- Lead
- 15,053
- Total
- 169,536
- vs nation
- D+10.4
- Turnout
- 84.0%
Washington County, MN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 84.0% of 202,884 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 15,401
- Total
- 166,786
- vs nation
- D+4.8
- Turnout
- 88.0%
- Lead
- 2,658
- Total
- 144,235
- vs nation
- R+0.2
- Turnout
- 80.7%
- Lead
- 1,066
- Total
- 142,133
- vs nation
- R+3.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,943
- Total
- 137,059
- vs nation
- R+2.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,356
- Total
- 128,449
- vs nation
- R+0.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,865
- Total
- 107,009
- vs nation
- R+2.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 13,900
- Total
- 88,057
- vs nation
- D+7.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+8.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 276,2382024 5-year
- Population density
- 718 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 385 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $115,3452024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 77.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 5.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+34.3 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+62.0 in 1904MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Dakota County, MN · twin score 96.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 84.0%170,365 participants ÷ 202,884 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +21.7 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +1.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 62.3%–68.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 170,365 | 202,884 ± 1,159 | 84.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 131,259 | 197,904 ± 1,117 | 66.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 167,453 | 190,319 ± 1,035 | 88.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 130,940 | 184,560 ± 967 | 70.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 145,489 | 180,335 ± 900 | 80.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 142,133 | 170,404 | 83.4% | Derived | — | |
| 137,059 | 159,457 | 86.0% | Derived | — | |
| 128,449 | 148,510 extrapolated | 86.5% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Washington County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Washington County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 7 candidates
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 173 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
173 precincts · 169,536 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -LAKE ELMO P-1LAKE ELMO P-1 | 2,630 | 2,232 | 106 | 4,968 | 52.9% | 44.9% | D+8.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-09WOODBURY P-09 | 2,622 | 1,626 | 126 | 4,374 | 59.9% | 37.2% | D+22.8 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-01COTTAGE GROVE P-01 | 2,247 | 1,874 | 93 | 4,214 | 53.3% | 44.5% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-15WOODBURY P-15 | 2,435 | 1,576 | 120 | 4,131 | 58.9% | 38.2% | D+20.8 |
| Precinct -LAKE ELMO P-2LAKE ELMO P-2 | 2,040 | 1,949 | 81 | 4,070 | 50.1% | 47.9% | D+2.2 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-11WOODBURY P-11 | 2,344 | 1,539 | 116 | 3,999 | 58.6% | 38.5% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-02COTTAGE GROVE P-02 | 1,921 | 1,824 | 80 | 3,825 | 50.2% | 47.7% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-06COTTAGE GROVE P-06 | 2,008 | 1,672 | 105 | 3,785 | 53.1% | 44.2% | D+8.9 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-12WOODBURY P-12 | 2,089 | 1,574 | 89 | 3,752 | 55.7% | 42.0% | D+13.7 |
| Precinct -FOREST LAKE P-2FOREST LAKE P-2 | 1,497 | 2,147 | 85 | 3,729 | 40.1% | 57.6% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-05COTTAGE GROVE P-05 | 1,945 | 1,708 | 72 | 3,725 | 52.2% | 45.9% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -STILLWATER W-3 P-3STILLWATER W-3 P-3 | 1,889 | 1,552 | 76 | 3,517 | 53.7% | 44.1% | D+9.6 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-13WOODBURY P-13 | 1,893 | 1,488 | 99 | 3,480 | 54.4% | 42.8% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -FOREST LAKE P-4FOREST LAKE P-4 | 1,273 | 1,975 | 70 | 3,318 | 38.4% | 59.5% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -STILLWATER W-4 P-4STILLWATER W-4 P-4 | 1,977 | 1,275 | 56 | 3,308 | 59.8% | 38.5% | D+21.2 |
| Precinct -STILLWATER W-2 P-2STILLWATER W-2 P-2 | 1,907 | 1,169 | 87 | 3,163 | 60.3% | 37.0% | D+23.3 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-10WOODBURY P-10 | 1,921 | 1,140 | 63 | 3,124 | 61.5% | 36.5% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-08WOODBURY P-08 | 1,826 | 1,190 | 75 | 3,091 | 59.1% | 38.5% | D+20.6 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-7OAKDALE P-7 | 1,746 | 1,161 | 69 | 2,976 | 58.7% | 39.0% | D+19.7 |
| Precinct -SCANDIASCANDIA | 1,282 | 1,607 | 67 | 2,956 | 43.4% | 54.4% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -MAHTOMEDI P-2MAHTOMEDI P-2 | 1,688 | 1,135 | 84 | 2,907 | 58.1% | 39.0% | D+19.0 |
| Precinct -HUGO W-2 P-3HUGO W-2 P-3 | 1,306 | 1,519 | 59 | 2,884 | 45.3% | 52.7% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -OAK PARK HEIGHTSOAK PARK HEIGHTS | 1,615 | 1,207 | 54 | 2,876 | 56.2% | 42.0% | D+14.2 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-02WOODBURY P-02 | 1,797 | 1,001 | 65 | 2,863 | 62.8% | 35.0% | D+27.8 |
