Martin County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
74 precincts · 10,796 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-1 P-2FAIRMONT W-1 P-2 | 325 | 534 | 14 | 873 | 37.2% | 61.2% | R+23.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-2 P-2FAIRMONT W-2 P-2 | 272 | 552 | 13 | 837 | 32.5% | 65.9% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-2 P-1FAIRMONT W-2 P-1 | 250 | 388 | 14 | 652 | 38.3% | 59.5% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-1 P-1FAIRMONT W-1 P-1 | 209 | 401 | 15 | 625 | 33.4% | 64.2% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -SHERBURNSHERBURN | 151 | 434 | 8 | 593 | 25.5% | 73.2% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -TRUMANTRUMAN | 153 | 394 | 9 | 556 | 27.5% | 70.9% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-3 P-2FAIRMONT W-3 P-2 | 210 | 327 | 16 | 553 | 38.0% | 59.1% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-4 P-1FAIRMONT W-4 P-1 | 151 | 393 | 7 | 551 | 27.4% | 71.3% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-4 P-2FAIRMONT W-4 P-2 | 162 | 351 | 7 | 520 | 31.2% | 67.5% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT W-3 P-1FAIRMONT W-3 P-1 | 201 | 284 | 10 | 495 | 40.6% | 57.4% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -WELCOMEWELCOME | 92 | 300 | 7 | 399 | 23.1% | 75.2% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -TRIMONTTRIMONT | 116 | 256 | 6 | 378 | 30.7% | 67.7% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -SILVER LAKE TWPSILVER LAKE TWP | 68 | 237 | 3 | 308 | 22.1% | 76.9% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -RUTLAND TWPRUTLAND TWP | 66 | 179 | 5 | 250 | 26.4% | 71.6% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -MANYASKA TWPMANYASKA TWP | 57 | 156 | 2 | 215 | 26.5% | 72.6% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -FAIRMONT TWPFAIRMONT TWP | 55 | 123 | 6 | 184 | 29.9% | 66.8% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -FOX LAKE TWPFOX LAKE TWP | 51 | 130 | 1 | 182 | 28.0% | 71.4% | R+43.4 |
| Precinct -JAY TWPJAY TWP | 31 | 141 | 1 | 173 | 17.9% | 81.5% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -EAST CHAIN TWPEAST CHAIN TWP | 35 | 130 | 2 | 167 | 21.0% | 77.8% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -WESTFORD TWPWESTFORD TWP | 24 | 139 | 1 | 164 | 14.6% | 84.8% | R+70.1 |
| Precinct -FRASER TWPFRASER TWP | 32 | 125 | 3 | 160 | 20.0% | 78.1% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -CEYLONCEYLON | 33 | 121 | 3 | 157 | 21.0% | 77.1% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT PRAIRIE TWPPLEASANT PRAIRIE TWP | 28 | 126 | 1 | 155 | 18.1% | 81.3% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -GRANADAGRANADA | 34 | 115 | 3 | 152 | 22.4% | 75.7% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -ROLLING GREEN TWPROLLING GREEN TWP | 41 | 102 | 3 | 146 | 28.1% | 69.9% | R+41.8 |
| Precinct -CEDAR TWPCEDAR TWP | 36 | 102 | 4 | 142 | 25.4% | 71.8% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -TENHASSEN TWPTENHASSEN TWP | 25 | 111 | 3 | 139 | 18.0% | 79.9% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -GALENA TWPGALENA TWP | 27 | 102 | 4 | 133 | 20.3% | 76.7% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -NASHVILLE TWPNASHVILLE TWP | 27 | 102 | 1 | 130 | 20.8% | 78.5% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -NORTHROPNORTHROP | 39 | 88 | 1 | 128 | 30.5% | 68.8% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -CENTER CREEK TWPCENTER CREEK TWP | 22 | 100 | 2 | 124 | 17.7% | 80.6% | R+62.9 |
| Precinct -WAVERLY TWPWAVERLY TWP | 36 | 81 | 3 | 120 | 30.0% | 67.5% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -ELM CREEK TWPELM CREEK TWP | 43 | 74 | 0 | 117 | 36.8% | 63.2% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -LAKE BELT TWPLAKE BELT TWP | 25 | 84 | 3 | 112 | 22.3% | 75.0% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -LAKE FREMONT TWPLAKE FREMONT TWP | 15 | 79 | 1 | 95 | 15.8% | 83.2% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -DUNNELLDUNNELL | 20 | 60 | 1 | 81 | 24.7% | 74.1% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -ORMSBYORMSBY | 9 | 21 | 0 | 30 | 30.0% | 70.0% | R+40.0 |
