Harford County, Maryland
Precinct data
Results by precinct
64 precincts · 150,090 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -3-093-09 | 1,959 | 3,847 | 179 | 5,985 | 32.7% | 64.3% | R+31.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -3-073-07 | 1,748 | 3,230 | 170 | 5,148 | 34.0% | 62.7% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -3-063-06 | 1,869 | 2,843 | 160 | 4,872 | 38.4% | 58.4% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -3-013-01 | 1,190 | 3,151 | 140 | 4,481 | 26.6% | 70.3% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -5-015-01 | 905 | 3,337 | 120 | 4,362 | 20.7% | 76.5% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -6-046-04 | 2,260 | 1,775 | 156 | 4,191 | 53.9% | 42.4% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -3-133-13 | 1,693 | 2,329 | 130 | 4,152 | 40.8% | 56.1% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -3-113-11 | 1,704 | 2,233 | 105 | 4,042 | 42.2% | 55.2% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -3-163-16 | 1,690 | 2,137 | 112 | 3,939 | 42.9% | 54.3% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -1-031-03 | 1,780 | 1,953 | 134 | 3,867 | 46.0% | 50.5% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -1-211-21 | 2,370 | 1,359 | 100 | 3,829 | 61.9% | 35.5% | D+26.4 |
| Precinct -1-071-07 | 1,605 | 2,054 | 126 | 3,785 | 42.4% | 54.3% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -1-041-04 | 1,479 | 1,947 | 132 | 3,558 | 41.6% | 54.7% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -1-051-05 | 1,613 | 1,712 | 116 | 3,441 | 46.9% | 49.8% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -2-072-07 | 1,941 | 1,340 | 97 | 3,378 | 57.5% | 39.7% | D+17.8 |
| Precinct -4-064-06 | 1,024 | 2,162 | 110 | 3,296 | 31.1% | 65.6% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -3-043-04 | 891 | 2,053 | 104 | 3,048 | 29.2% | 67.4% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -6-056-05 | 1,597 | 1,342 | 92 | 3,031 | 52.7% | 44.3% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -2-062-06 | 1,591 | 1,298 | 83 | 2,972 | 53.5% | 43.7% | D+9.9 |
| Precinct -1-161-16 | 1,295 | 1,565 | 83 | 2,943 | 44.0% | 53.2% | R+9.2 |
| Precinct -1-151-15 | 1,631 | 1,233 | 77 | 2,941 | 55.5% | 41.9% | D+13.5 |
| Precinct -1-141-14 | 1,774 | 994 | 89 | 2,857 | 62.1% | 34.8% | D+27.3 |
| Precinct -3-033-03 | 1,051 | 1,627 | 84 | 2,762 | 38.1% | 58.9% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -4-034-03 | 583 | 1,904 | 72 | 2,559 | 22.8% | 74.4% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -3-053-05 | 960 | 1,489 | 93 | 2,542 | 37.8% | 58.6% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -3-173-17 | 1,033 | 1,397 | 80 | 2,510 | 41.2% | 55.7% | R+14.5 |
| Precinct -2-012-01 | 783 | 1,616 | 73 | 2,472 | 31.7% | 65.4% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -4-044-04 | 690 | 1,665 | 97 | 2,452 | 28.1% | 67.9% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -3-023-02 | 764 | 1,548 | 73 | 2,385 | 32.0% | 64.9% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -3-143-14 | 888 | 1,426 | 70 | 2,384 | 37.2% | 59.8% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -1-131-13 | 1,252 | 918 | 56 | 2,226 | 56.2% | 41.2% | D+15.0 |
| Precinct -5-025-02 | 405 | 1,751 | 53 | 2,209 | 18.3% | 79.3% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -3-083-08 | 723 | 1,425 | 55 | 2,203 | 32.8% | 64.7% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -4-014-01 | 460 | 1,665 | 52 | 2,177 | 21.1% | 76.5% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -3-153-15 | 866 | 1,130 | 71 | 2,067 | 41.9% | 54.7% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -3-103-10 | 758 | 1,204 | 63 | 2,025 | 37.4% | 59.5% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct -1-191-19 | 1,395 | 574 | 52 | 2,021 | 69.0% | 28.4% | D+40.6 |
| Precinct -6-026-02 | 935 | 992 | 75 | 2,002 | 46.7% | 49.6% | R+2.8 |
| Precinct -1-181-18 | 1,008 | 875 | 50 | 1,933 | 52.1% | 45.3% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -1-201-20 | 1,335 | 446 | 61 | 1,842 | 72.5% | 24.2% | D+48.3 |
