- Lead
- 17,605
- Total
- 54,465
- vs nation
- R+30.9
- Turnout
- 57.0%
Faulkner County, AR
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 57.0% of 96,107 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 16,074
- Total
- 54,428
- vs nation
- R+34.0
- Turnout
- 58.7%
- Lead
- 14,717
- Total
- 45,650
- vs nation
- R+34.3
- Turnout
- 54.0%
- Lead
- 13,101
- Total
- 41,460
- vs nation
- R+35.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 10,407
- Total
- 41,179
- vs nation
- R+32.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,976
- Total
- 36,686
- vs nation
- R+16.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,105
- Total
- 29,216
- vs nation
- R+14.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,854
- Total
- 24,123
- vs nation
- R+0.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+32.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 127,7172024 5-year
- Population density
- 197 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 647 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $67,2892024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 76.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 11.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+71.3 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+32.3 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Craighead County, AR · twin score 86.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 57.0%54,764 participants ÷ 96,107 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.7 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 42.3%–43.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54,764 | 96,107 ± 590 | 57.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 41,527 | 94,264 ± 600 | 44.1% | Audited | C/A |
| 54,534 | 92,892 ± 641 | 58.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 38,818 | 91,134 ± 479 | 42.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 48,488 | 89,723 ± 414 | 54.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 41,460 | 83,620 | 49.6% | Derived | — | |
| 41,179 | 76,783 | 53.6% | Derived | — | |
| 36,686 | 69,946 extrapolated | 52.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Faulkner County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Faulkner County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 51 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
51 precincts · 54,465 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Pct 12Pct 12 | 568 | 1,440 | 53 | 2,061 | 27.6% | 69.9% | R+42.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Pct 21Pct 21 | 343 | 1,633 | 57 | 2,033 | 16.9% | 80.3% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -Pct 39Pct 39 | 328 | 1,557 | 35 | 1,920 | 17.1% | 81.1% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 19Pct 19 | 357 | 1,475 | 37 | 1,869 | 19.1% | 78.9% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -Pct 5Pct 5 | 666 | 1,146 | 42 | 1,854 | 35.9% | 61.8% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -Pct 43Pct 43 | 789 | 949 | 54 | 1,792 | 44.0% | 53.0% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -Pct 10Pct 10 | 717 | 992 | 44 | 1,753 | 40.9% | 56.6% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -Pct 3Pct 3 | 733 | 825 | 48 | 1,606 | 45.6% | 51.4% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -Pct 50Pct 50 | 609 | 924 | 55 | 1,588 | 38.4% | 58.2% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -Pct 42Pct 42 | 705 | 824 | 47 | 1,576 | 44.7% | 52.3% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -Pct 29Pct 29 | 267 | 1,276 | 28 | 1,571 | 17.0% | 81.2% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -Pct 44Pct 44 | 599 | 913 | 53 | 1,565 | 38.3% | 58.3% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 22Pct 22 | 208 | 1,229 | 34 | 1,471 | 14.1% | 83.5% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -Pct 26Pct 26 | 263 | 1,161 | 47 | 1,471 | 17.9% | 78.9% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 40Pct 40 | 696 | 716 | 27 | 1,439 | 48.4% | 49.8% | R+1.4 |
| Precinct -Pct 13Pct 13 | 522 | 883 | 32 | 1,437 | 36.3% | 61.4% | R+25.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 11Pct 11 | 676 | 659 | 32 | 1,367 | 49.5% | 48.2% | D+1.2 |
| Precinct -Pct 28Pct 28 | 246 | 1,085 | 29 | 1,360 | 18.1% | 79.8% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -Pct 36Pct 36 | 512 | 813 | 32 | 1,357 | 37.7% | 59.9% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -Pct 37Pct 37 | 191 | 1,134 | 16 | 1,341 | 14.2% | 84.6% | R+70.3 |
| Precinct -Pct 9Pct 9 | 633 | 619 | 49 | 1,301 | 48.7% | 47.6% | D+1.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 1Pct 1 | 618 | 632 | 37 | 1,287 | 48.0% | 49.1% | R+1.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 25Pct 25 | 214 | 1,019 | 32 | 1,265 | 16.9% | 80.6% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -Pct 46Pct 46 | 459 | 683 | 42 | 1,184 | 38.8% | 57.7% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -Pct 53Pct 53 | 399 | 692 | 25 | 1,116 | 35.8% | 62.0% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -Pct 48Pct 48 | 438 | 624 | 35 | 1,097 | 39.9% | 56.9% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 49Pct 49 | 624 | 430 | 21 | 1,075 | 58.0% | 40.0% | D+18.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 18Pct 18 | 172 | 856 | 19 | 1,047 | 16.4% | 81.8% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -Pct 24Pct 24 | 291 | 703 | 21 | 1,015 | 28.7% | 69.3% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -Pct 23Pct 23 | 291 | 686 | 15 | 992 | 29.3% | 69.2% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -Pct 6Pct 6 | 484 | 373 | 41 | 898 | 53.9% | 41.5% | D+12.4 |
