HarrisDemocratic59.2%41,504TrumpRepublican39.4%27,576OliverLibertarian0.7%508
D+19.9- Lead
- 13,928
- Total
- 70,067
- vs nation
- D+21.4
- Turnout
- 63.0%
Akashiccounty
Coconino County, AZ
Contests in this Place (82 available)
President29 · 1912–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1912–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 63.0% of 112,728 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic60.7%44,698TrumpRepublican36.7%27,052JorgensenLibertarian2.1%1,522
D+24.0- Lead
- 17,646
- Total
- 73,632
- vs nation
- D+19.5
- Turnout
- 67.1%
ClintonDemocratic54.2%32,404TrumpRepublican35.3%21,108OtherAll other candidates10.5%6,272
D+18.9- Lead
- 11,296
- Total
- 59,784
- vs nation
- D+16.8
- Turnout
- 58.3%
ObamaDemocratic56.3%29,257RomneyRepublican40.8%21,220JohnsonLibertarian1.8%941
D+15.5- Lead
- 8,037
- Total
- 51,962
- vs nation
- D+11.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic57.8%31,433McCainRepublican40.8%22,186OtherAll other candidates1.3%725
D+17.0- Lead
- 9,247
- Total
- 54,344
- vs nation
- D+9.7
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic55.8%29,243BushRepublican43.0%22,526OtherAll other candidates1.2%622
D+12.8- Lead
- 6,717
- Total
- 52,391
- vs nation
- D+15.3
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic49.6%20,280BushRepublican43.0%17,562NaderGreen6.1%2,478
D+6.6- Lead
- 2,718
- Total
- 40,883
- vs nation
- D+6.1
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic53.2%20,475DoleRepublican35.4%13,638PerotReform9.5%3,666
D+17.7- Lead
- 6,837
- Total
- 38,522
- vs nation
- D+9.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+19.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 144,5082024 5-year
- Population density
- 7.8 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 18,616 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $72,9662024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 52.2%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 15.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+41.0 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+28.6 in 1968MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Denver County, CO · twin score 93.2
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 63.0%70,993 participants ÷ 112,728 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +17.6 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- +0.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 45.4%–51.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70,993 | 112,728 ± 866 | 63.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 55,475 | 111,990 ± 979 | 49.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 73,968 | 110,158 ± 885 | 67.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 55,948 | 106,672 ± 706 | 52.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 60,744 | 104,266 ± 659 | 58.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 51,962 | 97,857 | 53.1% | Derived | — | |
| 54,344 | 89,286 | 60.9% | Derived | — | |
| 52,391 | 80,715 extrapolated | 64.9% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 160 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
160 precincts · 70,371 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Pumphouse Wash 62Pumphouse Wash 62 | 1,575 | 1,015 | 54 | 2,644 | 59.6% | 38.4% | D+21.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Flagstaff 22Flagstaff 22 | 1,572 | 884 | 45 | 2,501 | 62.9% | 35.3% | D+27.5 |
| Precinct -Tuba City South 95Tuba City South 95 | 1,904 | 424 | 45 | 2,373 | 80.2% | 17.9% | D+62.4 |
| Precinct -Williams North 98Williams North 98 | 548 | 1,748 | 31 | 2,327 | 23.5% | 75.1% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 24Flagstaff 24 | 1,341 | 929 | 35 | 2,305 | 58.2% | 40.3% | D+17.9 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 15Flagstaff 15 | 1,543 | 611 | 42 | 2,196 | 70.3% | 27.8% | D+42.4 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 21Flagstaff 21 | 1,301 | 667 | 43 | 2,011 | 64.7% | 33.2% | D+31.5 |
| Precinct -Doney Park 50Doney Park 50 | 786 | 1,157 | 35 | 1,978 | 39.7% | 58.5% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 5Flagstaff 5 | 1,310 | 597 | 45 | 1,952 | 67.1% | 30.6% | D+36.5 |
| Precinct -Fernwood 52Fernwood 52 | 756 | 1,016 | 21 | 1,793 | 42.2% | 56.7% | R+14.5 |
| Precinct -Sedona 83Sedona 83 | 945 | 767 | 32 | 1,744 | 54.2% | 44.0% | D+10.2 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 19Flagstaff 19 | 1,040 | 650 | 20 | 1,710 | 60.8% | 38.0% | D+22.8 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 25Flagstaff 25 | 989 | 657 | 27 | 1,673 | 59.1% | 39.3% | D+19.8 |
| Precinct -Sunset Crater 85Sunset Crater 85 | 614 | 987 | 29 | 1,630 | 37.7% | 60.6% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 16Flagstaff 16 | 1,128 | 465 | 35 | 1,628 | 69.3% | 28.6% | D+40.7 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 4Flagstaff 4 | 1,211 | 373 | 28 | 1,612 | 75.1% | 23.1% | D+52.0 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 1Flagstaff 1 | 1,142 | 402 | 31 | 1,575 | 72.5% | 25.5% | D+47.0 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 7Flagstaff 7 | 988 | 529 | 27 | 1,544 | 64.0% | 34.3% | D+29.7 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 23Flagstaff 23 | 889 | 443 | 35 | 1,367 | 65.0% | 32.4% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -Winona 92Winona 92 | 602 | 700 | 26 | 1,328 | 45.3% | 52.7% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 9Flagstaff 9 | 866 | 317 | 24 | 1,207 | 71.7% | 26.3% | D+45.5 |
| Precinct -Tonalea 90Tonalea 90 | 873 | 300 | 27 | 1,200 | 72.8% | 25.0% | D+47.8 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 2Flagstaff 2 | 916 | 192 | 28 | 1,136 | 80.6% | 16.9% | D+63.7 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 6Flagstaff 6 | 646 | 355 | 18 | 1,019 | 63.4% | 34.8% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -Leupp 69Leupp 69 | 738 | 231 | 11 | 980 | 75.3% | 23.6% | D+51.7 |
