Izard County, Arkansas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
45 precincts · 5,925 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Horseshoe Bend Ward 2Horseshoe Bend Ward 2 | 60 | 277 | 10 | 347 | 17.3% | 79.8% | R+62.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Horseshoe Bend Ward 4Horseshoe Bend Ward 4 | 56 | 277 | 9 | 342 | 16.4% | 81.0% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct -Calico Rock RuralCalico Rock Rural | 44 | 233 | 3 | 280 | 15.7% | 83.2% | R+67.5 |
| Precinct -Melbourne Ward 4Melbourne Ward 4 | 44 | 217 | 8 | 269 | 16.4% | 80.7% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -Horseshoe Bend Ward 3Horseshoe Bend Ward 3 | 56 | 176 | 9 | 241 | 23.2% | 73.0% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -BrockwellBrockwell | 35 | 183 | 8 | 226 | 15.5% | 81.0% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -Melbourne RuralMelbourne Rural | 28 | 192 | 4 | 224 | 12.5% | 85.7% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -Mt. Pleasant RuralMt. Pleasant Rural | 30 | 188 | 2 | 220 | 13.6% | 85.5% | R+71.8 |
| Precinct -Oxford CityOxford City | 25 | 181 | 7 | 213 | 11.7% | 85.0% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -Melbourne Ward 1Melbourne Ward 1 | 41 | 156 | 2 | 199 | 20.6% | 78.4% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -ZionZion | 36 | 156 | 0 | 192 | 18.8% | 81.3% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -SageSage | 23 | 153 | 4 | 180 | 12.8% | 85.0% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -Violet HillViolet Hill | 21 | 151 | 0 | 172 | 12.2% | 87.8% | R+75.6 |
| Precinct -DolphDolph | 27 | 139 | 3 | 169 | 16.0% | 82.2% | R+66.3 |
| Precinct -Mt. Pleasant CityMt. Pleasant City | 16 | 138 | 3 | 157 | 10.2% | 87.9% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -SylamoreSylamore | 25 | 125 | 3 | 153 | 16.3% | 81.7% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -Horseshoe Bend Ward 1Horseshoe Bend Ward 1 | 34 | 106 | 2 | 142 | 23.9% | 74.6% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -BoswellBoswell | 26 | 109 | 3 | 138 | 18.8% | 79.0% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -Melbourne Ward 2Melbourne Ward 2 | 27 | 110 | 1 | 138 | 19.6% | 79.7% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -Oxford RuralOxford Rural | 18 | 108 | 4 | 130 | 13.8% | 83.1% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -GidGid | 10 | 106 | 4 | 120 | 8.3% | 88.3% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -Calico Rock Ward 2Calico Rock Ward 2 | 15 | 96 | 3 | 114 | 13.2% | 84.2% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct -StrawberryStrawberry | 19 | 92 | 0 | 111 | 17.1% | 82.9% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -LacrosseLacrosse | 21 | 82 | 5 | 108 | 19.4% | 75.9% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -Big SpringBig Spring | 18 | 88 | 1 | 107 | 16.8% | 82.2% | R+65.4 |
| Precinct -Melbourne Ward 3Melbourne Ward 3 | 20 | 74 | 7 | 101 | 19.8% | 73.3% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -Calico Rock Ward 3Calico Rock Ward 3 | 12 | 84 | 4 | 100 | 12.0% | 84.0% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -Pineville RuralPineville Rural | 8 | 84 | 2 | 94 | 8.5% | 89.4% | R+80.9 |
| Precinct -Calico Rock Ward 4Calico Rock Ward 4 | 19 | 68 | 3 | 90 | 21.1% | 75.6% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -ClaiborneClaiborne | 11 | 77 | 1 | 89 | 12.4% | 86.5% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -Franklin RuralFranklin Rural | 15 | 69 | 1 | 85 | 17.6% | 81.2% | R+63.5 |
| Precinct -Franklin CityFranklin City | 9 | 71 | 0 | 80 | 11.3% | 88.8% | R+77.5 |
