Cumberland County, North Carolina
Precinct data
Results by precinct
77 precincts · 140,513 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -G10AG10A | 1,989 | 1,881 | 49 | 3,919 | 50.8% | 48.0% | D+2.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -G6AG6A | 1,077 | 2,719 | 29 | 3,825 | 28.2% | 71.1% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -G9B-2G9B-2 | 1,737 | 1,802 | 54 | 3,593 | 48.3% | 50.2% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -LO66ALO66A | 1,922 | 1,467 | 47 | 3,436 | 55.9% | 42.7% | D+13.2 |
| Precinct -LR63LR63 | 2,405 | 802 | 50 | 3,257 | 73.8% | 24.6% | D+49.2 |
| Precinct -G2AG2A | 2,208 | 918 | 53 | 3,179 | 69.5% | 28.9% | D+40.6 |
| Precinct -G9B-1G9B-1 | 1,508 | 1,621 | 35 | 3,164 | 47.7% | 51.2% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -G1BG1B | 1,270 | 1,830 | 40 | 3,140 | 40.4% | 58.3% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -G10CG10C | 1,350 | 1,689 | 38 | 3,077 | 43.9% | 54.9% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -SL78-3SL78-3 | 2,052 | 842 | 39 | 2,933 | 70.0% | 28.7% | D+41.3 |
| Precinct -CC22ACC22A | 1,842 | 1,023 | 50 | 2,915 | 63.2% | 35.1% | D+28.1 |
| Precinct -LI65LI65 | 944 | 1,910 | 22 | 2,876 | 32.8% | 66.4% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -EO01EO01 | 924 | 1,555 | 25 | 2,504 | 36.9% | 62.1% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -G3A-1G3A-1 | 1,673 | 789 | 36 | 2,498 | 67.0% | 31.6% | D+35.4 |
| Precinct -G8AG8A | 1,476 | 898 | 38 | 2,412 | 61.2% | 37.2% | D+24.0 |
| Precinct -CC27CC27 | 1,687 | 603 | 59 | 2,349 | 71.8% | 25.7% | D+46.1 |
| Precinct -SH77SH77 | 944 | 1,261 | 19 | 2,224 | 42.4% | 56.7% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -CL57-1CL57-1 | 1,529 | 643 | 33 | 2,205 | 69.3% | 29.2% | D+40.2 |
| Precinct -CL57-2CL57-2 | 1,651 | 514 | 32 | 2,197 | 75.1% | 23.4% | D+51.8 |
| Precinct -CC26CC26 | 1,585 | 579 | 32 | 2,196 | 72.2% | 26.4% | D+45.8 |
| Precinct -G2C-1G2C-1 | 1,287 | 803 | 49 | 2,139 | 60.2% | 37.5% | D+22.6 |
| Precinct -CC21CC21 | 1,459 | 632 | 36 | 2,127 | 68.6% | 29.7% | D+38.9 |
| Precinct -G8DG8D | 988 | 1,096 | 22 | 2,106 | 46.9% | 52.0% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -G8BG8B | 1,099 | 974 | 25 | 2,098 | 52.4% | 46.4% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -AH49AH49 | 1,421 | 633 | 35 | 2,089 | 68.0% | 30.3% | D+37.7 |
| Precinct -G10BG10B | 1,055 | 1,004 | 29 | 2,088 | 50.5% | 48.1% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -CC23-2CC23-2 | 1,106 | 873 | 43 | 2,022 | 54.7% | 43.2% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -G9A-3G9A-3 | 1,019 | 969 | 27 | 2,015 | 50.6% | 48.1% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -G5B-1G5B-1 | 1,621 | 320 | 31 | 1,972 | 82.2% | 16.2% | D+66.0 |
| Precinct -CC14CC14 | 852 | 1,061 | 38 | 1,951 | 43.7% | 54.4% | R+10.7 |
| Precinct -MR02MR02 | 1,213 | 671 | 38 | 1,922 | 63.1% | 34.9% | D+28.2 |
| Precinct -MB62MB62 | 1,373 | 477 | 36 | 1,886 | 72.8% | 25.3% | D+47.5 |
| Precinct -CC15CC15 | 814 | 1,029 | 18 | 1,861 | 43.7% | 55.3% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -AL51-2AL51-2 | 732 | 1,078 | 22 | 1,832 | 40.0% | 58.8% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -G3A-2CG3A-2C | 992 | 808 | 30 | 1,830 | 54.2% | 44.2% | D+10.1 |
