Montgomery County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
125 precincts · 307,258 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 87Precinct 87 | 1,468 | 2,761 | 55 | 4,284 | 34.3% | 64.4% | R+30.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 30Precinct 30 | 625 | 3,580 | 31 | 4,236 | 14.8% | 84.5% | R+69.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 90Precinct 90 | 801 | 3,398 | 30 | 4,229 | 18.9% | 80.3% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 50Precinct 50 | 717 | 3,488 | 21 | 4,226 | 17.0% | 82.5% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 100Precinct 100 | 1,453 | 2,685 | 65 | 4,203 | 34.6% | 63.9% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 53APrecinct 53A | 1,357 | 2,704 | 39 | 4,100 | 33.1% | 66.0% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 102Precinct 102 | 863 | 3,152 | 32 | 4,047 | 21.3% | 77.9% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 40Precinct 40 | 1,049 | 2,965 | 27 | 4,041 | 26.0% | 73.4% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 56Precinct 56 | 1,378 | 2,516 | 46 | 3,940 | 35.0% | 63.9% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 18Precinct 18 | 857 | 3,008 | 24 | 3,889 | 22.0% | 77.3% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 43APrecinct 43A | 799 | 3,043 | 32 | 3,874 | 20.6% | 78.5% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 1,216 | 2,591 | 60 | 3,867 | 31.4% | 67.0% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 72Precinct 72 | 660 | 3,163 | 28 | 3,851 | 17.1% | 82.1% | R+65.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 65Precinct 65 | 545 | 3,200 | 22 | 3,767 | 14.5% | 84.9% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 76Precinct 76 | 738 | 2,986 | 28 | 3,752 | 19.7% | 79.6% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 78Precinct 78 | 1,318 | 2,386 | 48 | 3,752 | 35.1% | 63.6% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 88APrecinct 88A | 1,381 | 2,307 | 53 | 3,741 | 36.9% | 61.7% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 97Precinct 97 | 631 | 3,026 | 28 | 3,685 | 17.1% | 82.1% | R+65.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 91APrecinct 91A | 581 | 3,067 | 28 | 3,676 | 15.8% | 83.4% | R+67.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 96Precinct 96 | 1,362 | 2,248 | 54 | 3,664 | 37.2% | 61.4% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 36Precinct 36 | 1,070 | 2,551 | 29 | 3,650 | 29.3% | 69.9% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 31Precinct 31 | 1,199 | 2,389 | 44 | 3,632 | 33.0% | 65.8% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 92Precinct 92 | 1,438 | 2,137 | 44 | 3,619 | 39.7% | 59.0% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 61Precinct 61 | 1,473 | 2,081 | 56 | 3,610 | 40.8% | 57.6% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 63APrecinct 63A | 608 | 2,958 | 25 | 3,591 | 16.9% | 82.4% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 29Precinct 29 | 538 | 3,027 | 23 | 3,588 | 15.0% | 84.4% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 1,071 | 2,484 | 29 | 3,584 | 29.9% | 69.3% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 68Precinct 68 | 1,042 | 2,435 | 37 | 3,514 | 29.7% | 69.3% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 41Precinct 41 | 715 | 2,751 | 25 | 3,491 | 20.5% | 78.8% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 99Precinct 99 | 611 | 2,832 | 17 | 3,460 | 17.7% | 81.8% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 71Precinct 71 | 1,239 | 2,173 | 47 | 3,459 | 35.8% | 62.8% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 35Precinct 35 | 1,099 | 2,317 | 40 | 3,456 | 31.8% | 67.0% | R+35.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 80APrecinct 80A | 1,037 | 2,366 | 40 | 3,443 | 30.1% | 68.7% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17Precinct 17 | 651 | 2,756 | 32 | 3,439 | 18.9% | 80.1% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 46Precinct 46 | 1,258 | 2,125 | 49 | 3,432 | 36.7% | 61.9% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 113Precinct 113 | 609 | 2,786 | 28 | 3,423 | 17.8% | 81.4% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 66Precinct 66 | 662 | 2,713 | 32 | 3,407 | 19.4% | 79.6% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 77Precinct 77 | 594 | 2,765 | 13 | 3,372 | 17.6% | 82.0% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 81Precinct 81 | 1,102 | 2,226 | 27 | 3,355 | 32.8% | 66.3% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 22Precinct 