- Lead
- 67,559
- Total
- 310,498
- vs nation
- R+20.3
- Turnout
- 68.5%
Volusia County, FL
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 68.5% of 460,130 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 43,246
- Total
- 307,439
- vs nation
- R+18.5
- Turnout
- 71.0%
- Lead
- 33,916
- Total
- 260,869
- vs nation
- R+15.1
- Turnout
- 65.7%
- Lead
- 2,742
- Total
- 234,536
- vs nation
- R+5.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 13,857
- Total
- 243,824
- vs nation
- R+1.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,595
- Total
- 228,939
- vs nation
- D+4.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 14,945
- Total
- 183,674
- vs nation
- D+7.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 15,828
- Total
- 160,158
- vs nation
- D+1.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+21.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 579,6222024 5-year
- Population density
- 526 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 1,101 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $70,0442024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 67.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 10.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 16.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+85.1 in 1892MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+41.6 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Palm Beach County, FL · twin score 91.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 68.5%315,395 participants ÷ 460,130 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.1 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -3.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 48.5%–53.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 315,395 | 460,130 ± 2,372 | 68.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 226,962 | 445,848 ± 2,264 | 50.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 309,403 | 435,968 ± 2,157 | 71.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 231,004 | 417,870 ± 1,801 | 55.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 265,202 | 403,923 ± 1,609 | 65.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 234,536 | 387,096 | 60.6% | Derived | — | |
| 243,824 | 380,116 | 64.1% | Derived | — | |
| 228,939 | 373,136 extrapolated | 61.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 142 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
142 precincts · 311,551 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -311311 | 2,482 | 4,793 | 108 | 7,383 | 33.6% | 64.9% | R+31.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -216216 | 2,862 | 3,604 | 61 | 6,527 | 43.8% | 55.2% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -503503 | 2,325 | 3,775 | 68 | 6,168 | 37.7% | 61.2% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -601601 | 2,158 | 3,795 | 75 | 6,028 | 35.8% | 63.0% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -401401 | 2,500 | 2,883 | 69 | 5,452 | 45.9% | 52.9% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -412412 | 2,032 | 2,794 | 75 | 4,901 | 41.5% | 57.0% | R+15.5 |
| Precinct -710710 | 1,749 | 2,916 | 47 | 4,712 | 37.1% | 61.9% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -411411 | 1,977 | 2,624 | 70 | 4,671 | 42.3% | 56.2% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -403403 | 2,142 | 2,414 | 50 | 4,606 | 46.5% | 52.4% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -408408 | 2,110 | 2,407 | 49 | 4,566 | 46.2% | 52.7% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct -211211 | 2,184 | 2,218 | 58 | 4,460 | 49.0% | 49.7% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -714714 | 1,586 | 2,799 | 45 | 4,430 | 35.8% | 63.2% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -512512 | 1,789 | 2,551 | 52 | 4,392 | 40.7% | 58.1% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct -716716 | 1,397 | 2,889 | 55 | 4,341 | 32.2% | 66.6% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -701701 | 1,636 | 2,555 | 51 | 4,242 | 38.6% | 60.2% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -209209 | 2,009 | 2,171 | 58 | 4,238 | 47.4% | 51.2% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -205205 | 1,393 | 2,771 | 57 | 4,221 | 33.0% | 65.6% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -307307 | 1,347 | 2,705 | 74 | 4,126 | 32.6% | 65.6% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -514514 | 1,472 | 2,524 | 60 | 4,056 | 36.3% | 62.2% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -804804 | 1,250 | 2,683 | 59 | 3,992 | 31.3% | 67.2% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -904904 | 1,238 | 2,659 | 45 | 3,942 | 31.4% | 67.5% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -711711 | 1,437 | 2,312 | 44 | 3,793 | 37.9% | 61.0% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -309309 | 1,266 | 2,443 | 44 | 3,753 | 33.7% | 65.1% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -807807 | 1,465 | 2,241 | 42 | 3,748 | 39.1% | 59.8% | R+20.7 |
