HarrisDemocratic53.2%110,937TrumpRepublican44.3%92,474EllisIndependent0.6%1,334
D+8.9- Lead
- 18,463
- Total
- 208,604
- vs nation
- D+10.3
- Turnout
- 60.0%
Akashiccounty
Hampden County, MA
Contests in this Place (89 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 60.0% of 350,858 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic57.0%125,948TrumpRepublican39.5%87,318JorgensenLibertarian1.3%2,971
D+17.5- Lead
- 38,630
- Total
- 220,793
- vs nation
- D+13.0
- Turnout
- 62.5%
ClintonDemocratic53.8%112,590TrumpRepublican37.6%78,685JohnsonLibertarian4.0%8,322
D+16.2- Lead
- 33,905
- Total
- 209,336
- vs nation
- D+14.1
- Turnout
- 60.3%
ObamaDemocratic61.7%123,619RomneyRepublican36.6%73,392OtherAll other candidates1.7%3,388
D+25.1- Lead
- 50,227
- Total
- 200,399
- vs nation
- D+21.2
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic61.4%121,454McCainRepublican36.1%71,350OtherAll other candidates2.5%4,916
D+25.3- Lead
- 50,104
- Total
- 197,720
- vs nation
- D+18.1
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic60.9%113,710BushRepublican38.0%70,925OtherAll other candidates1.1%2,004
D+22.9- Lead
- 42,785
- Total
- 186,639
- vs nation
- D+25.4
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic58.2%100,103BushRepublican34.6%59,558NaderGreen6.0%10,326
D+23.6- Lead
- 40,545
- Total
- 172,093
- vs nation
- D+23.0
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic61.0%105,050DoleRepublican28.2%48,513PerotReform9.8%16,942
D+32.8- Lead
- 56,537
- Total
- 172,239
- vs nation
- D+24.3
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+8.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 462,8152024 5-year
- Population density
- 750 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 617 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $71,3062024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 59.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 7.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 27.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+49.8 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+40.7 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Providence County, RI · twin score 93.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 60.0%210,526 participants ÷ 350,858 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +22.7 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 37.3%–41.1%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210,526 | 350,858 ± 2,333 | 60.0% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2022Mid | 139,703 | 351,606 ± 2,025 | 39.7% | Audited | B/A |
| 220,793 | 353,423 ± 2,029 | 62.5% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 159,238 | 351,845 ± 1,656 | 45.3% | Audited | B/A |
| 209,336 | 347,412 ± 1,819 | 60.3% | Audited | B/A | |
| 200,399 | 337,219 | 59.4% | Derived | — | |
| 197,720 | 338,196 | 58.5% | Derived | — | |
| 186,639 | 339,173 extrapolated | 55.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 179 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
179 precincts · 208,604 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Hampden Precinct 1Hampden Precinct 1 | 1,438 | 1,805 | 61 | 3,304 | 43.5% | 54.6% | R+11.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Wilbraham Precinct DWilbraham Precinct D | 1,203 | 1,160 | 67 | 2,430 | 49.5% | 47.7% | D+1.8 |
| Precinct -Brimfield Precinct 1Brimfield Precinct 1 | 1,032 | 1,293 | 71 | 2,396 | 43.1% | 54.0% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Ludlow Precinct 3Ludlow Precinct 3 | 917 | 1,401 | 38 | 2,356 | 38.9% | 59.5% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -Wilbraham Precinct AWilbraham Precinct A | 1,245 | 1,045 | 62 | 2,352 | 52.9% | 44.4% | D+8.5 |
| Precinct -Wilbraham Precinct CWilbraham Precinct C | 1,137 | 1,122 | 75 | 2,334 | 48.7% | 48.1% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -Southwick Precinct 1Southwick Precinct 1 | 826 | 1,390 | 52 | 2,268 | 36.4% | 61.3% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -Wilbraham Precinct BWilbraham Precinct B | 1,131 | 1,041 | 63 | 2,235 | 50.6% | 46.6% | D+4.0 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 5West Springfield Precinct 5 | 1,059 | 1,118 | 45 | 2,222 | 47.7% | 50.3% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 5-AWestfield Precinct 5-A | 1,017 | 1,138 | 57 | 2,212 | 46.0% | 51.4% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 2Agawam Precinct 2 | 942 | 1,211 | 49 | 2,202 | 42.8% | 55.0% | R+12.2 |
