Morgan County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
96 precincts · 35,352 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -GREEN 02GREEN 02 | 189 | 870 | 12 | 1,071 | 17.6% | 81.2% | R+63.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 10WASHINGTON 10 | 279 | 767 | 11 | 1,057 | 26.4% | 72.6% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -MONROE 01MONROE 01 | 221 | 786 | 17 | 1,024 | 21.6% | 76.8% | R+55.2 |
| Precinct -GREEN 01GREEN 01 | 201 | 806 | 12 | 1,019 | 19.7% | 79.1% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -MADISON 02MADISON 02 | 210 | 796 | 13 | 1,019 | 20.6% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -MONROE 03MONROE 03 | 230 | 740 | 14 | 984 | 23.4% | 75.2% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 09WASHINGTON 09 | 219 | 721 | 24 | 964 | 22.7% | 74.8% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -MADISON 05MADISON 05 | 313 | 627 | 18 | 958 | 32.7% | 65.4% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 07WASHINGTON 07 | 208 | 728 | 16 | 952 | 21.8% | 76.5% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -MADISON 01MADISON 01 | 194 | 745 | 12 | 951 | 20.4% | 78.3% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -MADISON 04MADISON 04 | 267 | 651 | 28 | 946 | 28.2% | 68.8% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 02JEFFERSON 02 | 221 | 689 | 19 | 929 | 23.8% | 74.2% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -ASHLAND 01ASHLAND 01 | 124 | 766 | 17 | 907 | 13.7% | 84.5% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSON 01JEFFERSON 01 | 151 | 722 | 19 | 892 | 16.9% | 80.9% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 05WASHINGTON 05 | 185 | 681 | 20 | 886 | 20.9% | 76.9% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -BROWN 04BROWN 04 | 233 | 636 | 11 | 880 | 26.5% | 72.3% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -MADISON 03MADISON 03 | 191 | 666 | 13 | 870 | 22.0% | 76.6% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 06WASHINGTON 06 | 226 | 604 | 32 | 862 | 26.2% | 70.1% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -GREGG 02GREGG 02 | 171 | 661 | 17 | 849 | 20.1% | 77.9% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 01JACKSON 01 | 197 | 635 | 12 | 844 | 23.3% | 75.2% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -HARRISON 01HARRISON 01 | 149 | 683 | 9 | 841 | 17.7% | 81.2% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -BROWN 05BROWN 05 | 230 | 587 | 20 | 837 | 27.5% | 70.1% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -BROWN 03BROWN 03 | 223 | 588 | 15 | 826 | 27.0% | 71.2% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -BROWN 02BROWN 02 | 201 | 609 | 13 | 823 | 24.4% | 74.0% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -MADISON 06MADISON 06 | 160 | 630 | 21 | 811 | 19.7% | 77.7% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 02JACKSON 02 | 143 | 635 | 9 | 787 | 18.2% | 80.7% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -MONROE 02MONROE 02 | 203 | 537 | 17 | 757 | 26.8% | 70.9% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 02WASHINGTON 02 | 153 | 553 | 15 | 721 | 21.2% | 76.7% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -GREGG 01GREGG 01 | 128 | 582 | 8 | 718 | 17.8% | 81.1% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -CLAY 03CLAY 03 | 156 | 547 | 14 | 717 | 21.8% | 76.3% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -CLAY 02CLAY 02 | 146 | 553 | 16 | 715 | 20.4% | 77.3% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -BROWN 01BROWN 01 | 182 | 508 | 14 | 704 | 25.9% | 72.2% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 01WASHINGTON 01 | 133 | 547 | 9 | 689 | 19.3% | 79.4% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -CLAY 01CLAY 01 | 156 | 508 | 12 | 676 | 23.1% | 75.1% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 03WASHINGTON 03 | 102 | 548 | 9 | 659 | 15.5% | 83.2% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 04WASHINGTON 04 | 174 | 465 | 15 | 654 | 26.6% | 71.1% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -BROWN 07BROWN 07 | 154 | 480 | 9 | 643 | 24.0% | 74.7% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -BROWN 08BROWN 08 | 131 | 477 | 11 | 619 | 21.2% | 77.1% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -RAY 02RAY 02 | 89 | 452 | 6 | 547 | 16.3% | 82.6% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -ADAMS 01ADAMS 01 | 94 | 438 | 12 | 544 | 17.3% | 80.5% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -WASHINGTON 08WASHINGTON 08 | 133 | 392 | 11 | 536 | 24.8% | 73.1% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -BROWN 06BROWN 06 | 99 | 376 | 6 | 481 | 20.6% | 78.2% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -BAKER 01BAKER 01 | 56 | 340 | 7 | 403 | 13.9% | 84.4% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -JACKSON 03JACKSON 03 | 58 | 322 | 3 | 383 | 15.1% | 84.1% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -RAY 01RAY 01 | 34 | 166 | 2 | 202 | 16.8% | 82.2% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -BROWN 09BROWN 09 | 48 | 145 | 2 | 195 | 24.6% | 74.4% | R+49.7 |
