St. Landry Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
91 precincts · 37,044 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -000035000035 | 758 | 667 | 10 | 1,435 | 52.8% | 46.5% | D+6.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -000009000009 | 825 | 358 | 10 | 1,193 | 69.2% | 30.0% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -000039000039 | 108 | 906 | 10 | 1,024 | 10.5% | 88.5% | R+77.9 |
| Precinct -000018000018 | 488 | 447 | 10 | 945 | 51.6% | 47.3% | D+4.3 |
| Precinct -000033000033 | 340 | 591 | 6 | 937 | 36.3% | 63.1% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -000004000004 | 107 | 820 | 4 | 931 | 11.5% | 88.1% | R+76.6 |
| Precinct -000043000043 | 151 | 756 | 7 | 914 | 16.5% | 82.7% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -000041000041 | 129 | 762 | 3 | 894 | 14.4% | 85.2% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -000032000032 | 220 | 662 | 6 | 888 | 24.8% | 74.5% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -000015000015 | 311 | 553 | 14 | 878 | 35.4% | 63.0% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -000029000029 | 263 | 520 | 4 | 787 | 33.4% | 66.1% | R+32.7 |
| Precinct -30A30A | 184 | 548 | 10 | 742 | 24.8% | 73.9% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -000025000025 | 609 | 53 | 10 | 672 | 90.6% | 7.9% | D+82.7 |
| Precinct -000027000027 | 310 | 345 | 10 | 665 | 46.6% | 51.9% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -000031000031 | 263 | 389 | 4 | 656 | 40.1% | 59.3% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -000016000016 | 31 | 576 | 6 | 613 | 5.1% | 94.0% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct -000024000024 | 289 | 302 | 14 | 605 | 47.8% | 49.9% | R+2.1 |
| Precinct -000017000017 | 31 | 561 | 6 | 598 | 5.2% | 93.8% | R+88.6 |
| Precinct -000022000022 | 471 | 91 | 13 | 575 | 81.9% | 15.8% | D+66.1 |
| Precinct -000052000052 | 89 | 457 | 7 | 553 | 16.1% | 82.6% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -000003000003 | 330 | 213 | 8 | 551 | 59.9% | 38.7% | D+21.2 |
| Precinct -000036000036 | 430 | 102 | 13 | 545 | 78.9% | 18.7% | D+60.2 |
| Precinct -000040000040 | 101 | 439 | 0 | 540 | 18.7% | 81.3% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -000010000010 | 210 | 325 | 4 | 539 | 39.0% | 60.3% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -000012000012 | 473 | 54 | 6 | 533 | 88.7% | 10.1% | D+78.6 |
| Precinct -000007000007 | 19 | 503 | 4 | 526 | 3.6% | 95.6% | R+92.0 |
| Precinct -000008000008 | 210 | 307 | 8 | 525 | 40.0% | 58.5% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -000023000023 | 463 | 33 | 11 | 507 | 91.3% | 6.5% | D+84.8 |
| Precinct -000038000038 | 131 | 371 | 1 | 503 | 26.0% | 73.8% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -000006000006 | 265 | 216 | 18 | 499 | 53.1% | 43.3% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -000049000049 | 203 | 256 | 4 | 463 | 43.8% | 55.3% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -000026000026 | 268 | 178 | 7 | 453 | 59.2% | 39.3% | D+19.9 |
| Precinct -000045000045 | 76 | 371 | 0 | 447 | 17.0% | 83.0% | R+66.0 |
| Precinct -000028000028 | 139 | 300 | 7 | 446 | 31.2% | 67.3% | R+36.1 |
| Precinct -23A23A | 413 | 23 | 7 | 443 | 93.2% | 5.2% | D+88.0 |
| Precinct -000011000011 | 340 | 96 | 6 | 442 | 76.9% | 21.7% | D+55.2 |
| Precinct -14B14B | 212 | 211 | 1 | 424 | 50.0% | 49.8% | D+0.2 |
| Precinct -000047000047 | 88 | 330 | 4 | 422 | 20.9% | 78.2% | R+57.3 |
| Precinct -24B24B | 169 | 234 | 8 | 411 | 41.1% | 56.9% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -000030000030 | 29 | 368 | 3 | 400 | 7.2% | 92.0% | R+84.8 |
