Apache County, Arizona
Precinct data
Results by precinct
89 precincts · 32,101 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -ConchoConcho | 348 | 1,701 | 20 | 2,069 | 16.8% | 82.2% | R+65.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Ft. DefianceFt. Defiance | 1,524 | 423 | 38 | 1,985 | 76.8% | 21.3% | D+55.5 |
| Precinct -Canyon de ChellyCanyon de Chelly | 1,467 | 320 | 21 | 1,808 | 81.1% | 17.7% | D+63.4 |
| Precinct -VernonVernon | 265 | 1,305 | 20 | 1,590 | 16.7% | 82.1% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -St. MichaelsSt. Michaels | 1,116 | 339 | 18 | 1,473 | 75.8% | 23.0% | D+52.7 |
| Precinct -Window RockWindow Rock | 823 | 258 | 15 | 1,096 | 75.1% | 23.5% | D+51.6 |
| Precinct -Many FarmsMany Farms | 906 | 156 | 11 | 1,073 | 84.4% | 14.5% | D+69.9 |
| Precinct -ChinleChinle | 821 | 224 | 20 | 1,065 | 77.1% | 21.0% | D+56.1 |
| Precinct -St. JohnsSt. Johns | 196 | 786 | 13 | 995 | 19.7% | 79.0% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -CoronadoCoronado | 120 | 842 | 13 | 975 | 12.3% | 86.4% | R+74.1 |
| Precinct -EagarEagar | 142 | 806 | 11 | 959 | 14.8% | 84.0% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -PuercoPuerco | 565 | 346 | 21 | 932 | 60.6% | 37.1% | D+23.5 |
| Precinct -WheatfieldsWheatfields | 758 | 152 | 17 | 927 | 81.8% | 16.4% | D+65.4 |
| Precinct -LukachukaiLukachukai | 725 | 139 | 16 | 880 | 82.4% | 15.8% | D+66.6 |
| Precinct -Flat TopFlat Top | 107 | 710 | 10 | 827 | 12.9% | 85.9% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -SteamboatSteamboat | 685 | 124 | 10 | 819 | 83.6% | 15.1% | D+68.5 |
| Precinct -SpringervilleSpringerville | 154 | 621 | 12 | 787 | 19.6% | 78.9% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -Round ValleyRound Valley | 122 | 654 | 6 | 782 | 15.6% | 83.6% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -Rock PointRock Point | 585 | 144 | 9 | 738 | 79.3% | 19.5% | D+59.8 |
| Precinct -CottonwoodCottonwood | 612 | 115 | 7 | 734 | 83.4% | 15.7% | D+67.7 |
| Precinct -Ganado SouthGanado South | 537 | 135 | 10 | 682 | 78.7% | 19.8% | D+58.9 |
| Precinct -HouckHouck | 382 | 206 | 8 | 596 | 64.1% | 34.6% | D+29.5 |
| Precinct -NazliniNazlini | 422 | 149 | 6 | 577 | 73.1% | 25.8% | D+47.3 |
| Precinct -Rough RockRough Rock | 459 | 86 | 6 | 551 | 83.3% | 15.6% | D+67.7 |
| Precinct -DennehotsoDennehotso | 427 | 115 | 5 | 547 | 78.1% | 21.0% | D+57.0 |
| Precinct -KinlicheeKinlichee | 431 | 96 | 4 | 531 | 81.2% | 18.1% | D+63.1 |
| Precinct -Round RockRound Rock | 431 | 87 | 4 | 522 | 82.6% | 16.7% | D+65.9 |
| Precinct -SawmillSawmill | 399 | 102 | 7 | 508 | 78.5% | 20.1% | D+58.5 |
| Precinct -Wide RuinsWide Ruins | 339 | 103 | 9 | 451 | 75.2% | 22.8% | D+52.3 |
| Precinct -KlagetohKlagetoh | 315 | 118 | 11 | 444 | 70.9% | 26.6% | D+44.4 |
| Precinct -CornfieldsCornfields | 338 | 86 | 7 | 431 | 78.4% | 20.0% | D+58.5 |
| Precinct -Ganado NorthGanado North | 348 | 70 | 7 | 425 | 81.9% | 16.5% | D+65.4 |
| Precinct -AlpineAlpine | 94 | 315 | 6 | 415 | 22.7% | 75.9% | R+53.3 |
| Precinct -Teec Nos PosTeec Nos Pos | 306 | 92 | 4 | 402 | 76.1% | 22.9% | D+53.2 |
| Precinct -Red ValleyRed Valley | 215 | 147 | 4 | 366 | 58.7% | 40.2% | D+18.6 |
| Precinct -LuptonLupton | 264 | 93 | 5 | 362 | 72.9% | 25.7% | D+47.2 |
| Precinct -NutriosoNutrioso | 58 | 277 | 4 | 339 | 17.1% | 81.7% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct -SweetwaterSweetwater | 222 | 94 | 3 | 319 | 69.6% | 29.5% | D+40.1 |
| Precinct -Oak SpringsOak Springs | 240 | 56 | 6 | 302 | 79.5% | 18.5% | D+60.9 |
| Precinct -TacheeTachee | 234 | 48 | 3 | 285 | 82.1% | 16.8% | D+65.3 |
| Precinct -Mexican WaterMexican Water | 128 | 25 | 3 | 156 | 82.1% | 16.0% | D+66.0 |
| Precinct -Red MesaRed Mesa | 125 | 24 | 1 | 150 | 83.3% | 16.0% | D+67.3 |
| Precinct -GreerGreer | 45 | 70 | 0 | 115 | 39.1% | 60.9% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -McNaryMcNary | 72 | 36 | 3 | 111 | 64.9% | 32.4% | D+32.4 |
| Alpine Voting District04_0400102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Canyon de Chelly Voting District04_0400103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chinle Voting District04_0400105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Concho Voting District04_0400109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Cornfields Voting District04_0400110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Coronado Voting District04_0400112 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Cottonwood Voting District04_0400111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Dennehotso Voting District04_0400113 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Eagar Voting District04_0400116 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Flat Top Voting District04_0400117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fort Defiance Voting District04_0400119 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ganado North Voting District04_0400122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ganado South Voting District04_0400123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Greer Voting District04_0400125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Houck Voting District04_0400127 