| Precinct -Ludlow Precinct 6Ludlow Precinct 6 | 1,008 | 1,146 | 40 | 2,194 | 45.9% | 52.2% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 5Agawam Precinct 5 | 1,003 | 1,134 | 49 | 2,186 | 45.9% | 51.9% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 1-AWestfield Precinct 1-A | 1,010 | 1,124 | 33 | 2,167 | 46.6% | 51.9% | R+5.3 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 7Agawam Precinct 7 | 920 | 1,195 | 39 | 2,154 | 42.7% | 55.5% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 4-BWestfield Precinct 4-B | 1,027 | 1,084 | 43 | 2,154 | 47.7% | 50.3% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 5-BWestfield Precinct 5-B | 903 | 1,179 | 63 | 2,145 | 42.1% | 55.0% | R+12.9 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 7West Springfield Precinct 7 | 941 | 1,126 | 67 | 2,134 | 44.1% | 52.8% | R+8.7 |
| Precinct -Longmeadow Precinct CLongmeadow Precinct C | 1,222 | 797 | 59 | 2,078 | 58.8% | 38.4% | D+20.5 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 6West Springfield Precinct 6 | 949 | 1,075 | 41 | 2,065 | 46.0% | 52.1% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 8Agawam Precinct 8 | 923 | 1,068 | 57 | 2,048 | 45.1% | 52.1% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -Longmeadow Precinct ALongmeadow Precinct A | 1,326 | 660 | 58 | 2,044 | 64.9% | 32.3% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -Longmeadow Precinct DLongmeadow Precinct D | 1,152 | 812 | 60 | 2,024 | 56.9% | 40.1% | D+16.8 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 6Agawam Precinct 6 | 870 | 1,069 | 46 | 1,985 | 43.8% | 53.9% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -Southwick Precinct 3Southwick Precinct 3 | 839 | 1,102 | 35 | 1,976 | 42.5% | 55.8% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -Ludlow Precinct 1Ludlow Precinct 1 | 901 | 1,031 | 33 | 1,965 | 45.9% | 52.5% | R+6.6 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 5East Longmeadow Precinct 5 | 916 | 970 | 53 | 1,939 | 47.2% | 50.0% | R+2.8 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 3Agawam Precinct 3 | 819 | 1,057 | 60 | 1,936 | 42.3% | 54.6% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 3East Longmeadow Precinct 3 | 997 | 889 | 39 | 1,925 | 51.8% | 46.2% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 1East Longmeadow Precinct 1 | 1,023 | 868 | 23 | 1,914 | 53.4% | 45.4% | D+8.1 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 2East Longmeadow Precinct 2 | 940 | 913 | 53 | 1,906 | 49.3% | 47.9% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 1-BWestfield Precinct 1-B | 841 | 1,014 | 45 | 1,900 | 44.3% | 53.4% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 6-AWestfield Precinct 6-A | 828 | 1,034 | 35 | 1,897 | 43.6% | 54.5% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Longmeadow Precinct ELongmeadow Precinct E | 1,167 | 660 | 69 | 1,896 | 61.6% | 34.8% | D+26.7 |
| Precinct -Ludlow Precinct 4Ludlow Precinct 4 | 916 | 929 | 38 | 1,883 | 48.6% | 49.3% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -Longmeadow Precinct BLongmeadow Precinct B | 1,179 | 632 | 50 | 1,861 | 63.4% | 34.0% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 5-AHolyoke Precinct 5-A | 995 | 802 | 52 | 1,849 | 53.8% | 43.4% | D+10.4 |
| Precinct -Palmer Precinct 1Palmer Precinct 1 | 773 | 962 | 49 | 1,784 | 43.3% | 53.9% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 7-AHolyoke Precinct 7-A | 1,201 | 529 | 45 | 1,775 | 67.7% | 29.8% | D+37.9 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 1Agawam Precinct 1 | 757 | 966 | 44 | 1,767 | 42.8% | 54.7% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -Palmer Precinct 2Palmer Precinct 2 | 707 | 1,030 | 30 | 1,767 | 40.0% | 58.3% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 3-BWestfield Precinct 3-B | 915 | 804 | 45 | 1,764 | 51.9% | 45.6% | D+6.3 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 4East Longmeadow Precinct 4 | 789 | 944 | 30 | 1,763 | 44.8% | 53.5% | R+8.8 |
| Precinct -Monson Precinct CMonson Precinct C | 785 | 925 | 34 | 1,744 | 45.0% | 53.0% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -Monson Precinct AMonson Precinct A | 758 | 936 | 43 | 1,737 | 43.6% | 53.9% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 1-BChicopee Precinct 1-B | 901 | 762 | 39 | 1,702 | 52.9% | 44.8% | D+8.2 |