| Precinct -Fort Valley 56Fort Valley 56 | 526 | 418 | 15 | 959 | 54.8% | 43.6% | D+11.3 |
| Precinct -Bellemont 40Bellemont 40 | 409 | 514 | 24 | 947 | 43.2% | 54.3% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -Pinewood 80Pinewood 80 | 338 | 597 | 10 | 945 | 35.8% | 63.2% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 26Flagstaff 26 | 549 | 378 | 16 | 943 | 58.2% | 40.1% | D+18.1 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 3Flagstaff 3 | 716 | 140 | 20 | 876 | 81.7% | 16.0% | D+65.8 |
| Precinct -Page West 75Page West 75 | 334 | 514 | 17 | 865 | 38.6% | 59.4% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 29Flagstaff 29 | 508 | 324 | 14 | 846 | 60.0% | 38.3% | D+21.7 |
| Precinct -Kaibeto 65Kaibeto 65 | 585 | 247 | 12 | 844 | 69.3% | 29.3% | D+40.0 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 27Flagstaff 27 | 621 | 199 | 20 | 840 | 73.9% | 23.7% | D+50.2 |
| Precinct -Williams South 99Williams South 99 | 237 | 538 | 16 | 791 | 30.0% | 68.0% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 11Flagstaff 11 | 531 | 224 | 24 | 779 | 68.2% | 28.8% | D+39.4 |
| Precinct -Page Central 72Page Central 72 | 318 | 442 | 12 | 772 | 41.2% | 57.3% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 12Flagstaff 12 | 599 | 140 | 23 | 762 | 78.6% | 18.4% | D+60.2 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 8Flagstaff 8 | 548 | 193 | 21 | 762 | 71.9% | 25.3% | D+46.6 |
| Precinct -Page East 73Page East 73 | 256 | 483 | 11 | 750 | 34.1% | 64.4% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -LeChee 67LeChee 67 | 456 | 227 | 4 | 687 | 66.4% | 33.0% | D+33.3 |
| Precinct -Blue Ridge 41Blue Ridge 41 | 150 | 530 | 3 | 683 | 22.0% | 77.6% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -Cameron 43Cameron 43 | 522 | 148 | 13 | 683 | 76.4% | 21.7% | D+54.8 |
| Precinct -Tuba City Northeast 93Tuba City Northeast 93 | 547 | 112 | 18 | 677 | 80.8% | 16.5% | D+64.3 |
| Precinct -Tusayan 97Tusayan 97 | 257 | 390 | 18 | 665 | 38.6% | 58.6% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -Kaibab 64Kaibab 64 | 149 | 496 | 10 | 655 | 22.7% | 75.7% | R+53.0 |
| Precinct -Bodaway 42Bodaway 42 | 427 | 208 | 15 | 650 | 65.7% | 32.0% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 18Flagstaff 18 | 371 | 248 | 27 | 646 | 57.4% | 38.4% | D+19.0 |
| Precinct -Grand Canyon 59Grand Canyon 59 | 447 | 162 | 15 | 624 | 71.6% | 26.0% | D+45.7 |
| Precinct -Fredonia 58Fredonia 58 | 131 | 470 | 5 | 606 | 21.6% | 77.6% | R+55.9 |
| Precinct -Page South 74Page South 74 | 279 | 316 | 11 | 606 | 46.0% | 52.1% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 20Flagstaff 20 | 463 | 112 | 11 | 586 | 79.0% | 19.1% | D+59.9 |
| Precinct -Parks North 79Parks North 79 | 177 | 394 | 8 | 579 | 30.6% | 68.0% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 17Flagstaff 17 | 320 | 200 | 11 | 531 | 60.3% | 37.7% | D+22.6 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 13Flagstaff 13 | 438 | 76 | 6 | 520 | 84.2% | 14.6% | D+69.6 |
| Precinct -Tuba City Northwest 94Tuba City Northwest 94 | 410 | 91 | 9 | 510 | 80.4% | 17.8% | D+62.5 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 10Flagstaff 10 | 395 | 69 | 4 | 468 | 84.4% | 14.7% | D+69.7 |
| Precinct -Parks South 78Parks South 78 | 127 | 330 | 6 | 463 | 27.4% | 71.3% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 14Flagstaff 14 | 343 | 108 | 4 | 455 | 75.4% | 23.7% | D+51.6 |
| Precinct -Inscription House 61Inscription House 61 | 258 | 165 | 10 | 433 | 59.6% | 38.1% | D+21.5 |
| Precinct -Coppermine 47Coppermine 47 | 265 | 95 | 9 | 369 | 71.8% | 25.7% | D+46.1 |
| Precinct -Tolani Lake 88Tolani Lake 88 | 229 | 44 | 4 | 277 | 82.7% | 15.9% | D+66.8 |
| Precinct -Moenkopi 70Moenkopi 70 | 242 | 28 | 2 | 272 | 89.0% | 10.3% | D+78.7 |
| Precinct -Ranches South 84Ranches South 84 | 125 | 141 | 5 | 271 | 46.1% | 52.0% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -Coalmine 48Coalmine 48 | 187 | 28 | 4 | 219 | 85.4% | 12.8% | D+72.6 |
| Precinct -Mormon Lake 63Mormon Lake 63 | 66 | 135 | 0 | 201 | 32.8% | 67.2% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -Oak Creek 82Oak Creek 82 | 89 | 70 | 1 | 160 | 55.6% | 43.8% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -Forest Lakes 53Forest Lakes 53 | 38 | 109 | 1 | 148 | 25.7% | 73.6% | R+48.0 |
| Precinct -Flagstaff 28Flagstaff 28 | 95 | 44 | 1 | 140 | 67.9% | 31.4% | D+36.4 |
| Precinct -Walnut Canyon 89Walnut Canyon 89 | 27 | 77 | 5 | 109 | 24.8% | 70.6% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -Navajo Mountain 71Navajo Mountain 71 | 58 | 41 | 0 | 99 | 58.6% | 41.4% | D+17.2 |
| Precinct -Ranches North 81Ranches North 81 | 26 | 57 | 0 | 83 | 31.3% | 68.7% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -Howard Mesa 96Howard Mesa 96 | 22 | 58 | 1 | 81 | 27.2% | 71.6% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -Havasupai 60Havasupai 60 | 51 | 6 | 0 | 57 | 89.5% | 10.5% | D+78.9 |
| Precinct -Meteor 57Meteor 57 | 19 | 24 | 1 | 44 | 43.2% | 54.5% | R+11.4 |
