- Lead
- 9,346
- Total
- 35,653
- vs nation
- R+24.7
- Turnout
- 67.4%
Aroostook County, ME
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 67.4% of 53,494 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,124
- Total
- 36,210
- vs nation
- R+24.1
- Turnout
- 66.8%
- Lead
- 6,033
- Total
- 35,097
- vs nation
- R+19.3
- Turnout
- 65.5%
- Lead
- 2,581
- Total
- 33,860
- vs nation
- D+3.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,447
- Total
- 35,994
- vs nation
- D+2.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,005
- Total
- 37,733
- vs nation
- D+7.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 641
- Total
- 35,143
- vs nation
- D+1.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,622
- Total
- 34,792
- vs nation
- D+13.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+26.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 67,0582024 5-year
- Population density
- 10 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 6,671 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $56,7002024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+27.4 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+77.4 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- St. Lawrence County, NY · twin score 87.8
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 67.4%36,075 participants ÷ 53,494 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 53.7%–54.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36,075 | 53,494 ± 433 | 67.4% | Audited | E/A | |
| 2022Mid | 28,846 | 54,045 ± 405 | 53.4% | Audited | E/A |
| 36,210 | 54,236 ± 423 | 66.8% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 28,102 | 54,610 ± 350 | 51.5% | Audited | B/A |
| 36,210 | 55,291 ± 367 | 65.5% | Audited | E/A | |
| 33,860 | 56,246 | 60.2% | Derived | — | |
| 35,994 | 55,794 | 64.5% | Derived | — | |
| 37,733 | 55,342 extrapolated | 68.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:lower bound:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 308/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:lower bound:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 303/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:lower bound:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 290/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Aroostook County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Aroostook County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 66 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 35,653 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 035302300303530 | 1,926 | 2,365 | 67 | 4,358 | 44.2% | 54.3% | R+10.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 030802300303080 | 1,617 | 2,468 | 52 | 4,137 | 39.1% | 59.7% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct 033002300303300 | 1,024 | 1,767 | 39 | 2,830 | 36.2% | 62.4% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct 032002300303200 | 941 | 1,332 | 27 | 2,300 | 40.9% | 57.9% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct 033702300303370 | 1,060 | 1,137 | 28 | 2,225 | 47.6% | 51.1% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct 031902300303190 | 695 | 1,030 | 22 | 1,747 | 39.8% | 59.0% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct 033802300303380 | 384 | 837 | 22 | 1,243 | 30.9% | 67.3% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct 036102300303610 | 447 | 473 | 12 | 932 | 48.0% | 50.8% | R+2.8 |
| Precinct 032902300303290 | 178 | 711 | 9 | 898 | 19.8% | 79.2% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct 036402300303640 | 256 | 562 | 9 | 827 | 31.0% | 68.0% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct 033202300303320 | 297 | 479 | 13 | 789 | 37.6% | 60.7% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct 033902300303390 | 220 | 549 | 8 | 777 | 28.3% | 70.7% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct 031802300303180 | 230 | 502 | 16 | 748 | 30.7% | 67.1% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct 036902300303690 | 239 | 484 | 14 | 737 | 32.4% | 65.7% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct 030302300303030 | 233 | 459 | 14 | 706 | 33.0% | 65.0% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct 035502300303550 | 266 | 378 | 6 | 650 | 40.9% | 58.2% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct 032102300303210 | 223 | 406 | 8 | 637 | 35.0% | 63.7% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct 033302300303330 | 83 | 478 | 4 | 565 | 14.7% | 84.6% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct 033402300303340 | 128 | 418 | 8 | 554 | 23.1% | 75.5% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct 033102300303310 | 135 | 323 | 4 | 462 | 29.2% | 69.9% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct 034802300303480 | 119 | 320 | 6 | 445 | 26.7% | 71.9% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct 034202300303420 | 83 | 356 | 3 | 442 | 18.8% | 80.5% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct 030602300303060 | 93 | 301 | 5 | 399 | 23.3% | 75.4% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct 034602300303460 | 110 | 260 | 2 | 372 | 29.6% | 69.9% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct 034702300303470 | 136 | 210 | 9 | 355 | 38.3% | 59.2% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct 036302300303630 | 146 | 180 | 4 | 330 | 44.2% | 54.5% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct 036502300303650 | 80 | 204 | 4 | 288 | 27.8% | 70.8% | R+43.1 |
