Iberia Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
55 precincts · 29,331 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -0009-20009-2 | 197 | 1,223 | 8 | 1,428 | 13.8% | 85.6% | R+71.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 340 | 870 | 22 | 1,232 | 27.6% | 70.6% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -0014-30014-3 | 227 | 954 | 8 | 1,189 | 19.1% | 80.2% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -0014-10014-1 | 150 | 967 | 8 | 1,125 | 13.3% | 86.0% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -0013-30013-3 | 120 | 981 | 6 | 1,107 | 10.8% | 88.6% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -0008-30008-3 | 181 | 776 | 8 | 965 | 18.8% | 80.4% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -0012-30012-3 | 805 | 125 | 14 | 944 | 85.3% | 13.2% | D+72.0 |
| Precinct -0008-20008-2 | 195 | 712 | 5 | 912 | 21.4% | 78.1% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -0010-40010-4 | 156 | 690 | 5 | 851 | 18.3% | 81.1% | R+62.7 |
| Precinct -11-511-5 | 258 | 528 | 13 | 799 | 32.3% | 66.1% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -4-24-2 | 614 | 144 | 14 | 772 | 79.5% | 18.7% | D+60.9 |
| Precinct -0007-20007-2 | 159 | 595 | 8 | 762 | 20.9% | 78.1% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -0007-40007-4 | 165 | 554 | 11 | 730 | 22.6% | 75.9% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -0010-30010-3 | 102 | 610 | 0 | 712 | 14.3% | 85.7% | R+71.3 |
| Precinct -0013-10013-1 | 89 | 614 | 6 | 709 | 12.6% | 86.6% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -0010-10010-1 | 383 | 298 | 8 | 689 | 55.6% | 43.3% | D+12.3 |
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 467 | 181 | 19 | 667 | 70.0% | 27.1% | D+42.9 |
| Precinct -5-35-3 | 310 | 341 | 13 | 664 | 46.7% | 51.4% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -0009-40009-4 | 98 | 560 | 5 | 663 | 14.8% | 84.5% | R+69.7 |
| Precinct -0009-10009-1 | 220 | 435 | 5 | 660 | 33.3% | 65.9% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -6-26-2 | 125 | 525 | 5 | 655 | 19.1% | 80.2% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -0007-10007-1 | 143 | 456 | 13 | 612 | 23.4% | 74.5% | R+51.1 |
| Precinct -5-55-5 | 106 | 491 | 6 | 603 | 17.6% | 81.4% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -0001-30001-3 | 281 | 298 | 10 | 589 | 47.7% | 50.6% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -11-111-1 | 163 | 406 | 3 | 572 | 28.5% | 71.0% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -6-46-4 | 292 | 255 | 5 | 552 | 52.9% | 46.2% | D+6.7 |
| Precinct -5-25-2 | 77 | 452 | 2 | 531 | 14.5% | 85.1% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 481 | 33 | 13 | 527 | 91.3% | 6.3% | D+85.0 |
| Precinct -13-213-2 | 111 | 390 | 6 | 507 | 21.9% | 76.9% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -0006-10006-1 | 263 | 203 | 3 | 469 | 56.1% | 43.3% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -8-18-1 | 88 | 374 | 5 | 467 | 18.8% | 80.1% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -4-14-1 | 370 | 82 | 8 | 460 | 80.4% | 17.8% | D+62.6 |
| Precinct -0009-50009-5 | 93 | 322 | 2 | 417 | 22.3% | 77.2% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -11-311-3 | 75 | 287 | 2 | 364 | 20.6% | 78.8% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -11-411-4 | 98 | 236 | 13 | 347 | 28.2% | 68.0% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -0012-10012-1 | 231 | 97 | 3 | 331 | 69.8% | 29.3% | D+40.5 |
| Precinct -2-22-2 | 122 | 191 | 5 | 318 | 38.4% | 60.1% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -0010-20010-2 | 109 | 189 | 5 | 303 | 36.0% | 62.4% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -12-412-4 | 82 | 211 | 0 | 293 | 28.0% | 72.0% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -1-81-8 | 247 | 35 | 0 | 282 | 87.6% | 12.4% | D+75.2 |
| Precinct -14-414-4 | 14 | 259 | 0 | 273 | 5.1% | 94.9% | R+89.7 |
| Precinct -4-34-3 | 140 | 133 | 0 | 273 | 51.3% | 48.7% | D+2.6 |