| Bellemont Voting District04_0400540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Blue Ridge Voting District04_0400541 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bodaway Gap Voting District04_0400542 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cameron Voting District04_0400543 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Coalmine Voting District04_0400548 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Coppermine Voting District04_0400547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dinnebito Voting District04_0400544 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Doney Park Voting District04_0400550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fernwood Voting District04_0400552 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 1 Voting District04_0400501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 10 Voting District04_0400510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 11 Voting District04_0400511 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 12 Voting District04_0400512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 13 Voting District04_0400513 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 14 Voting District04_0400514 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 15 Voting District04_0400515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 16 Voting District04_0400516 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 17 Voting District04_0400517 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 18 Voting District04_0400518 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 2 Voting District04_0400502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 20 Voting District04_0400520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 21 Voting District04_0400521 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 22 Voting District04_0400522 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 23 Voting District04_0400523 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 24 Voting District04_0400524 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 25 Voting District04_0400525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 26 Voting District04_0400526 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 27 Voting District04_0400527 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 28 Voting District04_0400528 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 29 Voting District04_0400529 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 3 Voting District04_0400503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 30 Voting District04_0400530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 31 Voting District04_0400531 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 32 Voting District04_0400532 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 4 Voting District04_0400504 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 5 Voting District04_0400505 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 6 Voting District04_0400506 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 7 Voting District04_0400507 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 8 Voting District04_0400508 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff 9 Voting District04_0400509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Flagstaff19 Voting District04_0400519 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forest Lakes Voting District04_0400553 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fort Tuthill Voting District04_0400554 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fort Valley Voting District04_0400556 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fredonia Voting District04_0400558 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Glen Canyon Voting District04_0400587 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grand Canyon Voting District04_0400559 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Havasupai Voting District04_0400560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Inscription House Voting District04_0400561 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kachina Village Voting District04_0400562 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kaibab North Voting District04_0400564 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kaibeto Voting District04_0400565 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kiva Voting District04_0400555 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lechee Voting District04_0400567 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Leupp Voting District04_0400569 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Meteor Voting District04_0400557 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Moenkopi Voting District04_0400570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mormon Lake Voting District04_0400563 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Navajo Mountain Voting District04_0400571 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Rim Voting District04_0400566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Page Central Voting District04_0400572 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Page East Voting District04_0400573 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Page South Voting District04_0400574 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Page West Voting District04_0400575 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Paiute Voting District04_0400581 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Parks Voting District04_0400579 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pathway Voting District04_0400568 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pinewood Voting District04_0400580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ranches Voting District04_0400584 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sedona North Voting District04_0400582 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sedona South Voting District04_0400583 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sunset Crater East Voting District04_0400585 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sunset Crater West Voting District04_0400586 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tolani Lake East Voting District04_0400588 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tolani Lake West Voting District04_0400589 