Warren County, Pennsylvania
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 20,723 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 0181421230181 | 509 | 1,114 | 16 | 1,639 | 31.1% | 68.0% | R+36.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 0220421230220 | 440 | 863 | 6 | 1,309 | 33.6% | 65.9% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct 0140421230140 | 369 | 888 | 6 | 1,263 | 29.2% | 70.3% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct 0351421230351 | 487 | 689 | 16 | 1,192 | 40.9% | 57.8% | R+16.9 |
| Precinct 0060421230060 | 414 | 698 | 6 | 1,118 | 37.0% | 62.4% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct 0361421230361 | 414 | 645 | 11 | 1,070 | 38.7% | 60.3% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct 0420421230420 | 277 | 638 | 9 | 924 | 30.0% | 69.0% | R+39.1 |
| Precinct 0050421230050 | 223 | 688 | 2 | 913 | 24.4% | 75.4% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct 0231421230231 | 243 | 659 | 11 | 913 | 26.6% | 72.2% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct 0020421230020 | 242 | 634 | 8 | 884 | 27.4% | 71.7% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct 0255421230255 | 180 | 656 | 3 | 839 | 21.5% | 78.2% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct 0070421230070 | 199 | 555 | 4 | 758 | 26.3% | 73.2% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct 0165421230165 | 184 | 529 | 2 | 715 | 25.7% | 74.0% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct 0195421230195 | 162 | 522 | 6 | 690 | 23.5% | 75.7% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct 0400421230400 | 275 | 409 | 6 | 690 | 39.9% | 59.3% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct 0331421230331 | 264 | 388 | 7 | 659 | 40.1% | 58.9% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct 0110421230110 | 142 | 509 | 2 | 653 | 21.7% | 77.9% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct 0125421230125 | 93 | 459 | 3 | 555 | 16.8% | 82.7% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct 0320421230320 | 217 | 290 | 7 | 514 | 42.2% | 56.4% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct 0260421230260 | 80 | 350 | 8 | 438 | 18.3% | 79.9% | R+61.6 |
| Precinct 0100421230100 | 84 | 262 | 5 | 351 | 23.9% | 74.6% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct 0290421230290 | 86 | 247 | 6 | 339 | 25.4% | 72.9% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct 0300421230300 | 106 | 205 | 3 | 314 | 33.8% | 65.3% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct 0370421230370 | 120 | 186 | 4 | 310 | 38.7% | 60.0% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct 0090421230090 | 61 | 232 | 2 | 295 | 20.7% | 78.6% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct 0250421230250 | 32 | 229 | 1 | 262 | 12.2% | 87.4% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct 0150421230150 | 65 | 140 | 2 | 207 | 31.4% | 67.6% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct 0040421230040 | 55 | 148 | 1 | 204 | 27.0% | 72.5% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct 0080421230080 | 58 | 123 | 0 | 181 | 32.0% | 68.0% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct 0410421230410 | 62 | 111 | 0 | 173 | 35.8% | 64.2% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct 0310421230310 | 36 | 118 | 1 | 155 | 23.2% | 76.1% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct 0030421230030 | 22 | 97 | 1 | 120 | 18.3% | 80.8% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct 0010421230010 | 11 | 64 | 1 | 76 | 14.5% | 84.2% | R+69.7 |
| BEAR LAKE Voting District42_4212310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BROKENSTRAW TWP Voting District42_4212320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHERRY GROVE TWP Voting District42_4212330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLARENDON Voting District42_4212340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| COLUMBUS TWP Voting District42_4212350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONEWANGO TWP PCT 0142_4212360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONEWANGO TWP PCT 0242_4212370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DEERFIELD TWP Voting District42_4212380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ELDRED TWP Voting District42_4212390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ELK TWP Voting District42_42123100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FARMINGTON TWP Voting District42_42123110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FREEHOLD TWP Voting District42_42123125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GLADE TWP Voting District42_42123140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LIMESTONE TWP Voting District42_42123150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEAD TWP Voting District42_42123165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PINE GROVE TWP Voting District42_42123181 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PITTSFIELD TWP Voting District42_42123195 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT TWP Voting District42_42123220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SHEFFIELD TWP Voting District42_42123231 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SOUTHWEST TWP Voting District42_42123250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPRING CREEK TWP Voting District42_42123260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SUGAR GROVE TWP Voting District42_42123255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SUGAR GROVE Voting District42_42123290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TIDIOUTE Voting District42_42123300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TRIUMPH TWP Voting District42_42123310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARREN WD CENTRAL42_42123320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARREN WD EAST42_42123351 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARREN WD NORTH42_42123400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARREN WD SOUTH42_42123370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARREN WD SOUTH EAST42_42123361 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WARREN WD WEST42_42123331 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WATSON TWP Voting District42_42123410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| YOUNGSVILLE Voting District42_42123420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −14.9% |
| 1896 | −21.8% |
| 1900 | −36.0% |
| 1904 | −50.9% |
| 1908 | −34.8% |
| 1912 | +1.7% |
| 1916 | −11.0% |
| 1920 | −46.9% |
| 1924 | −52.9% |
| 1928 | −61.4% |
| 1932 | −19.0% |
| 1936 | −5.0% |
| 1940 | −30.6% |
| 1944 | −34.9% |
| 1948 | −33.4% |
| 1952 | −44.0% |
| 1956 | −46.1% |
| 1960 | −28.0% |
| 1964 | +27.8% |
| 1968 | −15.8% |
| 1972 | −33.9% |
| 1976 | −6.8% |
| 1980 | −22.6% |
| 1984 | −26.7% |
| 1988 | −13.8% |
| 1992 | +2.1% |
| 1996 | +1.4% |
| 2000 | −10.0% |
| 2004 | −15.3% |
| 2008 | −6.2% |
| 2012 | −17.4% |
| 2016 | −39.4% |
| 2020 | −39.6% |
| 2024 | −39.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 4.3 points more Democratic.
25,404 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−48 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,943 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,353 in average income, against $65,484 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.2 on average — 25 points more Democratic-leaning than Warren County, PA itself (R+39.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Erie County, PA100R+1.0
- Chautauqua County, NY60R+21.9
- McKean County, PA34R+47.2
- Allegheny County, PA28D+20.3
- Crawford County, PA28R+39.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Erie County, PA109
- Chautauqua County, NY76
- Allegheny County, PA36
- McKean County, PA28
- Crawford County, PA22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −206 |
| 2012 | −130 |
| 2013 | −181 |
| 2014 | −197 |
| 2015 | −237 |
| 2016 | −234 |
| 2017 | −212 |
| 2018 | −43 |
| 2019 | −250 |
| 2021 | −122 |
| 2022 | −2 |
| 2023 | +24 |
| 2024 | −105 |
| 2025 | −48 |
Warren County, anchored by the city of Warren along the Allegheny River, has shifted decisively rightward over the past decade. In 2024 it recorded an R+39.3 presidential margin, placing it among Pennsylvania's most lopsided counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.8 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 61.4 points in 1928. The 2024 margin was 39.2 points.
A population of 37,920, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,480 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of McKean County and Iron County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Warren County, Pennsylvania. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/42123/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.