| Precinct -Southwick Precinct 2Southwick Precinct 2 | 657 | 998 | 38 | 1,693 | 38.8% | 58.9% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 9-BChicopee Precinct 9-B | 843 | 803 | 33 | 1,679 | 50.2% | 47.8% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -Agawam Precinct 4Agawam Precinct 4 | 807 | 821 | 36 | 1,664 | 48.5% | 49.3% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -Monson Precinct BMonson Precinct B | 736 | 900 | 27 | 1,663 | 44.3% | 54.1% | R+9.9 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 4West Springfield Precinct 4 | 888 | 713 | 44 | 1,645 | 54.0% | 43.3% | D+10.6 |
| Precinct -Holland Precinct 1Holland Precinct 1 | 668 | 890 | 44 | 1,602 | 41.7% | 55.6% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 8West Springfield Precinct 8 | 821 | 719 | 44 | 1,584 | 51.8% | 45.4% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -Palmer Precinct 4Palmer Precinct 4 | 639 | 915 | 23 | 1,577 | 40.5% | 58.0% | R+17.5 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 2-BChicopee Precinct 2-B | 717 | 771 | 45 | 1,533 | 46.8% | 50.3% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -Ludlow Precinct 5Ludlow Precinct 5 | 669 | 827 | 37 | 1,533 | 43.6% | 53.9% | R+10.3 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 6-BWestfield Precinct 6-B | 681 | 788 | 43 | 1,512 | 45.0% | 52.1% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 1-AChicopee Precinct 1-A | 731 | 711 | 33 | 1,475 | 49.6% | 48.2% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 8-AChicopee Precinct 8-A | 751 | 689 | 34 | 1,474 | 50.9% | 46.7% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 7-BHolyoke Precinct 7-B | 1,061 | 356 | 55 | 1,472 | 72.1% | 24.2% | D+47.9 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 3West Springfield Precinct 3 | 749 | 675 | 33 | 1,457 | 51.4% | 46.3% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 2-BWestfield Precinct 2-B | 749 | 665 | 39 | 1,453 | 51.5% | 45.8% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 5-AChicopee Precinct 5-A | 798 | 616 | 34 | 1,448 | 55.1% | 42.5% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -Ludlow Precinct 2Ludlow Precinct 2 | 687 | 700 | 45 | 1,432 | 48.0% | 48.9% | R+0.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-GSpringfield Precinct 7-G | 799 | 605 | 25 | 1,429 | 55.9% | 42.3% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 8-BChicopee Precinct 8-B | 650 | 734 | 42 | 1,426 | 45.6% | 51.5% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 9-AChicopee Precinct 9-A | 793 | 599 | 34 | 1,426 | 55.6% | 42.0% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-FSpringfield Precinct 7-F | 882 | 488 | 26 | 1,396 | 63.2% | 35.0% | D+28.2 |
| Precinct -Palmer Precinct 3Palmer Precinct 3 | 676 | 676 | 31 | 1,383 | 48.9% | 48.9% | Exact tie |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 3-BHolyoke Precinct 3-B | 824 | 511 | 29 | 1,364 | 60.4% | 37.5% | D+22.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-CSpringfield Precinct 7-C | 775 | 547 | 26 | 1,348 | 57.5% | 40.6% | D+16.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-BSpringfield Precinct 7-B | 811 | 474 | 51 | 1,336 | 60.7% | 35.5% | D+25.2 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 5-BChicopee Precinct 5-B | 679 | 598 | 41 | 1,318 | 51.5% | 45.4% | D+6.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-GSpringfield Precinct 5-G | 759 | 502 | 22 | 1,283 | 59.2% | 39.1% | D+20.0 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 6-BHolyoke Precinct 6-B | 846 | 387 | 43 | 1,276 | 66.3% | 30.3% | D+36.0 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 4-AChicopee Precinct 4-A | 700 | 539 | 19 | 1,258 | 55.6% | 42.8% | D+12.8 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-DSpringfield Precinct 6-D | 715 | 497 | 23 | 1,235 | 57.9% | 40.2% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-DSpringfield Precinct 5-D | 757 | 449 | 28 | 1,234 | 61.3% | 36.4% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 5-BHolyoke Precinct 5-B | 652 | 525 | 37 | 1,214 | 53.7% | 43.2% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 4-BChicopee Precinct 4-B | 661 | 513 | 33 | 1,207 | 54.8% | 42.5% | D+12.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-ASpringfield Precinct 7-A | 743 | 391 | 65 | 1,199 | 62.0% | 32.6% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 3-AWestfield Precinct 3-A | 599 | 558 | 42 | 1,199 | 50.0% | 46.5% | D+3.4 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-DSpringfield Precinct 7-D | 669 | 484 | 26 | 1,179 | 56.7% | 41.1% | D+15.7 |
