Hays County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
78 precincts · 125,827 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 228Precinct 228 | 1,852 | 1,319 | 48 | 3,219 | 57.5% | 41.0% | D+16.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 435Precinct 435 | 1,448 | 1,459 | 49 | 2,956 | 49.0% | 49.4% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 446Precinct 446 | 1,321 | 1,430 | 55 | 2,806 | 47.1% | 51.0% | R+3.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 335Precinct 335 | 1,193 | 1,562 | 26 | 2,781 | 42.9% | 56.2% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 452Precinct 452 | 1,176 | 1,541 | 41 | 2,758 | 42.6% | 55.9% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 442Precinct 442 | 1,357 | 1,238 | 55 | 2,650 | 51.2% | 46.7% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 221Precinct 221 | 1,512 | 1,078 | 47 | 2,637 | 57.3% | 40.9% | D+16.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 314Precinct 314 | 988 | 1,565 | 33 | 2,586 | 38.2% | 60.5% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 337Precinct 337 | 973 | 1,566 | 39 | 2,578 | 37.7% | 60.7% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 344Precinct 344 | 927 | 1,569 | 30 | 2,526 | 36.7% | 62.1% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 443Precinct 443 | 1,170 | 1,312 | 32 | 2,514 | 46.5% | 52.2% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 316Precinct 316 | 1,554 | 835 | 59 | 2,448 | 63.5% | 34.1% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 231Precinct 231 | 1,399 | 969 | 39 | 2,407 | 58.1% | 40.3% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 220Precinct 220 | 1,329 | 1,037 | 40 | 2,406 | 55.2% | 43.1% | D+12.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 115Precinct 115 | 1,479 | 886 | 29 | 2,394 | 61.8% | 37.0% | D+24.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 336Precinct 336 | 1,283 | 1,060 | 44 | 2,387 | 53.7% | 44.4% | D+9.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 371Precinct 371 | 1,263 | 1,040 | 31 | 2,334 | 54.1% | 44.6% | D+9.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 342Precinct 342 | 1,063 | 1,193 | 28 | 2,284 | 46.5% | 52.2% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 449Precinct 449 | 867 | 1,383 | 26 | 2,276 | 38.1% | 60.8% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 142Precinct 142 | 1,696 | 550 | 24 | 2,270 | 74.7% | 24.2% | D+50.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 205Precinct 205 | 1,210 | 980 | 26 | 2,216 | 54.6% | 44.2% | D+10.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 426Precinct 426 | 1,114 | 997 | 28 | 2,139 | 52.1% | 46.6% | D+5.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 333Precinct 333 | 836 | 1,187 | 31 | 2,054 | 40.7% | 57.8% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 206Precinct 206 | 1,100 | 925 | 28 | 2,053 | 53.6% | 45.1% | D+8.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 445Precinct 445 | 942 | 1,072 | 35 | 2,049 | 46.0% | 52.3% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 203Precinct 203 | 1,171 | 810 | 29 | 2,010 | 58.3% | 40.3% | D+18.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 436Precinct 436 | 777 | 1,202 | 23 | 2,002 | 38.8% | 60.0% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 120Precinct 120 | 1,185 | 762 | 39 | 1,986 | 59.7% | 38.4% | D+21.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 254Precinct 254 | 1,146 | 767 | 25 | 1,938 | 59.1% | 39.6% | D+19.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 424Precinct 424 | 984 | 926 | 28 | 1,938 | 50.8% | 47.8% | D+3.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 227Precinct 227 | 1,137 | 776 | 21 | 1,934 | 58.8% | 40.1% | D+18.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 338Precinct 338 | 848 | 1,056 | 26 | 1,930 | 43.9% | 54.7% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 253Precinct 253 | 1,113 | 748 | 30 | 1,891 | 58.9% | 39.6% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 1,007 | 849 | 30 | 1,886 | 53.4% | 45.0% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 432Precinct 432 | 783 | 1,040 | 36 | 1,859 | 42.1% | 55.9% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 136Precinct 136 | 1,038 | 786 | 21 | 1,845 | 56.3% | 42.6% | D+13.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 441Precinct 441 | 687 | 1,131 | 23 | 1,841 | 37.3% | 61.4% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 140Precinct 140 | 1,376 | 419 | 23 | 1,818 | 75.7% | 23.0% | D+52.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 223Precinct 223 | 1,007 | 764 | 25 | 1,796 | 56.1% | 42.5% | D+13.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 332Precinct 332 | 1,073 | 613 | 32 | 1,718 | 62.5% | 35.7% | D+26.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 121Precinct 121 | 1,270 | 385 | 30 | 1,685 | 75.4% | 22.8% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 252Precinct 252 | 959 | 697 | 21 | 1,677 | 57.2% | 41.6% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 448Precinct 448 | 616 | 916 | 22 | 1,554 | 39.6% | 58.9% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 134Precinct 134 | 895 | 619 | 24 | 1,538 | 58.2% | 40.2% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 320Precinct 320 | 598 | 925 | 13 | 1,536 | 38.9% | 60.2% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 347Precinct 347 | 791 | 700 | 24 | 1,515 | 52.2% | 46.2% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 315Precinct 315 | 735 | 755 | 22 | 1,512 | 48.6% | 49.9% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 423Precinct 423 | 797 | 644 | 16 | 1,457 | 54.7% | 44.2% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 340Precinct 340 | 915 | 479 | 25 | 1,419 | 64.5% | 33.8% | D+30.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 113Precinct 113 | 913 | 406 | 21 | 1,340 | 68.1% | 30.3% | D+37.