| Precinct -1-061-06 | 686 | 1,030 | 78 | 1,794 | 38.2% | 57.4% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -4-024-02 | 453 | 1,279 | 39 | 1,771 | 25.6% | 72.2% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -4-054-05 | 518 | 1,185 | 49 | 1,752 | 29.6% | 67.6% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -1-021-02 | 718 | 940 | 42 | 1,700 | 42.2% | 55.3% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -1-111-11 | 781 | 848 | 52 | 1,681 | 46.5% | 50.4% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -1-081-08 | 766 | 794 | 59 | 1,619 | 47.3% | 49.0% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -1-121-12 | 840 | 750 | 22 | 1,612 | 52.1% | 46.5% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -1-171-17 | 701 | 710 | 52 | 1,463 | 47.9% | 48.5% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -2-052-05 | 904 | 416 | 30 | 1,350 | 67.0% | 30.8% | D+36.1 |
| Precinct -1-011-01 | 368 | 928 | 38 | 1,334 | 27.6% | 69.6% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -2-102-10 | 592 | 662 | 41 | 1,295 | 45.7% | 51.1% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -5-035-03 | 323 | 884 | 37 | 1,244 | 26.0% | 71.1% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -2-082-08 | 695 | 475 | 42 | 1,212 | 57.3% | 39.2% | D+18.2 |
| Precinct -1-221-22 | 660 | 474 | 37 | 1,171 | 56.4% | 40.5% | D+15.9 |
| Precinct -1-101-10 | 462 | 348 | 26 | 836 | 55.3% | 41.6% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -2-092-09 | 337 | 241 | 21 | 599 | 56.3% | 40.2% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -6-036-03 | 338 | 207 | 10 | 555 | 60.9% | 37.3% | D+23.6 |
| Precinct -4-074-07 | 194 | 340 | 16 | 550 | 35.3% | 61.8% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -3-123-12 | 247 | 281 | 15 | 543 | 45.5% | 51.7% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -1-091-09 | 105 | 273 | 17 | 395 | 26.6% | 69.1% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -2-022-02 | 116 | 187 | 6 | 309 | 37.5% | 60.5% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -6-016-01 | 73 | 131 | 5 | 209 | 34.9% | 62.7% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -2-042-04 | 60 | 101 | 5 | 166 | 36.1% | 60.8% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -2-032-03 | 18 | 23 | 0 | 41 | 43.9% | 56.1% | R+12.2 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +14.3% |
| 1896 | −0.2% |
| 1900 | No data |
| 1904 | No data |
| 1908 | No data |
| 1912 | +74.1% |
| 1916 | +18.2% |
| 1920 | −0.5% |
| 1924 | +3.8% |
| 1928 | −29.6% |
| 1932 | +20.9% |
| 1936 | +7.3% |
| 1940 | −8.3% |
| 1944 | −16.5% |
| 1948 | −5.7% |
| 1952 | −22.4% |
| 1956 | −31.5% |
| 1960 | −13.1% |
| 1964 | +15.2% |
| 1968 | −19.2% |
| 1972 | −47.7% |
| 1976 | −10.0% |
| 1980 | −13.1% |
| 1984 | −37.1% |
| 1988 | −31.9% |
| 1992 | −11.4% |
| 1996 | −12.7% |
| 2000 | −18.8% |
| 2004 | −28.3% |
| 2008 | −18.8% |
| 2012 | −18.4% |
| 2016 | −23.4% |
| 2020 | −12.0% |
| 2024 | −13.7% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 4.3 points more Democratic.
199,722 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+468 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,047 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $70,939 in average income, against $101,626 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+25.0 on average — 39 points more Democratic-leaning than Harford County, MD itself (R+13.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Baltimore County, MD2,072D+24.3
- Baltimore city, MD621D+72.4
- Cecil County, MD364R+30.7
- Anne Arundel County, MD224D+13.8
- York County, PA173R+25.3
- Howard County, MD115D+41.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Baltimore County, MD1,393
- Baltimore city, MD513
- Cecil County, MD392
- York County, PA273
- Anne Arundel County, MD174
- Sussex County, DE111
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +340 |
| 2012 | +770 |
| 2013 | −505 |
| 2014 | −523 |
| 2015 | −884 |
| 2016 | −105 |
| 2017 | +876 |
| 2018 | +1,365 |
| 2019 | +1,096 |
| 2021 | +1,850 |
| 2022 | +500 |
| 2023 | +549 |
| 2024 | +250 |
| 2025 | +468 |
Harford County sits at the northeastern edge of the Baltimore metro, where lower-density development and a large military presence around Aberdeen Proving Ground have anchored consistently Republican margins in statewide and national contests.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 74.1 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 47.7 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 13.7 points.
A population of 263,757, a 72% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $112,265 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hunterdon County and Frederick County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Harford County, Maryland. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/24025/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.