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tonalea North Voting District04_0400590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tonalea South Voting District04_0400591 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tuba City North East Voting District04_0400593 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tuba City North West Voting District04_0400594 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tuba City South East Voting District04_0400595 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tuba City South West Voting District04_0400596 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tusayan Voting District04_0400597 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Williams North Side Voting District04_0400598 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Willliams South Side Voting District04_0400599 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Wynona Voting District04_0400592 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Coconino County, AZ · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1912–2024 · 29 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
69.8%
2,689 votes · D+41.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 67.3%
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1956
63.5%
4,044 votes · R+27.2
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · 63.2%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
44,698votes
60.7% of the vote · D+24.0
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 41,504 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
27,576votes
39.4% of the vote · D+19.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 27,052 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
+23.2pts D vs U.S.
Place D+41.0 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · +21.4 pts
Republican
Richard Nixon1968
+27.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+28.6 · U.S. R+0.7
Runner-up · Barry Goldwater, 1964 · +27.0 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
DTheresa HatathlieState Senate · 6
RWendy RogersState Senate · 7
DMae PeshlakaiState House · 6
DMyron TsosieState House · 6
RSylvia AllenState House · 7
RWalt BlackmanState House · 7
Seats representing Coconino County, AZ. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 3 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
voter registration
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Party registration · 2026D+11.8
Presidential vote · 2024D+19.9
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 8.1 points more Democratic than the rolls.
86,421 registered voters · 2026
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−879 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −3,404 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $61,366 in average income, against $85,888 for residents who stayed — 29% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.6 on average — 26 points more Republican-leaning than Coconino County, AZ itself (D+19.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Maricopa County, AZ1,297R+3.5
- Yavapai County, AZ344R+33.9
- Navajo County, AZ193R+17.2
- Pima County, AZ156D+15.2
- Mohave County, AZ92R+55.8
- Pinal County, AZ90R+22.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Maricopa County, AZ1,541
- Yavapai County, AZ427
- Pima County, AZ257
- Navajo County, AZ199
- Mohave County, AZ92
- Pinal County, AZ89
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −1,559 |
| 2012 | +672 |
| 2013 | −629 |
| 2014 | −364 |
| 2015 | +370 |
| 2016 | +501 |
| 2017 | −162 |
| 2018 | +890 |
| 2019 | +313 |
| 2021 | −2,460 |
| 2022 | +771 |
| 2023 | −143 |
| 2024 | −725 |
| 2025 | −879 |
Coconino is Arizona's largest county by area, stretching from the Grand Canyon to the Utah border, and its electorate is shaped by a large Native American population—roughly a quarter of residents—and Northern Arizona University's presence in Flagstaff.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 41.0 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 28.6 points in 1968. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 19.9 points.
A population of 144,508, a 52% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,966 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Denver County and Humboldt County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Denver County
Colorado
93.2twin score
12-yr trend% Evangelicalmedian age≠ 2008 margin
Humboldt County
California
92.2twin score
2004–2024 trajectory≠ median age
Douglas County
Kansas
91.9twin score
2004–2024 trajectory≠ college share
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Coconino County, Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/04005/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Coconino County
Arizona at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Coconino County, Arizona vote in 2024?
In 2024, Coconino County, Arizona voted Democratic by 19.9 points (D+19.9), carried by the Democratic candidate. Out of 70,067 votes cast, 41,504 went Democratic and 27,576 went Republican.
When did Coconino County, Arizona last vote Republican?
The most recent presidential election in which Coconino County, Arizona voted Republican was 1988.
How many people live in Coconino County, Arizona?
Coconino County, Arizona has a population of 144,508 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Coconino County, Arizona?
Median household income in Coconino County, Arizona is $72,966 — below the national median of $80,734. The Arizona state median is $79,964.
What is the political history of Coconino County, Arizona?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Coconino County, Arizona from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 16 went Democratic and 13 went Republican.