Redwood County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
85 precincts · 8,326 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -REDWOOD FALLS W-3REDWOOD FALLS W-3 | 319 | 555 | 13 | 887 | 36.0% | 62.6% | R+26.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -REDWOOD FALLS W-2REDWOOD FALLS W-2 | 292 | 552 | 13 | 857 | 34.1% | 64.4% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -REDWOOD FALLS W-1REDWOOD FALLS W-1 | 312 | 469 | 16 | 797 | 39.1% | 58.8% | R+19.7 |
| Precinct -MORGANMORGAN | 127 | 314 | 2 | 443 | 28.7% | 70.9% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -LAMBERTONLAMBERTON | 125 | 297 | 7 | 429 | 29.1% | 69.2% | R+40.1 |
| Precinct -WABASSOWABASSO | 78 | 334 | 6 | 418 | 18.7% | 79.9% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -PAXTON TWPPAXTON TWP | 169 | 212 | 5 | 386 | 43.8% | 54.9% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -WALNUT GROVEWALNUT GROVE | 112 | 171 | 6 | 289 | 38.8% | 59.2% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -SANBORNSANBORN | 49 | 140 | 0 | 189 | 25.9% | 74.1% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -DELHI TWPDELHI TWP | 43 | 138 | 4 | 185 | 23.2% | 74.6% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -BELVIEWBELVIEW | 50 | 115 | 5 | 170 | 29.4% | 67.6% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -SHERMAN TWPSHERMAN TWP | 95 | 71 | 3 | 169 | 56.2% | 42.0% | D+14.2 |
| Precinct -MORGAN TWPMORGAN TWP | 16 | 150 | 2 | 168 | 9.5% | 89.3% | R+79.8 |
| Precinct -VAIL TWPVAIL TWP | 24 | 118 | 3 | 145 | 16.6% | 81.4% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -VESTAVESTA | 23 | 115 | 7 | 145 | 15.9% | 79.3% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -MILROYMILROY | 42 | 98 | 2 | 142 | 29.6% | 69.0% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -WILLOW LAKE TWPWILLOW LAKE TWP | 20 | 119 | 1 | 140 | 14.3% | 85.0% | R+70.7 |
| Precinct -LAMBERTON TWPLAMBERTON TWP | 21 | 109 | 1 | 131 | 16.0% | 83.2% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -NEW AVON TWPNEW AVON TWP | 15 | 113 | 1 | 129 | 11.6% | 87.6% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -LUCANLUCAN | 20 | 101 | 4 | 125 | 16.0% | 80.8% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -VESTA TWPVESTA TWP | 25 | 92 | 4 | 121 | 20.7% | 76.0% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -BROOKVILLE TWPBROOKVILLE TWP | 5 | 110 | 5 | 120 | 4.2% | 91.7% | R+87.5 |
| Precinct -SHERIDAN TWPSHERIDAN TWP | 20 | 100 | 0 | 120 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -SUNDOWN TWPSUNDOWN TWP | 19 | 96 | 3 | 118 | 16.1% | 81.4% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -GRANITE ROCK TWPGRANITE ROCK TWP | 8 | 107 | 1 | 116 | 6.9% | 92.2% | R+85.3 |
| Precinct -SPRINGDALE TWPSPRINGDALE TWP | 34 | 80 | 2 | 116 | 29.3% | 69.0% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -UNDERWOOD TWPUNDERWOOD TWP | 7 | 104 | 1 | 112 | 6.3% | 92.9% | R+86.6 |
| Precinct -REDWOOD FALLS TWPREDWOOD FALLS TWP | 31 | 78 | 2 | 111 | 27.9% | 70.3% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -CHARLESTOWN TWPCHARLESTOWN TWP | 22 | 82 | 2 | 106 | 20.8% | 77.4% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -KINTIRE TWPKINTIRE TWP | 17 | 84 | 1 | 102 | 16.7% | 82.4% | R+65.7 |
| Precinct -WESTLINE TWPWESTLINE TWP | 23 | 78 | 0 | 101 | 22.8% | 77.2% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -THREE LAKES TWPTHREE LAKES TWP | 7 | 90 | 2 | 99 | 7.1% | 90.9% | R+83.8 |
| Precinct -WATERBURY TWPWATERBURY TWP | 15 | 81 | 2 | 98 | 15.3% | 82.7% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -GALES TWPGALES TWP | 9 | 84 | 2 | 95 | 9.5% | 88.4% | R+78.9 |
| Precinct -NORTH HERO TWPNORTH HERO TWP | 21 | 59 | 0 | 80 | 26.3% | 73.8% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -CLEMENTSCLEMENTS | 15 | 63 | 0 | 78 | 19.2% | 80.8% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -JOHNSONVILLE TWPJOHNSONVILLE TWP | 10 | 66 | 0 | 76 | 13.2% | 86.8% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -SWEDES FOREST TWPSWEDES FOREST TWP | 19 | 48 | 0 | 67 | 28.4% | 71.6% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -WANDAWANDA | 5 | 42 | 0 | 47 | 10.6% | 89.4% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct -REVEREREVERE | 8 | 23 | 3 | 34 | 23.5% | 67.6% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -SEAFORTHSEAFORTH | 15 | 19 | 0 | 34 | 44.1% | 55.9% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -DELHIDELHI | 13 | 18 | 0 | 31 | 41.9% | 58.1% | R+16.1 |
| Belview Voting District27_271270005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Brookville Twp. Voting District27_271270010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Charlestown Twp. Voting District27_271270015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clements Voting District27_271270020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Delhi Twp. Voting District27_271270030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Delhi Voting District27_271270025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Gales Twp. Voting District27_271270035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Granite Rock Twp. Voting District27_271270040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Honner Twp. Voting District27_271270045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Johnsonville Twp. Voting District27_271270050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kintire