| Precinct -Wales Precinct 1Wales Precinct 1 | 440 | 685 | 24 | 1,149 | 38.3% | 59.6% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-ESpringfield Precinct 5-E | 825 | 283 | 36 | 1,144 | 72.1% | 24.7% | D+47.4 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 3-AChicopee Precinct 3-A | 493 | 614 | 33 | 1,140 | 43.2% | 53.9% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-HSpringfield Precinct 6-H | 696 | 410 | 25 | 1,131 | 61.5% | 36.3% | D+25.3 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 7-BChicopee Precinct 7-B | 652 | 449 | 29 | 1,130 | 57.7% | 39.7% | D+18.0 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 3-BChicopee Precinct 3-B | 571 | 505 | 36 | 1,112 | 51.3% | 45.4% | D+5.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-FSpringfield Precinct 5-F | 761 | 310 | 25 | 1,096 | 69.4% | 28.3% | D+41.1 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 3-AHolyoke Precinct 3-A | 716 | 320 | 33 | 1,069 | 67.0% | 29.9% | D+37.0 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 2West Springfield Precinct 2 | 539 | 488 | 40 | 1,067 | 50.5% | 45.7% | D+4.8 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 7-AChicopee Precinct 7-A | 554 | 464 | 35 | 1,053 | 52.6% | 44.1% | D+8.5 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 2-AWestfield Precinct 2-A | 546 | 459 | 41 | 1,046 | 52.2% | 43.9% | D+8.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-GSpringfield Precinct 2-G | 625 | 373 | 33 | 1,031 | 60.6% | 36.2% | D+24.4 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-HSpringfield Precinct 5-H | 648 | 349 | 24 | 1,021 | 63.5% | 34.2% | D+29.3 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 6-AHolyoke Precinct 6-A | 677 | 314 | 29 | 1,020 | 66.4% | 30.8% | D+35.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-BSpringfield Precinct 2-B | 621 | 368 | 28 | 1,017 | 61.1% | 36.2% | D+24.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-BSpringfield Precinct 5-B | 711 | 283 | 17 | 1,011 | 70.3% | 28.0% | D+42.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-HSpringfield Precinct 2-H | 632 | 345 | 20 | 997 | 63.4% | 34.6% | D+28.8 |
| Precinct -Granville Precinct 1Granville Precinct 1 | 362 | 604 | 25 | 991 | 36.5% | 60.9% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-FSpringfield Precinct 8-F | 585 | 348 | 35 | 968 | 60.4% | 36.0% | D+24.5 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-ASpringfield Precinct 8-A | 570 | 372 | 23 | 965 | 59.1% | 38.5% | D+20.5 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 2-AChicopee Precinct 2-A | 563 | 368 | 28 | 959 | 58.7% | 38.4% | D+20.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-CSpringfield Precinct 8-C | 636 | 288 | 27 | 951 | 66.9% | 30.3% | D+36.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-DSpringfield Precinct 2-D | 603 | 318 | 28 | 949 | 63.5% | 33.5% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-BSpringfield Precinct 6-B | 695 | 220 | 28 | 943 | 73.7% | 23.3% | D+50.4 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-BSpringfield Precinct 8-B | 587 | 307 | 26 | 920 | 63.8% | 33.4% | D+30.4 |
| Precinct -Russell Precinct 1Russell Precinct 1 | 355 | 533 | 28 | 916 | 38.8% | 58.2% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-FSpringfield Precinct 2-F | 549 | 314 | 39 | 902 | 60.9% | 34.8% | D+26.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-ESpringfield Precinct 2-E | 559 | 313 | 17 | 889 | 62.9% | 35.2% | D+27.7 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-ASpringfield Precinct 4-A | 693 | 158 | 38 | 889 | 78.0% | 17.8% | D+60.2 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-GSpringfield Precinct 8-G | 544 | 316 | 19 | 879 | 61.9% | 35.9% | D+25.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-HSpringfield Precinct 8-H | 574 | 281 | 20 | 875 | 65.6% | 32.1% | D+33.5 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-CSpringfield Precinct 5-C | 534 | 312 | 18 | 864 | 61.8% | 36.1% | D+25.7 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-CSpringfield Precinct 6-C | 507 | 326 | 29 | 862 | 58.8% | 37.8% | D+21.0 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 4-BHolyoke Precinct 4-B | 572 | 249 | 35 | 856 | 66.8% | 29.1% | D+37.7 |
