Imperial County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
134 precincts · 53,849 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -365021365021 | 1,358 | 2,080 | 64 | 3,502 | 38.8% | 59.4% | R+20.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -411105411105 | 1,387 | 1,984 | 95 | 3,466 | 40.0% | 57.2% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -411102411102 | 1,073 | 1,173 | 58 | 2,304 | 46.6% | 50.9% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -365015365015 | 815 | 1,069 | 47 | 1,931 | 42.2% | 55.4% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -245205245205 | 850 | 917 | 63 | 1,830 | 46.4% | 50.1% | R+3.7 |
| Precinct -121010121010 | 1,018 | 668 | 59 | 1,745 | 58.3% | 38.3% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -245220245220 | 937 | 737 | 44 | 1,718 | 54.5% | 42.9% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -121013121013 | 1,003 | 564 | 63 | 1,630 | 61.5% | 34.6% | D+26.9 |
| Precinct -345202345202 | 912 | 608 | 47 | 1,567 | 58.2% | 38.8% | D+19.4 |
| Precinct -121016121016 | 871 | 653 | 38 | 1,562 | 55.8% | 41.8% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -245212245212 | 787 | 719 | 38 | 1,544 | 51.0% | 46.6% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -121004121004 | 915 | 541 | 31 | 1,487 | 61.5% | 36.4% | D+25.2 |
| Precinct -121012121012 | 850 | 574 | 40 | 1,464 | 58.1% | 39.2% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -554021554021 | 659 | 733 | 33 | 1,425 | 46.2% | 51.4% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -286232286232 | 624 | 632 | 37 | 1,293 | 48.3% | 48.9% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -511126511126 | 754 | 490 | 38 | 1,282 | 58.8% | 38.2% | D+20.6 |
| Precinct -121023121023 | 651 | 545 | 23 | 1,219 | 53.4% | 44.7% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -245219245219 | 514 | 495 | 29 | 1,038 | 49.5% | 47.7% | D+1.8 |
| Precinct -432019432019 | 424 | 446 | 28 | 898 | 47.2% | 49.7% | R+2.4 |
| Precinct -121019121019 | 488 | 364 | 31 | 883 | 55.3% | 41.2% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -565229565229 | 358 | 490 | 19 | 867 | 41.3% | 56.5% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -385014385014 | 269 | 544 | 14 | 827 | 32.5% | 65.8% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -547239547239 | 330 | 428 | 16 | 774 | 42.6% | 55.3% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -511127511127 | 379 | 354 | 17 | 750 | 50.5% | 47.2% | D+3.3 |
| Precinct -247229247229 | 239 | 458 | 19 | 716 | 33.4% | 64.0% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -365029365029 | 294 | 394 | 21 | 709 | 41.5% | 55.6% | R+14.1 |
| Precinct -345201345201 | 325 | 341 | 19 | 685 | 47.4% | 49.8% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -247235247235 | 295 | 360 | 17 | 672 | 43.9% | 53.6% | R+9.7 |
| Precinct -483021483021 | 303 | 349 | 11 | 663 | 45.7% | 52.6% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -286213286213 | 329 | 268 | 14 | 611 | 53.8% | 43.9% | D+10.0 |
| Precinct -365016365016 | 231 | 331 | 11 | 573 | 40.3% | 57.8% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -345223345223 | 306 | 244 | 14 | 564 | 54.3% | 43.3% | D+11.0 |
| Precinct -245213245213 | 296 | 229 | 19 | 544 | 54.4% | 42.1% | D+12.3 |
| Precinct -121006121006 | 318 | 194 | 12 | 524 | 60.7% | 37.0% | D+23.7 |
| Precinct -474117474117 | 276 | 202 | 17 | 495 | 55.8% | 40.8% | D+14.9 |
| Precinct -121007121007 | 229 | 189 | 9 | 427 | 53.6% | 44.3% | D+9.4 |
| Precinct -389208389208 | 188 | 205 | 21 | 414 | 45.4% | 49.5% | R+4.1 |
| Precinct -545210545210 | 234 | 167 | 7 | 408 | 57.4% | 40.9% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -584021584021 | 108 | 281 | 5 | 394 | 27.4% | 71.3% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -245227245227 | 196 | 167 | 5 | 368 | 53.3% | 45.4% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -247234247234 | 132 | 229 | 6 | 367 | 36.0% | 62.4% | R+26.4 |
| Precinct -545212545212 | 207 | 136 | 13 | 356 | 58.1% | 38.2% | D+19.9 |
| Precinct -521041521041 | 163 | 181 | 9 | 353 | 46.2% | 51.3% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -584020584020 | 113 | 226 | 9 | 348 | 32.5% | 64.9% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -554022554022 | 170 | 164 | 10 | 344 | 49.4% | 47.7% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -483020483020 | 136 | 175 | 15 | 326 | 41.7% | 53.7% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -521042521042 | 146 | 141 | 5 | 292 | 50.0% | 48.3% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -588260588260 | 150 | 132 | 5 | 287 | 52.3% | 46.0% | D+6.3 |
| Precinct -121024121024 | 123 | 118 | 4 | 245 | 50.2% | 48.2% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -545209545209 | 135 | 97 | 4 | 236 | 57.2% | 41.1% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -565001565001 | 89 | 125 | 4 | 218 | 40.8% | 57.3% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -345224345224 | 111 | 91 | 4 | 206 | 53.9% | 44.2% | D+9.7 |
| Precinct -586008586008 | 134 | 46 | 4 | 184 | 72.8% | 25.0% | D+47.8 |
| Precinct -411143411143 | 112 | 62 | 5 | 179 | 62.6% | 34.6% | D+27.9 |
