Arkansas County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
30 precincts · 5,547 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -81 - Stuttgart 281 - Stuttgart 2 | 293 | 639 | 19 | 951 | 30.8% | 67.2% | R+36.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -91 - Stuttgart 391 - Stuttgart 3 | 252 | 672 | 20 | 944 | 26.7% | 71.2% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -71 - Stuttgart 171 - Stuttgart 1 | 419 | 153 | 11 | 583 | 71.9% | 26.2% | D+45.6 |
| Precinct -22 - Lagrue22 - Lagrue | 38 | 399 | 3 | 440 | 8.6% | 90.7% | R+82.0 |
| Precinct -55 - Dewitt 355 - Dewitt 3 | 42 | 272 | 3 | 317 | 13.2% | 85.8% | R+72.6 |
| Precinct -13 - Keaton13 - Keaton | 70 | 236 | 1 | 307 | 22.8% | 76.9% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -53 - Dewitt 253 - Dewitt 2 | 49 | 188 | 5 | 242 | 20.2% | 77.7% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -21 - Prairie21 - Prairie | 18 | 154 | 2 | 174 | 10.3% | 88.5% | R+78.2 |
| Precinct -51 - DeWitt 151 - DeWitt 1 | 101 | 61 | 5 | 167 | 60.5% | 36.5% | D+24.0 |
| Precinct -42 - Gum Pond42 - Gum Pond | 20 | 121 | 2 | 143 | 14.0% | 84.6% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -14 - Mill Bayou14 - Mill Bayou | 13 | 87 | 4 | 104 | 12.5% | 83.7% | R+71.2 |
| Precinct -15 - Almyra15 - Almyra | 7 | 93 | 0 | 100 | 7.0% | 93.0% | R+86.0 |
| Precinct -31 - Chester31 - Chester | 12 | 86 | 2 | 100 | 12.0% | 86.0% | R+74.0 |
| Precinct -35 - Gillett Ward 235 - Gillett Ward 2 | 14 | 82 | 2 | 98 | 14.3% | 83.7% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -37 - PT Deluce37 - PT Deluce | 5 | 84 | 1 | 90 | 5.6% | 93.3% | R+87.8 |
| Precinct -44 - Henton44 - Henton | 9 | 79 | 1 | 89 | 10.1% | 88.8% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct -41 - Morris41 - Morris | 10 | 72 | 2 | 84 | 11.9% | 85.7% | R+73.8 |
| Precinct -34 - Gillett Ward 134 - Gillett Ward 1 | 12 | 58 | 2 | 72 | 16.7% | 80.6% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -38 - Bayou Meto38 - Bayou Meto | 9 | 61 | 1 | 71 | 12.7% | 85.9% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -23 - St. Charles23 - St. Charles | 5 | 64 | 0 | 69 | 7.2% | 92.8% | R+85.5 |
| Precinct -36 - Gillett Ward 336 - Gillett Ward 3 | 25 | 39 | 2 | 66 | 37.9% | 59.1% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -43 - Barton43 - Barton | 2 | 64 | 0 | 66 | 3.0% | 97.0% | R+93.9 |
| Precinct -46 - Garland46 - Garland | 6 | 48 | 1 | 55 | 10.9% | 87.3% | R+76.4 |
| Precinct -47 - Humphrey Ward 147 - Humphrey Ward 1 | 32 | 16 | 1 | 49 | 65.3% | 32.7% | D+32.7 |
| Precinct -11 - McFall11 - McFall | 8 | 35 | 0 | 43 | 18.6% | 81.4% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -32 - Arkansas32 - Arkansas | 11 | 25 | 1 | 37 | 29.7% | 67.6% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -12 - Crockett12 - Crockett | 9 | 25 | 0 | 34 | 26.5% | 73.5% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -45 - Brewer45 - Brewer | 0 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -48 - Humphrey Ward 348 - Humphrey Ward 3 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 21 | 38.1% | 57.1% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -33 - Stanley33 - Stanley | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 44.4% | 44.4% | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +20.3% |
| 1896 | +35.9% |
| 1900 | +24.5% |
| 1904 | +21.8% |
| 1908 | +15.8% |
| 1912 | +42.2% |
| 1916 | +29.2% |
| 1920 | −1.8% |
| 1924 | +21.0% |
| 1928 | +17.5% |
| 1932 | +69.9% |
| 1936 | +70.7% |
| 1940 | +51.2% |
| 1944 | +24.7% |
| 1948 | +31.1% |
| 1952 | −0.9% |
| 1956 | −1.6% |
| 1960 | +14.0% |
| 1964 | −8.1% |
| 1968 | +2.8% |
| 1972 | −47.5% |
| 1976 | +38.9% |
| 1980 | +11.2% |
| 1984 | −20.6% |
| 1988 | −12.9% |
| 1992 | +26.5% |
| 1996 | +34.5% |
| 2000 | −7.5% |
| 2004 | −9.8% |
| 2008 | −22.4% |
| 2012 | −22.2% |
| 2016 | −32.0% |
| 2020 | −39.5% |
| 2024 | −44.1% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 22.7%1,012 | 74.9%3,342 | 4,459 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 75.3%4,567 | 6,068 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 10,161 |
| 2020 | 10,300 |
| 2022 | 8,901 |
| 2024 | 9,137 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−176 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,337 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $38,320 in average income, against $65,096 for residents who stayed — 41% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+10.6 on average — 55 points more Democratic-leaning than Arkansas County, AR itself (R+44.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pulaski County, AR43D+22.1
- Jefferson County, AR39D+20.1
- Monroe County, AR33R+15.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pulaski County, AR58
- Jefferson County, AR31
- Prairie County, AR26
- Faulkner County, AR22
- Lonoke County, AR20
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −137 |
| 2012 | +44 |
| 2013 | −213 |
| 2014 | −283 |
| 2015 | −151 |
| 2016 | −188 |
| 2017 | −271 |
| 2018 | −141 |
| 2019 | −229 |
| 2021 | −302 |
| 2022 | −38 |
| 2023 | −74 |
| 2024 | −178 |
| 2025 | −176 |
Arkansas County sits in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain, an agricultural economy built on rice and soybeans. Its 2024 presidential margin of R+44.1 reflects a pattern of decisive Republican dominance that has deepened steadily over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 70.7 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 47.5 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 44.1 points.
A population of 16,515, a 67% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $53,164 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Ashley County and Howard County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Arkansas County. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05001/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.