| Precinct -Blandford Precinct 1Blandford Precinct 1 | 312 | 501 | 15 | 828 | 37.7% | 60.5% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-HSpringfield Precinct 1-H | 614 | 188 | 17 | 819 | 75.0% | 23.0% | D+52.0 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 4-AWestfield Precinct 4-A | 361 | 437 | 18 | 816 | 44.2% | 53.6% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-GSpringfield Precinct 6-G | 533 | 267 | 15 | 815 | 65.4% | 32.8% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-ESpringfield Precinct 7-E | 530 | 270 | 11 | 811 | 65.4% | 33.3% | D+32.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-ASpringfield Precinct 5-A | 620 | 162 | 22 | 804 | 77.1% | 20.1% | D+57.0 |
| Precinct -West Springfield Precinct 1West Springfield Precinct 1 | 382 | 380 | 17 | 779 | 49.0% | 48.8% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 2-AHolyoke Precinct 2-A | 491 | 252 | 18 | 761 | 64.5% | 33.1% | D+31.4 |
| Precinct -Chester Precinct 1Chester Precinct 1 | 297 | 442 | 16 | 755 | 39.3% | 58.5% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-FSpringfield Precinct 6-F | 509 | 191 | 15 | 715 | 71.2% | 26.7% | D+44.5 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 1-BHolyoke Precinct 1-B | 495 | 186 | 27 | 708 | 69.9% | 26.3% | D+43.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-CSpringfield Precinct 2-C | 394 | 271 | 18 | 683 | 57.7% | 39.7% | D+18.0 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 2-ASpringfield Precinct 2-A | 444 | 206 | 17 | 667 | 66.6% | 30.9% | D+35.7 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-DSpringfield Precinct 8-D | 435 | 212 | 16 | 663 | 65.6% | 32.0% | D+33.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-GSpringfield Precinct 4-G | 515 | 123 | 13 | 651 | 79.1% | 18.9% | D+60.2 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-ESpringfield Precinct 8-E | 381 | 253 | 15 | 649 | 58.7% | 39.0% | D+19.7 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-ASpringfield Precinct 6-A | 433 | 191 | 12 | 636 | 68.1% | 30.0% | D+38.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-HSpringfield Precinct 4-H | 525 | 88 | 17 | 630 | 83.3% | 14.0% | D+69.4 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-ESpringfield Precinct 6-E | 392 | 224 | 11 | 627 | 62.5% | 35.7% | D+26.8 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-BSpringfield Precinct 1-B | 423 | 177 | 15 | 615 | 68.8% | 28.8% | D+40.0 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-HSpringfield Precinct 7-H | 364 | 218 | 12 | 594 | 61.3% | 36.7% | D+24.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-DSpringfield Precinct 3-D | 414 | 153 | 13 | 580 | 71.4% | 26.4% | D+45.0 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 4-AHolyoke Precinct 4-A | 362 | 187 | 29 | 578 | 62.6% | 32.4% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 1-AHolyoke Precinct 1-A | 340 | 209 | 20 | 569 | 59.8% | 36.7% | D+23.0 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-BSpringfield Precinct 4-B | 427 | 128 | 14 | 569 | 75.0% | 22.5% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-DSpringfield Precinct 4-D | 438 | 109 | 19 | 566 | 77.4% | 19.3% | D+58.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-CSpringfield Precinct 4-C | 445 | 112 | 7 | 564 | 78.9% | 19.9% | D+59.0 |
| Precinct -Montgomery Precinct 1Montgomery Precinct 1 | 240 | 307 | 9 | 556 | 43.2% | 55.2% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-ESpringfield Precinct 1-E | 358 | 182 | 14 | 554 | 64.6% | 32.9% | D+31.8 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-FSpringfield Precinct 1-F | 369 | 161 | 17 | 547 | 67.5% | 29.4% | D+38.0 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-ESpringfield Precinct 4-E | 422 | 100 | 11 | 533 | 79.2% | 18.8% | D+60.4 |
