- Lead
- 5,214
- Total
- 12,564
- vs nation
- R+40.0
- Turnout
- 56.7%
Logan County, IL
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 56.7% of 22,169 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,296
- Total
- 13,327
- vs nation
- R+44.2
- Turnout
- 59.4%
- Lead
- 4,868
- Total
- 12,401
- vs nation
- R+41.3
- Turnout
- 51.7%
- Lead
- 3,866
- Total
- 12,088
- vs nation
- R+35.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,179
- Total
- 12,896
- vs nation
- R+24.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,839
- Total
- 13,467
- vs nation
- R+33.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,541
- Total
- 13,065
- vs nation
- R+27.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,900
- Total
- 12,345
- vs nation
- R+23.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+41.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 27,7132024 5-year
- Population density
- 45 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 618 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $66,3582024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 85.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 5.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+27.3 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+41.9 in 1984MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Montgomery County, IN · twin score 87.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 56.7%12,564 participants ÷ 22,169 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.9 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -7.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 41.7%–45.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12,564 | 22,169 ± 295 | 56.7% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2022Mid | 9,963 | 22,411 ± 326 | 44.5% | Audited | C/A |
| 13,690 | 23,048 ± 280 | 59.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 10,409 | 23,327 ± 288 | 44.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 12,401 | 23,971 ± 166 | 51.7% | Audited | C/A | |
| 12,088 | 24,088 | 50.2% | Derived | — | |
| 12,896 | 23,820 | 54.1% | Derived | — | |
| 13,467 | 23,552 extrapolated | 57.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 156/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 148/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Logan County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Logan County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 73 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
73 precincts · 12,723 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Atlanta 1Atlanta 1 | 245 | 701 | 24 | 970 | 25.3% | 72.3% | R+47.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -East Lincoln 5East Lincoln 5 | 233 | 490 | 27 | 750 | 31.1% | 65.3% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -East Lincoln 2East Lincoln 2 | 193 | 496 | 25 | 714 | 27.0% | 69.5% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -Mt. Pulaski 1Mt. Pulaski 1 | 183 | 509 | 22 | 714 | 25.6% | 71.3% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 3West Lincoln 3 | 234 | 373 | 27 | 634 | 36.9% | 58.8% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 6West Lincoln 6 | 199 | 392 | 28 | 619 | 32.1% | 63.3% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -East Lincoln 1East Lincoln 1 | 194 | 364 | 23 | 581 | 33.4% | 62.7% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -East Lincoln 3East Lincoln 3 | 184 | 369 | 22 | 575 | 32.0% | 64.2% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -East Lincoln 6East Lincoln 6 | 157 | 381 | 15 | 553 | 28.4% | 68.9% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -East Lincoln 4East Lincoln 4 | 177 | 308 | 18 | 503 | 35.2% | 61.2% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 1West Lincoln 1 | 163 | 317 | 19 | 499 | 32.7% | 63.5% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 4West Lincoln 4 | 131 | 313 | 18 | 462 | 28.4% | 67.7% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -Mt. Pulaski 2Mt. Pulaski 2 | 114 | 308 | 21 | 443 | 25.7% | 69.5% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 7West Lincoln 7 | 127 | 293 | 10 | 430 | 29.5% | 68.1% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 5West Lincoln 5 | 129 | 261 | 13 | 403 | 32.0% | 64.8% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -ChesterChester | 100 | 288 | 12 | 400 | 25.0% | 72.0% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -Lake Fork/ LaennaLake Fork/ Laenna | 96 | 278 | 10 | 384 | 25.0% | 72.4% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -CorwinCorwin | 74 | 243 | 13 | 330 | 22.4% | 73.6% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -Orvil 1Orvil 1 | 71 | 230 | 8 | 309 | 23.0% | 74.4% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -EminenceEminence | 66 | 228 | 8 | 302 | 21.9% | 75.5% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -ElkhartElkhart | 66 | 223 | 12 | 301 | 21.9% | 74.1% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -BroadwellBroadwell | 62 | 224 | 6 | 292 | 21.2% | 76.7% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -West Lincoln 2West Lincoln 2 | 90 | 169 | 8 | 267 | 33.7% | 63.3% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -SheridanSheridan | 65 | 180 | 7 | 252 | 25.8% | 71.4% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct -AetnaAetna | 37 | 204 | 7 | 248 | 14.9% | 82.3% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -Prairie CreekPrairie Creek | 45 | 166 | 9 | 220 | 20.5% | 75.5% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -Orvil 2Orvil 2 | 41 | 159 | 7 | 207 | 19.8% | 76.8% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -HurlbutHurlbut | 34 | 154 | 4 | 192 | 17.7% | 80.2% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -OranOran | 33 | 136 | 0 | 169 | 19.5% | 80.5% | R+60.9 |
