Cochise County, Arizona
Precinct data
Results by precinct
118 precincts · 59,135 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -SV BUFFALO SOLDIERSV BUFFALO SOLDIER | 786 | 1,441 | 42 | 2,269 | 34.6% | 63.5% | R+28.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -SV VILLAGE MEADOWSSV VILLAGE MEADOWS | 700 | 1,284 | 35 | 2,019 | 34.7% | 63.6% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -SV YAQUISV YAQUI | 626 | 1,294 | 20 | 1,940 | 32.3% | 66.7% | R+34.4 |
| Precinct -SV AVENIDA DEL SOLSV AVENIDA DEL SOL | 757 | 1,147 | 24 | 1,928 | 39.3% | 59.5% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -WHETSTONEWHETSTONE | 488 | 1,402 | 27 | 1,917 | 25.5% | 73.1% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -SV COUNTRY CLUBSV COUNTRY CLUB | 717 | 1,164 | 23 | 1,904 | 37.7% | 61.1% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -BE J-SIXBE J-SIX | 485 | 1,312 | 22 | 1,819 | 26.7% | 72.1% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -SV MOSONSV MOSON | 444 | 1,233 | 30 | 1,707 | 26.0% | 72.2% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -SV TOWN & COUNTRYSV TOWN & COUNTRY | 580 | 1,079 | 23 | 1,682 | 34.5% | 64.1% | R+29.7 |
| Precinct -SV SOLDIER CREEKSV SOLDIER CREEK | 724 | 919 | 33 | 1,676 | 43.2% | 54.8% | R+11.6 |
| Precinct -ST. DAVIDST. DAVID | 374 | 1,252 | 16 | 1,642 | 22.8% | 76.2% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -BE SAN PEDROBE SAN PEDRO | 529 | 1,076 | 23 | 1,628 | 32.5% | 66.1% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -SV ESTATESSV ESTATES | 598 | 987 | 29 | 1,614 | 37.1% | 61.2% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -GREATER SAN PEDROGREATER SAN PEDRO | 361 | 1,075 | 34 | 1,470 | 24.6% | 73.1% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -SV BUSBYSV BUSBY | 635 | 786 | 34 | 1,455 | 43.6% | 54.0% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -SV COLLEGESV COLLEGE | 552 | 851 | 27 | 1,430 | 38.6% | 59.5% | R+20.9 |
| Precinct -COCHISE STRONGHOLDCOCHISE STRONGHOLD | 411 | 981 | 20 | 1,412 | 29.1% | 69.5% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -SV VISTA VILLAGESV VISTA VILLAGE | 545 | 812 | 29 | 1,386 | 39.3% | 58.6% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -BE BENSONBE BENSON | 427 | 936 | 20 | 1,383 | 30.9% | 67.7% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -HEREFORDHEREFORD | 429 | 889 | 29 | 1,347 | 31.8% | 66.0% | R+34.1 |
| Precinct -SV RAMSEYSV RAMSEY | 423 | 888 | 24 | 1,335 | 31.7% | 66.5% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -TOMBSTONETOMBSTONE | 303 | 985 | 17 | 1,305 | 23.2% | 75.5% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -DO CARLSONDO CARLSON | 712 | 530 | 13 | 1,255 | 56.7% | 42.2% | D+14.5 |
| Precinct -SV HOPISV HOPI | 480 | 681 | 14 | 1,175 | 40.9% | 58.0% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -SV PUEBLO DEL SOLSV PUEBLO DEL SOL | 440 | 690 | 22 | 1,152 | 38.2% | 59.9% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -BI WARRENBI WARREN | 741 | 369 | 31 | 1,141 | 64.9% | 32.3% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -BI BISBEEBI BISBEE | 859 | 205 | 19 | 1,083 | 79.3% | 18.9% | D+60.4 |
| Precinct -WI KANSAS SETTLEMENTWI KANSAS SETTLEMENT | 269 | 778 | 5 | 1,052 | 25.6% | 74.0% | R+48.4 |
| Precinct -DO CASTRO PARKDO CASTRO PARK | 712 | 299 | 13 | 1,024 | 69.5% | 29.2% | D+40.3 |
| Precinct -BI DON LUISBI DON LUIS | 610 | 404 | 9 | 1,023 | 59.6% | 39.5% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -POMERENEPOMERENE | 261 | 736 | 8 | 1,005 | 26.0% | 73.2% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -SV SNYDERSV SNYDER | 367 | 579 | 7 | 953 | 38.5% | 60.8% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -WI STEWARTWI STEWART | 194 | 708 | 16 | 918 | 21.1% | 77.1% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -PALOMINASPALOMINAS | 287 | 598 | 24 | 909 | 31.6% | 65.8% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -DO CALVARYDO CALVARY | 588 | 287 | 5 | 880 | 66.8% | 32.6% | D+34.2 |
| Precinct -DO SUNNYSIDEDO SUNNYSIDE | 496 | 365 | 9 | 870 | 57.0% | 42.0% | D+15.1 |
| Precinct -SV CARMELITASV CARMELITA | 357 | 497 | 13 | 867 | 41.2% | 57.3% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -PIRTLEVILLEPIRTLEVILLE | 482 | 363 | 8 | 853 | 56.5% | 42.6% | D+14.0 |
| Precinct -MCNEALMCNEAL | 248 | 516 | 19 | 783 | 31.7% | 65.9% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -DO GADSDENDO GADSDEN | 494 | 274 | 10 | 778 | 63.5% | 35.2% | D+28.3 |
| Precinct -HUACHUCAHUACHUCA | 290 | 451 | 11 | 752 | 38.6% | 60.0% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -WI WILLCOXWI WILLCOX | 209 | 529 | 7 | 745 | 28.1% | 71.0% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -SV CLOUDSV CLOUD | 278 | 362 | 13 | 653 | 42.6% | 55.4% | R+12.9 |
| Precinct -THREE CANYONSTHREE CANYONS | 164 | 386 | 10 | 560 | 29.3% | 68.9% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -SUNIZONASUNIZONA | 126 | 327 | 8 | 461 | 27.3% | 70.9% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -WEBBWEBB | 112 | 339 | 7 | 458 | 24.5% | 74.0% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -NACONACO | 292 | 162 | 3 | 457 | 63.9% | 35.4% | D+28.4 |
| Precinct -PORTALPORTAL | 151 | 165 | 6 | 322 | 46.9% | 51.2% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -GREENBUSHGREENBUSH | 64 | 160 | 6 | 230 | 27.8% | 69.6% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -BOWIEBOWIE | 43 | 141 | 3 | 187 | 23.0% | 75.4% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -SAN SIMONSAN SIMON | 27 | 134 | 2 | 163 | 16.6% | 82.2% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -DO GRANDDO GRAND | 22 | 55 | 0 | 77 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -BI SACRAMENTOBI SACRAMENTO | 24 | 43 | 1 | 68 | 35.3% | 63.2% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -PARKERPARKER | 3 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 23.1% | 76.9% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct 0104_0400301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0204_0400302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0304_0400303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0404_0400304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0504_0400305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0604_0400306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0704_0400307 