HarrisDemocratic48.5%31,952TrumpRepublican50.7%33,384SteinIndependent0.4%283
R+2.2- Lead
- 1,432
- Total
- 65,865
- vs nation
- R+0.7
- Turnout
- 48.3%
Akashiccounty
Webb County, TX
Contests in this Place (86 available)
President31 · 1904–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1904–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 48.3% of 142,475 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic61.1%41,842TrumpRepublican37.8%25,904JorgensenLibertarian0.7%446
D+23.3- Lead
- 15,938
- Total
- 68,534
- vs nation
- D+18.8
- Turnout
- 49.4%
ClintonDemocratic73.5%42,307TrumpRepublican22.5%12,947JohnsonLibertarian1.8%1,033
D+51.0- Lead
- 29,360
- Total
- 57,585
- vs nation
- D+48.9
- Turnout
- 45.2%
ObamaDemocratic76.4%37,597RomneyRepublican22.5%11,078GrayLibertarian0.6%303
D+53.9- Lead
- 26,519
- Total
- 49,196
- vs nation
- D+50.0
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic71.4%33,452McCainRepublican28.0%13,119OtherAll other candidates0.5%250
D+43.4- Lead
- 20,333
- Total
- 46,821
- vs nation
- D+36.2
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic56.9%23,654BushRepublican42.7%17,753OtherAll other candidates0.4%149
D+14.2- Lead
- 5,901
- Total
- 41,556
- vs nation
- D+16.7
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic57.4%18,120BushRepublican41.4%13,076NaderGreen0.8%256
D+16.0- Lead
- 5,044
- Total
- 31,571
- vs nation
- D+15.5
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic76.7%18,997DoleRepublican19.0%4,712PerotReform3.8%936
D+57.7- Lead
- 14,285
- Total
- 24,777
- vs nation
- D+49.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+2.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 269,2942024 5-year
- Population density
- 80 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 3,362 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $63,0582024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 3.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 95.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+80.3 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+65.3 in 1908MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hidalgo County, TX · twin score 98.5
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 48.3%68,822 participants ÷ 142,475 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +16.5 ptsPersistently low turnout
- Drop-off vs state
- -2.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 31.8%–35.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68,822 | 142,475 ± 2,311 | 48.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 46,002 | 139,976 ± 2,215 | 32.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 68,397 | 138,569 ± 2,123 | 49.4% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2018Mid | 49,381 | 133,675 ± 1,855 | 36.9% | Audited | C/A |
| 58,264 | 128,842 ± 1,675 | 45.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 49,196 | 116,755 | 42.1% | Derived | — | |
| 46,821 | 103,515 | 45.2% | Derived | — | |
| 41,556 | 90,275 extrapolated | 46.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 152/2.
- 2018: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 150/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Webb County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Webb County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
ANDREW WHITE0—
ANGELA "TIAANGIE" VILLESCAZ0—
BOBBY COLE0—
CARLTON W. HART0—
CHRIS BELL0—
GINA HINOJOSA0—
Show all 9 candidates
JOSE NAVARRO BALBUENA0—
PATRICIA ABREGO0—
ZACH VANCE0—
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 82 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
82 precincts · 65,995 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 356Precinct 356 | 1,253 | 1,590 | 18 | 2,861 | 43.8% | 55.6% | R+11.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 349Precinct 349 | 1,039 | 1,726 | 20 | 2,785 | 37.3% | 62.0% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 359Precinct 359 | 1,319 | 1,417 | 16 | 2,752 | 47.9% | 51.5% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 344Precinct 344 | 1,199 | 1,318 | 27 | 2,544 | 47.1% | 51.8% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 447Precinct 447 | 819 | 1,221 | 19 | 2,059 | 39.8% | 59.3% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 458Precinct 458 | 913 | 1,122 | 14 | 2,049 | 44.6% | 54.8% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 132Precinct 132 | 800 | 898 | 18 | 1,716 | 46.6% | 52.3% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 370Precinct 370 | 723 | 920 | 11 | 1,654 | 43.7% | 55.6% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 274Precinct 274 | 680 | 942 | 12 | 1,634 | 41.6% | 57.6% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 446Precinct 446 | 858 | 720 | 15 | 1,593 | 53.9% | 45.2% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 309Precinct 309 | 930 | 590 | 13 | 1,533 | 60.7% | 38.5% | D+22.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 343Precinct 343 | 777 | 721 | 13 | 1,511 | 51.4% | 47.7% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 371Precinct 371 | 666 | 830 | 14 | 1,510 | 44.1% | 55.0% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 154Precinct 154 | 662 | 771 | 13 | 1,446 | 45.8% | 53.3% | R+7.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 340Precinct 340 | 632 | 767 | 17 | 1,416 | 44.6% | 54.2% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 255Precinct 255 | 618 | 750 | 8 | 1,376 | 44.9% | 54.5% | R+9.