| Precinct -483023483023 | 84 | 77 | 7 | 168 | 50.0% | 45.8% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -482028482028 | 68 | 88 | 7 | 163 | 41.7% | 54.0% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -365022365022 | 71 | 79 | 3 | 153 | 46.4% | 51.6% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -245224245224 | 92 | 56 | 3 | 151 | 60.9% | 37.1% | D+23.8 |
| Precinct -285001285001 | 36 | 109 | 3 | 148 | 24.3% | 73.6% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -286244286244 | 95 | 39 | 7 | 141 | 67.4% | 27.7% | D+39.7 |
| Precinct -389207389207 | 42 | 89 | 4 | 135 | 31.1% | 65.9% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -121015121015 | 75 | 46 | 0 | 121 | 62.0% | 38.0% | D+24.0 |
| Precinct -545238545238 | 54 | 63 | 0 | 117 | 46.2% | 53.8% | R+7.7 |
| Precinct -482025482025 | 52 | 48 | 3 | 103 | 50.5% | 46.6% | D+3.9 |
| Precinct -387246387246 | 30 | 61 | 1 | 92 | 32.6% | 66.3% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -482018482018 | 25 | 63 | 2 | 90 | 27.8% | 70.0% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -586010586010 | 53 | 31 | 2 | 86 | 61.6% | 36.0% | D+25.6 |
| Precinct -585049585049 | 37 | 46 | 1 | 84 | 44.0% | 54.8% | R+10.7 |
| Precinct -584051584051 | 31 | 51 | 1 | 83 | 37.3% | 61.4% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -387206387206 | 12 | 67 | 2 | 81 | 14.8% | 82.7% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -482029482029 | 44 | 35 | 2 | 81 | 54.3% | 43.2% | D+11.1 |
| Precinct -287241287241 | 34 | 44 | 1 | 79 | 43.0% | 55.7% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -481116481116 | 29 | 44 | 6 | 79 | 36.7% | 55.7% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -121009121009 | 42 | 32 | 2 | 76 | 55.3% | 42.1% | D+13.2 |
| Precinct -345205345205 | 34 | 30 | 7 | 71 | 47.9% | 42.3% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -585016585016 | 20 | 45 | 1 | 66 | 30.3% | 68.2% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -481141481141 | 9 | 56 | 0 | 65 | 13.8% | 86.2% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -289204289204 | 33 | 30 | 1 | 64 | 51.6% | 46.9% | D+4.7 |
| Precinct -584004584004 | 13 | 49 | 2 | 64 | 20.3% | 76.6% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -587235587235 | 14 | 47 | 3 | 64 | 21.9% | 73.4% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -511131511131 | 24 | 36 | 3 | 63 | 38.1% | 57.1% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -287239287239 | 12 | 44 | 3 | 59 | 20.3% | 74.6% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -389225389225 | 29 | 30 | 0 | 59 | 49.2% | 50.8% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -588270588270 | 22 | 34 | 0 | 56 | 39.3% | 60.7% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -221021221021 | 37 | 17 | 0 | 54 | 68.5% | 31.5% | D+37.0 |
| Precinct -586037586037 | 14 | 39 | 1 | 54 | 25.9% | 72.2% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -387245387245 | 23 | 30 | 0 | 53 | 43.4% | 56.6% | R+13.2 |
| Precinct -584017584017 | 11 | 41 | 0 | 52 | 21.2% | 78.8% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -581009581009 | 27 | 22 | 2 | 51 | 52.9% | 43.1% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -586005586005 | 22 | 29 | 0 | 51 | 43.1% | 56.9% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -588214588214 | 22 | 27 | 0 | 49 | 44.9% | 55.1% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -584005584005 | 18 | 28 | 1 | 47 | 38.3% | 59.6% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -385017385017 | 18 | 28 | 0 | 46 | 39.1% | 60.9% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -387210387210 | 11 | 33 | 1 | 45 | 24.4% | 73.3% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct -482024482024 | 19 | 22 | 3 | 44 | 43.2% | 50.0% | R+6.8 |
| Precinct -483113483113 | 10 | 32 | 1 | 43 | 23.3% | 74.4% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -385024385024 | 17 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 40.5% | 59.5% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -554025554025 | 11 | 26 | 4 | 41 | 26.8% | 63.4% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -287208287208 | 9 | 27 | 1 | 37 | 24.3% | 73.0% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -385005385005 | 15 | 18 | 0 | 33 | 45.5% | 54.5% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -588215588215 | 12 | 21 | 0 | 33 | 36.4% | 63.6% | R+27.3 |
| Precinct -484135484135 | 7 | 25 | 0 | 32 | 21.9% | 78.1% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -554024554024 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 22 | 45.5% | 54.5% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -482110482110 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 20 | 20.0% | 80.0% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -521043521043 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 45.0% | 55.0% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -581125581125 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -587234587234 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 20 | 35.0% | 65.0% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -289203289203 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 10.5% | 84.2% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -484115484115 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 18 | 22.2% | 77.8% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -586032586032 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 18 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -286238286238 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 17 | 58.8% | 35.3% | D+23.5 |
