Mille Lacs County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
50 precincts · 15,190 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRINCETONPRINCETON | 810 | 1,537 | 41 | 2,388 | 33.9% | 64.4% | R+30.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -MILACAMILACA | 524 | 988 | 27 | 1,539 | 34.0% | 64.2% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -PRINCETON TWPPRINCETON TWP | 346 | 1,076 | 20 | 1,442 | 24.0% | 74.6% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -BORGHOLM TWPBORGHOLM TWP | 238 | 870 | 15 | 1,123 | 21.2% | 77.5% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -MILACA TWPMILACA TWP | 226 | 840 | 15 | 1,081 | 20.9% | 77.7% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -MILO TWPMILO TWP | 213 | 744 | 15 | 972 | 21.9% | 76.5% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -BOGUS BROOK TWPBOGUS BROOK TWP | 202 | 718 | 17 | 937 | 21.6% | 76.6% | R+55.1 |
| Precinct -GREENBUSH TWPGREENBUSH TWP | 164 | 601 | 14 | 779 | 21.1% | 77.2% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -KATHIO TWPKATHIO TWP | 355 | 274 | 12 | 641 | 55.4% | 42.7% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -SOUTH HARBOR TWPSOUTH HARBOR TWP | 188 | 335 | 6 | 529 | 35.5% | 63.3% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -PAGE TWPPAGE TWP | 95 | 417 | 7 | 519 | 18.3% | 80.3% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -EAST SIDE TWPEAST SIDE TWP | 149 | 299 | 5 | 453 | 32.9% | 66.0% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -ISLEISLE | 182 | 256 | 8 | 446 | 40.8% | 57.4% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -ONAMIAONAMIA | 150 | 212 | 13 | 375 | 40.0% | 56.5% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -ISLE HARBOR TWPISLE HARBOR TWP | 100 | 233 | 8 | 341 | 29.3% | 68.3% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct -FORESTONFORESTON | 71 | 237 | 4 | 312 | 22.8% | 76.0% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -ONAMIA TWPONAMIA TWP | 110 | 196 | 3 | 309 | 35.6% | 63.4% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -HAYLAND TWPHAYLAND TWP | 61 | 236 | 5 | 302 | 20.2% | 78.1% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -WAHKONWAHKON | 69 | 110 | 2 | 181 | 38.1% | 60.8% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -PEASEPEASE | 41 | 95 | 2 | 138 | 29.7% | 68.8% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct -DAILEY TWPDAILEY TWP | 31 | 98 | 3 | 132 | 23.5% | 74.2% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -BRADBURY TWPBRADBURY TWP | 28 | 88 | 1 | 117 | 23.9% | 75.2% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -MUDGETT TWPMUDGETT TWP | 5 | 56 | 0 | 61 | 8.2% | 91.8% | R+83.6 |
| Precinct -LEWIS TWPLEWIS TWP | 7 | 29 | 2 | 38 | 18.4% | 76.3% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -BOCKBOCK | 9 | 25 | 1 | 35 | 25.7% | 71.4% | R+45.7 |
| Bock Voting District27_270950005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Bogus Brook Twp. Voting District27_270950010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Borgholm Twp. Voting District27_270950015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Bradbury Twp. Voting District27_270950020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dailey Twp. Voting District27_270950025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Side Twp. Voting District27_270950030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Foreston Voting District27_270950035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Greenbush Twp. Voting District27_270950040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hayland Twp. Voting District27_270950045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Isle Harbor Twp. Voting District27_270950055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Isle Voting District27_270950050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kathio Twp. Voting District27_270950060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lewis Twp. Voting District27_270950065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Milaca Twp. Voting District27_270950075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Milaca Voting District27_270950070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Milo Twp. Voting District27_270950080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Mudgett Twp. Voting District27_270950085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Onamia Twp. Voting District27_270950095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Onamia Voting District27_270950090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Page Twp. Voting District27_270950100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Pease Voting District27_270950105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Princeton Twp. Voting District27_270950115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Princeton Voting District27_270950110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| South Harbor Twp. Voting District27_270950120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wahkon Voting District27_270950125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −29.1% |
| 1896 | −35.6% |
| 1900 | −47.6% |
| 1904 | −75.0% |
| 1908 | −38.3% |
| 1912 | +2.8% |
| 1916 | −0.6% |
| 1920 | −62.2% |
| 1924 | −45.4% |
| 1928 | −46.1% |
| 1932 | +26.6% |
| 1936 | +26.9% |
| 1940 | +2.2% |
| 1944 | +1.3% |
| 1948 | +13.9% |
| 1952 | −17.5% |
| 1956 | −11.7% |
| 1960 | −15.0% |
| 1964 | +27.6% |
| 1968 | +7.3% |
| 1972 | −13.9% |
| 1976 | +22.6% |
| 1980 | +6.5% |
| 1984 | −3.5% |
| 1988 | +5.6% |
| 1992 | +9.1% |
| 1996 | +15.6% |
| 2000 | −8.3% |
| 2004 | −11.6% |
| 2008 | −7.2% |
| 2012 | −8.6% |
| 2016 | −35.6% |
| 2020 | −37.8% |
| 2024 | −40.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 15,632 |
| 2018 | 15,328 |
| 2020 | 16,433 |
| 2022 | 16,855 |
| 2024 | 18,237 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+94 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,342 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,484 in average income, against $68,443 for residents who stayed — 13% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+20.1 on average — 21 points more Democratic-leaning than Mille Lacs County, MN itself (R+40.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sherburne County, MN168R+34.8
- Anoka County, MN83R+4.4
- Hennepin County, MN83D+42.4
- Kanabec County, MN55R+42.3
- Benton County, MN51R+35.8
- Isanti County, MN47R+41.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sherburne County, MN146
- Stearns County, MN58
- Isanti County, MN52
- Anoka County, MN50
- Hennepin County, MN48
- Kanabec County, MN48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −260 |
| 2012 | −283 |
| 2013 | −29 |
| 2014 | −130 |
| 2015 | −86 |
| 2016 | +82 |
| 2017 | +226 |
| 2018 | +183 |
| 2019 | +119 |
| 2021 | +540 |
| 2022 | +454 |
| 2023 | +205 |
| 2024 | +227 |
| 2025 | +94 |
Mille Lacs county, anchored by the eponymous lake and its resort economy, has shifted from competitive territory to one of Minnesota's most lopsided presidential counties over the past two decades, reflecting broader rural realignment across the upper Midwest.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.6 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 75.0 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 40.8 points.
A population of 27,125, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,729 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Meeker County and Pine County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Mille Lacs County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27095/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.