| Precinct -G5A-1G5A-1 | 1,312 | 486 | 27 | 1,825 | 71.9% | 26.6% | D+45.3 |
| Precinct -EO02EO02 | 681 | 1,069 | 18 | 1,768 | 38.5% | 60.5% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -G11BG11B | 768 | 916 | 25 | 1,709 | 44.9% | 53.6% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -G5A-2G5A-2 | 1,061 | 589 | 18 | 1,668 | 63.6% | 35.3% | D+28.3 |
| Precinct -CC33CC33 | 1,019 | 570 | 23 | 1,612 | 63.2% | 35.4% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct -CC519CC519 | 1,350 | 227 | 31 | 1,608 | 84.0% | 14.1% | D+69.8 |
| Precinct -G2E-2G2E-2 | 1,266 | 297 | 32 | 1,595 | 79.4% | 18.6% | D+60.8 |
| Precinct -G8CG8C | 901 | 644 | 30 | 1,575 | 57.2% | 40.9% | D+16.3 |
| Precinct -CC34CC34 | 696 | 849 | 19 | 1,564 | 44.5% | 54.3% | R+9.8 |
| Precinct -G5B-2G5B-2 | 1,162 | 345 | 27 | 1,534 | 75.7% | 22.5% | D+53.3 |
| Precinct -G6CG6C | 508 | 971 | 13 | 1,492 | 34.0% | 65.1% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -CC17CC17 | 1,193 | 229 | 22 | 1,444 | 82.6% | 15.9% | D+66.8 |
| Precinct -CC12CC12 | 470 | 912 | 26 | 1,408 | 33.4% | 64.8% | R+31.4 |
| Precinct -G2E-1G2E-1 | 1,017 | 339 | 22 | 1,378 | 73.8% | 24.6% | D+49.2 |
| Precinct -G1AG1A | 880 | 468 | 26 | 1,374 | 64.0% | 34.1% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -CC29CC29 | 898 | 455 | 19 | 1,372 | 65.5% | 33.2% | D+32.3 |
| Precinct -AL51-1AL51-1 | 439 | 891 | 14 | 1,344 | 32.7% | 66.3% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -CC01CC01 | 1,126 | 175 | 12 | 1,313 | 85.8% | 13.3% | D+72.4 |
| Precinct -G5CG5C | 863 | 431 | 19 | 1,313 | 65.7% | 32.8% | D+32.9 |
| Precinct -AL51-3AL51-3 | 306 | 987 | 8 | 1,301 | 23.5% | 75.9% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -CU02CU02 | 678 | 571 | 30 | 1,279 | 53.0% | 44.6% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -CC25CC25 | 751 | 492 | 31 | 1,274 | 58.9% | 38.6% | D+20.3 |
| Precinct -G4CG4C | 840 | 384 | 25 | 1,249 | 67.3% | 30.7% | D+36.5 |
| Precinct -CC31CC31 | 694 | 537 | 16 | 1,247 | 55.7% | 43.1% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -CC16CC16 | 1,124 | 62 | 19 | 1,205 | 93.3% | 5.1% | D+88.1 |
| Precinct -CC18CC18 | 433 | 745 | 16 | 1,194 | 36.3% | 62.4% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -G4BG4B | 543 | 623 | 12 | 1,178 | 46.1% | 52.9% | R+6.8 |
| Precinct -CC08CC08 | 451 | 657 | 16 | 1,124 | 40.1% | 58.5% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -CC13CC13 | 969 | 105 | 11 | 1,085 | 89.3% | 9.7% | D+79.6 |
| Precinct -G4AG4A | 583 | 432 | 13 | 1,028 | 56.7% | 42.0% | D+14.7 |
| Precinct -CC03CC03 | 598 | 408 | 20 | 1,026 | 58.3% | 39.8% | D+18.5 |
| Precinct -G7AG7A | 239 | 772 | 15 | 1,026 | 23.3% | 75.2% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -G7BG7B | 243 | 733 | 14 | 990 | 24.5% | 74.0% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -G3CG3C | 418 | 558 | 7 | 983 | 42.5% | 56.8% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -CC24CC24 | 544 | 359 | 25 | 928 | 58.6% | 38.7% | D+19.9 |
| Precinct -G6BG6B | 200 | 712 | 3 | 915 | 21.9% | 77.8% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -CC04CC04 | 442 | 370 | 14 | 826 | 53.5% | 44.8% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -CC06CC06 | 385 | 417 | 19 | 821 | 46.9% | 50.8% | R+3.9 |
| Precinct -CC07CC07 | 361 | 421 | 19 | 801 | 45.1% | 52.6% | R+7.5 |