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 342Precinct 342 | 651 | 667 | 11 | 1,329 | 49.0% | 50.2% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 231Precinct 231 | 579 | 637 | 10 | 1,226 | 47.2% | 52.0% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250APrecinct 250A | 560 | 644 | 9 | 1,213 | 46.2% | 53.1% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 252Precinct 252 | 563 | 541 | 13 | 1,117 | 50.4% | 48.4% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 239Precinct 239 | 648 | 461 | 6 | 1,115 | 58.1% | 41.3% | D+16.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 345Precinct 345 | 555 | 539 | 17 | 1,111 | 50.0% | 48.5% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 130Precinct 130 | 493 | 543 | 8 | 1,044 | 47.2% | 52.0% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 267Precinct 267 | 524 | 476 | 5 | 1,005 | 52.1% | 47.4% | D+4.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 341Precinct 341 | 431 | 543 | 10 | 984 | 43.8% | 55.2% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 218Precinct 218 | 516 | 448 | 14 | 978 | 52.8% | 45.8% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 272Precinct 272 | 438 | 494 | 5 | 937 | 46.7% | 52.7% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 134Precinct 134 | 422 | 486 | 8 | 916 | 46.1% | 53.1% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 176APrecinct 176A | 365 | 521 | 3 | 889 | 41.1% | 58.6% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 129Precinct 129 | 409 | 438 | 7 | 854 | 47.9% | 51.3% | R+3.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 169Precinct 169 | 395 | 434 | 6 | 835 | 47.3% | 52.0% | R+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 273Precinct 273 | 370 | 411 | 6 | 787 | 47.0% | 52.2% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 219Precinct 219 | 396 | 336 | 8 | 740 | 53.5% | 45.4% | D+8.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 124Precinct 124 | 404 | 326 | 7 | 737 | 54.8% | 44.2% | D+10.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 413Precinct 413 | 404 | 319 | 7 | 730 | 55.3% | 43.7% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 405Precinct 405 | 373 | 325 | 7 | 705 | 52.9% | 46.1% | D+6.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 361Precinct 361 | 397 | 299 | 8 | 704 | 56.4% | 42.5% | D+13.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 133Precinct 133 | 319 | 379 | 2 | 700 | 45.6% | 54.1% | R+8.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 311Precinct 311 | 401 | 277 | 7 | 685 | 58.5% | 40.4% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 266Precinct 266 | 366 | 309 | 7 | 682 | 53.7% | 45.3% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 404Precinct 404 | 355 | 286 | 6 | 647 | 54.9% | 44.2% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 221Precinct 221 | 369 | 254 | 12 | 635 | 58.1% | 40.0% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 415Precinct 415 | 327 | 238 | 9 | 574 | 57.0% | 41.5% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 128Precinct 128 | 297 | 267 | 8 | 572 | 51.9% | 46.7% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 401Precinct 401 | 331 | 231 | 8 | 570 | 58.1% | 40.5% | D+17.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 226Precinct 226 | 307 | 233 | 6 | 546 | 56.2% | 42.7% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 275APrecinct 275A | 223 | 313 | 6 | 542 | 41.1% | 57.7% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 402Precinct 402 | 315 | 219 | 8 | 542 | 58.1% | 40.4% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 220Precinct 220 | 293 | 225 | 4 | 522 | 56.1% | 43.1% | D+13.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 308Precinct 308 | 237 | 234 | 3 | 474 | 50.0% | 49.4% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 312Precinct 312 | 266 | 180 | 9 | 455 | 58.5% | 39.6% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 403Precinct 403 | 241 | 205 | 5 | 451 | 53.4% | 45.5% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 164Precinct 164 | 238 | 189 | 6 | 433 | 55.0% | 43.6% | D+11.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 135Precinct 135 | 197 | 226 | 9 | 432 | 45.6% | 52.3% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 237Precinct 237 | 124 | 250 | 6 | 380 | 32.6% | 65.8% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 125Precinct 125 | 213 | 153 | 6 | 372 | 57.3% | 41.1% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 123Precinct 123 | 206 | 149 | 1 | 356 | 57.9% | 41.9% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 414Precinct 414 | 206 | 137 | 1 | 344 | 59.9% | 39.8% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 363Precinct 363 | 185 | 152 | 3 | 340 | 54.4% | 44.7% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 465Precinct 465 | 200 | 136 | 3 | 339 | 59.0% | 40.1% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 416Precinct 416 | 190 | 134 | 7 | 331 | 57.4% | 40.5% | D+16.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 406Precinct 406 | 179 | 145 | 6 | 330 | 54.2% | 43.9% | D+10.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 177Precinct 177 | 170 | 151 | 4 | 325 | 52.3% | 46.5% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 227Precinct 227 | 139 | 181 | 2 | 322 | 43.2% | 56.2% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 268Precinct 268 | 130 | 191 | 1 | 322 | 40.4% | 59.3% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 422Precinct 422 | 145 | 132 | 2 | 279 | 52.0% | 47.3% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 417Precinct 417 | 147 | 95 | 1 | 243 | 60.5% | 39.1% | D+21.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 448Precinct 448 | 104 | 126 | 5 | 235 | 44.3% | 53.6% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 251Precinct 251 | 113 | 86 | 4 | 203 | 55.7% | 42.4% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 460Precinct 460 | 114 | 87 | 2 | 203 | 56.2% | 42.9% | D+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 310Precinct 310 | 109 | 84 | 3 | 196 | 55.6% | 42.9% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 407Precinct 407 | 104 | 87 | 3 | 194 | 53.6% | 44.8% | D+8.