Duchesne County, Utah
Precinct data
Results by precinct
50 precincts · 8,898 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -RO22RO22 | 147 | 605 | 22 | 774 | 19.0% | 78.2% | R+59.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -DU12:GRGR | 63 | 653 | 18 | 734 | 8.6% | 89.0% | R+80.4 |
| Precinct -RO12RO12 | 82 | 437 | 8 | 527 | 15.6% | 82.9% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -RO32RO32 | 56 | 446 | 9 | 511 | 11.0% | 87.3% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -DU11:DWGRDWGR | 38 | 458 | 5 | 501 | 7.6% | 91.4% | R+83.8 |
| Precinct -RO42RO42 | 63 | 409 | 6 | 478 | 13.2% | 85.6% | R+72.4 |
| Precinct -NE11:CWNRCWNR | 41 | 395 | 12 | 448 | 9.2% | 88.2% | R+79.0 |
| Precinct -AB11:UWURUWUR | 26 | 349 | 2 | 377 | 6.9% | 92.6% | R+85.7 |
| Precinct -MH11:UWURUWUR | 23 | 346 | 5 | 374 | 6.1% | 92.5% | R+86.4 |
| Precinct -RO41RO41 | 22 | 348 | 4 | 374 | 5.9% | 93.0% | R+87.2 |
| Precinct -TA11:HWTRHWTR | 19 | 254 | 2 | 275 | 6.9% | 92.4% | R+85.5 |
| Precinct -NE11:NWNRNWNR | 39 | 213 | 3 | 255 | 15.3% | 83.5% | R+68.2 |
| Precinct -FR11:FWGRFWGR | 54 | 193 | 0 | 247 | 21.9% | 78.1% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -RO51:JW2JW2 | 18 | 181 | 3 | 202 | 8.9% | 89.6% | R+80.7 |
| Precinct -RO21RO21 | 15 | 166 | 4 | 185 | 8.1% | 89.7% | R+81.6 |
| Precinct -MY12MY12 | 37 | 139 | 5 | 181 | 20.4% | 76.8% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -RO51:JW1JW1 | 13 | 159 | 3 | 175 | 7.4% | 90.9% | R+83.4 |
| Precinct -DU11:GRGR | 18 | 139 | 5 | 162 | 11.1% | 85.8% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -RO12:JW2JW2 | 17 | 137 | 3 | 157 | 10.8% | 87.3% | R+76.4 |
| Precinct -AR11:UWURUWUR | 15 | 140 | 1 | 156 | 9.6% | 89.7% | R+80.1 |
| Precinct -NE11:CWCW | 10 | 132 | 1 | 143 | 7.0% | 92.3% | R+85.3 |
| Precinct -RO31RO31 | 12 | 118 | 1 | 131 | 9.2% | 90.1% | R+80.9 |
| Precinct -FR11:PWGRPWGR | 34 | 94 | 2 | 130 | 26.2% | 72.3% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -AM11:JW4JW4 | 15 | 104 | 1 | 120 | 12.5% | 86.7% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -AL12:URUR | 11 | 101 | 2 | 114 | 9.6% | 88.6% | R+78.9 |
| Precinct -RO51:JW3JW3 | 15 | 88 | 1 | 104 | 14.4% | 84.6% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -AR11:J1URJ1UR | 10 | 84 | 2 | 96 | 10.4% | 87.5% | R+77.1 |
| Precinct -AM11:JW3JW3 | 1 | 90 | 1 | 92 | 1.1% | 97.8% | R+96.7 |
| Precinct -TA12:TRTR | 2 | 88 | 0 | 90 | 2.2% | 97.8% | R+95.6 |
| Precinct -MH11:URUR | 15 | 68 | 1 | 84 | 17.9% | 81.0% | R+63.1 |
| Precinct -NE11:NRNR | 8 | 68 | 0 | 76 | 10.5% | 89.5% | R+78.9 |
| Precinct -RO11:SBD2SBD2 | 3 | 55 | 2 | 60 | 5.0% | 91.7% | R+86.7 |
| Precinct -DU11:PWGRPWGR | 18 | 39 | 2 | 59 | 30.5% | 66.1% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -AM11AM11 | 6 | 47 | 0 | 53 | 11.3% | 88.7% | R+77.4 |
| Precinct -AR11:DWURDWUR | 1 | 43 | 0 | 44 | 2.3% | 97.7% | R+95.5 |
| Precinct -FR11:GRGR | 9 | 31 | 1 | 41 | 22.0% | 75.6% | R+53.7 |
| Precinct -AR11:DWGRDWGR | 1 | 36 | 1 | 38 | 2.6% | 94.7% | R+92.1 |
| Precinct -TA11:TRTR | 7 | 31 | 0 | 38 | 18.4% | 81.6% | R+63.2 |
| Precinct -NE11NE11 | 1 | 35 | 0 | 36 | 2.8% | 97.2% | R+94.4 |
| Precinct -AM11:DWDW | 0 | 34 | 1 | 35 | 0.0% | 97.1% | R+97.1 |