| Precinct -Holyoke Precinct 2-BHolyoke Precinct 2-B | 312 | 202 | 13 | 527 | 59.2% | 38.3% | D+20.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-ASpringfield Precinct 1-A | 332 | 175 | 18 | 525 | 63.2% | 33.3% | D+29.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-HSpringfield Precinct 3-H | 346 | 167 | 6 | 519 | 66.7% | 32.2% | D+34.5 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-FSpringfield Precinct 3-F | 324 | 139 | 10 | 473 | 68.5% | 29.4% | D+39.1 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-BSpringfield Precinct 3-B | 336 | 122 | 14 | 472 | 71.2% | 25.8% | D+45.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-CSpringfield Precinct 3-C | 299 | 125 | 9 | 433 | 69.1% | 28.9% | D+40.2 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-ASpringfield Precinct 3-A | 322 | 97 | 9 | 428 | 75.2% | 22.7% | D+52.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-GSpringfield Precinct 1-G | 294 | 105 | 10 | 409 | 71.9% | 25.7% | D+46.2 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-CSpringfield Precinct 1-C | 283 | 107 | 12 | 402 | 70.4% | 26.6% | D+43.8 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 4AEast Longmeadow Precinct 4A | 183 | 209 | 4 | 396 | 46.2% | 52.8% | R+6.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-GSpringfield Precinct 3-G | 262 | 119 | 10 | 391 | 67.0% | 30.4% | D+36.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-DSpringfield Precinct 1-D | 267 | 93 | 22 | 382 | 69.9% | 24.3% | D+45.5 |
| Precinct -Tolland Precinct 1Tolland Precinct 1 | 150 | 178 | 2 | 330 | 45.5% | 53.9% | R+8.5 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 3-ESpringfield Precinct 3-E | 242 | 75 | 9 | 326 | 74.2% | 23.0% | D+51.2 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 3-A1Chicopee Precinct 3-A1 | 152 | 86 | 4 | 242 | 62.8% | 35.5% | D+27.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 4-FSpringfield Precinct 4-F | 133 | 26 | 1 | 160 | 83.1% | 16.3% | D+66.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-H1Springfield Precinct 7-H1 | 59 | 57 | 0 | 116 | 50.9% | 49.1% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 3AEast Longmeadow Precinct 3A | 52 | 50 | 4 | 106 | 49.1% | 47.2% | D+1.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-D1Springfield Precinct 1-D1 | 65 | 25 | 1 | 91 | 71.4% | 27.5% | D+44.0 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 6-B1Westfield Precinct 6-B1 | 25 | 55 | 1 | 81 | 30.9% | 67.9% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -Westfield Precinct 2-A1Westfield Precinct 2-A1 | 42 | 30 | 0 | 72 | 58.3% | 41.7% | D+16.7 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 1-C1Springfield Precinct 1-C1 | 51 | 12 | 0 | 63 | 81.0% | 19.0% | D+61.9 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-B1Springfield Precinct 8-B1 | 29 | 31 | 1 | 61 | 47.5% | 50.8% | R+3.3 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-A1Springfield Precinct 7-A1 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 54 | 81.5% | 16.7% | D+64.8 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 6-D1Springfield Precinct 6-D1 | 27 | 16 | 1 | 44 | 61.4% | 36.4% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 7-B1Springfield Precinct 7-B1 | 27 | 15 | 0 | 42 | 64.3% | 35.7% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 8-G1Springfield Precinct 8-G1 | 12 | 16 | 1 | 29 | 41.4% | 55.2% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -Springfield Precinct 5-C1Springfield Precinct 5-C1 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 17 | 47.1% | 52.9% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -East Longmeadow Precinct 2AEast Longmeadow Precinct 2A | 9 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 64.3% | 35.7% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 6-AChicopee Precinct 6-A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Chicopee Precinct 6-BChicopee Precinct 6-B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Hampden County, MA · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
74.7%
133,085 votes · D+49.8
Runner-up · Hubert Humphrey, 1968 · 62.5%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
68.9%
46,741 votes · R+40.7
Runner-up · William McKinley, 1896 · 67.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
133,085votes
74.7% of the vote · D+49.8
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 125,948 votes
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1956
104,689votes
55.9% of the vote · R+12.2
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 98,641 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Hubert Humphrey1968
+31.9pts D vs U.S.