| Precinct -615615 | 1,761 | 1,935 | 46 | 3,742 | 47.1% | 51.7% | R+4.6 |
| Precinct -708708 | 1,212 | 2,471 | 30 | 3,713 | 32.6% | 66.5% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -902902 | 1,174 | 2,485 | 43 | 3,702 | 31.7% | 67.1% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -903903 | 1,155 | 2,433 | 43 | 3,631 | 31.8% | 67.0% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -703703 | 1,220 | 2,291 | 55 | 3,566 | 34.2% | 64.2% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -413413 | 1,415 | 2,046 | 48 | 3,509 | 40.3% | 58.3% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -718718 | 1,197 | 2,250 | 45 | 3,492 | 34.3% | 64.4% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -104104 | 1,046 | 2,404 | 30 | 3,480 | 30.1% | 69.1% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct -208208 | 1,432 | 2,008 | 36 | 3,476 | 41.2% | 57.8% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -517517 | 1,271 | 2,135 | 39 | 3,445 | 36.9% | 62.0% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -210210 | 1,608 | 1,724 | 63 | 3,395 | 47.4% | 50.8% | R+3.4 |
| Precinct -501501 | 1,106 | 2,187 | 52 | 3,345 | 33.1% | 65.4% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -720720 | 821 | 2,459 | 39 | 3,319 | 24.7% | 74.1% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -802802 | 1,149 | 2,126 | 39 | 3,314 | 34.7% | 64.2% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -516516 | 1,266 | 2,008 | 26 | 3,300 | 38.4% | 60.8% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -404404 | 1,535 | 1,704 | 42 | 3,281 | 46.8% | 51.9% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -406406 | 1,504 | 1,703 | 41 | 3,248 | 46.3% | 52.4% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -602602 | 1,307 | 1,749 | 32 | 3,088 | 42.3% | 56.6% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -901901 | 999 | 2,012 | 37 | 3,048 | 32.8% | 66.0% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -506506 | 1,164 | 1,793 | 46 | 3,003 | 38.8% | 59.7% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -803803 | 1,044 | 1,905 | 24 | 2,973 | 35.1% | 64.1% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct -409409 | 1,376 | 1,549 | 39 | 2,964 | 46.4% | 52.3% | R+5.8 |
| Precinct -515515 | 1,128 | 1,772 | 35 | 2,935 | 38.4% | 60.4% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -707707 | 1,077 | 1,814 | 27 | 2,918 | 36.9% | 62.2% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -706706 | 890 | 1,886 | 51 | 2,827 | 31.5% | 66.7% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -418418 | 496 | 2,243 | 25 | 2,764 | 17.9% | 81.2% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -410410 | 1,235 | 1,422 | 27 | 2,684 | 46.0% | 53.0% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -405405 | 1,070 | 1,215 | 43 | 2,328 | 46.0% | 52.2% | R+6.2 |
| Precinct -507507 | 813 | 1,470 | 14 | 2,297 | 35.4% | 64.0% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -610610 | 832 | 1,392 | 46 | 2,270 | 36.7% | 61.3% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -207207 | 866 | 1,373 | 27 | 2,266 | 38.2% | 60.6% | R+22.4 |
| Precinct -603603 | 1,566 | 657 | 26 | 2,249 | 69.6% | 29.2% | D+40.4 |
| Precinct -905905 | 538 | 1,669 | 23 | 2,230 | 24.1% | 74.8% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -806806 | 826 | 1,382 | 14 | 2,222 | 37.2% | 62.2% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -702702 | 785 | 1,373 | 29 | 2,187 | 35.9% | 62.8% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -204204 | 646 | 1,485 | 40 | 2,171 | 29.8% | 68.4% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -801801 | 681 | 1,444 | 24 | 2,149 | 31.7% | 67.2% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -811811 | 654 | 1,460 | 27 | 2,141 | 30.5% | 68.2% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -717717 | 766 | 1,342 | 30 | 2,138 | 35.8% | 62.8% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -502502 | 706 | 1,403 | 15 | 2,124 | 33.2% | 66.1% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -212212 | 1,314 | 756 | 24 | 2,094 | 62.8% | 36.1% | D+26.6 |
| Precinct -511511 | 783 | 1,263 | 28 | 2,074 | 37.8% | 60.9% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -715715 | 771 | 1,248 | 31 | 2,050 | 37.6% | 60.9% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -206206 | 710 | 1,264 | 21 | 1,995 | 35.6% | 63.4% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -805805 | 924 | 990 | 26 | 1,940 | 47.6% | 51.0% | R+3.4 |
| Precinct -620620 | 788 | 1,133 | 18 | 1,939 | 40.6% | 58.4% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -509509 | 591 | 1,311 | 18 | 1,920 | 30.8% | 68.3% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -809809 | 722 | 1,164 | 33 | 1,919 | 37.6% | 60.7% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -220220 | 569 | 1,311 | 23 | 1,903 | 29.9% | 68.9% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct -313313 | 679 | 1,201 | 21 | 1,901 | 35.7% | 63.2% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -201201 | 560 | 1,269 | 20 | 1,849 | 30.3% | 68.6% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -513513 | 667 | 1,154 | 21 | 1,842 | 36.2% | 62.6% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -303303 | 721 | 875 | 24 | 1,620 | 44.5% | 54.0% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -712712 | 639 | 960 | 18 | 1,617 | 39.5% | 59.4% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -808808 | 653 | 919 | 21 | 1,593 | 41.0% | 57.7% | R+16.7 |