22 | 514 | 2,801 | 15 | 3,330 | 15.4% | 84.1% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 14Precinct 14 | 936 | 2,314 | 31 | 3,281 | 28.5% | 70.5% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 106APrecinct 106A | 491 | 2,739 | 20 | 3,250 | 15.1% | 84.3% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 69Precinct 69 | 1,150 | 2,000 | 47 | 3,197 | 36.0% | 62.6% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 23Precinct 23 | 799 | 2,357 | 22 | 3,178 | 25.1% | 74.2% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 75Precinct 75 | 1,090 | 2,041 | 40 | 3,171 | 34.4% | 64.4% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 19Precinct 19 | 513 | 2,643 | 13 | 3,169 | 16.2% | 83.4% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 38Precinct 38 | 476 | 2,670 | 16 | 3,162 | 15.1% | 84.4% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 506 | 2,630 | 20 | 3,156 | 16.0% | 83.3% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 89Precinct 89 | 632 | 2,458 | 33 | 3,123 | 20.2% | 78.7% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 33Precinct 33 | 1,057 | 1,986 | 47 | 3,090 | 34.2% | 64.3% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 94Precinct 94 | 1,121 | 1,927 | 35 | 3,083 | 36.4% | 62.5% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 28APrecinct 28A | 538 | 2,516 | 16 | 3,070 | 17.5% | 82.0% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 103Precinct 103 | 1,089 | 1,935 | 43 | 3,067 | 35.5% | 63.1% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 93Precinct 93 | 792 | 2,209 | 23 | 3,024 | 26.2% | 73.0% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 82Precinct 82 | 838 | 2,050 | 30 | 2,918 | 28.7% | 70.3% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 6Precinct 6 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 51 | 2,914 | 34.7% | 63.6% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 8Precinct 8 | 418 | 2,459 | 19 | 2,896 | 14.4% | 84.9% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 84Precinct 84 | 1,292 | 1,516 | 45 | 2,853 | 45.3% | 53.1% | R+7.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 16Precinct 16 | 437 | 2,384 | 15 | 2,836 | 15.4% | 84.1% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 15Precinct 15 | 599 | 2,178 | 29 | 2,806 | 21.3% | 77.6% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 95Precinct 95 | 1,141 | 1,610 | 45 | 2,796 | 40.8% | 57.6% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 26Precinct 26 | 769 | 1,946 | 20 | 2,735 | 28.1% | 71.2% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 39Precinct 39 | 296 | 2,367 | 14 | 2,677 | 11.1% | 88.4% | R+77.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 85Precinct 85 | 444 | 2,191 | 20 | 2,655 | 16.7% | 82.5% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 788 | 1,824 | 20 | 2,632 | 29.9% | 69.3% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 57Precinct 57 | 455 | 2,105 | 11 | 2,571 | 17.7% | 81.9% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 21Precinct 21 | 797 | 1,744 | 29 | 2,570 | 31.0% | 67.9% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 52Precinct 52 | 612 | 1,899 | 36 | 2,547 | 24.0% | 74.6% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 54Precinct 54 | 572 | 1,932 | 19 | 2,523 | 22.7% | 76.6% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 112Precinct 112 | 381 | 2,119 | 10 | 2,510 | 15.2% | 84.4% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 37Precinct 37 | 809 | 1,500 | 28 | 2,337 | 34.6% | 64.2% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 636 | 1,668 | 21 | 2,325 | 27.4% | 71.7% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 34Precinct 34 | 564 | 1,718 | 27 | 2,309 | 24.4% | 74.4% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 109Precinct 109 | 684 | 1,547 | 26 | 2,257 | 30.3% | 68.5% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 24Precinct 24 | 662 | 1,581 | 14 | 2,257 | 29.3% | 70.0% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 108Precinct 108 | 745 | 1,455 | 41 | 2,241 | 33.2% | 64.9% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 86Precinct 86 | 405 | 1,727 | 20 | 2,152 | 18.8% | 80.3% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 45Precinct 45 | 687 | 1,391 | 34 | 2,112 | 32.5% | 65.9% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 70Precinct 70 | 765 | 1,266 | 31 | 2,062 | 37.1% | 61.4% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 62Precinct 62 | 804 | 1,192 | 21 | 2,017 | 39.9% | 59.1% | R+19.