| AETNA Voting District17_1710700301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ATLANTA 1 Voting District17_1710700501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ATLANTA 2 Voting District17_1710700502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ATLANTA 3 Voting District17_1710700503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BROADWELL Voting District17_1710701101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHESTER Voting District17_1710700701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CORWIN Voting District17_1710701501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 1 Voting District17_1710700801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 10 Voting District17_1710700810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 11 Voting District17_1710700811 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 12 Voting District17_1710700812 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 2 Voting District17_1710700802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 3 Voting District17_1710700803 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 4 Voting District17_1710700804 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 5 Voting District17_1710700805 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 6 Voting District17_1710700806 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 7 Voting District17_1710700807 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 8 Voting District17_1710700808 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EAST LINCOLN 9 Voting District17_1710700809 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 1 Voting District17_1710701001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELKHART 2 Voting District17_1710701002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| EMINENCE Voting District17_1710700901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HURLBUT Voting District17_1710701401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAENNA Voting District17_1710700201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAKE FORK Voting District17_1710700101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT PULASKI 1 Voting District17_1710700601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT PULASKI 2 Voting District17_1710700602 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT PULASKI 3 Voting District17_1710700603 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT PULASKI 4 Voting District17_1710700604 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ORAN Voting District17_1710700401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ORVIL 1 Voting District17_1710701301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ORVIL 2 Voting District17_1710701302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIE CREEK Voting District17_1710701701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHERIDAN Voting District17_1710701601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 1 Voting District17_1710701201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 10 Voting District17_1710701210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 2 Voting District17_1710701202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 3 Voting District17_1710701203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 4 Voting District17_1710701204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 5 Voting District17_1710701205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 6 Voting District17_1710701206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 7 Voting District17_1710701207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 8 Voting District17_1710701208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WEST LINCOLN 9 Voting District17_1710701209 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Logan County, IL · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
57.5%
8,119 votes · D+16.1
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 53.1%
Republican
Ronald Reagan1984
70.7%
9,932 votes · R+41.9
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 69.9%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
8,119votes
57.5% of the vote · D+16.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 7,886 votes
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
10,277votes
69.9% of the vote · R+40.0
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 9,932 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Alton B. Parker1904
+10.9pts D vs U.S.
Place R+8.8 · U.S. R+19.7
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +10.9 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+44.2pts R vs U.S.
Place R+39.7 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +41.3 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Logan County, IL. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%10,281 | 10,281 |
| 2020 | R | 23.1%3,037 | 76.9%10,124 | 13,161 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 19,403 |
| 2018 | 18,765 |
| 2020 | 19,579 |
| 2022 | 19,048 |
| 2024 | 10,773 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+47 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,618 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,534 in average income, against $74,913 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+12.1 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than Logan County, IL itself (R+41.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- McLean County, IL107D+4.9
- Sangamon County, IL100R+4.9
- Tazewell County, IL42R+26.6
- Macon County, IL39R+18.9
- Mason County, IL30R+42.2
- De Witt County, IL23R+44.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sangamon County, IL91
- McLean County, IL76
- Tazewell County, IL51
- Macon County, IL37
- Mason County, IL26
- De Witt County, IL23
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −20 |
| 2012 | +100 |
| 2013 | −517 |
| 2014 | −163 |
| 2015 | −355 |
| 2016 | −87 |
| 2017 | −99 |
| 2018 | −73 |
| 2019 | −258 |
| 2021 | −448 |
| 2022 | +75 |
| 2023 | −69 |
| 2024 | +249 |
| 2025 | +47 |
Logan County's small-city and rural mix — anchored by Lincoln, the county seat — has shifted steadily toward lopsided Republican margins over the past two decades, mirroring a broader realignment across downstate Illinois farming communities.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.3 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 41.9 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 41.5 points.
A population of 27,713, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,358 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Montgomery County and Wabash County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Logan County, Illinois. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/17107/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.