| Precinct -CC32CC32 | 575 | 215 | 10 | 800 | 71.9% | 26.9% | D+45.0 |
| Precinct -G3BG3B | 415 | 362 | 8 | 785 | 52.9% | 46.1% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -CC10CC10 | 425 | 281 | 9 | 715 | 59.4% | 39.3% | D+20.1 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +17.2% |
| 1896 | +6.5% |
| 1900 | −4.2% |
| 1904 | +17.0% |
| 1908 | +11.5% |
| 1912 | +51.7% |
| 1916 | +23.7% |
| 1920 | +24.2% |
| 1924 | +35.8% |
| 1928 | −3.5% |
| 1932 | +68.2% |
| 1936 | +72.8% |
| 1940 | +68.8% |
| 1944 | +53.3% |
| 1948 | +35.9% |
| 1952 | +8.4% |
| 1956 | +13.9% |
| 1960 | +17.9% |
| 1964 | +20.8% |
| 1968 | +2.8% |
| 1972 | −42.0% |
| 1976 | +26.0% |
| 1980 | +1.2% |
| 1984 | −16.5% |
| 1988 | −6.4% |
| 1992 | +4.9% |
| 1996 | +4.4% |
| 2000 | +0.6% |
| 2004 | −3.5% |
| 2008 | +17.7% |
| 2012 | +19.7% |
| 2016 | +16.0% |
| 2020 | +16.6% |
| 2024 | +13.4% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | D | 55.3%46,449 | 42.5%35,674 | 83,963 |
| 2020 | D | 55.6%81,001 | 39.2%57,121 | 145,719 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 2.5 points.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 187,905 | 99,196 | 46,768 | 41,810 | 131 |
| 2012 | 216,659 | 110,377 | 51,793 | 53,871 | 618 |
| 2016 | 212,582 | 99,466 | 49,002 | 63,107 | 1,007 |
| 2020 | 227,571 | 98,366 | 52,753 | 74,427 | 2,025 |
| 2022 | 211,670 | 88,947 | 48,830 | 72,097 | 1,796 |
| 2024 | 230,310 | 89,333 | 52,796 | 84,857 | 3,324 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2,118 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −45,757 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $46,506 in average income, against $61,905 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+1.3 on average — 12 points more Republican-leaning than Cumberland County, NC itself (D+13.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Harnett County, NC732R+25.0
- Hoke County, NC692D+5.9
- Robeson County, NC445R+27.6
- Wake County, NC430D+25.4
- Sampson County, NC185R+29.7
- Mecklenburg County, NC177D+32.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Hoke County, NC853
- Harnett County, NC794
- Wake County, NC624
- Robeson County, NC463
- Mecklenburg County, NC282
- Moore County, NC228
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −926 |
| 2012 | −7,032 |
| 2013 | −1,964 |
| 2014 | −5,710 |
| 2015 | −5,950 |
| 2016 | −2,024 |
| 2017 | −5,770 |
| 2018 | −642 |
| 2019 | −978 |
| 2021 | +173 |
| 2022 | −3,904 |
| 2023 | −4,599 |
| 2024 | −4,313 |
| 2025 | −2,118 |
Cumberland County's large active-duty and veteran population surrounding Fort Liberty shapes an electorate that has backed Democratic presidential candidates by double digits in recent cycles, while its diverse workforce keeps turnout competitive across party lines.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 72.8 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 42.0 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 13.4 points.
A population of 338,545, a 40% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $61,291 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Muscogee County and Newport News city.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cumberland County, North Carolina. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/37051/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.