Pearl River County, Mississippi
Precinct data
Results by precinct
61 precincts · 24,671 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Pic/Hawl/Nh 5Pic/Hawl/Nh 5 | 416 | 2,557 | 25 | 2,998 | 13.9% | 85.3% | R+71.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Carriere 5Carriere 5 | 166 | 1,536 | 10 | 1,712 | 9.7% | 89.7% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -Picayune 2Picayune 2 | 237 | 1,264 | 23 | 1,524 | 15.6% | 82.9% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -Ceasar 4Ceasar 4 | 133 | 1,361 | 11 | 1,505 | 8.8% | 90.4% | R+81.6 |
| Precinct -Nicholson 4Nicholson 4 | 183 | 1,151 | 7 | 1,341 | 13.6% | 85.8% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -Poplarville 2Poplarville 2 | 151 | 1,059 | 14 | 1,224 | 12.3% | 86.5% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -Picayune 1 SouthsidePicayune 1 Southside | 865 | 292 | 19 | 1,176 | 73.6% | 24.8% | D+48.7 |
| Precinct -Carriere 3Carriere 3 | 102 | 1,016 | 17 | 1,135 | 9.0% | 89.5% | R+80.5 |
| Precinct -Poplarville 3Poplarville 3 | 128 | 944 | 17 | 1,089 | 11.8% | 86.7% | R+74.9 |
| Precinct -Salem 4Salem 4 | 88 | 917 | 7 | 1,012 | 8.7% | 90.6% | R+81.9 |
| Precinct -Henleyfield 2Henleyfield 2 | 99 | 826 | 9 | 934 | 10.6% | 88.4% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -Gumpond/Hickory Grove 3Gumpond/Hickory Grove 3 | 79 | 843 | 9 | 931 | 8.5% | 90.5% | R+82.1 |
| Precinct -Steep Hollow 3Steep Hollow 3 | 63 | 841 | 7 | 911 | 6.9% | 92.3% | R+85.4 |
| Precinct -Picayune 1 EastsidePicayune 1 Eastside | 393 | 479 | 15 | 887 | 44.3% | 54.0% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -Mcneill 3Mcneill 3 | 68 | 788 | 3 | 859 | 7.9% | 91.7% | R+83.8 |
| Precinct -Pine Grove 4Pine Grove 4 | 60 | 735 | 7 | 802 | 7.5% | 91.6% | R+84.2 |
| Precinct -Sycamore 5Sycamore 5 | 94 | 703 | 4 | 801 | 11.7% | 87.8% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -Mill Creek 2Mill Creek 2 | 58 | 620 | 4 | 682 | 8.5% | 90.9% | R+82.4 |
| Precinct -Crossroads 2Crossroads 2 | 53 | 536 | 9 | 598 | 8.9% | 89.6% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -Poplarville 1Poplarville 1 | 159 | 303 | 9 | 471 | 33.8% | 64.3% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -Carriere 1Carriere 1 | 83 | 281 | 2 | 366 | 22.7% | 76.8% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -Whitesand 1Whitesand 1 | 173 | 174 | 5 | 352 | 49.1% | 49.4% | R+0.3 |
| Precinct -Progress 3Progress 3 | 17 | 296 | 5 | 318 | 5.3% | 93.1% | R+87.7 |
| Precinct -Derby 1Derby 1 | 70 | 238 | 4 | 312 | 22.4% | 76.3% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -Amackertown 2Amackertown 2 | 14 | 260 | 5 | 279 | 5.0% | 93.2% | R+88.2 |
| Precinct -Springhill 2Springhill 2 | 20 | 228 | 3 | 251 | 8.0% | 90.8% | R+82.9 |
| Precinct -Springhill 3Springhill 3 | 10 | 190 | 1 | 201 | 5.0% | 94.5% | R+89.6 |
| Anchor Lake/West Union Voting District28_28109535 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Buck Branch Voting District28_28109240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Byrd Line Voting District28_28109260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Caesar Voting District28_28109320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Carriere Voting District28_28109520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Derby Voting District28_28109130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ford's Creek Voting District28_28109250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Gum Pond Voting District28_28109390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Henleyfield Voting District28_28109280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hickory Grove Voting District28_28109380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Hide-A-Way North Hills Voting District28_28109540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McNeill 3 Voting District28_28109359 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McNeill 5 Voting District28_28109510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Mill Creek Voting District28_28109210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Nicholson Voting District28_28109420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Oak Hill Voting