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0804_0400308 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0904_0400309 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1004_0400310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1104_0400311 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1204_0400312 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1304_0400313 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1404_0400314 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1504_0400315 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1604_0400316 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1704_0400317 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1804_0400318 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 1904_0400319 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2004_0400320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2104_0400321 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2204_0400322 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2304_0400323 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2404_0400324 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2504_0400325 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2604_0400326 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2704_0400327 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2804_0400328 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 2904_0400329 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| precinct 3004_0400330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3104_0400331 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3204_0400332 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3304_0400333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3404_0400334 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3504_0400335 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3604_0400336 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3704_0400337 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3804_0400338 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 3904_0400339 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4004_0400340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4104_0400341 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4204_0400342 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4304_0400343 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4404_0400344 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4504_0400345 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4604_0400346 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4704_0400347 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4804_0400348 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 4904_0400349 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5004_0400350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5104_0400351 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5204_0400352 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5304_0400353 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5404_0400354 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5504_0400355 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5604_0400356 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5704_0400357 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5804_0400358 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 5904_0400359 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 6004_0400360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 6104_0400361 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 6204_0400362 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 6304_0400363 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 6404_0400364 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1912–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1912 | +34.0% |
| 1916 | +28.7% |
| 1920 | −9.3% |
| 1924 | −2.2% |
| 1928 | −15.0% |
| 1932 | +44.2% |
| 1936 | +57.5% |
| 1940 | +46.7% |
| 1944 | +34.5% |
| 1948 | +22.6% |
| 1952 | −7.0% |
| 1956 | −12.8% |
| 1960 | −1.0% |
| 1964 | +8.4% |
| 1968 | −6.1% |
| 1972 | −31.1% |
| 1976 | −3.2% |
| 1980 | −28.2% |
| 1984 | −25.6% |
| 1988 | −14.3% |
| 1992 | +1.5% |
| 1996 | −1.8% |
| 2000 | −14.5% |
| 2004 | −20.3% |
| 2008 | −20.7% |
| 2012 | −22.3% |
| 2016 | −21.3% |
| 2020 | −19.5% |
| 2024 | −23.1% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.4 points more Democratic.
82,413 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,385 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −9,103 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $57,052 in average income, against $62,505 for residents who stayed — 9% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+4.1 on average — 27 points more Democratic-leaning than Cochise County, AZ itself (R+23.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pima County, AZ625D+15.2
- Maricopa County, AZ437R+3.5
- Pinal County, AZ73R+22.1
- San Diego County, CA68D+16.8
- El Paso County, CO57R+9.8
- Los Angeles County, CA51D+32.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pima County, AZ784
- Maricopa County, AZ388
- El Paso County, TX57
- Pinal County, AZ56
- Honolulu County, HI50
- El Paso County, CO48
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +449 |
| 2012 | −2,093 |
| 2013 | −3,228 |
| 2014 | −3,072 |
| 2015 | −1,700 |
| 2016 | −1,192 |
| 2017 | −1,058 |
| 2018 | +1,483 |
| 2019 | −595 |
| 2021 | +1,081 |
| 2022 | −407 |
| 2023 | −713 |
| 2024 | +557 |
| 2025 | +1,385 |
Home to Fort Huachuca and roughly 83 miles of international border, Cochise County combines a significant active-duty and veteran population with rural ranching communities, producing consistent double-digit Republican margins in federal races.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 57.5 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 31.1 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 23.1 points.
A population of 125,566, a 54% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $59,742 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Yuma County and Pima County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cochise County, Arizona. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/04003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.