| Precinct -508508 | 574 | 1,000 | 13 | 1,587 | 36.2% | 63.0% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -305305 | 643 | 909 | 12 | 1,564 | 41.1% | 58.1% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -616616 | 578 | 967 | 16 | 1,561 | 37.0% | 61.9% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -625625 | 694 | 841 | 21 | 1,556 | 44.6% | 54.0% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -613613 | 607 | 917 | 25 | 1,549 | 39.2% | 59.2% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -612612 | 788 | 698 | 30 | 1,516 | 52.0% | 46.0% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -415415 | 429 | 1,052 | 23 | 1,504 | 28.5% | 69.9% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -906906 | 422 | 996 | 9 | 1,427 | 29.6% | 69.8% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -304304 | 483 | 897 | 19 | 1,399 | 34.5% | 64.1% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -521521 | 545 | 836 | 10 | 1,391 | 39.2% | 60.1% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -810810 | 400 | 945 | 14 | 1,359 | 29.4% | 69.5% | R+40.1 |
| Precinct -606606 | 1,104 | 228 | 17 | 1,349 | 81.8% | 16.9% | D+64.9 |
| Precinct -214214 | 390 | 934 | 12 | 1,336 | 29.2% | 69.9% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -518518 | 552 | 760 | 23 | 1,335 | 41.3% | 56.9% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -713713 | 524 | 787 | 13 | 1,324 | 39.6% | 59.4% | R+19.9 |
| Precinct -302302 | 537 | 765 | 20 | 1,322 | 40.6% | 57.9% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -402402 | 549 | 729 | 18 | 1,296 | 42.4% | 56.3% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -520520 | 559 | 696 | 22 | 1,277 | 43.8% | 54.5% | R+10.7 |
| Precinct -301301 | 627 | 629 | 19 | 1,275 | 49.2% | 49.3% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -607607 | 1,038 | 209 | 22 | 1,269 | 81.8% | 16.5% | D+65.3 |
| Precinct -519519 | 500 | 744 | 15 | 1,259 | 39.7% | 59.1% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -709709 | 445 | 802 | 12 | 1,259 | 35.3% | 63.7% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -407407 | 572 | 658 | 22 | 1,252 | 45.7% | 52.6% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -624624 | 938 | 296 | 15 | 1,249 | 75.1% | 23.7% | D+51.4 |
| Precinct -611611 | 467 | 655 | 25 | 1,147 | 40.7% | 57.1% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -504504 | 284 | 836 | 13 | 1,133 | 25.1% | 73.8% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -103103 | 200 | 832 | 3 | 1,035 | 19.3% | 80.4% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -306306 | 394 | 583 | 12 | 989 | 39.8% | 58.9% | R+19.1 |
| Precinct -617617 | 355 | 611 | 11 | 977 | 36.3% | 62.5% | R+26.2 |
| Precinct -101101 | 173 | 714 | 3 | 890 | 19.4% | 80.2% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -622622 | 391 | 465 | 9 | 865 | 45.2% | 53.8% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -614614 | 765 | 85 | 7 | 857 | 89.3% | 9.9% | D+79.3 |
| Precinct -813813 | 135 | 705 | 7 | 847 | 15.9% | 83.2% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -604604 | 540 | 276 | 7 | 823 | 65.6% | 33.5% | D+32.1 |
| Precinct -505505 | 162 | 574 | 7 | 743 | 21.8% | 77.3% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -310310 | 204 | 518 | 8 | 730 | 27.9% | 71.0% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -414414 | 246 | 424 | 6 | 676 | 36.4% | 62.7% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -621621 | 346 | 297 | 9 | 652 | 53.1% | 45.6% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -705705 | 203 | 411 | 11 | 625 | 32.5% | 65.8% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -314314 | 284 | 317 | 10 | 611 | 46.5% | 51.9% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -102102 | 140 | 450 | 6 | 596 | 23.5% | 75.5% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -605605 | 444 | 124 | 8 | 576 | 77.1% | 21.5% | D+55.6 |
| Precinct -704704 | 186 | 324 | 6 | 516 | 36.0% | 62.8% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -217217 | 152 | 343 | 4 | 499 | 30.5% | 68.7% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -308308 | 140 | 346 | 7 | 493 | 28.4% | 70.2% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -203203 | 115 | 347 | 6 | 468 | 24.6% | 74.1% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -105105 | 104 | 348 | 7 | 459 | 22.7% | 75.8% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -312312 | 138 | 273 | 3 | 414 | 33.3% | 65.9% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -416416 | 81 | 303 | 3 | 387 | 20.9% | 78.3% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -619619 | 111 | 258 | 1 | 370 | 30.0% | 69.7% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -609609 | 163 | 135 | 4 | 302 | 54.0% | 44.7% | D+9.3 |
