- Lead
- 2,046
- Total
- 65,208
- vs nation
- R+1.7
- Turnout
- 77.2%
Eaton County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 77.2% of 85,052 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 499
- Total
- 64,327
- vs nation
- R+5.2
- Turnout
- 76.2%
- Lead
- 2,671
- Total
- 56,575
- vs nation
- R+6.8
- Turnout
- 68.8%
- Lead
- 1,716
- Total
- 54,788
- vs nation
- R+0.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,842
- Total
- 57,616
- vs nation
- D+1.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,370
- Total
- 55,755
- vs nation
- R+5.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,592
- Total
- 49,272
- vs nation
- R+3.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 311
- Total
- 44,666
- vs nation
- R+9.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+3.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 109,1302024 5-year
- Population density
- 190 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 575 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $79,5972024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 79.8%2024 5-year
- Black
- 6.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 6.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+17.0 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+57.3 in 1928MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Kalamazoo County, MI · twin score 88.2
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 77.2%65,669 participants ÷ 85,052 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +12.8 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -2.4 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 64.4%–67.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65,669 | 85,052 ± 502 | 77.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 53,964 | 85,051 ± 564 | 63.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 64,752 | 84,928 ± 535 | 76.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 51,778 | 84,010 ± 387 | 61.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 57,126 | 83,065 ± 385 | 68.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 54,788 | 81,147 | 67.5% | Derived | — | |
| 57,616 | 80,532 | 71.5% | Derived | — | |
| 55,755 | 79,917 extrapolated | 69.8% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Eaton County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Eaton County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 95 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
95 precincts · 65,208 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 16Delta Charter Township, Precinct 16 | 2,014 | 1,045 | 53 | 3,112 | 64.7% | 33.6% | D+31.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Eaton Township, Precinct 1Eaton Township, Precinct 1 | 979 | 1,693 | 45 | 2,717 | 36.0% | 62.3% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -Oneida Charter Township, Precinct 1Oneida Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 1,157 | 1,491 | 54 | 2,702 | 42.8% | 55.2% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -Eaton Rapids Township, Precinct 1Eaton Rapids Township, Precinct 1 | 912 | 1,633 | 35 | 2,580 | 35.3% | 63.3% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 6Delta Charter Township, Precinct 6 | 1,745 | 772 | 40 | 2,557 | 68.2% | 30.2% | D+38.1 |
| Precinct -City of Charlotte, District 2, Precinct 1City of Charlotte, District 2, Precinct 1 | 1,047 | 1,281 | 43 | 2,371 | 44.2% | 54.0% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -City of Charlotte, District 1, Precinct 1City of Charlotte, District 1, Precinct 1 | 1,033 | 1,156 | 34 | 2,223 | 46.5% | 52.0% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -Hamlin Township, Precinct 1Hamlin Township, Precinct 1 | 831 | 1,260 | 27 | 2,118 | 39.2% | 59.5% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -Windsor Charter Township, Precinct 1Windsor Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 789 | 1,052 | 32 | 1,873 | 42.1% | 56.2% | R+14.0 |
| Precinct -Bellevue Township, Precinct 1Bellevue Township, Precinct 1 | 469 | 1,369 | 14 | 1,852 | 25.3% | 73.9% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -Carmel Township, Precinct 1Carmel Township, Precinct 1 | 637 | 1,189 | 25 | 1,851 | 34.4% | 64.2% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -Benton Charter Township, Precinct 1Benton Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 648 | 1,177 | 24 | 1,849 | 35.0% | 63.7% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -City of Lansing, Ward 3, Precinct 22City of Lansing, Ward 3, Precinct 22 | 1,438 | 306 | 26 | 1,770 | 81.2% | 17.3% | D+64.0 |
| Precinct -Windsor Charter Township, Precinct 2Windsor Charter Township, Precinct 2 | 894 | 791 | 22 | 1,707 | 52.4% | 46.3% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 15Delta Charter Township, Precinct 15 | 931 | 682 | 30 | 1,643 | 56.7% | 41.5% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 5Delta Charter Township, Precinct 5 | 950 | 631 | 24 | 1,605 | 59.2% | 39.3% | D+19.9 |
| Precinct -City of Potterville, Precinct 1City of Potterville, Precinct 1 | 623 | 903 | 29 | 1,555 | 40.1% | 58.1% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 8Delta Charter Township, Precinct 8 | 1,037 | 470 | 22 | 1,529 | 67.8% | 30.7% | D+37.1 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 7Delta Charter Township, Precinct 7 | 943 | 534 | 46 | 1,523 | 61.9% | 35.1% | D+26.9 |