| Precinct -484162484162 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 17 | 41.2% | 52.9% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -548211548211 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 17 | 58.8% | 41.2% | D+17.6 |
| Precinct -585229585229 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 88.2% | 5.9% | D+82.4 |
| Precinct -484113484113 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 31.3% | 68.8% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -385015385015 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -385009385009 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 57.1% | 42.9% | D+14.3 |
| Precinct -582134582134 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 14 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -285004285004 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 13 | 7.7% | 92.3% | R+84.6 |
| Precinct -285247285247 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 61.5% | 23.1% | D+38.5 |
| Precinct -287245287245 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -385046385046 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 53.8% | 46.2% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -481101481101 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 13 | 7.7% | 92.3% | R+84.6 |
| Precinct -548265548265 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 53.8% | 46.2% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -287209287209 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -287206287206 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 18.2% | 72.7% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -385013385013 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 54.5% | 45.5% | D+9.1 |
| Precinct -586007586007 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 63.6% | 18.2% | D+45.5 |
| Precinct -281006281006 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 80.0% | 20.0% | D+60.0 |
| Precinct -287250287250 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -585017585017 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -585272585272 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 40.0% | 40.0% | Even |
| Precinct -588263588263 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 30.0% | 70.0% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -281045281045 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 88.9% | 11.1% | D+77.8 |
Presidential margin, 1908–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | −12.3% |
| 1912 | +38.5% |
| 1916 | +8.7% |
| 1920 | −36.8% |
| 1924 | −39.2% |
| 1928 | −36.6% |
| 1932 | +38.3% |
| 1936 | +22.4% |
| 1940 | +5.9% |
| 1944 | −8.0% |
| 1948 | −7.8% |
| 1952 | −24.4% |
| 1956 | −12.4% |
| 1960 | −7.5% |
| 1964 | +3.8% |
| 1968 | −16.3% |
| 1972 | −27.1% |
| 1976 | −1.8% |
| 1980 | −19.0% |
| 1984 | −25.1% |
| 1988 | −11.3% |
| 1992 | +5.3% |
| 1996 | +18.5% |
| 2000 | +10.2% |
| 2004 | +6.1% |
| 2008 | +26.2% |
| 2012 | +32.0% |
| 2016 | +41.5% |
| 2020 | +24.4% |
| 2024 | −0.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Imperial County, CA registers Democratic but votes Republican — a 24-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
88,694 registered voters · 2024 · up from 86,318 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2,228 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −20,520 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $44,722 in average income, against $54,971 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+4.7 on average — 5.5 points more Democratic-leaning than Imperial County, CA itself (R+0.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- San Diego County, CA472D+16.8
- Riverside County, CA443R+1.3
- Yuma County, AZ227R+20.4
- Los Angeles County, CA177D+32.9
- Maricopa County, AZ117R+3.5
- San Bernardino County, CA98R+2.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- San Diego County, CA619
- Riverside County, CA398
- Yuma County, AZ325
- Maricopa County, AZ225
- Los Angeles County, CA172
- Orange County, CA90
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −991 |
| 2012 | −1,249 |
| 2013 | −2,472 |
| 2014 | −951 |
| 2015 | −1,879 |
| 2016 | −1,531 |
| 2017 | −767 |
| 2018 | −1,808 |
| 2019 | −2,000 |
| 2021 | −1,159 |
| 2022 | −1,427 |
| 2023 | −1,297 |
| 2024 | −761 |
| 2025 | −2,228 |
Imperial County sits along the U.S.-Mexico border with a majority-Latino electorate and an economy anchored by agriculture, yet its presidential margin has narrowed dramatically over the past decade, landing at R+0.9 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 41.5 points in 2016 and a Republican high of 39.2 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 25.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 0.9 points.
A population of 180,202, a 9% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $57,681 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Webb County and Hidalgo County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Imperial County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06025/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.