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 67Precinct 67 | 780 | 1,159 | 26 | 1,965 | 39.7% | 59.0% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 32Precinct 32 | 811 | 1,103 | 33 | 1,947 | 41.7% | 56.7% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 58Precinct 58 | 667 | 1,235 | 30 | 1,932 | 34.5% | 63.9% | R+29.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 13Precinct 13 | 299 | 1,618 | 9 | 1,926 | 15.5% | 84.0% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 752 | 1,112 | 35 | 1,899 | 39.6% | 58.6% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 104Precinct 104 | 522 | 1,332 | 29 | 1,883 | 27.7% | 70.7% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 11Precinct 11 | 348 | 1,467 | 13 | 1,828 | 19.0% | 80.3% | R+61.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 48Precinct 48 | 685 | 1,076 | 21 | 1,782 | 38.4% | 60.4% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 44Precinct 44 | 550 | 1,183 | 18 | 1,751 | 31.4% | 67.6% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 47Precinct 47 | 722 | 996 | 16 | 1,734 | 41.6% | 57.4% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 74Precinct 74 | 418 | 1,286 | 19 | 1,723 | 24.3% | 74.6% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 49Precinct 49 | 653 | 1,017 | 21 | 1,691 | 38.6% | 60.1% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12Precinct 12 | 435 | 1,237 | 14 | 1,686 | 25.8% | 73.4% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 98Precinct 98 | 672 | 953 | 26 | 1,651 | 40.7% | 57.7% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 7Precinct 7 | 348 | 1,265 | 11 | 1,624 | 21.4% | 77.9% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 60Precinct 60 | 549 | 1,050 | 22 | 1,621 | 33.9% | 64.8% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 9Precinct 9 | 254 | 1,331 | 7 | 1,592 | 16.0% | 83.6% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 27Precinct 27 | 500 | 1,045 | 15 | 1,560 | 32.1% | 67.0% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 73Precinct 73 | 417 | 1,086 | 9 | 1,512 | 27.6% | 71.8% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 83Precinct 83 | 241 | 1,250 | 10 | 1,501 | 16.1% | 83.3% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 79Precinct 79 | 535 | 897 | 21 | 1,453 | 36.8% | 61.7% | R+24.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 111Precinct 111 | 334 | 1,099 | 12 | 1,445 | 23.1% | 76.1% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 25Precinct 25 | 271 | 1,146 | 17 | 1,434 | 18.9% | 79.9% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 59Precinct 59 | 433 | 845 | 18 | 1,296 | 33.4% | 65.2% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 51Precinct 51 | 501 | 770 | 14 | 1,285 | 39.0% | 59.9% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10Precinct 10 | 740 | 498 | 7 | 1,245 | 59.4% | 40.0% | D+19.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 526 | 684 | 32 | 1,242 | 42.4% | 55.1% | R+12.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 20Precinct 20 | 441 | 779 | 11 | 1,231 | 35.8% | 63.3% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 64Precinct 64 | 245 | 918 | 5 | 1,168 | 21.0% | 78.6% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 55Precinct 55 | 234 | 769 | 4 | 1,007 | 23.2% | 76.4% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 42Precinct 42 | 81 | 441 | 3 | 525 | 15.4% | 84.0% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 5Precinct 5 | 25 | 247 | 1 | 273 | 9.2% | 90.5% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 53BPrecinct 53B | 66 | 136 | 2 | 204 | 32.4% | 66.7% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 80BPrecinct 80B | 31 | 70 | 0 | 101 | 30.7% | 69.3% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 106BPrecinct 106B | 12 | 65 | 1 | 78 | 15.4% | 83.3% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 28BPrecinct 28B | 9 | 43 | 0 | 52 | 17.3% | 82.7% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 63BPrecinct 63B | 9 | 41 | 0 | 50 | 18.0% | 82.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 43EPrecinct 43E | 9 | 32 | 0 | 41 | 22.0% | 78.0% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 28CPrecinct 28C | 6 | 26 | 0 | 32 | 18.8% | 81.3% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 107Precinct 107 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 24 | 29.2% | 70.8% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 88BPrecinct 88B | 6 | 14 | 0 | 20 | 30.0% | 70.0% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 91BPrecinct 91B | 1 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 9.1% | 90.9% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 43BPrecinct 43B | 1 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 11.1% | 88.9% | R+77.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 43CPrecinct 43C | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 12.5% | 87.5% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 43DPrecinct 43D | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 12.5% | 87.5% | R+75.0 |