| Precinct -City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 2City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 2 | 791 | 697 | 30 | 1,518 | 52.1% | 45.9% | D+6.2 |
| Precinct -City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 1City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 1 | 803 | 618 | 33 | 1,454 | 55.2% | 42.5% | D+12.7 |
| Precinct -Walton Township, Precinct 1Walton Township, Precinct 1 | 384 | 984 | 15 | 1,383 | 27.8% | 71.1% | R+43.4 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 1Delta Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 733 | 582 | 12 | 1,327 | 55.2% | 43.9% | D+11.4 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 2Delta Charter Township, Precinct 2 | 673 | 609 | 20 | 1,302 | 51.7% | 46.8% | D+4.9 |
| Precinct -Windsor Charter Township, Precinct 3Windsor Charter Township, Precinct 3 | 674 | 600 | 26 | 1,300 | 51.8% | 46.2% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -Sunfield Township, Precinct 1Sunfield Township, Precinct 1 | 356 | 869 | 24 | 1,249 | 28.5% | 69.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 11Delta Charter Township, Precinct 11 | 748 | 434 | 15 | 1,197 | 62.5% | 36.3% | D+26.2 |
| Precinct -Roxand Township, Precinct 1Roxand Township, Precinct 1 | 357 | 758 | 22 | 1,137 | 31.4% | 66.7% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -Vermontville Township, Precinct 1Vermontville Township, Precinct 1 | 324 | 760 | 20 | 1,104 | 29.3% | 68.8% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 12Delta Charter Township, Precinct 12 | 667 | 420 | 13 | 1,100 | 60.6% | 38.2% | D+22.5 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 4Delta Charter Township, Precinct 4 | 709 | 365 | 14 | 1,088 | 65.2% | 33.5% | D+31.6 |
| Precinct -Chester Township, Precinct 1Chester Township, Precinct 1 | 302 | 756 | 12 | 1,070 | 28.2% | 70.7% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 14Delta Charter Township, Precinct 14 | 548 | 473 | 14 | 1,035 | 52.9% | 45.7% | D+7.2 |
| Precinct -City of Eaton Rapids, Precinct 3City of Eaton Rapids, Precinct 3 | 442 | 554 | 14 | 1,010 | 43.8% | 54.9% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 3City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 3 | 559 | 402 | 13 | 974 | 57.4% | 41.3% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 4City of Grand Ledge, Precinct 4 | 545 | 393 | 14 | 952 | 57.2% | 41.3% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 3Delta Charter Township, Precinct 3 | 567 | 335 | 25 | 927 | 61.2% | 36.1% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -Brookfield Township, Precinct 1Brookfield Township, Precinct 1 | 249 | 625 | 9 | 883 | 28.2% | 70.8% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -City of Eaton Rapids, Precinct 2City of Eaton Rapids, Precinct 2 | 321 | 529 | 17 | 867 | 37.0% | 61.0% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -City of Eaton Rapids, Precinct 1City of Eaton Rapids, Precinct 1 | 344 | 483 | 20 | 847 | 40.6% | 57.0% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -Delta Charter Township, Precinct 13Delta Charter Township, Precinct 13 | 427 | 375 | 16 | 818 | 52.2% | 45.8% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -Kalamo Township, Precinct 2Kalamo Township, Precinct 2 | 150 | 396 | 12 | 558 | 26.9% | 71.0% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -City of Olivet, Precinct 1City of Olivet, Precinct 1 | 174 | 311 | 6 | 491 | 35.4% | 63.3% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -Kalamo Township, Precinct 1Kalamo Township, Precinct 1 | 132 | 339 | 9 | 480 | 27.5% | 70.6% | R+43.1 |
| Bellevue Township 00001045-07080-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Benton Township 00001045-07440-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brookfield Township 00001045-10920-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Carmel Township 00001045-13380-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Charlotte City 01001045-14820-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Charlotte City 01002045-14820-01002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Charlotte City 02001045-14820-02001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Charlotte City 02002045-14820-02002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Chester Township 00001045-15260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00001045-21520-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00002045-21520-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00003045-21520-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00004045-21520-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00005045-21520-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00006045-21520-00006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00007045-21520-00007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00008045-21520-00008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00009045-21520-00009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00010045-21520-00010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00011045-21520-00011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00012045-21520-00012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00013045-21520-00013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00014045-21520-00014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00015045-21520-00015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Delta