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 112Precinct 112 | 943 | 359 | 32 | 1,334 | 70.7% | 26.9% | D+43.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 319Precinct 319 | 633 | 647 | 17 | 1,297 | 48.8% | 49.9% | R+1.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 128Precinct 128 | 666 | 597 | 22 | 1,285 | 51.8% | 46.5% | D+5.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 422Precinct 422 | 651 | 491 | 25 | 1,167 | 55.8% | 42.1% | D+13.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 440Precinct 440 | 429 | 715 | 13 | 1,157 | 37.1% | 61.8% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 125Precinct 125 | 634 | 502 | 13 | 1,149 | 55.2% | 43.7% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 451Precinct 451 | 579 | 543 | 19 | 1,141 | 50.7% | 47.6% | D+3.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 430Precinct 430 | 548 | 549 | 12 | 1,109 | 49.4% | 49.5% | R+0.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 204Precinct 204 | 581 | 492 | 12 | 1,085 | 53.5% | 45.3% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 339Precinct 339 | 398 | 664 | 9 | 1,071 | 37.2% | 62.0% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 450Precinct 450 | 373 | 676 | 16 | 1,065 | 35.0% | 63.5% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 114Precinct 114 | 620 | 332 | 18 | 970 | 63.9% | 34.2% | D+29.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 444Precinct 444 | 385 | 515 | 11 | 911 | 42.3% | 56.5% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 351Precinct 351 | 618 | 261 | 12 | 891 | 69.4% | 29.3% | D+40.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 425Precinct 425 | 292 | 429 | 7 | 728 | 40.1% | 58.9% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 219Precinct 219 | 343 | 286 | 4 | 633 | 54.2% | 45.2% | D+9.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 141Precinct 141 | 486 | 132 | 13 | 631 | 77.0% | 20.9% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 132Precinct 132 | 313 | 145 | 20 | 478 | 65.5% | 30.3% | D+35.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 325Precinct 325 | 186 | 232 | 3 | 421 | 44.2% | 55.1% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 438Precinct 438 | 271 | 128 | 12 | 411 | 65.9% | 31.1% | D+34.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 216Precinct 216 | 172 | 185 | 6 | 363 | 47.4% | 51.0% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 225Precinct 225 | 160 | 190 | 2 | 352 | 45.5% | 54.0% | R+8.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 373Precinct 373 | 115 | 198 | 4 | 317 | 36.3% | 62.5% | R+26.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 374Precinct 374 | 98 | 133 | 3 | 234 | 41.9% | 56.8% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 372Precinct 372 | 107 | 51 | 4 | 162 | 66.0% | 31.5% | D+34.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 376Precinct 376 | 37 | 30 | 0 | 67 | 55.2% | 44.8% | D+10.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 375Precinct 375 | 14 | 27 | 0 | 41 | 34.1% | 65.9% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 146Precinct 146 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 75.0% | 25.0% | D+50.0 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +66.8% |
| 1908 | +71.9% |
| 1912 | +82.5% |
| 1916 | +77.0% |
| 1920 | +50.3% |
| 1924 | +58.5% |
| 1928 | −27.4% |
| 1932 | +78.1% |
| 1936 | +74.3% |
| 1940 | +67.8% |
| 1944 | +49.2% |
| 1948 | +56.4% |
| 1952 | −1.5% |
| 1956 | +3.7% |
| 1960 | +28.9% |
| 1964 | +49.4% |
| 1968 | +25.1% |
| 1972 | −14.1% |
| 1976 | +10.0% |
| 1980 | −3.8% |
| 1984 | −30.2% |
| 1988 | −2.3% |
| 1992 | +3.1% |
| 1996 | −4.8% |
| 2000 | −25.6% |
| 2004 | −14.5% |
| 2008 | −2.0% |
| 2012 | −10.4% |
| 2016 | −0.8% |
| 2020 | +10.8% |
| 2024 | +5.6% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 123,954 |
| 2018 | 127,029 |
| 2020 | 152,840 |
| 2022 | 167,750 |
| 2024 | 186,198 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+7,545 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +103,677 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $90,404 in average income, against $109,820 for residents who stayed — 18% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+14.2 on average — 8.5 points more Democratic-leaning than Hays County, TX itself (D+5.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Travis County, TX5,064D+39.3
- Williamson County, TX717R+2.4
- Bexar County, TX671D+9.7
- Harris County, TX497D+5.5
- Comal County, TX425R+45.5
- Guadalupe County, TX354R+29.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Travis County, TX2,606
- Comal County, TX701
- Bexar County, TX680
- Guadalupe County, TX577
- Williamson County, TX516
- Caldwell County, TX495
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +3,692 |
| 2012 | +3,730 |
| 2013 | +5,941 |
| 2014 | +6,976 |
| 2015 | +7,691 |
| 2016 | +7,984 |
| 2017 | +8,419 |
| 2018 | +6,200 |
| 2019 | +5,751 |
| 2021 | +11,259 |
| 2022 | +10,491 |
| 2023 | +9,166 |
| 2024 | +8,832 |
| 2025 | +7,545 |
Hays County has nearly doubled in population since 2010 as Austin's sprawl pushes south, and that demographic churn pushed the 2024 presidential margin to D+5.6 — a notable shift in a county that leaned Republican as recently as 2016.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 82.5 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 30.2 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 5.6 points.
A population of 268,638, a 51% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $89,097 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Garfield County and San Luis Obispo County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Hays County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48209/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.