| Precinct -0003-30003-3 | 66 | 193 | 3 | 262 | 25.2% | 73.7% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -12-212-2 | 172 | 76 | 5 | 253 | 68.0% | 30.0% | D+37.9 |
| Precinct -0002-30002-3 | 81 | 144 | 3 | 228 | 35.5% | 63.2% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -11-611-6 | 89 | 99 | 3 | 191 | 46.6% | 51.8% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -3-43-4 | 32 | 150 | 3 | 185 | 17.3% | 81.1% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -5-15-1 | 20 | 146 | 3 | 169 | 11.8% | 86.4% | R+74.6 |
| Precinct -13-413-4 | 11 | 148 | 0 | 159 | 6.9% | 93.1% | R+86.2 |
| Precinct -6-56-5 | 29 | 127 | 0 | 156 | 18.6% | 81.4% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -0007-50007-5 | 11 | 136 | 0 | 147 | 7.5% | 92.5% | R+85.0 |
| Precinct -13-513-5 | 27 | 101 | 3 | 131 | 20.6% | 77.1% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -3-53-5 | 11 | 53 | 0 | 64 | 17.2% | 82.8% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -14-514-5 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 55 | 7.3% | 92.7% | R+85.5 |
| Precinct -1-71-7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 66.7% | 33.3% | D+33.3 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +95.6% |
| 1896 | +40.9% |
| 1900 | +21.3% |
| 1904 | +55.0% |
| 1908 | +41.0% |
| 1912 | +34.3% |
| 1916 | +37.4% |
| 1920 | −48.9% |
| 1924 | +4.3% |
| 1928 | +72.2% |
| 1932 | +50.3% |
| 1936 | +35.5% |
| 1940 | +41.1% |
| 1944 | +52.5% |
| 1948 | −30.8% |
| 1952 | −16.8% |
| 1956 | −30.0% |
| 1960 | +36.7% |
| 1964 | −0.3% |
| 1968 | +0.3% |
| 1972 | −37.2% |
| 1976 | −2.0% |
| 1980 | −18.3% |
| 1984 | −26.5% |
| 1988 | −11.5% |
| 1992 | +3.7% |
| 1996 | +10.3% |
| 2000 | −18.2% |
| 2004 | −21.7% |
| 2008 | −23.0% |
| 2012 | −26.2% |
| 2016 | −31.4% |
| 2020 | −31.3% |
| 2024 | −34.1% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 26.3%5,163 | 72.0%14,131 | 19,632 |
| 2020 | R | 28.7%8,952 | 67.3%20,985 | 31,180 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 33 points more Democratic.
45,726 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−765 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −10,282 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $38,466 in average income, against $62,936 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+34.5 on average — about the same lean as Iberia Parish, LA (R+34.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lafayette Parish, LA349R+31.4
- St. Mary Parish, LA143R+31.9
- Vermilion Parish, LA131R+63.8
- St. Martin Parish, LA122R+40.7
- Harris County, TX49D+5.5
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA35D+11.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lafayette Parish, LA551
- Vermilion Parish, LA155
- St. Martin Parish, LA145
- St. Mary Parish, LA95
- Harris County, TX58
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA36
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −317 |
| 2012 | −101 |
| 2013 | −304 |
| 2014 | −533 |
| 2015 | −439 |
| 2016 | −1,187 |
| 2017 | −1,290 |
| 2018 | −1,275 |
| 2019 | −1,221 |
| 2021 | −747 |
| 2022 | −1,037 |
| 2023 | −771 |
| 2024 | −295 |
| 2025 | −765 |
Iberia Parish anchors Louisiana's Acadiana region, where a Cajun cultural identity and petroleum-industry employment have long reinforced a conservative tilt—the 2024 presidential margin of R+34 reflects a alignment that has deepened steadily over two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 95.6 points in 1892 and a Republican high of 48.9 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 34.1 points.
A population of 68,599, a 56% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $56,961 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of St. Martin Parish and St. Mary Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Iberia Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22045/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.