| Cedar Twp. Voting District27_270910005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Center Creek Twp. Voting District27_270910010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ceylon Voting District27_270910015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dunnell Voting District27_270910020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Chain Twp. Voting District27_270910025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elm Creek Twp. Voting District27_270910030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont Twp. Voting District27_270910095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-1 P-127_270910035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-1 P-227_270910040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-2 P-127_270910050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-2 P-227_270910055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-3 P-127_270910065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-3 P-227_270910070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-4 P-127_270910080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fairmont W-4 P-227_270910085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fox Lake Twp. Voting District27_270910100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fraser Twp. Voting District27_270910105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Galena Twp. Voting District27_270910110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Granada Voting District27_270910115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Jay Twp. Voting District27_270910120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lake Belt Twp. Voting District27_270910125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lake Fremont Twp. Voting District27_270910130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Manyaska Twp. Voting District27_270910135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Nashville Twp. Voting District27_270910140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Northrop Voting District27_270910145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ormsby Voting District27_270910150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Pleasant Prairie Twp. Voting District27_270910155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rolling Green Twp. Voting District27_270910160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rutland Twp. Voting District27_270910165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sherburn Voting District27_270910170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Silver Lake Twp. Voting District27_270910175 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Tenhassen Twp. Voting District27_270910180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Trimont Voting District27_270910185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Truman Voting District27_270910195 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Waverly Twp. Voting District27_270910200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Welcome Voting District27_270910205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Westford Twp. Voting District27_270910210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −25.4% |
| 1896 | −12.9% |
| 1900 | −17.6% |
| 1904 | −49.3% |
| 1908 | −26.7% |
| 1912 | +17.0% |
| 1916 | +0.4% |
| 1920 | −59.8% |
| 1924 | −46.3% |
| 1928 | −28.7% |
| 1932 | +22.0% |
| 1936 | +34.6% |
| 1940 | −19.8% |
| 1944 | −7.7% |
| 1948 | +12.6% |
| 1952 | −55.6% |
| 1956 | −42.4% |
| 1960 | −33.8% |
| 1964 | −7.9% |
| 1968 | −23.8% |
| 1972 | −32.0% |
| 1976 | −6.5% |
| 1980 | −22.4% |
| 1984 | −21.9% |
| 1988 | −7.5% |
| 1992 | −3.6% |
| 1996 | +3.9% |
| 2000 | −14.7% |
| 2004 | −15.6% |
| 2008 | −15.3% |
| 2012 | −23.7% |
| 2016 | −41.1% |
| 2020 | −37.9% |
| 2024 | −39.6% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 12,504 |
| 2018 | 11,862 |
| 2020 | 12,498 |
| 2022 | 12,229 |
| 2024 | 12,898 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−60 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,271 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,820 in average income, against $77,606 for residents who stayed — 36% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+35.9 on average — 3.7 points more Democratic-leaning than Martin County, MN itself (R+39.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Faribault County, MN39R+37.3
- Watonwan County, MN26R+27.7
- Emmet County, IA20R+43.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Blue Earth County, MN34
- Faribault County, MN33
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −148 |
| 2012 | −146 |
| 2013 | −36 |
| 2014 | −128 |
| 2015 | −151 |
| 2016 | −113 |
| 2017 | −44 |
| 2018 | −73 |
| 2019 | −98 |
| 2021 | −27 |
| 2022 | −187 |
| 2023 | +69 |
| 2024 | −129 |
| 2025 | −60 |
Martin County's farm-dominated economy and small-town demographics have pushed its presidential margins steadily rightward over the past two decades, reaching a 39-point Republican gap in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.6 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 59.8 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 39.6 points.
A population of 19,780, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,507 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Redwood County and McLeod County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Martin County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27091/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.