct -1200512005 | 208 | 151 | 14 | 373 | 55.8% | 40.5% | D+15.3 |
| Precinct -1205912059 | 127 | 66 | 6 | 199 | 63.8% | 33.2% | D+30.7 |
| Precinct -1205812058 | 75 | 42 | 5 | 122 | 61.5% | 34.4% | D+27.0 |
| Precinct -1201212012 | 70 | 17 | 5 | 92 | 76.1% | 18.5% | D+57.6 |
| Precinct -1201712017 | 23 | 60 | 3 | 86 | 26.7% | 69.8% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -1203412034 | 54 | 25 | 7 | 86 | 62.8% | 29.1% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -1205512055 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 36 | 63.9% | 36.1% | D+27.8 |
| Precinct -1201512015 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 64.3% | 35.7% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -1202912029 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 20.0% | 80.0% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -1201912019 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 12.5% | 87.5% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -1204412044 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -1204112041 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -1204612046 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0% | D+100.0 |
| Precinct -1205012050 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +4.9% |
| 1880 | +4.5% |
| 1884 | +0.3% |
| 1888 | +7.6% |
| 1892 | +10.0% |
| 1896 | +8.1% |
| 1900 | +5.4% |
| 1904 | −12.2% |
| 1908 | −4.4% |
| 1912 | +56.1% |
| 1916 | +10.7% |
| 1920 | −29.1% |
| 1924 | −30.7% |
| 1928 | −14.5% |
| 1932 | +38.3% |
| 1936 | +39.1% |
| 1940 | +18.5% |
| 1944 | +15.9% |
| 1948 | +8.6% |
| 1952 | −6.3% |
| 1956 | +3.7% |
| 1960 | +10.1% |
| 1964 | +39.2% |
| 1968 | +16.3% |
| 1972 | +13.4% |
| 1976 | +11.9% |
| 1980 | +3.9% |
| 1984 | +3.0% |
| 1988 | +15.1% |
| 1992 | +25.2% |
| 1996 | +24.5% |
| 2000 | +17.4% |
| 2004 | +20.6% |
| 2008 | +36.2% |
| 2012 | +33.9% |
| 2016 | +41.4% |
| 2020 | +41.4% |
| 2024 | +36.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 6.2 points more Republican.
115,633 registered voters · 2024 · down from 118,356 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−657 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −3,487 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $69,629 in average income, against $105,889 for residents who stayed — 34% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+21.0 on average — 15 points more Republican-leaning than Yolo County, CA itself (D+36.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sacramento County, CA1,751D+19.7
- Solano County, CA461D+23.0
- Los Angeles County, CA316D+32.9
- Alameda County, CA243D+53.6
- Santa Clara County, CA191D+40.0
- Placer County, CA165R+8.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sacramento County, CA2,136
- Solano County, CA422
- Los Angeles County, CA274
- Placer County, CA269
- Alameda County, CA242
- Santa Clara County, CA237
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −1,150 |
| 2012 | +687 |
| 2013 | −560 |
| 2014 | −325 |
| 2015 | +1,054 |
| 2016 | +1,106 |
| 2017 | +748 |
| 2018 | −70 |
| 2019 | −1,312 |
| 2021 | −4,817 |
| 2022 | +6,476 |
| 2023 | −3,438 |
| 2024 | −1,229 |
| 2025 | −657 |
Home to the University of California, Davis, Yolo County combines a large student and academic population with Sacramento-adjacent suburbs, producing presidential margins that have exceeded D+30 in every cycle since 2008.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 56.1 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 30.7 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 36.2 points.
A population of 220,564, a 42% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $91,752 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Contra Costa County and Solano County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Yolo County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06113/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.