| Precinct -000034000034 | 100 | 295 | 4 | 399 | 25.1% | 73.9% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -37A37A | 122 | 274 | 3 | 399 | 30.6% | 68.7% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -000037000037 | 86 | 297 | 4 | 387 | 22.2% | 76.7% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -000002000002 | 205 | 178 | 3 | 386 | 53.1% | 46.1% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -000020000020 | 275 | 106 | 0 | 381 | 72.2% | 27.8% | D+44.4 |
| Precinct -000014000014 | 43 | 327 | 1 | 371 | 11.6% | 88.1% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -34A34A | 45 | 310 | 1 | 356 | 12.6% | 87.1% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -000042000042 | 50 | 289 | 6 | 345 | 14.5% | 83.8% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -000051000051 | 270 | 68 | 6 | 344 | 78.5% | 19.8% | D+58.7 |
| Precinct -000013000013 | 91 | 249 | 3 | 343 | 26.5% | 72.6% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -00007A00007A | 76 | 264 | 3 | 343 | 22.2% | 77.0% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -000044000044 | 45 | 290 | 1 | 336 | 13.4% | 86.3% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -000046000046 | 64 | 266 | 0 | 330 | 19.4% | 80.6% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -30B30B | 26 | 281 | 6 | 313 | 8.3% | 89.8% | R+81.5 |
| Precinct -14A14A | 52 | 249 | 0 | 301 | 17.3% | 82.7% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -20B20B | 193 | 102 | 4 | 299 | 64.5% | 34.1% | D+30.4 |
| Precinct -000048000048 | 179 | 109 | 0 | 288 | 62.2% | 37.8% | D+24.3 |
| Precinct -18B18B | 107 | 172 | 6 | 285 | 37.5% | 60.4% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -44B44B | 132 | 142 | 6 | 280 | 47.1% | 50.7% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -16A16A | 5 | 236 | 0 | 241 | 2.1% | 97.9% | R+95.9 |
| Precinct -000021000021 | 194 | 38 | 7 | 239 | 81.2% | 15.9% | D+65.3 |
| Precinct -19A19A | 198 | 23 | 6 | 227 | 87.2% | 10.1% | D+77.1 |
| Precinct -2B2B | 201 | 18 | 0 | 219 | 91.8% | 8.2% | D+83.6 |
| Precinct -000019000019 | 182 | 15 | 3 | 200 | 91.0% | 7.5% | D+83.5 |
| Precinct -1A1A | 17 | 178 | 0 | 195 | 8.7% | 91.3% | R+82.6 |
| Precinct -2C2C | 14 | 177 | 1 | 192 | 7.3% | 92.2% | R+84.9 |
| Precinct -000050000050 | 156 | 30 | 1 | 187 | 83.4% | 16.0% | D+67.4 |
| Precinct -11B11B | 179 | 8 | 0 | 187 | 95.7% | 4.3% | D+91.4 |
| Precinct -000001000001 | 98 | 78 | 3 | 179 | 54.7% | 43.6% | D+11.2 |
| Precinct -1C1C | 19 | 152 | 3 | 174 | 10.9% | 87.4% | R+76.4 |
| Precinct -33A33A | 86 | 86 | 0 | 172 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -26A26A | 117 | 38 | 10 | 165 | 70.9% | 23.0% | D+47.9 |
| Precinct -1B1B | 88 | 63 | 1 | 152 | 57.9% | 41.4% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -10A10A | 67 | 81 | 0 | 148 | 45.3% | 54.7% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -4B4B | 17 | 120 | 4 | 141 | 12.1% | 85.1% | R+73.0 |
| Precinct -32A32A | 62 | 69 | 0 | 131 | 47.3% | 52.7% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -13A13A | 3 | 116 | 0 | 119 | 2.5% | 97.5% | R+95.0 |
| Precinct -41A41A | 64 | 50 | 1 | 115 | 55.7% | 43.5% | D+12.2 |
| Precinct -1D1D | 10 | 94 | 1 | 105 | 9.5% | 89.5% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -44A44A | 43 | 56 | 4 | 103 | 41.7% | 54.4% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -18A18A | 45 | 56 | 1 | 102 | 44.1% | 54.9% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -2A2A | 12 | 87 | 0 | 99 | 12.1% | 87.9% | R+75.8 |