| ADAMS18_1810900010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ASHLAND 0118_1810900020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ASHLAND 0218_1810900030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BAKER18_1810900040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 0118_1810900050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 0418_1810900080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 0618_1810900100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 0818_1810900120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 1018_1810900140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 11 NV18_1810900150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 218_1810900060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 318_1810900070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 518_1810900090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 718_1810900110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROWN 918_1810900130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLAY 118_1810900160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLAY 218_1810900170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREEN 0118_1810900180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREEN 0218_1810900190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREGG 118_1810900200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREGG 218_1810900210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HARRISON18_1810900220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JACKSON 0118_1810900230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JACKSON 0218_1810900240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JEFFERSON 118_1810900250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JEFFERSON 218_1810900260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON 0118_1810900270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON 0218_1810900280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON 0318_1810900290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON 0418_1810900300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON 0618_1810900315 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MADISON 518_1810900310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 0118_1810900320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 218_1810900330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 318_1810900340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RAY 118_1810900350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RAY 218_1810900360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 0318_1810900390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 0418_1810900400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 118_1810900370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 1018_1810900480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 1118_1810900490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 1218_1810900500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 1318_1810900510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 218_1810900380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 518_1810900410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 618_1810900420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 718_1810900450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 818_1810900460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON 918_1810900470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −7.8% |
| 1896 | −5.3% |
| 1900 | −4.8% |
| 1904 | −12.0% |
| 1908 | −4.7% |
| 1912 | +22.5% |
| 1916 | −4.3% |
| 1920 | −13.7% |
| 1924 | −13.4% |
| 1928 | −16.2% |
| 1932 | +8.8% |
| 1936 | −3.0% |
| 1940 | −14.9% |
| 1944 | −18.9% |
| 1948 | −12.1% |
| 1952 | −26.5% |
| 1956 | −27.3% |
| 1960 | −27.2% |
| 1964 | −8.7% |
| 1968 | −30.4% |
| 1972 | −55.7% |
| 1976 | −20.8% |
| 1980 | −40.5% |
| 1984 | −52.3% |
| 1988 | −45.1% |
| 1992 | −29.6% |
| 1996 | −32.7% |
| 2000 | −41.1% |
| 2004 | −48.2% |
| 2008 | −27.1% |
| 2012 | −41.0% |
| 2016 | −56.1% |
| 2020 | −54.6% |
| 2024 | −54.3% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 51,790 |
| 2018 | 47,932 |
| 2020 | 51,779 |
| 2022 | 52,503 |
| 2024 | 55,232 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+974 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,562 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,880 in average income, against $79,815 for residents who stayed — 20% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+0.3 on average — 54 points more Democratic-leaning than Morgan County, IN itself (R+54.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marion County, IN829D+27.6
- Hendricks County, IN397R+21.5
- Johnson County, IN284R+34.3
- Monroe County, IN105D+27.4
- Owen County, IN45R+50.7
- Putnam County, IN39R+52.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN521
- Hendricks County, IN297
- Johnson County, IN241
- Monroe County, IN87
- Owen County, IN67
- Putnam County, IN56
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −90 |
| 2012 | −189 |
| 2013 | +90 |
| 2014 | +67 |
| 2015 | −67 |
| 2016 | −86 |
| 2017 | +41 |
| 2018 | +178 |
| 2019 | +208 |
| 2021 | +509 |
| 2022 | +188 |
| 2023 | +946 |
| 2024 | +793 |
| 2025 | +974 |
Morgan County, directly south of Indianapolis, has shifted steadily toward lopsided Republican margins over the past two decades, with its 2024 presidential result of R+54.3 placing it among the state's most one-sided exurban counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 22.5 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 56.1 points in 2016. The 2024 margin was 54.3 points.
A population of 72,659, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $79,429 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Wells County and Wabash County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Morgan County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18109/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.