| Precinct 031202300303120 | 89 | 190 | 4 | 283 | 31.4% | 67.1% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct 035202300303520 | 97 | 165 | 21 | 283 | 34.3% | 58.3% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct 033502300303350 | 64 | 195 | 7 | 266 | 24.1% | 73.3% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct 035102300303510 | 61 | 175 | 13 | 249 | 24.5% | 70.3% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct 032402300303240 | 95 | 142 | 3 | 240 | 39.6% | 59.2% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct 035602300303560 | 94 | 145 | 0 | 239 | 39.3% | 60.7% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct 031002300303100 | 97 | 131 | 1 | 229 | 42.4% | 57.2% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct 036702300303670 | 48 | 173 | 1 | 222 | 21.6% | 77.9% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct 034502300303450 | 55 | 124 | 3 | 182 | 30.2% | 68.1% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct 035902300303590 | 50 | 131 | 0 | 181 | 27.6% | 72.4% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct 036202300303620 | 58 | 113 | 6 | 177 | 32.8% | 63.8% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct 030202300303020 | 32 | 133 | 3 | 168 | 19.0% | 79.2% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct 031302300303130 | 36 | 125 | 4 | 165 | 21.8% | 75.8% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct 036002300303600 | 64 | 94 | 3 | 161 | 39.8% | 58.4% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct 030102300303010 | 62 | 97 | 0 | 159 | 39.0% | 61.0% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct 031502300303150 | 34 | 120 | 2 | 156 | 21.8% | 76.9% | R+55.1 |
| Precinct 035702300303570 | 50 | 100 | 5 | 155 | 32.3% | 64.5% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct 036802300303680 | 65 | 87 | 2 | 154 | 42.2% | 56.5% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct 034102300303410 | 45 | 94 | 2 | 141 | 31.9% | 66.7% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct 031102300303110 | 43 | 88 | 0 | 131 | 32.8% | 67.2% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct 034002300303400 | 39 | 89 | 3 | 131 | 29.8% | 67.9% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct 038892300303889 | 70 | 45 | 0 | 115 | 60.9% | 39.1% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct 032502300303250 | 43 | 71 | 0 | 114 | 37.7% | 62.3% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct 035402300303540 | 18 | 72 | 1 | 91 | 19.8% | 79.1% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct 034902300303490 | 20 | 68 | 0 | 88 | 22.7% | 77.3% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct 032702300303270 | 11 | 57 | 0 | 68 | 16.2% | 83.8% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct 036602300303660 | 28 | 33 | 2 | 63 | 44.4% | 52.4% | R+7.9 |
| Precinct 031402300303140 | 27 | 34 | 1 | 62 | 43.5% | 54.8% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct 032202300303220 | 14 | 43 | 2 | 59 | 23.7% | 72.9% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct 032602300303260 | 12 | 43 | 2 | 57 | 21.1% | 75.4% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct 032802300303280 | 11 | 31 | 1 | 43 | 25.6% | 72.1% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct 033602300303360 | 10 | 31 | 0 | 41 | 24.4% | 75.6% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct 034402300303440 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 23 | 30.4% | 69.6% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct 032302300303230 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Exact tie |
| Precinct 000002300300000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 030702300303070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 031702300303170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 034302300303430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct 035802300303580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Aroostook County, ME · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
63.7%
17,552 votes · D+27.4
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 53.7%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
88.5%
11,191 votes · R+77.4
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 83.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
John Kerry2004
19,569votes
51.9% of the vote · D+5.3
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 19,345 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
22,246votes
62.4% of the vote · R+26.2
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 21,837 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1996
+13.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+21.9 · U.S. D+8.5
Runner-up · John Kerry, 2004 · +7.8 pts
Republican
Alf Landon1936
+55.1pts R vs U.S.
Place R+30.8 · U.S. D+24.3
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · +51.2 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Aroostook County, ME. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 40.5%14,251 | 59.5%20,933 | 35,184 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 13 points more Republican than the rolls.
45,795 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+167 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,406 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $50,029 in average income, against $61,526 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+0.7 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than Aroostook County, ME itself (R+26.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Penobscot County, ME139R+10.9
- Cumberland County, ME48D+35.3
- York County, ME43D+10.5
- Kennebec County, ME36R+2.7
- Androscoggin County, ME25R+6.1
- Washington County, ME25R+23.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Penobscot County, ME164
- Cumberland County, ME83
- Kennebec County, ME44
- York County, ME38
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −142 |
| 2012 | −399 |
| 2013 | −572 |
| 2014 | −518 |
| 2015 | −477 |
| 2016 | −437 |
| 2017 | −417 |
| 2018 | −113 |
| 2019 | −45 |
| 2021 | +352 |
| 2022 | +716 |
| 2023 | +412 |
| 2024 | +67 |
| 2025 | +167 |
Aroostook covers nearly as much land as Connecticut and Rhode Island combined, and its economy still turns on agriculture and timber. Once reliably competitive, it backed the 2024 Republican presidential nominee by 26 points.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.4 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 77.4 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.2 points.
A population of 67,058, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $56,700 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of St. Lawrence County and Coos County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Aroostook County, Maine. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/23003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.