Charter Township 00016045-21520-00016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Rapids City 00001045-24540-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Rapids City 00002045-24540-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Rapids City 00003045-24540-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Rapids Township 00001045-24560-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Rapids Township 00002045-24560-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Township 00001045-24520-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Eaton Township 00002045-24520-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grand Ledge City 00001045-33420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grand Ledge City 00002045-33420-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grand Ledge City 00003045-33420-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grand Ledge City 00004045-33420-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamlin Township 00001045-36200-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kalamo Township 00001045-42220-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lansing City 03022045-46000-03022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lansing City 03023045-46000-03023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Olivet City 00001045-60580-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oneida Charter Township 00001045-60700-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oneida Charter Township 00002045-60700-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Potterville City 00001045-66100-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Roxand Township 00001045-70020-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sunfield Township 00001045-77440-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Vermontville Township 00001045-81980-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Walton Township 00001045-83180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Windsor Charter Township 00001045-87840-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Windsor Charter Township 00002045-87840-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Windsor Charter Township 00003045-87840-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Eaton County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
58.4%
12,590 votes · D+17.0
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 53.4%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
78.4%
8,493 votes · R+57.3
Runner-up · Calvin Coolidge, 1924 · 73.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
31,299votes
48.7% of the vote · R+0.8
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 31,056 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
33,102votes
50.8% of the vote · R+3.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 31,798 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+10.0pts D vs U.S.
Place D+4.0 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · +1.1 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
+40.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+32.5 · U.S. D+7.5
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · +39.8 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Eaton County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 1 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 47.0%28,952 | 53.0%32,710 | 61,662 |
| 2020 | R | 47.6%29,923 | 52.4%32,893 | 62,816 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 81,665 |
| 2018 | 81,911 |
| 2020 | 88,135 |
| 2022 | 89,082 |
| 2024 | 90,814 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+347 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +141 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,177 in average income, against $75,839 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+12.4 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Eaton County, MI itself (R+3.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Ingham County, MI1,495D+29.7
- Clinton County, MI268R+8.6
- Ionia County, MI128R+31.9
- Calhoun County, MI125R+14.0
- Barry County, MI110R+34.3
- Kent County, MI106D+5.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Ingham County, MI1,454
- Clinton County, MI279
- Kent County, MI148
- Calhoun County, MI146
- Ionia County, MI113
- Jackson County, MI88
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −283 |
| 2012 | −325 |
| 2013 | −2 |
| 2014 | +18 |
| 2015 | −313 |
| 2016 | +137 |
| 2017 | −15 |
| 2018 | +66 |
| 2019 | +405 |
| 2021 | −91 |
| 2022 | +138 |
| 2023 | −52 |
| 2024 | +111 |
| 2025 | +347 |
Eaton County sits immediately west of Michigan's capital, blending suburban Lansing commuter communities with small agricultural towns—a mix that has compressed its once-reliably wide Republican margins to single digits in recent presidential cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 17.0 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 57.3 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 3.1 points.
A population of 109,130, a 80% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $79,597 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Kalamazoo County and Berrien County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Eaton County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26045/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.