| Precinct -NE11:NWNW | 3 | 29 | 0 | 32 | 9.4% | 90.6% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -AR11:URUR | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -RO21:CWCW | 1 | 27 | 0 | 28 | 3.6% | 96.4% | R+92.9 |
| Precinct -AB11AB11 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 22 | 4.5% | 95.5% | R+90.9 |
| Precinct -RO41:CWCW | 1 | 21 | 0 | 22 | 4.5% | 95.5% | R+90.9 |
| Precinct -AM11:JW1JW1 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 20 | 10.0% | 80.0% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -MH11:DWGRDWGR | 0 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 0.0% | 83.3% | R+83.3 |
| Precinct -MH11:GRGR | 5 | 13 | 0 | 18 | 27.8% | 72.2% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -RO51RO51 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -DU12:DWGRDWGR | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1916–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1916 | +29.7% |
| 1920 | −28.4% |
| 1924 | −24.6% |
| 1928 | −27.5% |
| 1932 | +8.4% |
| 1936 | +29.2% |
| 1940 | +20.0% |
| 1944 | +17.7% |
| 1948 | +11.2% |
| 1952 | −22.6% |
| 1956 | −36.0% |
| 1960 | −14.0% |
| 1964 | +2.7% |
| 1968 | −30.9% |
| 1972 | −50.2% |
| 1976 | −37.9% |
| 1980 | −61.7% |
| 1984 | −70.8% |
| 1988 | −42.9% |
| 1992 | −26.5% |
| 1996 | −42.2% |
| 2000 | −62.5% |
| 2004 | −72.1% |
| 2008 | −65.8% |
| 2012 | −80.2% |
| 2016 | −71.7% |
| 2020 | −77.9% |
| 2024 | −75.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.5 points more Democratic.
10,644 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+109 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −345 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,840 in average income, against $80,796 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+33.9 on average — 42 points more Democratic-leaning than Duchesne County, UT itself (R+75.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Uintah County, UT100R+73.6
- Salt Lake County, UT98D+10.2
- Utah County, UT61R+39.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Uintah County, UT124
- Salt Lake County, UT68
- Utah County, UT44
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −198 |
| 2012 | +13 |
| 2013 | +634 |
| 2014 | −88 |
| 2015 | +243 |
| 2016 | −753 |
| 2017 | −582 |
| 2018 | −161 |
| 2019 | −236 |
| 2021 | +86 |
| 2022 | +249 |
| 2023 | +224 |
| 2024 | +115 |
| 2025 | +109 |
Duchesne County's economy anchors on oil, gas, and ranching across the Uinta Basin's high desert, producing a rural electorate that backed the Republican presidential nominee by more than 75 points in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 29.7 points in 1916 and a Republican high of 80.2 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.0 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 75.9 points.
A population of 20,185, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $78,445 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Uintah County and Sevier County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Duchesne County, Utah. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/49013/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.