- Lead
- 10,397
- Total
- 27,648
- vs nation
- R+36.1
- Turnout
- 64.8%
Gila County, AZ
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 64.8% of 43,145 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 9,434
- Total
- 27,735
- vs nation
- R+38.5
- Turnout
- 66.3%
- Lead
- 7,179
- Total
- 22,515
- vs nation
- R+34.0
- Turnout
- 56.9%
- Lead
- 5,758
- Total
- 21,595
- vs nation
- R+30.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,211
- Total
- 22,333
- vs nation
- R+35.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,029
- Total
- 20,877
- vs nation
- R+16.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,458
- Total
- 17,736
- vs nation
- R+8.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,170
- Total
- 17,411
- vs nation
- D+3.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+37.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 53,7952024 5-year
- Population density
- 11 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 4,758 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $61,9862024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 61.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 18.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+50.7 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+37.6 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- La Paz County, AZ · twin score 71.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 64.8%27,979 participants ÷ 43,145 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +12.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -4.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 52.5%–55.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27,979 | 43,145 ± 435 | 64.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 22,847 | 42,340 ± 326 | 54.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 28,057 | 42,329 ± 339 | 66.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 20,825 | 41,516 ± 342 | 50.2% | Audited | A/A |
| 23,483 | 41,289 ± 385 | 56.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 21,595 | 41,102 | 52.5% | Derived | — | |
| 22,333 | 38,810 | 57.5% | Derived | — | |
| 20,877 | 36,518 extrapolated | 57.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 78 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
78 precincts · 27,698 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Star ValleyStar Valley | 519 | 1,848 | 20 | 2,387 | 21.7% | 77.4% | R+55.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Payson #3Payson #3 | 637 | 1,684 | 24 | 2,345 | 27.2% | 71.8% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -Payson #2Payson #2 | 413 | 1,288 | 20 | 1,721 | 24.0% | 74.8% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -Pine-Strawberry WestPine-Strawberry West | 447 | 1,159 | 18 | 1,624 | 27.5% | 71.4% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -Payson #5Payson #5 | 376 | 1,182 | 15 | 1,573 | 23.9% | 75.1% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -San CarlosSan Carlos | 955 | 329 | 6 | 1,290 | 74.0% | 25.5% | D+48.5 |
| Precinct -Payson #8Payson #8 | 335 | 896 | 11 | 1,242 | 27.0% | 72.1% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -Tonto BasinTonto Basin | 208 | 1,001 | 4 | 1,213 | 17.1% | 82.5% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -Payson #1Payson #1 | 300 | 895 | 15 | 1,210 | 24.8% | 74.0% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -Payson #4Payson #4 | 290 | 721 | 15 | 1,026 | 28.3% | 70.3% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Payson #6Payson #6 | 240 | 749 | 13 | 1,002 | 24.0% | 74.8% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -Payson #7Payson #7 | 208 | 577 | 9 | 794 | 26.2% | 72.7% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -East GlobeEast Globe | 242 | 479 | 10 | 731 | 33.1% | 65.5% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -Globe #6Globe #6 | 230 | 435 | 14 | 679 | 33.9% | 64.1% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -Zane GreyZane Grey | 144 | 438 | 7 | 589 | 24.4% | 74.4% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -Pine-Strawberry EastPine-Strawberry East | 160 | 415 | 4 | 579 | 27.6% | 71.7% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct -Claypool #1Claypool #1 | 147 | 411 | 6 | 564 | 26.1% | 72.9% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -YoungYoung | 79 | 476 | 1 | 556 | 14.2% | 85.6% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -Globe #11Globe #11 | 171 | 344 | 5 | 520 | 32.9% | 66.2% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -Claypool #2Claypool #2 | 187 | 322 | 9 | 518 | 36.1% | 62.2% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -Globe #1Globe #1 | 134 | 376 | 1 | 511 | 26.2% | 73.6% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -GiselaGisela | 113 | 367 | 6 | 486 | 23.3% | 75.5% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -Globe #4Globe #4 | 188 | 252 | 10 | 450 | 41.8% | 56.0% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct -Canyon DayCanyon Day | 358 | 75 | 7 | 440 | 81.4% | 17.0% | D+64.3 |
| Precinct -Copper BasinCopper Basin | 268 | 155 | 3 | 426 | 62.9% | 36.4% | D+26.5 |
| Precinct -Globe #8Globe #8 | 167 | 233 | 3 | 403 | 41.4% | 57.8% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -Globe #7Globe #7 | 109 | 220 | 6 | 335 | 32.5% | 65.7% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -Central HeightsCentral Heights | 100 | 230 | 2 | 332 | 30.1% | 69.3% | R+39.2 |
| Precinct -Miami #1Miami #1 | 137 | 189 | 5 | 331 | 41.4% | 57.1% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -Miami #3Miami #3 | 149 | 173 | 5 | 327 | 45.6% | 52.9% | R+7.3 |
| Precinct -Claypool #3Claypool #3 | 141 | 163 | 5 | 309 | 45.6% | 52.8% | R+7.1 |
| Precinct -Whispering PinesWhispering Pines | 50 | 175 | 4 | 229 | 21.8% | 76.4% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -RooseveltRoosevelt | 47 | 170 | 0 | 217 | 21.7% | 78.3% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -Pinal CreekPinal Creek | 80 | 130 | 3 | 213 | 37.6% | 61.0% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -Globe #2Globe #2 | 70 | 106 | 2 | 178 | 39.3% | 59.6% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -WheatfieldsWheatfields | 33 | 84 | 1 | 118 | 28.0% | 71.2% | R+43.2 |
| Precinct -Sierra AnchaSierra Ancha | 19 | 98 | 0 | 117 | 16.2% | 83.8% | R+67.5 |
| Precinct -Globe #3Globe #3 | 37 | 51 | 3 | 91 | 40.7% | 56.0% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -CarrizoCarrizo | 16 | 5 | 1 | 22 | 72.7% | 22.7% | D+50.0 |