| Precinct -417417 | 64 | 196 | 3 | 263 | 24.3% | 74.5% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -202202 | 51 | 174 | 0 | 225 | 22.7% | 77.3% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -219219 | 26 | 153 | 3 | 182 | 14.3% | 84.1% | R+69.8 |
| Precinct -812812 | 34 | 144 | 0 | 178 | 19.1% | 80.9% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct -510510 | 42 | 135 | 0 | 177 | 23.7% | 76.3% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -215215 | 42 | 104 | 1 | 147 | 28.6% | 70.7% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -623623 | 78 | 67 | 1 | 146 | 53.4% | 45.9% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -213213 | 37 | 104 | 2 | 143 | 25.9% | 72.7% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -814814 | 17 | 92 | 2 | 111 | 15.3% | 82.9% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -618618 | 9 | 58 | 2 | 69 | 13.0% | 84.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -218218 | 22 | 35 | 1 | 58 | 37.9% | 60.3% | R+22.4 |
| Precinct -719719 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 19 | 26.3% | 73.7% | R+47.4 |
presidential history
Party record book
Volusia County, FL · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 (partial returns from 1884) · 35 presidential cycles · 35 with a vote-share denominator · 34 with a national benchmark
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Grover Cleveland1892
85.1%
785 votes · D+85.1
Runner-up · Woodrow Wilson, 1912 · 67.5%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
70.6%
52,656 votes · R+41.6
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · 67.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
130,575votes
42.5% of the vote · R+14.1
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 127,795 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
187,691votes
60.4% of the vote · R+21.8
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 173,821 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Grover Cleveland1892
+83.5pts D vs U.S.
Place D+85.1 · U.S. D+1.7
Runner-up · Alton B. Parker, 1904 · +56.9 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2024
+20.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+21.8 · U.S. R+1.5
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · +19.3 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Volusia County, FL. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 2 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 7.1 points more Republican than the rolls.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 365,757 | 126,103 | 129,967 | 107,773 | 1,914 |
| 2018 | 384,885 | 131,369 | 137,416 | 112,744 | 3,356 |
| 2019 | 365,338 | 122,687 | 133,505 | 104,796 | 4,350 |
| 2020 | 404,466 | 132,750 | 152,559 | 111,974 | 7,183 |
| 2021 | 396,978 | 126,252 | 150,865 | 111,860 | 8,001 |
| 2023 | 403,348 | 117,119 | 160,038 | 115,659 | 10,532 |
| 2024 | 395,158 | 109,267 | 167,197 | 104,818 | 13,876 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+7,034 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +125,378 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $72,978 in average income, against $75,413 for residents who stayed — 3% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+0.4 on average — 21 points more Democratic-leaning than Volusia County, FL itself (R+21.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Seminole County, FL2,811R+3.6
- Orange County, FL2,023D+13.6
- Flagler County, FL828R+28.2
- Lake County, FL476R+24.7
- Broward County, FL438D+17.0
- Brevard County, FL404R+20.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Seminole County, FL1,690
- Orange County, FL1,178
- Flagler County, FL956
- Lake County, FL489
- Brevard County, FL400
- Duval County, FL376
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +758 |
| 2012 | +2,782 |
| 2013 | +4,565 |
| 2014 | +6,793 |
| 2015 | +10,649 |
| 2016 | +12,112 |
| 2017 | +10,167 |
| 2018 | +9,438 |
| 2019 | +8,975 |
| 2021 | +14,935 |
| 2022 | +15,506 |
| 2023 | +11,904 |
| 2024 | +9,760 |
| 2025 | +7,034 |
Once a competitive swing county, Volusia has moved decisively toward Republican presidential margins, with its 2024 gap of nearly 22 points reflecting a broader realignment among its mix of retirees, working-class whites, and coastal communities.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 85.1 points in 1892 and a Republican high of 41.6 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 7.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 21.8 points.
A population of 579,622, a 68% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,044 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Palm Beach County and Pinellas County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Volusia County, Florida. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/12127/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.