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Kinlichee Voting District04_0400129 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Klagetoh Voting District04_0400131 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lukachukai Voting District04_0400133 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lupton Voting District04_0400135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Many Farms Voting District04_0400139 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| McNary Voting District04_0400137 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Mexican Water Voting District04_0400141 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Nazlini Voting District04_0400143 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Nutrioso Voting District04_0400145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Oak Springs Voting District04_0400146 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Puerco East Voting District04_0400148 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Puerco West Voting District04_0400149 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Red Mesa Voting District04_0400151 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Red Valley Voting District04_0400152 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rock Point Voting District04_0400154 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rough Rock Voting District04_0400156 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Round Rock Voting District04_0400158 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Round Valley Voting District04_0400159 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sawmill Voting District04_0400167 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Springerville Voting District04_0400170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| St. Johns Voting District04_0400161 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| St. Michaels Voting District04_0400165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Steamboat Voting District04_0400174 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sweetwater Voting District04_0400176 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Tachee Voting District04_0400178 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Teec Nos Pos Voting District04_0400180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Vernon Voting District04_0400182 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wheatfields Voting District04_0400184 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wide Ruins Voting District04_0400186 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Window Rock Voting District04_0400188 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1912–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1912 | +20.4% |
| 1916 | +34.4% |
| 1920 | −4.7% |
| 1924 | −5.6% |
| 1928 | −2.8% |
| 1932 | +25.1% |
| 1936 | +44.5% |
| 1940 | +36.0% |
| 1944 | +25.9% |
| 1948 | +20.8% |
| 1952 | −19.4% |
| 1956 | −26.4% |
| 1960 | +0.8% |
| 1964 | +40.9% |
| 1968 | −10.1% |
| 1972 | −3.7% |
| 1976 | +30.4% |
| 1980 | −19.6% |
| 1984 | +12.6% |
| 1988 | +24.7% |
| 1992 | +36.3% |
| 1996 | +40.9% |
| 2000 | +36.4% |
| 2004 | +30.1% |
| 2008 | +28.2% |
| 2012 | +34.3% |
| 2016 | +32.0% |
| 2020 | +33.6% |
| 2024 | +19.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 8.0 points more Democratic.
53,411 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−204 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −4,237 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $46,290 in average income, against $49,159 for residents who stayed — 6% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+0.4 on average — 19 points more Republican-leaning than Apache County, AZ itself (D+19.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Maricopa County, AZ341R+3.5
- McKinley County, NM176D+24.5
- Navajo County, AZ162R+17.2
- San Juan County, NM65R+31.7
- Coconino County, AZ62D+19.9
- Pima County, AZ53D+15.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Maricopa County, AZ401
- McKinley County, NM191
- Navajo County, AZ187
- San Juan County, NM131
- Coconino County, AZ80
- Bernalillo County, NM71
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −156 |
| 2012 | −463 |
| 2013 | −454 |
| 2014 | −998 |
| 2015 | −1,215 |
| 2016 | +1 |
| 2017 | −235 |
| 2018 | −56 |
| 2019 | −112 |
| 2021 | −165 |
| 2022 | +414 |
| 2023 | −288 |
| 2024 | −306 |
| 2025 | −204 |
Apache County's electorate is shaped by the Navajo and Hopi nations, which together cover most of its land area and account for the Democratic-leaning margins that have defined its presidential results for decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 44.5 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 26.4 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 14.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 19.0 points.
A population of 65,341, a 19% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $41,438 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Oglala Lakota County and Menominee County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Apache County, Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/04001/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.