| Precinct -Pct 55Pct 55 | 170 | 686 | 18 | 874 | 19.5% | 78.5% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 45Pct 45 | 273 | 555 | 23 | 851 | 32.1% | 65.2% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 35Pct 35 | 142 | 672 | 11 | 825 | 17.2% | 81.5% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -Pct 2Pct 2 | 364 | 305 | 21 | 690 | 52.8% | 44.2% | D+8.6 |
| Precinct -Pct 41Pct 41 | 427 | 209 | 10 | 646 | 66.1% | 32.4% | D+33.7 |
| Precinct -Pct 4Pct 4 | 349 | 231 | 19 | 599 | 58.3% | 38.6% | D+19.7 |
| Precinct -Pct 7Pct 7 | 376 | 158 | 25 | 559 | 67.3% | 28.3% | D+39.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 54Pct 54 | 237 | 251 | 14 | 502 | 47.2% | 50.0% | R+2.8 |
| Precinct -Pct 38Pct 38 | 117 | 368 | 7 | 492 | 23.8% | 74.8% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -Pct 31Pct 31 | 49 | 423 | 8 | 480 | 10.2% | 88.1% | R+77.9 |
| Precinct -Pct 8Pct 8 | 162 | 285 | 16 | 463 | 35.0% | 61.6% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -Pct 16Pct 16 | 57 | 360 | 9 | 426 | 13.4% | 84.5% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 34Pct 34 | 70 | 350 | 5 | 425 | 16.5% | 82.4% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -Pct 15Pct 15 | 68 | 337 | 8 | 413 | 16.5% | 81.6% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 27Pct 27 | 29 | 348 | 8 | 385 | 7.5% | 90.4% | R+82.9 |
| Precinct -Pct 30Pct 30 | 54 | 317 | 4 | 375 | 14.4% | 84.5% | R+70.1 |
| Precinct -Pct 33Pct 33 | 42 | 192 | 5 | 239 | 17.6% | 80.3% | R+62.8 |
| Precinct -Pct 14Pct 14 | 106 | 111 | 1 | 218 | 48.6% | 50.9% | R+2.3 |
| Precinct -Pct 17Pct 17 | 26 | 123 | 1 | 150 | 17.3% | 82.0% | R+64.7 |
| Precinct -Pct 32Pct 32 | 16 | 125 | 4 | 145 | 11.0% | 86.2% | R+75.2 |
presidential history
Party record book
Faulkner County, AR · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
84.8%
2,749 votes · D+71.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 82.8%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
64.9%
35,357 votes · R+32.3
Runner-up · Mitt Romney, 2012 · 64.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
18,347votes
33.7% of the vote · R+29.5
Runner-up · Kamala Harris, 2024 · 17,752 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
35,357votes
64.9% of the vote · R+32.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 34,421 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+67.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+42.2 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · +63.0 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+35.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+31.6 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +34.3 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Faulkner County, AR. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 3 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 33.6%18,048 | 66.4%35,603 | 53,651 |
| 2020 | R | 35.0%19,017 | 65.0%35,279 | 54,296 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 75,001 |
| 2020 | 77,681 |
| 2022 | 78,047 |
| 2024 | 78,723 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,332 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +12,813 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,215 in average income, against $78,968 for residents who stayed — 35% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+19.6 on average — 13 points more Democratic-leaning than Faulkner County, AR itself (R+32.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pulaski County, AR813D+22.1
- Lonoke County, AR184R+53.7
- Conway County, AR162R+40.3
- Saline County, AR134R+40.1
- White County, AR133R+61.2
- Pope County, AR107R+52.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pulaski County, AR807
- Lonoke County, AR137
- Conway County, AR134
- Saline County, AR134
- White County, AR130
- Washington County, AR114
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +1,377 |
| 2012 | +1,334 |
| 2013 | +6 |
| 2014 | +598 |
| 2015 | −79 |
| 2016 | +221 |
| 2017 | +632 |
| 2018 | +951 |
| 2019 | +232 |
| 2021 | +1,474 |
| 2022 | +1,628 |
| 2023 | +1,754 |
| 2024 | +1,353 |
| 2025 | +1,332 |
Faulkner County has added roughly 20,000 residents since 2010, driven largely by spillover growth from the Little Rock metro. That demographic shift has not disrupted its consistent pattern of lopsided Republican margins at the presidential level.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 71.3 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 32.3 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 32.3 points.
A population of 127,717, a 77% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,289 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Craighead County and Saline County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Faulkner County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05045/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.