| Precinct -STILLWATER W-1 P-1STILLWATER W-1 P-1 | 1,722 | 1,059 | 72 | 2,853 | 60.4% | 37.1% | D+23.2 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-04COTTAGE GROVE P-04 | 1,413 | 1,329 | 67 | 2,809 | 50.3% | 47.3% | D+3.0 |
| Precinct -WEST LAKELAND TWPWEST LAKELAND TWP | 1,357 | 1,380 | 67 | 2,804 | 48.4% | 49.2% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-3OAKDALE P-3 | 1,509 | 1,043 | 57 | 2,609 | 57.8% | 40.0% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-08COTTAGE GROVE P-08 | 1,422 | 1,098 | 47 | 2,567 | 55.4% | 42.8% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-05WOODBURY P-05 | 1,611 | 892 | 57 | 2,560 | 62.9% | 34.8% | D+28.1 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-06WOODBURY P-06 | 1,493 | 946 | 75 | 2,514 | 59.4% | 37.6% | D+21.8 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-16WOODBURY P-16 | 1,396 | 1,024 | 51 | 2,471 | 56.5% | 41.4% | D+15.1 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-6OAKDALE P-6 | 1,255 | 1,143 | 65 | 2,463 | 51.0% | 46.4% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -MAHTOMEDI P-1MAHTOMEDI P-1 | 1,365 | 1,032 | 58 | 2,455 | 55.6% | 42.0% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -FOREST LAKE P-5FOREST LAKE P-5 | 962 | 1,369 | 37 | 2,368 | 40.6% | 57.8% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-04WOODBURY P-04 | 1,459 | 806 | 68 | 2,333 | 62.5% | 34.5% | D+28.0 |
| Precinct -HUGO W-3 P-5HUGO W-3 P-5 | 951 | 1,332 | 37 | 2,320 | 41.0% | 57.4% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -FOREST LAKE P-3FOREST LAKE P-3 | 888 | 1,379 | 51 | 2,318 | 38.3% | 59.5% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-07WOODBURY P-07 | 1,329 | 915 | 60 | 2,304 | 57.7% | 39.7% | D+18.0 |
| Precinct -HUGO W-1 P-1HUGO W-1 P-1 | 1,087 | 1,116 | 45 | 2,248 | 48.4% | 49.6% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -NEWPORTNEWPORT | 1,174 | 953 | 46 | 2,173 | 54.0% | 43.9% | D+10.2 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-03COTTAGE GROVE P-03 | 1,176 | 910 | 36 | 2,122 | 55.4% | 42.9% | D+12.5 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-5OAKDALE P-5 | 1,174 | 849 | 57 | 2,080 | 56.4% | 40.8% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -MAY TWPMAY TWP | 988 | 1,035 | 34 | 2,057 | 48.0% | 50.3% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-01WOODBURY P-01 | 1,206 | 747 | 53 | 2,006 | 60.1% | 37.2% | D+22.9 |
| Precinct -GRANT P-1GRANT P-1 | 878 | 1,003 | 54 | 1,935 | 45.4% | 51.8% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-14WOODBURY P-14 | 1,094 | 757 | 51 | 1,902 | 57.5% | 39.8% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-4OAKDALE P-4 | 1,063 | 722 | 37 | 1,822 | 58.3% | 39.6% | D+18.7 |
| Precinct -BAYPORTBAYPORT | 839 | 736 | 45 | 1,620 | 51.8% | 45.4% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -HUGO W-1 P-2HUGO W-1 P-2 | 729 | 833 | 33 | 1,595 | 45.7% | 52.2% | R+6.5 |
| Precinct -BAYTOWN TWPBAYTOWN TWP | 740 | 776 | 39 | 1,555 | 47.6% | 49.9% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-1OAKDALE P-1 | 835 | 681 | 29 | 1,545 | 54.0% | 44.1% | D+10.0 |
| Precinct -WOODBURY P-03WOODBURY P-03 | 957 | 474 | 43 | 1,474 | 64.9% | 32.2% | D+32.8 |
| Precinct -COTTAGE GROVE P-07COTTAGE GROVE P-07 | 677 | 683 | 35 | 1,395 | 48.5% | 49.0% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-2OAKDALE P-2 | 824 | 530 | 26 | 1,380 | 59.7% | 38.4% | D+21.3 |
| Precinct -STILLWATER TWP P-1STILLWATER TWP P-1 | 674 | 599 | 33 | 1,306 | 51.6% | 45.9% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -LAKELANDLAKELAND | 582 | 609 | 32 | 1,223 | 47.6% | 49.8% | R+2.2 |
| Precinct -ST PAUL PARK P-3ST PAUL PARK P-3 | 527 | 526 | 21 | 1,074 | 49.1% | 49.0% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct -GRANT P-2GRANT P-2 | 461 | 540 | 31 | 1,032 | 44.7% | 52.3% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -HUGO W-3 P-6HUGO W-3 P-6 | 398 | 577 | 15 | 990 | 40.2% | 58.3% | R+18.1 |
| Precinct -DENMARK TWP P-1DENMARK TWP P-1 | 406 | 550 | 19 | 975 | 41.6% | 56.4% | R+14.8 |
| Precinct -ST PAUL PARK P-2ST PAUL PARK P-2 | 452 | 496 | 24 | 972 | 46.5% | 51.0% | R+4.5 |
| Precinct -OAKDALE P-8OAKDALE P-8 | 510 | 342 | 17 | 869 | 58.7% | 39.4% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -ST PAUL PARK P-1ST PAUL PARK P-1 | 420 | 416 | 23 | 859 | 48.9% | 48.4% | D+0.5 |
| Precinct -DELLWOODDELLWOOD | 353 | 442 | 16 | 811 | 43.5% | 54.5% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -LAKE ST. CROIX BEACHLAKE ST. CROIX BEACH | 360 | 357 | 24 | 741 | 48.6% | 48.2% | D+0.4 |
| Precinct -HUGO W-2 P-4HUGO W-2 P-4 | 290 | 413 | 9 | 712 | 40.7% | 58.0% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct -FOREST LAKE P-1FOREST LAKE P-1 | 297 | 383 | 12 | 692 | 42.9% | 55.3% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -BIRCHWOOD VILLAGE CITYBIRCHWOOD VILLAGE CITY | 428 | 216 | 21 | 665 | 64.4% | 32.5% | D+31.9 |
| Precinct -AFTON W-1 P-1AFTON W-1 P-1 | 329 | 233 | 10 | 572 | 57.5% | 40.7% | D+16.8 |
| Precinct -AFTON W-2 P-2AFTON W-2 P-2 | 255 | 263 | 20 | 538 | 47.4% | 48.9% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -MARINE ON ST CROIXMARINE ON ST CROIX | 409 | 121 | 7 | 537 | 76.2% | 22.5% | D+53.6 |
| Precinct -AFTON W-4 P-4AFTON W-4 P-4 | 286 | 235 | 5 | 526 | 54.4% | 44.7% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -AFTON W-3 P-3AFTON W-3 P-3 | 297 | 199 | 11 | 507 | 58.6% | 39.3% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -DENMARK TWP P-2DENMARK TWP P-2 | 179 | 203 | 7 | 389 | 46.0% | 52.2% | R+6.2 |
