Champaign County, Ohio
Precinct data
Results by precinct
55 precincts · 20,468 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT GOSHENPRECINCT GOSHEN | 228 | 917 | 10 | 1,155 | 19.7% | 79.4% | R+59.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD RIVER BPRECINCT MAD RIVER B | 259 | 826 | 12 | 1,097 | 23.6% | 75.3% | R+51.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WAYNEPRECINCT WAYNE | 192 | 875 | 7 | 1,074 | 17.9% | 81.5% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JOHNSONPRECINCT JOHNSON | 171 | 741 | 15 | 927 | 18.4% | 79.9% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ST PARISPRECINCT ST PARIS | 202 | 701 | 13 | 916 | 22.1% | 76.5% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT CONCORDPRECINCT CONCORD | 179 | 701 | 9 | 889 | 20.1% | 78.9% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA SOUTHPRECINCT URBANA SOUTH | 237 | 636 | 9 | 882 | 26.9% | 72.1% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 2-BPRECINCT URBANA 2-B | 305 | 515 | 9 | 829 | 36.8% | 62.1% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 2-APRECINCT URBANA 2-A | 326 | 465 | 9 | 800 | 40.8% | 58.1% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA NORTHPRECINCT URBANA NORTH | 152 | 595 | 8 | 755 | 20.1% | 78.8% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT NORTH LEWISBURGPRECINCT NORTH LEWISBURG | 175 | 560 | 4 | 739 | 23.7% | 75.8% | R+52.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MECHANICSBURGPRECINCT MECHANICSBURG | 203 | 528 | 7 | 738 | 27.5% | 71.5% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 3-APRECINCT URBANA 3-A | 258 | 457 | 6 | 721 | 35.8% | 63.4% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 3-BPRECINCT URBANA 3-B | 261 | 422 | 6 | 689 | 37.9% | 61.2% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION NORTHPRECINCT UNION NORTH | 162 | 510 | 6 | 678 | 23.9% | 75.2% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACKSON WESTPRECINCT JACKSON WEST | 130 | 542 | 3 | 675 | 19.3% | 80.3% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALEM SOUTHPRECINCT SALEM SOUTH | 154 | 514 | 7 | 675 | 22.8% | 76.1% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALEM NORTHPRECINCT SALEM NORTH | 101 | 564 | 4 | 669 | 15.1% | 84.3% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT JACKSON EASTPRECINCT JACKSON EAST | 93 | 568 | 6 | 667 | 13.9% | 85.2% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MAD RIVER APRECINCT MAD RIVER A | 137 | 506 | 2 | 645 | 21.2% | 78.4% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT ADAMSPRECINCT ADAMS | 77 | 510 | 5 | 592 | 13.0% | 86.1% | R+73.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT RUSHPRECINCT RUSH | 91 | 486 | 5 | 582 | 15.6% | 83.5% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT UNION SOUTHPRECINCT UNION SOUTH | 128 | 420 | 2 | 550 | 23.3% | 76.4% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 1-BPRECINCT URBANA 1-B | 210 | 323 | 4 | 537 | 39.1% | 60.1% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 4-APRECINCT URBANA 4-A | 139 | 390 | 6 | 535 | 26.0% | 72.9% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 4-BPRECINCT URBANA 4-B | 168 | 340 | 6 | 514 | 32.7% | 66.1% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT HARRISONPRECINCT HARRISON | 72 | 427 | 4 | 503 | 14.3% | 84.9% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT URBANA 1-APRECINCT URBANA 1-A | 134 | 295 | 6 | 435 | 30.8% | 67.8% | R+37.0 |
| Voting District ADAMS39_39021021AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District CONCORD39_39021021ABY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District GOSHEN39_39021021AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District HARRISON39_39021021ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District JACKSON EAST39_39021021ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District JACKSON WEST39_39021021ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District JOHNSON39_39021021ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District MAD RIVER A39_39021021ACA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District MAD RIVER B39_39021021ABK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District MECHANICSBURG39_39021021AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District NORTH LEWISBURG39_39021021ABO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District RUSH39_39021021ABM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District SALEM NORTH39_39021021ABQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District SALEM SOUTH39_39021021ABR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District ST PARIS39_39021021ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District UNION NORTH39_39021021ABS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District UNION SOUTH39_39021021ABT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 1-A39_39021021AAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 1-B39_39021021AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 2-A39_39021021AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 3-A39_39021021AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 3-B39_39021021AAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 4-A39_39021021AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA 4-B39_39021021AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA NORTH39_39021021ABU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District URBANA SOUTH39_39021021ABV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Voting District WAYNE39_39021021ABW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −13.3% |
| 1896 | −11.3% |
| 1900 | −14.6% |
| 1904 | −27.4% |
| 1908 | −13.3% |
| 1912 | +5.4% |
| 1916 | −5.0% |
| 1920 | −20.7% |
| 1924 | −25.4% |
| 1928 | −39.6% |
| 1932 | +1.6% |
| 1936 | −2.8% |
| 1940 | −13.9% |
| 1944 | −23.8% |
| 1948 | −17.2% |
| 1952 | −32.1% |
| 1956 | −39.0% |
| 1960 | −33.4% |
| 1964 | +12.2% |
| 1968 | −20.4% |
| 1972 | −40.7% |
| 1976 | −15.5% |
| 1980 | −26.6% |
| 1984 | −47.0% |
| 1988 | −35.3% |
| 1992 | −11.1% |
| 1996 | −3.9% |
| 2000 | −20.8% |
| 2004 | −25.3% |
| 2008 | −19.8% |
| 2012 | −21.4% |
| 2016 | −43.3% |
| 2020 | −47.7% |
| 2024 | −50.7% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,696 |
| 2018 | 26,398 |
| 2020 | 26,492 |
| 2022 | 26,512 |
| 2024 | 27,055 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+168 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −902 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,666 in average income, against $68,765 for residents who stayed — 18% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.5 on average — 25 points more Democratic-leaning than Champaign County, OH itself (R+50.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Clark County, OH221R+29.5
- Logan County, OH141R+56.2
- Franklin County, OH114D+28.4
- Union County, OH76R+29.6
- Montgomery County, OH50D+0.5
- Madison County, OH40R+43.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Clark County, OH235
- Logan County, OH112
- Franklin County, OH88
- Union County, OH78
- Miami County, OH75
- Montgomery County, OH48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −292 |
| 2012 | −293 |
| 2013 | −166 |
| 2014 | −410 |
| 2015 | −81 |
| 2016 | −214 |
| 2017 | +100 |
| 2018 | −80 |
| 2019 | +87 |
| 2021 | +122 |
| 2022 | +41 |
| 2023 | +90 |
| 2024 | +26 |
| 2025 | +168 |
Champaign County's small-city core of Urbana anchors a largely agricultural landscape where the 2024 presidential margin exceeded 50 points, placing it among Ohio's most one-sided counties in recent cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 12.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 50.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 50.7 points.
A population of 38,804, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $75,556 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Brown County and Highland County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Champaign County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39021/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.