Twp. Voting District27_271270055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lamberton Twp. Voting District27_271270065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lamberton Voting District27_271270060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lucan Voting District27_271270070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Milroy Voting District27_271270075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Morgan Twp. Voting District27_271270085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Morgan Voting District27_271270080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| New Avon Twp. Voting District27_271270090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| North Hero Twp. Voting District27_271270095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Paxton Twp. Voting District27_271270105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Redwood Falls Twp. Voting District27_271270125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Redwood Falls W-127_271270110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Redwood Falls W-227_271270115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Redwood Falls W-327_271270120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Revere Voting District27_271270130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sanborn Voting District27_271270135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Seaforth Voting District27_271270140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sheridan Twp. Voting District27_271270145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sherman Twp. Voting District27_271270150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Springdale Twp. Voting District27_271270155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sundown Twp. Voting District27_271270160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Swedes Forest Twp. Voting District27_271270165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Three Lakes Twp. Voting District27_271270170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Underwood Twp. Voting District27_271270175 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Vail Twp. Voting District27_271270180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Vesta Twp. Voting District27_271270190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Vesta Voting District27_271270185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wabasso Voting District27_271270195 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Walnut Grove Voting District27_271270200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wanda Voting District27_271270205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Waterbury Twp. Voting District27_271270210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Westline Twp. Voting District27_271270215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Willow Lake Twp. Voting District27_271270220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −19.2% |
| 1896 | −23.2% |
| 1900 | −37.8% |
| 1904 | −62.9% |
| 1908 | −24.5% |
| 1912 | +18.4% |
| 1916 | −18.8% |
| 1920 | −70.0% |
| 1924 | −43.9% |
| 1928 | −27.3% |
| 1932 | +28.0% |
| 1936 | +18.7% |
| 1940 | −25.2% |
| 1944 | −30.5% |
| 1948 | +0.3% |
| 1952 | −44.8% |
| 1956 | −32.4% |
| 1960 | −21.1% |
| 1964 | +1.9% |
| 1968 | −15.7% |
| 1972 | −28.1% |
| 1976 | −4.1% |
| 1980 | −31.4% |
| 1984 | −33.8% |
| 1988 | −22.7% |
| 1992 | −7.5% |
| 1996 | −9.0% |
| 2000 | −24.6% |
| 2004 | −22.0% |
| 2008 | −13.6% |
| 2012 | −20.1% |
| 2016 | −42.7% |
| 2020 | −41.2% |
| 2024 | −43.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 9,842 |
| 2018 | 9,272 |
| 2020 | 9,606 |
| 2022 | 9,220 |
| 2024 | 9,813 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−1 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,244 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,793 in average income, against $82,358 for residents who stayed — 40% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+36.6 on average — 6.5 points more Democratic-leaning than Redwood County, MN itself (R+43.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Renville County, MN53R+41.3
- Lyon County, MN39R+31.7
- Brown County, MN35R+35.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Renville County, MN35
- Brown County, MN33
- Lyon County, MN32
- Hennepin County, MN23
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −55 |
| 2012 | −209 |
| 2013 | −106 |
| 2014 | −183 |
| 2015 | −98 |
| 2016 | −213 |
| 2017 | +14 |
| 2018 | −8 |
| 2019 | −118 |
| 2021 | −17 |
| 2022 | −40 |
| 2023 | −89 |
| 2024 | −121 |
| 2025 | −1 |
Redwood County's agricultural economy and predominantly white, non-Hispanic population have anchored it among Minnesota's most consistent GOP strongholds, with the 2024 presidential margin exceeding 43 points — well above the state's rural average.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.0 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 70.0 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 43.2 points.
A population of 15,350, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,866 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Brown County and Martin County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Redwood County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27127/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.