| Precinct -WILLERNIEWILLERNIE | 156 | 154 | 8 | 318 | 49.1% | 48.4% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -PINE SPRINGSPINE SPRINGS | 131 | 136 | 11 | 278 | 47.1% | 48.9% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -ST MARY'S POINTST MARY'S POINT | 139 | 108 | 6 | 253 | 54.9% | 42.7% | D+12.3 |
| Precinct -LANDFALLLANDFALL | 138 | 103 | 9 | 250 | 55.2% | 41.2% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -LAKELAND SHORESLAKELAND SHORES | 101 | 124 | 6 | 231 | 43.7% | 53.7% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -WHITE BEAR LAKE W-4 P-2WHITE BEAR LAKE W-4 P-2 | 130 | 79 | 9 | 218 | 59.6% | 36.2% | D+23.4 |
| Precinct -GREY CLOUD ISLAND TWPGREY CLOUD ISLAND TWP | 83 | 98 | 4 | 185 | 44.9% | 53.0% | R+8.1 |
| Precinct -STILLWATER TWP P-2STILLWATER TWP P-2 | 62 | 57 | 2 | 121 | 51.2% | 47.1% | D+4.1 |
| Afton W-1 P-127_271630006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Afton W-2 P-127_271630011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Afton W-3 P-127_271630016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Afton W-4 P-127_271630021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bayport Voting District27_271630035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Baytown Twp. Voting District27_271630045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Birchwood Village City Voting District27_271630050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-127_271630055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-1027_271630100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-1127_271630105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-1227_271630110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-227_271630060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-327_271630065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-427_271630070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-527_271630075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-627_271630080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-727_271630085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-827_271630090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cottage Grove P-927_271630095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dellwood Voting District27_271630115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Denmark Twp. Voting District27_271630120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lake P-127_271630125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lake P-227_271630130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lake P-327_271630135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lake P-427_271630137 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lake P-527_271630138 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grant Voting District27_271630140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grey Cloud Island Twp. Voting District27_271630150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hastings W-1 P-127_271630155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hugo W-1 P-127_271630160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hugo W-2 P-127_271630165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hugo W-2 P-227_271630167 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hugo W-3 P-127_271630170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lake Elmo P-127_271630175 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lake Elmo P-227_271630180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lake St. Croix Beach Voting District27_271630195 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lakeland Shores Voting District27_271630190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lakeland Voting District27_271630185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Landfall Voting District27_271630200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mahtomedi P-127_271630205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mahtomedi P-227_271630206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marine On St. Croix Voting District27_271630210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| May Twp. Voting District27_271630215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Newport P-127_271630220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Newport P-227_271630225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oak Park Heights P-127_271630265 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oak Park Heights P-227_271630266 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-127_271630235 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-227_271630240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-327_271630245 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-427_271630250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-527_271630255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-627_271630260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-727_271630262 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oakdale P-827_271630263 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pine Springs Voting District27_271630270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Scandia Voting District27_271630293 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St. Mary's Point Voting District27_271630275 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St. Paul Park P-127_271630280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St. Paul