Place D+31.2 · U.S. R+0.7
Runner-up · George McGovern, 1972 · +28.0 pts
Republican
William McKinley1896
+33.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+39.1 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · William H. Taft, 1912 · +22.1 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
DPaul MarkState Senate · Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and Hampshire
DAdam GómezState Senate · Hampden
DJohn VelisState Senate · Hampden and Hampshire
DJake OliveiraState Senate · Hampden, Hampshire and Worcester
RRyan FattmanState Senate · Worcester and Hampden
RTodd SmolaState House · 1st Hampden
DBrian AsheState House · 2nd Hampden
RNick BoldygaState House · 3rd Hampden
RKelly PeaseState House · 4th Hampden
DAngelo PuppoloState House · 12th Hampden
Seats representing Hampden County, MA. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 5 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 1 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | D | 99.9%161,108 | 0.1%97 | 161,205 |
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2025D+14.5
Presidential vote · 2024D+8.9
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 5.7 points more Republican than the rolls.
360,363 registered voters · 2025
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−422 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −34,136 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,049 in average income, against $75,992 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+26.4 on average — 18 points more Democratic-leaning than Hampden County, MA itself (D+8.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hampshire County, MA1,233D+41.7
- Capitol Planning Region, CT775D+20.1
- Worcester County, MA561D+10.0
- Middlesex County, MA314D+39.2
- Suffolk County, MA206D+52.1
- Franklin County, MA182D+37.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Capitol Planning Region, CT1,162
- Hampshire County, MA1,063
- Worcester County, MA459
- Middlesex County, MA240
- Suffolk County, MA220
- Franklin County, MA152
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −2,093 |
| 2012 | −3,215 |
| 2013 | −2,546 |
| 2014 | −1,906 |
| 2015 | −3,512 |
| 2016 | −4,511 |
| 2017 | −3,133 |
| 2018 | −3,061 |
| 2019 | −2,820 |
| 2021 | −1,467 |
| 2022 | −2,938 |
| 2023 | −1,479 |
| 2024 | −1,033 |
| 2025 | −422 |
Hampden County, anchored by Springfield, posts Democratic margins well below the statewide average, reflecting a post-industrial workforce and Latino population growth that make it one of the more competitive corners of an otherwise lopsided state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 49.8 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 40.7 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 8.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 8.9 points.
A population of 462,815, a 59% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,306 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Providence County and Bristol County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Providence County
Rhode Island
93.4twin score
2000–2020 trajectory≠ Polish ancestry
Bristol County
Massachusetts
93.3twin score
2000–2012 trajectory≠ % Latino
Berkshire County
Massachusetts
90.6twin score
2000–2016 trajectory≠ % Latino
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Hampden County, Massachusetts. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/25013/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Hampden County
Massachusetts at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Hampden County, Massachusetts vote in 2024?
In 2024, Hampden County, Massachusetts voted Democratic by 8.9 points (D+8.9), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 208,604 votes cast, 110,937 went Democratic and 92,474 went Republican.
When did Hampden County, Massachusetts last vote Republican?
The most recent presidential election in which Hampden County, Massachusetts voted Republican was 1984.
How many people live in Hampden County, Massachusetts?
Hampden County, Massachusetts has a population of 462,815 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Hampden County, Massachusetts?
Median household income in Hampden County, Massachusetts is $71,306 — below the national median of $80,734. The Massachusetts state median is $103,960.
What is the political history of Hampden County, Massachusetts?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Hampden County, Massachusetts from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 22 went Democratic and 12 went Republican.