| Precinct -NewburgNewburg | 14 | 64 | 0 | 78 | 17.9% | 82.1% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -Pineville CityPineville City | 18 | 54 | 0 | 72 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -LarkinLarkin | 5 | 58 | 2 | 65 | 7.7% | 89.2% | R+81.5 |
| Precinct -Twin CreekTwin Creek | 18 | 45 | 1 | 64 | 28.1% | 70.3% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -WisemanWiseman | 10 | 53 | 0 | 63 | 15.9% | 84.1% | R+68.3 |
| Precinct -MyronMyron | 8 | 42 | 1 | 51 | 15.7% | 82.4% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -WidemanWideman | 2 | 40 | 0 | 42 | 4.8% | 95.2% | R+90.5 |
| Precinct -Calico Rock Ward 1Calico Rock Ward 1 | 9 | 29 | 2 | 40 | 22.5% | 72.5% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -LaffertyLafferty | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Guion CityGuion City | 4 | 26 | 0 | 30 | 13.3% | 86.7% | R+73.3 |
| Precinct -Horseshoe Bend RuralHorseshoe Bend Rural | 9 | 16 | 0 | 25 | 36.0% | 64.0% | R+28.0 |
| Precinct -Guion RuralGuion Rural | 1 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 7.1% | 92.9% | R+85.7 |
| Precinct -Knob CreekKnob Creek | 2 | 11 | 0 | 13 | 15.4% | 84.6% | R+69.2 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +47.8% |
| 1896 | +67.3% |
| 1900 | +48.6% |
| 1904 | +30.7% |
| 1908 | +35.3% |
| 1912 | +46.2% |
| 1916 | +63.3% |
| 1920 | +26.3% |
| 1924 | +48.7% |
| 1928 | +12.9% |
| 1932 | +71.4% |
| 1936 | +52.9% |
| 1940 | +48.5% |
| 1944 | +35.8% |
| 1948 | +66.6% |
| 1952 | +26.6% |
| 1956 | +40.2% |
| 1960 | +23.7% |
| 1964 | +40.6% |
| 1968 | +0.6% |
| 1972 | −28.7% |
| 1976 | +41.0% |
| 1980 | +9.2% |
| 1984 | −7.4% |
| 1988 | −3.1% |
| 1992 | +33.8% |
| 1996 | +22.3% |
| 2000 | +5.7% |
| 2004 | −4.5% |
| 2008 | −26.8% |
| 2012 | −38.9% |
| 2016 | −55.5% |
| 2020 | −62.1% |
| 2024 | −65.9% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 15.8%721 | 80.7%3,687 | 4,566 |
| 2020 | R | 0.0%0 | 82.9%4,724 | 5,698 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 8,097 |
| 2020 | 9,008 |
| 2022 | 9,612 |
| 2024 | 10,480 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+209 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,945 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $47,099 in average income, against $56,671 for residents who stayed — 17% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+59.6 on average — 6.4 points more Democratic-leaning than Izard County, AR itself (R+65.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Baxter County, AR35R+56.8
- Independence County, AR31R+59.5
- Sharp County, AR31R+62.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Baxter County, AR34
- Independence County, AR34
- Sharp County, AR30
- Fulton County, AR27
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −76 |
| 2012 | +16 |
| 2013 | −60 |
| 2014 | +205 |
| 2015 | +26 |
| 2016 | +61 |
| 2017 | +254 |
| 2018 | −8 |
| 2019 | +113 |
| 2021 | +500 |
| 2022 | +229 |
| 2023 | +272 |
| 2024 | +204 |
| 2025 | +209 |
Izard County, tucked in the Ozark foothills along the Missouri border, recorded an R+65.9 presidential margin in 2024, making it among the most one-sided counties in the state despite a population of just over 13,000.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 71.4 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 65.9 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 65.9 points.
A population of 14,009, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $49,405 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Decatur County and Van Buren County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Izard County, Arkansas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/05065/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.