Park P-227_271630285 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St. Paul Park P-327_271630290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St. Paul Park P-427_271630291 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater Twp. Voting District27_271630340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-1 P-127_271630296 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-1 P-227_271630298 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-2 P-327_271630306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-2 P-427_271630308 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-2 P-527_271630310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-3 P-627_271630316 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-3 P-727_271630318 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-4 P-827_271630326 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Stillwater W-4 P-927_271630328 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Lakeland Twp. Voting District27_271630350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| White Bear Lake W-4 P-227_271630355 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Willernie Voting District27_271630360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-127_271630365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-1027_271630410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-1127_271630415 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-1227_271630420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-1327_271630425 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-1427_271630430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-1527_271630435 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-227_271630370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-327_271630375 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-427_271630380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-527_271630385 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-627_271630390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-727_271630395 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-827_271630400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Woodbury P-927_271630405 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Washington County, MN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
67.0%
18,108 votes · D+34.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 60.2%
Republican
Theodore Roosevelt1904
79.9%
2,913 votes · R+62.0
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · 74.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
90,324votes
53.3% of the vote · D+8.9
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 89,165 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
75,271votes
44.4% of the vote · D+8.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 73,764 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Hubert Humphrey1968
+19.8pts D vs U.S.
Place D+19.1 · U.S. R+0.7
Runner-up · Walter Mondale, 1984 · +17.3 pts
Republican
Theodore Roosevelt1904
+42.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+62.0 · U.S. R+19.7
Runner-up · William McKinley, 1896 · +36.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Washington County, MN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 3 congressional, 3 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | D | 54.8%89,232 | 45.2%73,682 | 162,914 |
| 2020 | D | 52.7%80,201 | 47.3%71,989 | 152,190 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 167,294 |
| 2018 | 166,595 |
| 2020 | 184,883 |
| 2022 | 185,558 |
| 2024 | 197,630 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+3,046 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +23,038 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $81,270 in average income, against $126,962 for residents who stayed — 36% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+22.5 on average — 14 points more Democratic-leaning than Washington County, MN itself (D+8.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Ramsey County, MN2,963D+43.1
- Hennepin County, MN1,145D+42.4
- Dakota County, MN996D+12.8
- Anoka County, MN522R+4.4
- St. Croix County, WI279R+19.2
- Chisago County, MN267R+31.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Ramsey County, MN2,023
- Hennepin County, MN1,111
- Dakota County, MN925
- Anoka County, MN562
- St. Croix County, WI470
- Chisago County, MN264
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +564 |
| 2012 | +657 |
| 2013 | +592 |
| 2014 | +819 |
| 2015 | +299 |
| 2016 | +577 |
| 2017 | +1,763 |
| 2018 | +2,216 |
| 2019 | +2,420 |
| 2021 | +3,374 |
| 2022 | +2,379 |
| 2023 | +1,372 |
| 2024 | +2,960 |
| 2025 | +3,046 |
Washington County sits along the St. Croix River east of St. Paul, where steady population growth and a mix of established suburbs and newer exurban development have kept its presidential margins consistently single-digit Democratic over the past several cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.3 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 62.0 points in 1904. The 2024 margin was 8.9 points.
A population of 276,238, a 77% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $115,345 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Dakota County and Anoka County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Washington County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27163/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.