District28_28109230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ozona Voting District28_28109310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Picayune 1 East Voting District28_28109140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Picayune 1 South Voting District28_28109160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Picayune 2 Voting District28_28109270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Picayune 4 East Voting District28_28109450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Picayune 4 West Voting District28_28109440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Picayune 5 Voting District28_28109550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Pine Grove Voting District28_28109410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Poplarville 1 Voting District28_28109150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Poplarville 2 Voting District28_28109220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Poplarville 3 Voting District28_28109360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Progress Voting District28_28109350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Salem Voting District28_28109430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Savannah Voting District28_28109330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Steep Hollow Voting District28_28109340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sycamore Voting District28_28109525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Whitesand 1 Voting District28_28109110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Whitesand 2 Voting District28_28109290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +94.4% |
| 1896 | +74.8% |
| 1900 | +65.6% |
| 1904 | +92.0% |
| 1908 | +85.9% |
| 1912 | +90.7% |
| 1916 | +87.3% |
| 1920 | +79.2% |
| 1924 | +61.8% |
| 1928 | −2.2% |
| 1932 | +86.9% |
| 1936 | +86.7% |
| 1940 | +91.3% |
| 1944 | +92.4% |
| 1948 | +4.7% |
| 1952 | +8.4% |
| 1956 | +5.1% |
| 1960 | +17.9% |
| 1964 | −69.0% |
| 1968 | −4.5% |
| 1972 | −77.4% |
| 1976 | +7.2% |
| 1980 | −14.8% |
| 1984 | −52.6% |
| 1988 | −43.8% |
| 1992 | −20.6% |
| 1996 | −23.1% |
| 2000 | −42.3% |
| 2004 | −53.5% |
| 2008 | −60.4% |
| 2012 | −59.3% |
| 2016 | −64.8% |
| 2020 | −64.3% |
| 2024 | −66.7% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 38,558 |
| 2018 | 39,768 |
| 2020 | 39,232 |
| 2022 | 38,268 |
| 2024 | 40,726 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+384 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +3,737 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,381 in average income, against $63,591 for residents who stayed — 16% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+34.9 on average — 32 points more Democratic-leaning than Pearl River County, MS itself (R+66.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- St. Tammany Parish, LA298R+43.8
- Hancock County, MS117R+58.7
- Jefferson Parish, LA84R+13.0
- Harrison County, MS76R+28.9
- Lamar County, MS58R+48.8
- St. Bernard Parish, LA43R+29.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- St. Tammany Parish, LA163
- Hancock County, MS107
- Harrison County, MS76
- Lamar County, MS57
- Forrest County, MS55
- Jefferson Parish, LA39
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −333 |
| 2012 | −562 |
| 2013 | −133 |
| 2014 | +276 |
| 2015 | −121 |
| 2016 | +177 |
| 2017 | +257 |
| 2018 | +219 |
| 2019 | +315 |
| 2021 | +626 |
| 2022 | +991 |
| 2023 | +849 |
| 2024 | +792 |
| 2025 | +384 |
Pearl River County, anchored by Poplarville in the longleaf pine belt, recorded an R+66.7 margin in 2024 — among the widest in a state already known for sharp partisan geographic sorting.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 94.4 points in 1892 and a Republican high of 77.4 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 66.7 points.
A population of 57,458, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,135 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Panola County and Beauregard Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Pearl River County, Mississippi. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/28109/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.