- Lead
- 6,232
- Total
- 41,169
- vs nation
- R+13.7
- Turnout
- 73.5%
Van Buren County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 73.5% of 56,421 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,788
- Total
- 39,066
- vs nation
- R+16.7
- Turnout
- 70.7%
- Lead
- 4,632
- Total
- 33,274
- vs nation
- R+16.0
- Turnout
- 61.5%
- Lead
- 149
- Total
- 32,837
- vs nation
- R+3.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,054
- Total
- 34,766
- vs nation
- D+1.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,483
- Total
- 34,174
- vs nation
- R+1.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 996
- Total
- 29,482
- vs nation
- R+3.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,008
- Total
- 27,975
- vs nation
- R+1.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+15.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 75,7952024 5-year
- Population density
- 125 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 608 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $68,1142024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 78.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 3.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 12.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+16.5 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+55.6 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Muskegon County, MI · twin score 92.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 73.5%41,450 participants ÷ 56,421 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.1 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -2.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 60.4%–63.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41,450 | 56,421 ± 457 | 73.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 32,144 | 55,787 ± 403 | 57.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 39,311 | 55,617 ± 431 | 70.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 29,970 | 55,221 ± 414 | 54.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 33,857 | 55,015 ± 392 | 61.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 32,837 | 54,798 | 59.9% | Derived | — | |
| 34,766 | 55,645 | 62.5% | Derived | — | |
| 34,174 | 56,492 extrapolated | 60.5% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 64 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
64 precincts · 41,183 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Antwerp Township, Precinct 2Antwerp Township, Precinct 2 | 1,013 | 1,146 | 41 | 2,200 | 46.0% | 52.1% | R+6.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Almena Township, Precinct 1Almena Township, Precinct 1 | 893 | 1,170 | 33 | 2,096 | 42.6% | 55.8% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -Pine Grove Township, Precinct 1Pine Grove Township, Precinct 1 | 651 | 1,277 | 39 | 1,967 | 33.1% | 64.9% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -Antwerp Township, Precinct 5Antwerp Township, Precinct 5 | 769 | 1,015 | 31 | 1,815 | 42.4% | 55.9% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -Porter Township, Precinct 1Porter Township, Precinct 1 | 712 | 1,068 | 21 | 1,801 | 39.5% | 59.3% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -Geneva Township, Precinct 1Geneva Township, Precinct 1 | 737 | 963 | 34 | 1,734 | 42.5% | 55.5% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -Decatur Township, Precinct 1Decatur Township, Precinct 1 | 651 | 1,058 | 22 | 1,731 | 37.6% | 61.1% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -Lawrence Township, Precinct 1Lawrence Township, Precinct 1 | 637 | 1,023 | 18 | 1,678 | 38.0% | 61.0% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -Paw Paw Township, Precinct 1Paw Paw Township, Precinct 1 | 814 | 820 | 26 | 1,660 | 49.0% | 49.4% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -Bloomingdale Township, Precinct 1Bloomingdale Township, Precinct 1 | 586 | 1,014 | 18 | 1,618 | 36.2% | 62.7% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -Antwerp Township, Precinct 4Antwerp Township, Precinct 4 | 734 | 816 | 20 | 1,570 | 46.8% | 52.0% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -Waverly Township, Precinct 1Waverly Township, Precinct 1 | 534 | 904 | 21 | 1,459 | 36.6% | 62.0% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -South Haven Township, Precinct 1South Haven Township, Precinct 1 | 689 | 732 | 21 | 1,442 | 47.8% | 50.8% | R+3.0 |
| Precinct -Almena Township, Precinct 2Almena Township, Precinct 2 | 634 | 770 | 22 | 1,426 | 44.5% | 54.0% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -Hartford Township, Precinct 1Hartford Township, Precinct 1 | 381 | 973 | 21 | 1,375 | 27.7% | 70.8% | R+43.1 |
| Precinct -Antwerp Township, Precinct 3Antwerp Township, Precinct 3 | 565 | 699 | 13 | 1,277 | 44.2% | 54.7% | R+10.5 |
| Precinct -Antwerp Township, Precinct 1Antwerp Township, Precinct 1 | 568 | 675 | 26 | 1,269 | 44.8% | 53.2% | R+8.4 |
| Precinct -Paw Paw Township, Precinct 3Paw Paw Township, Precinct 3 | 530 | 695 | 16 | 1,241 | 42.7% | 56.0% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -Columbia Township, Precinct 1Columbia Township, Precinct 1 | 404 | 800 | 22 | 1,226 | 33.0% | 65.3% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -Keeler Township, Precinct 1Keeler Township, Precinct 1 | 340 | 761 | 9 | 1,110 | 30.6% | 68.6% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -Covert Township, Precinct 1Covert Township, Precinct 1 | 594 | 487 | 13 | 1,094 | 54.3% | 44.5% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -Arlington Township, Precinct 1Arlington Township, Precinct 1 | 404 | 665 | 15 | 1,084 | 37.3% | 61.3% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -Paw Paw Township, Precinct 2Paw Paw Township, Precinct 2 | 459 | 596 | 13 | 1,068 | 43.0% | 55.8% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -Bangor Township, Precinct 1Bangor Township, Precinct 1 | 302 | 654 | 4 | 960 | 31.5% | 68.1% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -City of Hartford, Precinct 1City of Hartford, Precinct 1 | 379 | 565 | 13 | 957 | 39.6% | 59.0% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -City of South Haven, Ward 2, Precinct 1City of South Haven, Ward 2, Precinct 1 | 560 | 298 | 15 | 873 | 64.1% | 34.1% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -South Haven Township, Precinct 2South Haven Township, Precinct 2 | 389 | 377 | 8 | 774 | 50.3% | 48.7% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct -City of Bangor, Precinct 1City of Bangor, Precinct 1 | 338 | 421 | 8 | 767 | 44.1% | 54.9% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -City of South Haven, Ward 1, Precinct 1City of South Haven, Ward 1, Precinct 1 | 521 | 219 | 9 | 749 | 69.6% | 29.2% | D+40.3 |