presidential history
Presidential margin, 1908–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | +41.1% |
| 1912 | +51.9% |
| 1916 | +55.9% |
| 1920 | +50.5% |
| 1924 | +79.0% |
| 1928 | +19.2% |
| 1932 | +87.9% |
| 1936 | +85.6% |
| 1940 | +78.3% |
| 1944 | +74.1% |
| 1948 | +37.5% |
| 1952 | +7.2% |
| 1956 | −13.2% |
| 1960 | +2.9% |
| 1964 | +22.2% |
| 1968 | −2.5% |
| 1972 | −55.1% |
| 1976 | −6.8% |
| 1980 | −34.1% |
| 1984 | −51.1% |
| 1988 | −37.1% |
| 1992 | −27.5% |
| 1996 | −38.7% |
| 2000 | −54.0% |
| 2004 | −56.7% |
| 2008 | −52.7% |
| 2012 | −60.5% |
| 2016 | −50.7% |
| 2020 | −43.8% |
| 2024 | −45.5% |
DemocraticRepublican
Congressional elections · 3 Senate races
U.S. Senate
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 313,858 |
| 2018 | 334,476 |
| 2020 | 370,060 |
| 2022 | 409,759 |
| 2024 | 453,832 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+22,690 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +220,575 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $91,270 in average income, against $126,576 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+0.1 on average — 46 points more Democratic-leaning than Montgomery County, TX itself (R+45.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Harris County, TX12,733D+5.5
- Fort Bend County, TX636D+1.6
- Walker County, TX516R+39.9
- Liberty County, TX404R+61.6
- Travis County, TX371D+39.3
- Los Angeles County, CA298D+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Harris County, TX7,410
- Walker County, TX620
- Liberty County, TX546
- Travis County, TX423
- Fort Bend County, TX326
- Tarrant County, TX269
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +7,280 |
| 2012 | +8,228 |
| 2013 | +9,416 |
| 2014 | +13,396 |
| 2015 | +13,131 |
| 2016 | +14,050 |
| 2017 | +11,220 |
| 2018 | +13,856 |
| 2019 | +13,423 |
| 2021 | +23,146 |
| 2022 | +22,465 |
| 2023 | +24,797 |
| 2024 | +23,477 |
| 2025 | +22,690 |
Montgomery County, north of Houston, has absorbed rapid suburban and exurban growth while sustaining presidential margins above R+40 for over a decade, making it a consistent anchor of Republican vote totals in statewide contests.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 87.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 60.5 points in 2012. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 45.5 points.
A population of 684,432, a 59% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $97,701 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Canadian County and Cherokee County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Canadian County
Oklahoma
92.8twin score
12-yr trend2004–2012 trajectory≠ % Latino
Cherokee County
Georgia
91.8twin score
12-yr trend2000–2008 trajectory≠ % Latino
Ellis County
Texas
91.0twin score
12-yr trend2004–2008 trajectorymedian income
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Montgomery County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48339/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Montgomery County
Texas at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Montgomery County, Texas vote in 2024?
In 2024, Montgomery County, Texas voted Republican by 45.5 points (R+45.5), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 307,258 votes cast, 82,277 went Democratic and 221,964 went Republican.
When did Montgomery County, Texas last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Montgomery County, Texas voted Democratic was 1964.
How many people live in Montgomery County, Texas?
Montgomery County, Texas has a population of 684,432 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Montgomery County, Texas?
Median household income in Montgomery County, Texas is $97,701 — above the national median of $80,734. The Texas state median is $78,476.
What is the political history of Montgomery County, Texas?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Montgomery County, Texas from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 14 went Democratic and 15 went Republican.