| Canyon Day Voting District04_0400711 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Carrizo Voting District04_0400740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Central Heights Voting District04_0400716 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Christmas Voting District04_0400722 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Claypool #1 Voting District04_0400717 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Claypool #2 Voting District04_0400718 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Claypool #3 Voting District04_0400715 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Globe Voting District04_0400707 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Gisela Voting District04_0400737 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #1 Voting District04_0400701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #11 Voting District04_0400712 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #2 Voting District04_0400702 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #3 Voting District04_0400703 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #4 Voting District04_0400704 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #5 Voting District04_0400705 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #6 Voting District04_0400706 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #7 Voting District04_0400708 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Globe #8 Voting District04_0400709 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hayden Voting District04_0400720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Miami #1 Voting District04_0400713 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Miami #3 Voting District04_0400714 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #1 Voting District04_0400726 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #2 Voting District04_0400727 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #3 Voting District04_0400728 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #4 Voting District04_0400729 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #5 Voting District04_0400733 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #6 Voting District04_0400730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #7 Voting District04_0400731 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Payson #8 Voting District04_0400732 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pine-Strawberry Voting District04_0400739 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Roosevelt Voting District04_0400723 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| San Carlos Voting District04_0400710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sierra Ancha Voting District04_0400724 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Star Valley Voting District04_0400734 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tonto Basin Voting District04_0400725 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Whispering Pines Voting District04_0400735 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winkelman Voting District04_0400721 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Young Voting District04_0400738 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Zane Grey Voting District04_0400736 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Gila County, AZ · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1912–2024 · 29 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
74.0%
4,859 votes · D+50.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 68.8%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
68.4%
18,901 votes · R+37.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 66.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
8,943votes
32.2% of the vote · R+34.0
Runner-up · Bill Clinton, 1996 · 8,577 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
18,901votes
68.4% of the vote · R+37.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 18,377 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1916
+35.1pts D vs U.S.
Place D+38.2 · U.S. D+3.1
Runner-up · Harry S. Truman, 1948 · +29.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+38.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+34.0 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +36.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Gila County, AZ. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 10 points more Republican than the rolls.
34,258 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+136 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +4,597 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $69,345 in average income, against $65,556 for residents who stayed — 6% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.7 on average — 32 points more Democratic-leaning than Gila County, AZ itself (R+37.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Maricopa County, AZ627R+3.5
- Pinal County, AZ117R+22.1
- Pima County, AZ48D+15.2
- Navajo County, AZ35R+17.2
- Yavapai County, AZ33R+33.9
- Coconino County, AZ30D+19.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Maricopa County, AZ476
- Pinal County, AZ110
- Navajo County, AZ53
- Yavapai County, AZ40
- Pima County, AZ38
- Graham County, AZ23
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −110 |
| 2012 | −361 |
| 2013 | +52 |
| 2014 | +134 |
| 2015 | +89 |
| 2016 | +588 |
| 2017 | +417 |
| 2018 | +456 |
| 2019 | +504 |
| 2021 | +764 |
| 2022 | +892 |
| 2023 | +572 |
| 2024 | +464 |
| 2025 | +136 |
Gila County's economy has long centered on mining and ranching in the Mogollon Rim highlands, and its rural, majority-Hispanic and Native American precincts nonetheless produce some of Arizona's widest Republican presidential margins.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 50.7 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 37.6 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 37.6 points.
A population of 53,795, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $61,986 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of La Paz County and Mohave County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Gila County, Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/04007/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.