| Precinct -Hamilton Township, Precinct 1Hamilton Township, Precinct 1 | 244 | 492 | 8 | 744 | 32.8% | 66.1% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -City of Gobles, Precinct 1City of Gobles, Precinct 1 | 153 | 258 | 7 | 418 | 36.6% | 61.7% | R+25.1 |
| Almena Township 00001159-01600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Almena Township 00002159-01600-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Antwerp Township 00001159-03140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Antwerp Township 00002159-03140-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Antwerp Township 00003159-03140-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Antwerp Township 00004159-03140-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Antwerp Township 00005159-03140-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Arlington Township 00001159-03500-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bangor City 00001159-05140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bangor Township 00001159-05160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bloomingdale Township 00001159-09240-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Columbia Township 00001159-17440-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Covert Township 00001159-18560-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Decatur Township 00001159-21060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Geneva Township 00001159-31840-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Gobles City 00001159-32640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamilton Township 00001159-36180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartford City 00001159-36960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartford Township 00001159-36980-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Keeler Township 00001159-42500-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lawrence Township 00001159-46460-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Paw Paw Township 00001159-63000-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Paw Paw Township 00002159-63000-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Paw Paw Township 00003159-63000-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pine Grove Township 00001159-64280-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Porter Township 00001159-65760-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -City of South Haven, Ward 3, Precinct 1City of South Haven, Ward 3, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Haven Charter Township 00001159-75000-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Haven Charter Township 00002159-75000-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Haven City 01001159-74980-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Haven City 02001159-74980-02001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Haven City 03001159-74980-03001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Waverly Township 00001159-84820-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Van Buren County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
58.1%
11,336 votes · D+16.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 53.5%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
77.4%
9,325 votes · R+55.5
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · 75.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
18,588votes
53.5% of the vote · D+8.8
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 17,175 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
23,407votes
56.9% of the vote · R+15.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 21,591 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
+1.5pts D vs U.S.
Place D+8.8 · U.S. D+7.3
Runner-up · Bill Clinton, 1992 · +1.4 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
+44.6pts R vs U.S.
Place R+37.1 · U.S. D+7.5
Runner-up · Wendell Willkie, 1940 · +44.3 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Van Buren County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 39.9%15,760 | 60.1%23,763 | 39,523 |
| 2020 | R | 37.1%13,724 | 62.9%23,234 | 36,958 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 55,350 |
| 2018 | 55,755 |
| 2020 | 60,896 |
| 2022 | 62,840 |
| 2024 | 64,485 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−38 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,790 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,384 in average income, against $70,462 for residents who stayed — 11% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+0.8 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Van Buren County, MI itself (R+15.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Kalamazoo County, MI553D+17.7
- Allegan County, MI214R+27.2
- Berrien County, MI205R+7.9
- Cook County, IL72D+41.6
- Cass County, MI71R+33.9
- Kent County, MI62D+5.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Kalamazoo County, MI568
- Berrien County, MI221
- Allegan County, MI191
- Cass County, MI81
- Kent County, MI70
- Ottawa County, MI56
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −469 |
| 2012 | −999 |
| 2013 | −184 |
| 2014 | −372 |
| 2015 | −319 |
| 2016 | −8 |
| 2017 | −9 |
| 2018 | +51 |
| 2019 | +99 |
| 2021 | +188 |
| 2022 | +101 |
| 2023 | +121 |
| 2024 | +48 |
| 2025 | −38 |
Stretching along Lake Michigan's eastern shore, Van Buren County is Michigan's leading producer of blueberries and grapes, and its rural farming communities have driven a steady rightward shift — the 2024 presidential margin reached R+15.1, up from closer margins a decade ago.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 16.5 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 55.6 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 15.1 points.
A population of 75,795, a 78% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $68,114 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Muskegon County and LaSalle County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Van Buren County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26159/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.