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 453Precinct 453 | 104 | 88 | 0 | 192 | 54.2% | 45.8% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 136Precinct 136 | 53 | 133 | 0 | 186 | 28.5% | 71.5% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 238Precinct 238 | 58 | 85 | 3 | 146 | 39.7% | 58.2% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 462Precinct 462 | 83 | 51 | 1 | 135 | 61.5% | 37.8% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 457Precinct 457 | 9 | 41 | 0 | 50 | 18.0% | 82.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 278Precinct 278 | 13 | 18 | 0 | 31 | 41.9% | 58.1% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250CPrecinct 250C | 13 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 43.3% | 56.7% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 275BPrecinct 275B | 12 | 16 | 0 | 28 | 42.9% | 57.1% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 176BPrecinct 176B | 10 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250BPrecinct 250B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
presidential history
Party record book
Webb County, TX · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1904–2024 · 31 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
90.1%
10,073 votes · D+80.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 86.5%
Republican
William H. Taft1908
82.6%
1,109 votes · R+65.3
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 65.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Hillary Clinton2016
42,307votes
73.5% of the vote · D+51.0
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 41,842 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
33,384votes
50.7% of the vote · R+2.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 25,904 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+74.5pts D vs U.S.
Place D+49.3 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · John F. Kennedy, 1960 · +69.4 pts
Republican
William H. Taft1908
+55.7pts R vs U.S.
Place R+65.3 · U.S. R+9.6
Runner-up · William H. Taft, 1912 · +34.4 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
DJudith ZaffiriniState Senate · 21
DRichard RaymondState House · 42
RDon McLaughlinState House · 80
Seats representing Webb County, TX. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 123,291 |
| 2018 | 129,244 |
| 2020 | 137,840 |
| 2022 | 143,148 |
| 2024 | 148,536 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2,250 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −29,288 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,687 in average income, against $55,182 for residents who stayed — 3% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+7.5 on average — 9.7 points more Democratic-leaning than Webb County, TX itself (R+2.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Bexar County, TX396D+9.7
- Harris County, TX131D+5.5
- Travis County, TX97D+39.3
- Hidalgo County, TX80R+2.9
- Dallas County, TX74D+22.2
- Tarrant County, TX45R+5.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Bexar County, TX895
- Harris County, TX178
- Travis County, TX158
- Hidalgo County, TX143
- Dallas County, TX99
- Tarrant County, TX62
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −700 |
| 2012 | −430 |
| 2013 | −1,096 |
| 2014 | −2,031 |
| 2015 | −2,664 |
| 2016 | −2,670 |
| 2017 | −2,916 |
| 2018 | −2,332 |
| 2019 | −2,208 |
| 2021 | −2,106 |
| 2022 | −3,141 |
| 2023 | −2,108 |
| 2024 | −2,636 |
| 2025 | −2,250 |
Webb County, anchored by Laredo on the Rio Grande, voted Democratic for decades before narrowing to R+2.2 in 2024—one of the steepest rightward shifts among majority-Hispanic counties in Texas.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 80.3 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 65.3 points in 1908. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 25.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 2.2 points.
A population of 269,294, a 4% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $63,058 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hidalgo County and Maverick County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Hidalgo County
Texas
98.5twin score
% Latino2012–2016 trajectoryelasticity≠ % Catholic
Maverick County
Texas
97.9twin score
12-yr trend2012–2016 trajectory% Catholic≠ elasticity
Imperial County
California
96.7twin score
% Catholic% Latino2016 margin≠ 12-yr trend
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Webb County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48479/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Webb County
Texas at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Webb County, Texas vote in 2024?
In 2024, Webb County, Texas voted Republican by 2.2 points (R+2.2), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 65,865 votes cast, 31,952 went Democratic and 33,384 went Republican.
When did Webb County, Texas last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Webb County, Texas voted Democratic was 2020.
How many people live in Webb County, Texas?
Webb County, Texas has a population of 269,294 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Webb County, Texas?
Median household income in Webb County, Texas is $63,058 — below the national median of $80,734. The Texas state median is $78,476.
What is the political history of Webb County, Texas?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Webb County, Texas from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 27 went Democratic and 4 went Republican.