| Precinct -22B22B | 84 | 8 | 1 | 93 | 90.3% | 8.6% | D+81.7 |
| Precinct -000005000005 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 90 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -39A39A | 2 | 83 | 1 | 86 | 2.3% | 96.5% | R+94.2 |
| Precinct -50A50A | 31 | 45 | 0 | 76 | 40.8% | 59.2% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -29A29A | 14 | 48 | 3 | 65 | 21.5% | 73.8% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -4A4A | 5 | 54 | 1 | 60 | 8.3% | 90.0% | R+81.7 |
| Precinct -9A9A | 9 | 51 | 0 | 60 | 15.0% | 85.0% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -21A21A | 46 | 12 | 0 | 58 | 79.3% | 20.7% | D+58.6 |
| Precinct -51A51A | 15 | 38 | 1 | 54 | 27.8% | 70.4% | R+42.6 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +10.6% |
| 1896 | +75.2% |
| 1900 | +70.0% |
| 1904 | +86.6% |
| 1908 | +70.2% |
| 1912 | +68.9% |
| 1916 | +5.8% |
| 1920 | +3.8% |
| 1924 | +58.3% |
| 1928 | +65.1% |
| 1932 | +85.4% |
| 1936 | +85.5% |
| 1940 | +83.8% |
| 1944 | +69.9% |
| 1948 | +4.5% |
| 1952 | −5.4% |
| 1956 | −7.1% |
| 1960 | +57.0% |
| 1964 | +3.9% |
| 1968 | +22.1% |
| 1972 | −23.2% |
| 1976 | +21.6% |
| 1980 | +6.7% |
| 1984 | −3.0% |
| 1988 | +9.3% |
| 1992 | +23.1% |
| 1996 | +23.6% |
| 2000 | +7.7% |
| 2004 | −0.4% |
| 2008 | −3.3% |
| 2012 | −4.3% |
| 2016 | −11.9% |
| 2020 | −14.1% |
| 2024 | −18.8% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 35.2%9,473 | 62.2%16,752 | 26,942 |
| 2020 | R | 36.3%14,139 | 60.0%23,347 | 38,917 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
St. Landry Parish, LA registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 37-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
58,117 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−373 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −5,807 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $42,478 in average income, against $59,337 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+35.8 on average — 17 points more Republican-leaning than St. Landry Parish, LA itself (R+18.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lafayette Parish, LA471R+31.4
- Acadia Parish, LA202R+64.0
- Evangeline Parish, LA147R+49.1
- St. Martin Parish, LA83R+40.7
- Harris County, TX61D+5.5
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA54D+11.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lafayette Parish, LA556
- Acadia Parish, LA187
- Evangeline Parish, LA133
- St. Martin Parish, LA105
- Calcasieu Parish, LA75
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA75
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −514 |
| 2012 | −305 |
| 2013 | −389 |
| 2014 | −97 |
| 2015 | −298 |
| 2016 | −249 |
| 2017 | −512 |
| 2018 | −864 |
| 2019 | −756 |
| 2021 | −12 |
| 2022 | −511 |
| 2023 | −383 |
| 2024 | −544 |
| 2025 | −373 |
St. Landry Parish sits in Louisiana's Acadiana region with a population that is roughly 47% Black, yet its 2024 presidential margin landed at R+18.8 — a pattern reflecting broader rural realignment that has reshaped once-competitive Cajun-country electorates.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 86.6 points in 1904 and a Republican high of 23.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 18.8 points.
A population of 81,670, a 52% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $44,462 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of St. James Parish and St. Mary Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
St. Landry Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22097/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.